Why should/shouldn't Gary Johnson be in the presidential debates?

Why should/shouldn't Gary Johnson be in the presidential debates?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commission_on_Presidential_Debates
cbsnews.com/news/do-the-debates-unfairly-shut-out-third-parties/
youtube.com/watch?v=rAT_BuJAI70
youtube.com/watch?v=C_T5-KEkYNI
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Pro-TPP

Because the committee that heads the debates is bipartisan Democrat and Republican. And they say not.

Should be a Trump Johnson debate.

Democrats and Republicans run the show.


get lost 3rd party scum.

can wait to rub it into /pols/ face when their special snowflake 3rd party loser loses

I think adding him to the debates would be interesting and bring some sanity to the debate. Sassy-ass Weld would absolutely crush the VPs on the debate stage as well.

>majority of pol supports 3rd party

lurk more fgt

>implying Sup Forums hasn't been shitting on Johnson full time while drinking every drop of Trump's semen

He's literally a communist faggot.

first post best post

oy vey goyim, you only have two choices that we picked for you!

because his memes stink

What does that have to do with him being able to be in the debates?

Ross Perot debated alongside Clinton and Bush in 1992.

Johnson would shit on Trump more then Hillary and would be an insufferable cunt.

Because he's polling at less than 15% nationally.

Put him in and let him speak his peace. Is Sup Forums now anti free speech? Traitors.

>we picked
>donald trump

Can't wait until Trump can't get a table in Palm Beach or NYC cause he's a fucking loser and has to stay home with his retard family and eat Trump steaks.

Meanwhile, you'll be on Sup Forums blaming Johnson.

Get fucked nigger.

Jill will get to a debate before out of touch Pro-TPP Johnson.

Is this real?

Im conflicted because if someone like Ted Cruz wound up on stage instead of Trump Id be all for Johnson and him being up there with the rest.

Alright, they said yes that time, they aren't this time.

He'll soend his time shitting on Trump while Hillarity claps along and pretends to be above the fray.

>tpp
>open borders
>trying to allow a hilary, a socialist to win the election

they've been pushing it here for months

Trump support is a months consistant raid since he announced his candicency from reddit

Hillary support is for the normals

3rd party is Sup Forums support. like ron paul.

either way i win because i will see your shit johnson get crushed by clinton or trump.

either way. one of them will kill him.

stay mad johnson losers

Because more than half of his answers will be
>I don't know

I CLIMBED 7 MOUNTAINS EVERYONE IS A PUSSY BUT ME

>let's allow ourselves to become a minority population to a group of people who all vote socialist!

The system is fucked against third party candidates, you can't get into the debates unless you get 15% of the polls, but you can't get 15% of the polls (or at least it's not likely) unless you get mainstream coverage.

I hope the two party system will change in the future, should make things more interesting. And hopefully people will lose the "US VS THEM" mentality in politics.

>Trump
>Half his family converted to Judaism
>Married off his kids to AIPAC Power Jews

You're such a clueless faggot. Good goyim.

Cant Parry The Gary

Because he will get less than 1% on election day.

See last election. He is a protest vote. Replace his name with any other generic name and they would poll the same vs Trump and Clinton.

fuck off 3rd party worm

>either way I win

You're british. You already lost at birth.

He learned their ways

He infiltrated them and so they can't claim he's anti semetic

It's what Jews did with whites

Been a while since the last Johnson General.

He wasn't around during most of the political process and he's a fake libertarian fuck him

Third parties should be barred from participating in presidential elections as long as the US has a first past the post system.

Because he's a looney motherfucker any way you slice or dice him

On a side note, i would love if they polled Trump v Clinton v Jeb Bush. Jeb would be in debates again. I miss his memes the most. Ted Cruz memes seem forced

3rd party should not be allowed to participate until they are obviously the #2 or #1 party.

He should be in the debates - he'd get absolutely and irrevocably BTFO, and this terrible shilling can finally stop.

stay mad johnson loser

cant wait to see clinton have you killed

Gary Johnson is no Ross Perot, by a longshot.

Ross Perots efforts led to the current GOP candidate

Why should american politics be so beholding to establishment power and so afraid of new or different ideas?

>beholden*

>Ross Perot debated alongside Clinton and Bush in 1992.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commission_on_Presidential_Debates
>The Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) is a private firm. It began in 1987 by the Democratic and Republican parties to establish the way that presidential election debates are run between candidates for President of the United States. The Commission is a non-profit, 501(c)(3) corporation as defined by federal US tax laws, whose debates are sponsored by private contributions from foundations and corporations.

cbsnews.com/news/do-the-debates-unfairly-shut-out-third-parties/
>The dominance of the two major parties at the debates has critics charging that the system is effectively rigged to shut out other voices. Gary Johnson, the Libertarian Party nominee for president and former New Mexico governor, has sued on anti-trust grounds to be included this year. The CPD, he said in an interview, is designed "to protect the interests of Republicans and Democrats."

So, a non-profit corporation dictates the rules for the debates and who is included/excluded. Follow the money...

Yeah Ross Perot was awsome. He really knew Nafta was garbage. Way ahead of his time. Should have ran today with Trump as VP

Hilldog would say yes. She's already trying to bury the debates against Trump, she desperately needs someone else to take the attention off her.

because a 3rd party. UKIP ruined britain by forcing the conservatives to have the EU refrendum

if UKIP was banned we could have been in the EU.

fucking pricks

Because the US has a one-party system.

He didn't get to the top of NY real estate without knowing how to play the jews

youtube.com/watch?v=rAT_BuJAI70

ross perot is a loser like all 3rd parties

>A CPD debate allowed Perot on stage

Not real good with the reading comprehension, are you Jose

I mean you COULD

what bullshit is scotland bein ignored

don't see you complaining about Texas' 34 EVs

1/3 of the US population lives in California, Texas, New York, and Florida.

Ross Perot formed the Reform party.
Trump was a member for years.
I'm sure Trunp would have loved him as VP

Thinking about voting for him desu. I don't like Clinton or Trump, and even if I did vote Trump it wouldn't matter because of the state I live in. Don't get me wrong, I'm not a huge fan of Johnson either, but at least it'll help get the message across that we want to hear more voices and nuanced opinions in the debates

This has to be bait, you can't possibly be this blatant with your fascism

And then what happened? Who did Perot get votes from? Has it ever happened again?

If Johnson gets 15% and is allowed in the debates, they'll raise that number to 25%.

Of course if Johnson wins, you will do the correct thing and kill yourself, right?

You should do the isidewith test. I didn't realize how much i agreed with him.

UKIP should never have been allowed on public tv or question time

>California: 705,000 people per electoral vote
>New York: 635,000 people per electoral vote
>South Dakota: 284,000 people per electoral vote
>Wyoming: 194,000 people per electoral vote

The electoral college grossly inflates the importance of the small flyover states.

because he isn't libertarian, he's libertine

Due to an excessive amount of Gary Johnson threads, we please re-direct you to the /JohnsonGeneral/

If you are new to this board, please go there.

And he's partly the reason they made it even harder now to have the 3rd person up there.

Yeah! Let's silence people whose views we don't agree with! What better way to preserve freedom and democracy?

go home shill you cant even triforce

>California and NY are bullshit
>Texas isnt

LMAO @ ur life

>not killing yourself no matter what

Yeah, I suppose I should if I plan on voting third party. I generally agree with libertarians on most social/cultural issues but I can't in good faith call myself a libertarian because I've taken a basic econ course or two.

Trumps entire platform is Ross Perots with a dash of early Buchanan

even though i hate trump. i am very happy that he denied another paul the nomination

>freedom and democracy?

try order and control. people should not be allowed to just go and make a political party.

Who draws this shit?

Any candidate who qualifies for the ballot in enough states to mathematically win the EC should be allowed to participate in the national debates.

He isn't at 15%

This is weird. I've never seen someone move the goalposts by claiming someone else will move the goalposts before. It's like, meta-moving the goalposts.

no. they shouldent. only Democrats and Republicans matter

No normal fag is a Hillary supporter

he's late to the party where was he when 16 people were squaring off in the repub debates

Hair is JUST

>you only have two choices goy!
Big tent politics is cancer that attempts to shoehorn the beliefs of over 300 million people into one of two categories. The sooner we can do away with the two party system and switch to proportional representation in the house and senate, the better.

He's a FUCKING WHITE MALE

you will never win

and then you have the EU parliament with like 20 different parties, and either everyone has no principles or nothing gets done.

and NO he shouldnt be in the debate.

His entire platform is just calling trump a racist

youtube.com/watch?v=C_T5-KEkYNI

I literally dont give a fuck. neither of the major two parties have done anything to earn my vote, so I'm not giving it to them.
>either everyone has no principles or nothing gets done.
So, literally no change from what we have now? Good to know.

have fun losing

i am so happy. love seeing you dejected losers cry about never winning

fuck Gary Johnson, hes an asshole, vote Jill Stein

The US congress is a model of efficiency compared to what goes on in europe. Even in Canada 4 parties all with representatives often cock blocks legislation that we could pass with 2

Be careful what you wish for

sorry meant we have 5 parties all with representatives in parliament

you are a fucking idiot

there is no "losing" by expressing a vote, the only losers are people who dont vote

your logic is that if I am going to get fucked up the ass by a nigger, that I should vote for it, so I am a "winner"

you fucking muppet

Why would anyone supporting Johnson even consider voting for a socialist? Don't you know anything about libertarianism?

i am so happy this man is in power

inshallah

you are a fucking idiot

that legislation should "pass" is faulty logic

I dont want any legislation to pass that thinks you are smart

keeping out stupid ideas is a great service by government

Bloc Quebecois cock blocks 100% of everything, and will only sign off on bills if the government gives more kick backs or hand outs to their province.

seems like a functional system