Thread for discussion of Anti-Communism, Far-Right, Traditionalism, and European Identity. Share links, reading, videos. > Sup Forums IS A RIGHT WING BOARD! > BUMP TO PISS OFF THE SHILLS!
> "But in the face of these obstacles, blows, intrigues and persecutions, assaulting us from every direction, having this terrible feeling of aloneness, having nowhere to turn, we opposed all this with a firm determination to die. "The death team" is the expression of these inner feelings of the legionary youth throughout the whole country, to receive death; its determination to go forward, through death." -Corneliu Zelea Codreanu
Funny you say that, but NatSoc is a left of centre ideology.
Don't fall for Jewish tricks and downplay the socialist part goyim.
Ayden Cook
I wouldn't say it's left of centre but centre, it certainly has both right and left wing elements but it's balanced and puts it right in the middle, hence why it appeals to many people.
Jaxon Stewart
i love these threads maximum comfy
Carson Evans
>I really don't understand the goal of this thread. Many, many goals: >discuss Anti-Communism, Far-Right, Traditionalism, and European Identity. >Share links, reading, videos about natsoc, fascism, traditionalism, etc. >provide revisionist insights to correct historical misperception >explore still-valid aspects of supressed ideologies >educate anons on how ZOG propaganda obscures white identity and white history >educate anons on the ongoing project of white genocide To name a few. >it has socialism in the name every thread, like fucking robots. its not hard to figure out that they changed the definition in an effort to coopt the popularity of the label and unify the German working class AGAINST marxism. It's not rocket science man:
“’Socialist’ I define from the word ‘social’ meaning in the main ‘social equity’. A Socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency. >Our adopted term ‘Socialist has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is anti-property; true socialism is not. Marxism places no value on the individual, or individual effort, of efficiency; true Socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist. Both charges are false.” -- Adolf Hitler 1938
History never saw a better way of fighting socialism than to appropriate the label and redefine it as ethno-nationalism. Stop pushing jewish tricks
“’Socialist’ I define from the word ‘social’ meaning in the main ‘social equity’. A Socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency. >Our adopted term ‘Socialist has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is anti-property; true socialism is not. Marxism places no value on the individual, or individual effort, of efficiency; true Socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist. Both charges are false.” -- Adolf Hitler 1938
>falling for Jewish tricks Mein Kampf, Chapter 11, Volume 1:
>Soon the Jew became the leader of the battle against himself. I am speaking figuratively when I say “against himself” because the “great master of lies” always succeeds in making himself seem innocent and throwing the blame on others. Since he had the audacity to lead the masses himself, it never occurred to the people that this could be the most legendary fraud of all time...
>Without being aware of it, the laborer is put to work for the very power that he believes he is fighting against. He is led to believe he is acting against capitalism, and therefore he is easily made to fight for capitalism. The cry is heard against international capital, but the real target is the national economy. The current economy must be destroyed so that the international stock exchange can replace it on the corpse-strewn battlefield, with Jewish financial world interests.
>To achieve his goal, the Jew proceeds as follows: he creeps up on the workers in order to win their confidence, pretending to have compassion for their poverty and circumstances or even anger at their miserable lot in life. He is careful to study all the real or even their imagined problems. Then he arouses the desire for change. With infinite shrewdness, he stirs up the urge for (((SOCIAL JUSTICE))), an innate desire that is sleeping within every Aryan. Once the fire is burning, the Jew turns it into hatred toward those more fortunate and puts the stamp of a very special World-Concept on the battle; he builds a philosophy designed to correct social injustice. He founds the Marxist doctrine.
Austin Hall
Have some rare Hitlers, lads.
William Morales
Full pic
Gavin Murphy
>tfw the hero lost in this story and in the villain's history books he's written as the most evil person who ever lived
Matthew Bailey
...
Blake Bell
JEWS AS PARASITE ================ >The Jew’s life as a parasite within the body of other nations and states is the origin of an unusual characteristic which caused Schopenhauer (Arthur Schopenhauer, the German philosopher) to describe the Jew as the “great master of lies”. This kind of existence drives the Jew to lie and to lie regularly and methodically in an orderly, businesslike way which comes as naturally to them as warm clothes to those who live in cold climates.
>His life within a nation can only continue if he convinces the people that Jews are not a separate people, but merely a “religious community”, although an unusual one. But this itself is the first great lie.
>In order to carry on his existence as a parasite among other nations, he must conceal his inner character. The more intelligent the individual Jew is, the more successful his deception will be. This deception may even convince parts of the host nation that the Jew is really a Frenchman, an Englishman, a German, or an Italian, just a person of a different religious persuasion. Government offices are particularly easy victims of this notorious trick because bureaucrats have little sense when it comes to history and only react to a fraction of actual history. In such circles, independent thinking is often considered a sin against sacred rules that determine who is promoted and who is not. Because of this, we must not be surprised that the Bavarian State Ministry, for instance, even today doesn’t have the faintest idea that the Jews are members of a separate people and not of a simple “religious group”.
>The Jew could never create a religious institution on his own because he lacks any form of idealism which would be needed to create such a cover. The lack of idealism means that a belief in any life hereafter is absolutely foreign to him. According to the Aryan concept, no religion could be conceived that lacks a belief in some form of life after death. In fact, the Talmud (the record of Jewish Law, ethics, customs, and history) is a book that explains how to prepare for a practical and prosperous life in this world and it says nothing about preparation for the hereafter. -- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf
Guys how can we every bring a NatSoc party to America without it being cringey and autistic. I see it as a viable system that could work within our current frame of ideals but how do we make it not retarded like the Skin Heads and The Traditionalist Workers Party?
Justin Gray
With social media it's very easy to get your ideas out there and get known, then it's meet-ups, then congregations, then you can move to become a political party.
I'd like the same to happen in Australia.
Brayden Hill
This is cool and all and I accept that the holohoax was just that, but I think it's all wishful thinking.
I don't think we'll ever see a country as unified as Germany was in those times, nor will we perhaps see a world power rectify the wrongs that were levied against it's people and to expose the lies brought upon. Kind of sucks.
Who knows though, maybe we'll space nazis some day in the far future.
Levi Sanders
But how do we make it not retarded? The least autistic Nazi part in US history was GLR's and even then it was a bit out there. We cannot run around with swastika flags and shout Heil Hitler if we want people to take us seriously.
Nolan Richardson
You're right and I'm thinking we need websites, youtube channels, facebook etc, where we can tell people what we're all about, tell the truth about currant events etc and recruit more members.
We need to take it slow.
Isaiah Robinson
bump
Jaxon Williams
I honestly just think National Socialism is dead. I don't think it can come back in its true form ever again. At least not without a transitional phase. I think that the best we can hope for is to continue to to keep pushing further right until it doesn't seem so out there.
1: We do not seek any enemies in the world, and our revolution does not go against the interests of any nation. 2: We do not seek to destroy nations. 3: We do not hate other races as a default. 4: We seek out friendship and alliances all through out the world. 5: We are bound to help the peoples struggle for racial freedom and racial sovereignty. 6: We do not tolerate Marxism therefore Marxism must be exterminated. 7: We demand racial purity as the first priority of states within our control. 8: We do not seek war although we do not fear war, we only wish for rationality and respect for our will to be maintained. 9: We do not tolerate anyone going against the interests of our goals and truths. 10: We do not tolerate hatred without jury to fellow comrades. 11: We do not tolerate the unauthorized to tell us what we can or can't do. 12: We do not tolerate warmongers, and criminals. 13: We do not tolerate anyone breaking these rules. !
Jaxon Phillips
...
Brody Stewart
Thanks, pal.
Luis Jackson
You're basically correct, it can't come back in it's original form, but the fact is that it never truly died. One means of mainstreaming the core ideas is to fight the demonization of it in leftist history and propaganda. Just standing up and refusing to keep re-demonizing it for the sake of virtue signalling helps open the window for the ideas to be considered objectively, without emotional kneejerk. But as a political project, we have to promote the underlying ideas of ethnic nationalism, even in "proposition nations" like the US, and increasingly, Canada, the UK, Australia, Germany, etc. The fact that people of European descent, aka "whites", are not allowed to pursue ethnic interests as a group -- while eery other group on the planet is cheered for doing so -- is the great yoke leftism has placed around our necks. In every way that we fight that kind of repression we are pursuing the spirit of national socialism.
Nathaniel Moore
>83449618 >come back It is here, all that is needed is for you to accept it and for a single more to accept truth, after that then the tyrants fall and we have achieved the final victory.
Matthew Thomas
Just "patriotism" is a good guise in America. That alone would be able to propel a Nationalist to power in the right conditions.
We'd have to use a lot of subversion to unite Christians, Socialists, Muslims, and Capitalists all against Marxism. We have the ability to appeal to most groups for help against our enemies, and it would be wise to use that influence.
"racial purity" might be an impossibility, depending on how race is defined. In the US, for example, is anyone purely nordic, or French, or Spanish? Are any of the majorities in Europe pure at this point? The nations that currently exist are the ruins of past racially pure states. We might need to adopt a broader catery of racial identification under the present world condition, like "Aryan" was a broad identifcation in it's time with "European" (despite the Jewish propaganda myth that Aryan = Nordic). I think the natsocs anticipated the consequences of misegenation occuring in their own time, and pre-empted it with the concept of Aryanism. Once the boundaries around Europid-origin states are secured, and their racial/ethnic identities restored as national treasures, then purity will be a natural consequence of biology.
Justin Powell
...
Nolan White
It is non negotiable, nothing matters if the blood is false.
Michael Lee
The USA is European, no foreign mixture.
Anthony Thomas
soviet union is better than nazi germany
William Turner
>
Eli Harris
In the present "judeified" political culture, it might be impossible to unite any of the groups you mentioned. Muslims always have their ultimate loyalty to Sharia, because their religion can't be divorced from the will of Allah and the prohpet to "spread Islam", and that means converting the world under sharia. Socialists will always cuck to marxist values because marxism is "the ultimate logical conclusion of socialism". Christians in the US are heavily dominated by multicultural values and worship Israel and Jews; christian zionism has polluted christianity here. Capitalists are heavily influenced by Jewish "finance capitalism" ideals, just ask any Randbot that thinks the US has "magic soil" that can transform all brown people in K-selected rugged individualists. We will probably have to stand against all these groups for a while until all their cucks are driven out -- just as Trump has had to stand against the chorus of voices demanding that he "cuck" toward their interests. >promote white ethnic consciousness >condemn white submissivism (cucking for popularity from other cucks) >promote strong national pride, "Americanism" These are our weapons right now, since we're still in the guerilla war stage against zionist mental occupation
you have to go back
Asher Lewis
>implying Hitler wasn't a Communist Right-wing didn't exist during Socialism.
Hudson Powell
>>you have to go back no, you have to go back
Carter Martin
One State One Race One Leader, this can not be changed only negotiated as to how to occur it.
Lincoln James
>“’Socialist’ I define from the word ‘social’ meaning in the main ‘social equity’. A Socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency. >Our adopted term ‘Socialist has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. (((Marxism))) is anti-property; true socialism is not. (((Marxism))) places no value on the individual, or individual effort, of efficiency; true Socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist. Both charges are false.” -- Adolf Hitler 1938
Obviously we cannot convert the entirety of these groups to National Socialism. However, we could focus on trying to get these groups to hate the Globalists, and that way more people will start to wake up to the problem. It would create an environment perfect for the Nationalists to rise from.
I don't know if such subterfuge would be more worthwhile than simply campaigning. Starting as a small headquarters, however, and branching out to other areas of the community against the (((Globalists))) seems like a natural phase.
Where do you think we would be most likely to find sympathizers? The most I'm able to do would be to anonymously spread some papers around town, because I have yet to meet a fellow Nationalist.
James Price
>trying to hijack nationalism >trying to hijack ethnic consciousness >trying to hijack white struggle >promoting retarded dead ideology to create jew controled opposition you
Jaxson Stewart
Every Socialistic country was created by Communism by nationalizing property aka kicking every foreigner out of country, which includes other Socialistic leaders from other countries like Stalin. We didn't tolerate Stalin either during Socialism, we only had Russian trade. Stalin wanted to conquer lands which Hitler wanted to have, which is why they weren't good with each other, else they would still have a pact. Hitler learned everything though revolution. Arbeit und Brot was a slogan invented by Communism, which Hitler used. You are confusing right/left political parties of democracy/capitalism with Socialism which is a totally different system where you don't vote political parties.
Mason Walker
>this is actually a unironical thread
Ian Johnson
(you)
Lincoln Gomez
Moron.
Listen: government conserves. No government does not conserve. In America... (Are you still listening?) we have a liberal constitution, soooooooooooooooo to be conservative in the U.S. is to be conservative to a liberal document. THUS, the terms are reversed.
Okay... Now, read it again.
Juan Brooks
You can't ever get those groups to hate the globalists, except perhaps some christians. Islam is the original "globalist" movement, and still is. Socialism is full of globalists, which is why marxism makes sense to them (ie, the communist international), and finance capitalists (bankers) are fine doing away with national boundaries, even with tolerating limited socialism (Soros). The lesson learned from the natsocs was to subvert their philosophies, by cooptation of their labels and memes (appropriating the word "socialist" and redefining it as ethnic nationalist, appropriating "capitalism" and redefining it as "against usury, banking, globalism", etc). Islam will never be an ally, because its one goal is global hegemony, commanded by God. It can't be reformed. Christianity can be an ally, but it has to be freed from the Christian Zionist mindset.
you're posting the same three images every time. if you're going to shitpost, don't be boring. no one fucking cares about your MGTOW butthurt. you low energy faggot.
>it had socialism in the name come back when you bother to study NatSoc. there's more than enough material here for you to learn to tell the difference between an anti-marxist movement and a marxism movement.
>Against the Mainstream: Nazi privatization in 1930's Germany (Germa Bel) ub.edu/graap/EHR.pdf
Joseph Clark
Henry Ford was a Jew?
Austin Hill
National Socialists is name of political party, they are Communists, since Communists have enough power to create Socialism. No Social Democrats inside democratic system will ever create Socialism. It's laughable that you call Canada's medical system Socialistic when all their insurance companies are owned by USA.
Evan Jackson
Literally a prophet.
Jacob Perry
...
Jack Turner
>Sup Forums
>Unironic
Jayden Peterson
...
Robert Morales
>unironical trip >participating in an unironical nazi thread unironically
kys urself my man
Brody Rogers
Catholicism seemed to blend well with the National Socialists, the Government sometimes had to make it clear who was in charge, but they could certainly work together. Islam would need to be removed eventually, however, they can easily be turned against the Nihilists and their destruction of society.
Christians can definitely work, but will take a bit of effort to get rid of this "Dispensationalist" garbage that puts Jews and Israel before Christians and the Church.
Socialists would be an interesting group to conquer. It would require using some of the more leftist parts of NatSoc like education and welfare, by focusing on helping the people they could quickly be converted. If most Socialists knew more of the International nature of Marxist-Socialism they probably wouldn't support it as much, and that is why most leftists support International Socialist ideas (like no borders), but aren't very aware of the international plan of Marxism. By injecting Nationalism into the mix, and desire to help the workers/people, they would hear the same buzz words they are oh so fond of, and probably latch hold. It would be a bit hard to prevent subversion, so the group would have to heavily push Patriotism.
Capitalists should be relatively easy to convert by pointing out that we're fine with a free market within the country, and that alone (by their own standards) should be able to create a self sufficient nation. Only the rand-bots would really argue against this.
Although you do make good points, most of these groups could never be allowed to be major parts of the movement, for fear of subversion. However, they are useful pools to recruit from and temporarily ally ourselves with.
Arguably our system has too many vulnerabilities allowing subversion. They've been working at it since the first slaves arrived, even before the constitution was written. We should have been founded as an explicitly Christian nation, even if freedom to choose the denomination of Christianity also had to be secured. We simply can't survive allowing in semites, their culture is antithetical to the anglo-saxon culture and legal tradition that inspired our own.
>National Socialists is name of political party, they are Communists The ability to grasp that a word was APPROPRIATED must be a kind of IQ test. A percent of Sup Forums can never grasp the concept of a tactical misnomer. Don't even try comprehending Machiavelli, it'll make your brain catch fire. The entire purpose of National Socialism, from it's beginning, was to fight the spread of (((COMMUNISM))) in Europe. The only way you can keep believing otherwise is to refuse to read any of the links posted ITT. It's not even an argument.
>“’Socialist’ I define from the word ‘social’ meaning in the main ‘social equity’. A Socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency. >Our adopted term ‘Socialist has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is anti-property; true socialism is not. Marxism places no value on the individual, or individual effort, of efficiency; true Socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist. Both charges are false.” -- Adolf Hitler 1938
"My special snowflake socialism isnt the same as Stalin's special snowflake socialism" is propaganda, and not an actual argument. You are eating 80 year old propaganda, lad, way after expiration date.
Blake Morgan
These laws seem a little odd. Demanding racial purity as the primary goal seems a bit extreme. I feel there are more pressing issues to attend to and that the Asian family down the street can be taken care of later.
Robert Thomas
...
Kayden Moore
...
Liam Jenkins
An economy can be fixed in a few years.
Some criminals can be dealt with in a few days.
A Government can be over thrown in hours.
But your people, once gone, can never be brought back.
Eli Brown
>what are mefo bills
The government owed its people hundreds of billions of dollars. It was taking from the nation to buy guns, a huge national debt, the same thing people bitch about with modern USA.
The nazi economy was just taking in huge debts to start huge projects, so people have something to do.
Thomas Martin
>These laws seem a little odd. Demanding racial purity as the primary goal seems a bit extreme. I feel there are more pressing issues to attend to and that the Asian family down the street can be taken care of later.
Nolan Taylor
I like to ask this every thread
How many of you reflect the ideal aryan male?
I'm talking about >muscular >well groomed >well dressed >successful >has a wife/girlfriend >masculine >educated and well rounded
Elijah Murphy
You prove to me it was anti-slavic, then I'll do my best to rebutt.
archive.org/details/practicalcommun00eedegoog >Practical Communism, Work and Bread(Arbeit und Brot), published 1908 This is one of Hitler's reading material as he learned how to be a Fuhrer.
Joseph Cook
Fair enough. Maybe change the word race to people and it will be more normie friendly.
Easton Gonzalez
>i'll keep posting a historical quote until it becomes a historical quote Can you even hear yourself? >calls me special snowflake not an argument
