So is DCU: Rebirth technically a reboot, or...?

So is DCU: Rebirth technically a reboot, or...?

It's a retcon

It's not a reboot and it never was

It's a retcon of a reboot, basically DC took Synder's take on the Watchmen and put the blame of New 52 on Doc

Let me ask you this OP. Is the end of Back to the Future a reboot of the beginning of Back to the Future?

it's basically a Keikkaku

It's a ReRe. Just like everyone defending it.

It's an anti-reboot. It literally un-reboots the New52.

...

so will we get the real Mr. Fries back?
you know, the one with an ACTUAL wife?

It's like Heroes Reborn

>so will we get the real Mr. Fries back?
>you know, the one with an ACTUAL wife?

He's barely a character, but maybe.

It's a reboot but it's a bad word these days so it tries really hard to make you think it's not

In exactly what way is it a reboot? It reveals that the New 52 and the pre-Flashpoint universes are one and the same. We've been following the same characters all along, it's just that someone messed them up.

It's not a reboot, and it never was.

Rebirth retcons the New 52 into not being a reboot.

Then why are there two Supes?

We don't know yet, that's a plot point for Action Comics.

We know that they're not who they thought they were.

Really putting the CON in retCON amirite xd

It's more like a rollback.

probably, I mean they did say Love was stolen so it's easy to explain why they were not married.

Pre-52 Supes and Lois were captives of Brainiac so whoever's behind this made new ones to take their place. Mr Oz said that neither pre-52 nor 52 Supes are who they think they are or something like that.

*"Keikaku" means "plan"

I'm glad the costume lines meme has stopped.

How soft are Jon's nipples?