How come no one ever says Africa needs more diversity and multiculturalism?
How come no one ever says Africa needs more diversity and multiculturalism?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
only ypipo can be non-diverse
but it does racist
Because no one wants to live in Africa.
How come us whites don't go into the DRC and just take over and start improving the continent? We could get them to the second world and maybe further.
>us whites
But what's the reason behind it? You live in better conditions so you have to give them something
...
Katanga 2.0?
if you think about that they're already pretty diverse
Muslims, Christians, some tribal religions here and there
blacks, Arabs, Europeans in the South
Lmao nobody wants to live there
because water and food is more important than more diversity and multiculturalism?
They're already diverse. Divide-and-conquer has only hurt them, Africa needs more unity.
Only smart guy in the thread.
Africa needs more diversity and multiculturalism
Africa is drastically more diverse than Europe or most of Asia
300+ ethnic groups in one country is the not unheard of
I would love for a bunch of Sup Forums faggots to do this.
It'd be hilarious seeing you cunts get eaten by alligators, stampeded by hippos, dying from Malaria, or some other disease. Just to get raped by the military because you tried to chimp out and overthrow them.
This
Africa has plenty of diversity, what do you think spurs all that strife?
Because it's already pretty diverse and multicultural
Its literally the most genetically/ethnically/linguistically/phenotypically diverse continent.
Tutsi are subhuman
Because they kill you while whites dont do anything.
niggers gonna nig
Black skin and black hair with black eyes, they all live in huts made from scrap or mud, how is that diverse?
That would be Asia
Ask blacks if they want whites to rule them and they will say fuck whitey if qhites say they dont want to be ruled by kikes they get rediculed.
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
>knowing this little of Africans
Even Liberia, which is one of the smallest countries, has like 12 native populations
yes, they need it, the migration from India really helped their economies back in the 60's and 70's, but then the dictators went "NO FOREIGNERS ON MAH LAND, YO" and deported all of them.
I think that something bad happened to them after that...
Linguistically is probably Oceania. PNG and Australia combined must have over 1000 languages going
You're wrong
But there is not a single white country that is ruled by Jews, nor is there any white country where a significant portion of the political scene is Jewish.
And in the rare cases where a Jew was elected leader, it was because he fit the interests of the country, and not because he was some Zionist.
The only white people that claim Jews are ruling them are conspiracy-tards
By the logic USA would have 100s as well
What is this trying to prove, Tyrone?
Those are tribes, not ethnicities.
We're both wrong, it's Africa
Jews own all the compabies and industries banks and medias of the US.
You say "niggers are going to nig" because of differences in their culture.
I post examples of your people doing the exact same thing
Then Austrians, Germans, Dutch, and Danish are the same ethnicity.
It's Asia
because no one cares
Remind me again how those are political positions?
Nah it's not
Except it is
Economy is more important than some faces subject to their masters who control the money and thus country.
Nah it isn't
Okay lad.
Cause it's already the most diverse continent in the world
You seriously believe Africa is more diverse than Asia?
You stupid, stupid fucking spastic cunt.
I'll believe what the linguists have to say thanks
It is though you retard like a third of their continent is like han chinese to begin with then another third is an collection of indian ethnicities
>africa so diverse
>bantu language
>semitic language
This is a map showing all of Africa's ethnicity.
And i'm not claiming this as a source but..
if you google "ethnic groups of Asia"
20 results pop up
if you do the same for Africa.
It's nearly 60
>diversity is solely determined by linguists
You fucking braindead Abo piece of shit
Do you understand what diversity is?
>call him an Abo if I can't prove him wrong
Hmm, I explicitly remember saying I was talking about linguistic diversity
Do you? What kind of diversity are you even going on about? Language? Genetics? Looks?
...
>they have black skin so they're all the same
Bantu isn’t a language
Semitic isn’t a language either
You’re retarded
talking about discrete languages and not language groups
calling something a bantu language or a semitic language does not imply that bantu and semitic are languages
Dumb bantoid
>I have never met more than 2 black africans ever
Africa has over 3,000 languages
Good to know that British is all the same ethnicity
Banatoiiiiiiidddd
But claiming there’s only
>Bantu
>Semitic
Is retarded
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
So you're saying diversity is purely determined by what linguists say? Using the Abo's logic, in which he suggests Oceania is more diverse than Asia because it apparently has over 1000 languages, is wholly flawed as India around 800, Indonesia has over 600, Philippines has over 100, Malaysia near 150.
And you're still wrong.
Africa was conquered by bantoids recently.
Language families in africa is practically a psuedo-science anyway
>Nguni languages sound similar, wow!
And yet you claim Dutch and German are different
Zulu is nothing like Swahili
Kikongo is nothing like Ganda
Are you stupid?
Can't handle the Bantoid, lads.
Its actually the most ethnically diverse continant.
But south africa is 20% non black like reverse sweden.....but both have high rape rate
>Its actually the most ethnically diverse continant.
It actually isn't
They are more genetically diverse
Mena in 2nd
Whites iln indians in 3rd
Asians 4th
And natives last due to desceding fr a few tribes.
This why natives got wiped out by diseases compared to resr of old world
You're wrong, as Leafs always are
proofs?
I think there was a Harvard study relatively recently saying that it was with Uganda and Liberia being the two most ethnically diverse countries and Africa in general being the most diverse continent. I don't feel like spoonfeeding you but google it I'm sure.
Because it would be pointless, no western man (exception those who are completley selfless) would voluntarly move there unless he gets paid a kings salary
Because diversity is just a smokescreen for idiots. The same is true of the economic argument for mass immigration.
The primary goal is to create a racial divide in Europe's populations like the one in America and my country. It allows the political and financial establishment to play the groups off one another and replace all of the concerns people have with actual governance, with identity politics. Debt also plays a role, as well as simple things like "pop-marxism" in most politicians and historical resentment among a certain group.
All of the negatives - loss of national identity and culture, increases in crime - are just collateral to these people. It doesn't effect them. They can have their private security, glass skyscrapers and performance art exhibitions wherever in the world they want them.