Iislamist-terror

this is a load of bullshit and propaganda right? can you debunk this? counterfire.org/news/17599-graphic-islamist-terror-accounts-for-only-0-7-of-attacks-in-europe

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?
youtube.com/watch?v=kq4BFIoPCLI
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_the_European_Union
counterfire.org/news/17599-graphic-islamist-terror-accounts-for-only-0-7-of-attacks-in-europe
disqus.com/by/adycousins/comments/
disqus.com/by/dan_poulton/
youtu.be/J3bEDF0ekow
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

AND THIS

That's because people include reports of someone yelling 'fag' or bacon pranks as terrorism.
Ask for death figures instead.

>1968
All the groups responsible for terrorism in the orange part (IRA and catalonian shit) are inactive
It's like claiming we need to do something about the south because the civil war killed more Americans than the Afghan war.

Note the year range. It's pretty common to exclude "unfavorable" times from a study like this.

There was one for the US claiming that right wing terrorism claimed more lives than islamic terrorism, which looked reasonable, till you saw they started their dataset in 2002.

The best thing about that sort of aggregation is that now you have to claim Orlando wasn't islamist if you want that to be true.

>What is the IRA
>What is commie terror

>Trusting the mainstream media

That's your biggest mistake.

What exactly do they mean when they say "terror attacks"?

youtube.com/watch?
v=J3bEDF0ekow

youtube.com/watch?v=kq4BFIoPCLI

these video vids made me so fucking angry! is just full of shit and lies! the use such stew-man arguments as well

Do the "other" attacks include things like mean tweets and pig heads in proximity of mosques?
Pretty sure the statistics would look different it it was about deaths.

From 2006 till 2013. Would like to see newer statistics.
Nizza alone should've boosted France quite a bit.
It's not a secret that europe wasn't affected by terrorism till the refugee crisis.

>2013

convenient point to stop.

I enjoy talking to Germans so that I can ask them how they feel about Merkel and the Muslims. So user, how do you feel?

Yes. it's bullshit and propaganda.

Pic Related: Terrorist attacks in EU since 2004. All of the green ones are by Islamists.

Source:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_the_European_Union

So far Merkel has been a dream for the alt right, wasn't she?

any one can make a bullshit pie chart and claim its real. sight your sources. lets see a itemized list of these attacks. if they cant provide one then you call bullshit on it. that simple

you dont have to prove they are wrong they have to prove they are right since they showed off a fake pie chart

All you have to do to debunk this graph is go on the wikipedia page that shows terrorist attacks and play spot the non muslim motivated one.

They lumped in Islamists with the fucking IRA from 1968. A fucking joke.

Because its also a right wing political crime to draw a swastika?

>counterfire.org/news/17599-graphic-islamist-terror-accounts-for-only-0-7-of-attacks-in-europe

Wow, look at those attacks that they categorize though. Like 4 right wing terrorist attacks in total and the rest are all left wing.

Why the fuck are European leaders always going on about right wing extremism?!

Need to correct myself, because they dont count islamistic shootings as islamistic. All the happenings in germany are mot islamistic, they are psychopaths, they manipulate this statistic.

>2006-2013
>source: from 2011
WE WUZ TIMETRAVELLEZR NSHIEET

...

...

...

>1968-2013

Last I checked we didn't import 10 million Irish republicans and demand in our schools, television and radio that they were to be treated with respect and admiration.

Islam is a religion of peace. Therefore muslim terrorism must actually be non-islamic terrorism.

Gotta still put in a random non-0 number because obviously islamic terrorism exists, 0.7% looks fine.

>From 2006 to 2013
>Before mass migration
>Germany STILL hasn't released identiy of the Kino shooter.

Yeah, lets see one from 2015-2016.

Seriously, they dont count suicide bombing as islamic, because they declare them for psycho reasons because of the suicide...

The kino shooter killed no one, and he didnt hurt someone. He was german.

disqus.com/by/adycousins/comments/

Look at this dudes comments and couple them with one of his followers.

disqus.com/by/dan_poulton/

A bunch of fucking cultural marxists who think everything is subjective. Probably jews in disguise as well.

Read Dan Paultons mission statement.

Well, same here - youtu.be/J3bEDF0ekow / legit or load of crap? O.o

Since Islam worldwide in a month got almost the same as a few decades in Europe we shouldn't let more in. Simple.

>from 1968 when there was LITERALLY less than 0.1% Muslims in Europe

Try 2006-2016, Ahmed.

look at the years ahmed

I just made a thread about it but nobody gave a fuck:

>2007-2014

who the fuck is going to read that undecipherable wall of shit.. learn to be concise hamburger

...

>failed
>foiled

What percentage of those "failed" and "foiled" attacks were also planned by Islamists?

>terror attacks

Bullshit
Ask for deaths or any real causalities from those "Terror attacks" for that matter
Literary fucking bullying someone on the internet count as "terror attacks"

I posted it here Thread should be over now.

Graphs like that are literally the easiest thing in the world to read
>yes/no question
>country
>percent yes/no
It's all numbers, you barely even have to look at words dude

Anyone wanting to know the truth mountainjew
You can't get a more concise infograph
Besides, that was put together by an American, two canadians, a Bong, and a German

>Other
>Since 1968
>Barely 150 fatalities here

Bull fucking shit, ETA alone killed 830 people. Maybe if you don't count getting shot in the back as terrorism those numbers kinda fit but still, fucking retarded.

2006 +
IRA?
Even if it DID happened every day, it's not anywhere that matters

Guys, pic related is the front page of the site.

I think we can safely dismiss their "data" as biased nonsense.

Also, here is the real data

>all of those listed are within the last 15 years
Makes me cry on the inside

Even 1993-2013 would boost France's rates given what happened in 1994-1995 and what was initially planned to happen with flight 8969 (basically an early 9/11).

thank guys

Where the fuck are the 99.3% other ones? Bullshit

>since 1968
IRA/10

>It's not a secret that europe wasn't affected by terrorism till the refugee crisis.

>till the refugee crisis

Till USA destabilized all the fucking region.
Till we doomed Lybia.
Till we fucked every square netter of Syria by supporting Islamists.

Well, you could go back, THE FUCKING REFUGEES DIDN'T APPEAR SUDDENLY.

Look at the note at the bottom.
>figures from 2011 onward include all 'religiously motivated terror'
This fucks up the pie chart a lot and creates a visual that is intentionally misleading. When it says .7% of terrorist attacks between 2006 and 2013 are islamic it really means .7% of when they started to keep track. Also terrorism is still very loosely defined, and that chart includes foiled attempts as well so any nutjob sending a box of nails drenched in rat poison through the mail could be considered a terrorist act. They are also leaving out body count and severity of the act. Basically that pie chart is intended to intentionally dilute the waters so that the wretched poison of islamist terror attacks will get lost in the sea.

death for leaving islam is a command from quran. if you dont accept it you are not a muslim.

The chart is correct, all other attacks were by moderate muslims