Are you guys aware that the Bell Curve was not submitted for peer review before its publication?

Are you guys aware that the Bell Curve was not submitted for peer review before its publication?
Does the fact that this evidence is not scientific keep you from cutting it in the name of racist agenda, or do you plod on in ignorance of its invalidity?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=o3Sjp_hIrQ0
twitter.com/AnonBabble

More like queer review

No one submits books for "peer review" asshole.

>getting peer reviewed by a bunch of leftist cucks

the same cucks that called James Watson, a nobel prize winner, a racist.

it hasn;t been disproved since, everything backs what it claims, and people that oppose it have turned to attacking IQ as a whole rather than the books methods or findings

They submit scientific data and reports, which are included in the book.
The authors neglected to do so

One of the key components of scientific method is "Observation."
Do I need to go on, Smart Person?

>Everything backs what it claims
Source?

The book's statistical results pretty much agree with other studies that have been performed.

It's all stuff that's widely known, for example: blacks don't score as well on IQ tests as whites.

Nothing in the book was surprising. The only reason it generated controversy is because the authors refused to include the standard "politically correct" explanation in the book that attributes the racial disparities to discrimination, oppression, and white social attitudes.

The authors refused to discuss any cause of the disparities whatsoever. Contrary to popular belief, they did not speculate at all about possible biological causes. They reported only statistical facts.

As we now know, reporting statistical correlations between race and undesirable traits is now always called "racist", regardless of the attitudes of the author.

(To prove that fact, simply post a neutral racial fact on Twitter, citing a well-respected source, and it's 100% guaranteed that you will called a "racist".)

Daily reminder that this book is the only one Obama ever reviewed, and he got triggered as fuck from it. Everyone should give it a read.

Implying this is relevant. It's 20-bloody-16
>Surveys
>Demographics/Racial Statistics of areas
>Observations
>Common sense evaluation(s) of culture.
OP is probably a nigger who hasn't read the book or done research.
>Plod on in ignorance.

keep on denying what's obvious to everyone else

>cites statistics, methodology and test details
>b-but you didn't let us hand wave and dismiss the book as being evil before you released it! shame! shame!

If your research doesn't go through peer review, then it isn't worth shit

>Peer review

youtube.com/watch?v=o3Sjp_hIrQ0

You make all these claims, yet cite no sources
Fuck off if you're going to contribute nothing but nonsense

>have turned to attacking IQ as a whole

Why shouldn't people attack IQ as a whole?

"Hey let's boil down people's brains into one number and then rank them"

You can call that whatever you want, but it's not scientific.

Also - women generally have low visuospatial scores, but when they're specially trained in visuospatial skills they reach the level of males (and some at one and two standard deviations above, like men). So for cultural reasons, even in the US and Europe, women are not trained in that, but when they are they're the same. So what does IQ tell us for that other than women aren't trained in visuospaital skills, which we always knew anyhow?

Almost every single IQ and race study finds niggers have sub retard IQ levels

You think its all a conspiracy? Or its all just white peoples fault?

Is it white peoples fault they rape so much more too?

Poverty excuses rape?

>peer reviewing something socially unacceptable
They'll discredit it for the good goy points alone

I'm honestly surprised somebody hasn't started spamming those barneyfag images due to the thumbnail.

>So what does IQ tell us for that other than women aren't trained in visuospaital skills, which we always knew anyhow?


Women have IQs much closer to the median, men tend to be more of an extreme, which is at least part of the reason why we end up with the worst and best jobs

IQ tests arent "just one number" you dumb fuck, the test has categories based off memory and pattern recognition and all kinds of other shit, and combines all the scores into an average, but if you actually go fucking take a real IQ test you can see exactly what aspect of intelligence you're lacking or abundant in. The final number just makes it easier for people to tell whether you're generally an idiot or not at a glance.

That doesnt make it all totally wrong you asspained retard

>peer review

Peer review in contemporary academia does quite a lot to suppress dissent. An ill-timed publication can overturn a lifetime of someone else's research. You have no idea how bad it is in here, especially in the social "sciences".

Don't try to debunk the little babies' pseudoscience they hate facts