We say hello to BBC journalists lurking here

we say hello to BBC journalists lurking here.

Other urls found in this thread:

bbc.co.uk/programmes/p05402xs
bbc.com/news/av/magazine-39580173/life-advice-from-a-117-year-old
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>250x188

What is Sup Forums? What is OP post? What is capcha?

niggers tongue my anus

Tell them to change their name, they're appropriating black culture's reference to huge penis.

QUICK

SOMEONE POST A PICTURE OF A SWASTIKA

There already is 1 swastika in this thread and at least 3 more are hidden in the background.

>Niggers tongue my anus
>Post Jew kike
YOU HAD 1 JOB
Chinks can suck my balls

where's yotsuba?

the bbc study ants?

...

it's been like 10 years of "what is Sup Forums" articles

are people ever going to figure it out?

They all lurk here so they can post their own comments to use in their articles.
"Journalists" are scum.

Hello, BBC. I am the hacker you know as Sup Forums. I blew up a van with my internet

What does BBC stand for anyway?

No

Balmy British cuckolds

BIG
R
I
T
I
S
H

BROADCASTING
L
A
C
K

COCK
O
R
P

>what is Sup Forums
>can literally just type it into their search bar and find it out yourself in an hour
Also suck my cock you British faggots

BBC, or as we like to call it, for a joke, the British Broadcasting Corporation

INCLUDE ME IN THE BROADCAST

DO IT

It's mostly reditors posting here nowadays anyway.

How does it feel to work for a company which supports pedophiles?

Big Bang Clock

the british are obsessed with that damn clock

i heard he raped corpses and former and current victims in psych wards and hospitals

Assalaamu Alaykum

Most journos use forums for news. Newspapers visit a football forum I visit and report rumours as "anonymous source news articles".

Sup Forums is literally being watched 24/7

How does it feel to post in the same thread pedophiles post in?

All media now just follows Twitter reactions for stories

Not only is he a pedo, he got literal mad pusy. What a man

savile was literally /ourguy/

This too.

>Sup Forums attracting even more normalfags to this site because they're that starved for attention

Why am I not surprised?

honestly the cunny threads, racism threads, and incomprehensible memes will scare most of them off

They're the ones that bring the racism threads and incomprehensible memes.

BBC is as insanely dishonest as any totalitarian regime. Their show on the Second Amendment interviewed one expert -- one (1) -- who happens to be a discredited crank activist, and his point was that every historian before him and all the Founding Fathers were all lying, and the NRA is the most powerful lobby in the same town that houses AIPAC and lobbies for Saudi Arabia, the Pentagon, the PRC, Monsanto, Big Tobacco and Big Pharma. In a later, different show, they claimed Japan as an example of successfully disarming a population of firearms through legislation, and they claimed Japanese crime rates were a function of disarmament. Their coverage of the migrant situation has been far past dishonesty into unapologetic advocacy. They had one good thing (Top Gear) and they got rid of that as soon as they had a good excuse (yeah Jezza hits people, it's what he does, so what).
I can't listen to the voice of the host of Click without wanting to permanently wipe that audible smile off his face.
Still better than our own NPR, which is effectively a charity workfare program for crackheads.

cute ochako

what's wrong with racism threads

There's no way they're on Sup Forums. Probably just pol and b.

>hello to BBC journalists
I am fucking sure it's that nigger Krager

They're just a bit annoying tbqh

The purple anime girl on the front page is cute and a welcome inclusion in my opinion.

I highly doubt they came to Sup Forums to look at the Sup Forums board. Everyone knows they're here for Sup Forums, and maybe Sup Forums

bbc.co.uk/programmes/p05402xs

That's a shame. I left a month ago because it was nothing but ShareBlue trying to thought lead, third worders data mining ("What Do You Guys Think?"), and uninformed newbies babbling about "dank memes." I cannot imagine that they will ever know what Sup Forums was like during the lifetime of Kircheis, certainly not now. Hell, I've been hanging out at tv and out and various boards and seeing the same normie invasion and ShareBlue scripted posts.

didnt read a word

Any exploding vans?

Sup Forums really?, Sup Forums is only porn.

>23 minutes long
Someone highlight the good points in the video if there are any.

I would not be amazed to learn that they took a look at the Twin Peaks general. Those gormless anally-cleansing gits always want to try to talk about -- well, you know. But we're not going to talk about her.

Bring back /mlpol/. Or instigate another Sup Forums Harbor

First half of it isn't even about Sup Forums, just news.

Hello. I did not get a chance to read your reply but please be aware that I am grateful for it. Here is a random image that signifies nothing.

>And what's that folder called user, why-foo?

What I don't get it how you can't pretty much understand Sup Forums if you just spend a couple weeks on there and yet they still act like it's some sort of deep mystery.

>inb4 Britain blocks Sup Forums

>What is Sup Forums
Its a safespace for special snowflake whitebois who have never stepped foot out in the real world so they sit on their computers and phones all day bashing minorities because its so cool and randum xd

views

Yeah, but they love showing shit from Sup Forums to make this entire site looked like depraved lunatics.

>implying

...

Implying what you fucking idiot?

only torrent sites get blocked here

>

Virtue signalling. Herdthink. They must always vigorously protest to each other how good they are and that requires that they constantly claim to be able to understand why a person would do something bad.
tldr Everything they say is really about themselves.

I as a racist absolutely love this line of argument. Please continue to use it as often as possible. If I could I would pay you to say this sort of "we are right even according to our enemies" thing.

Even private trackers?

why is your (((news))) organization so incompetent?

>I as a racist

I don't get it

They spend ten minutes talking about nothing and then discuss Sup Forums getting inflated by stormfaggots.

>"Download this programme" image features a Zen Micro, an mp3 player from like 10 years ago
Nice job staying on top of the pulse of technology, BBC.

I lose nothing by so saying because he already made the accusation. In fact they consider all white people to be biologically racist. The nicest prius-driving liberals will one day get beaten down like they were wearing hoods.
But what I'm pointing out is that he just admitted we were right.
>stupid white boy virgins who know nothing and are always wrong: "blacks lack impulse control and are statistically much more likely to commit violence."
>kangs who single-handedly built the pyramids: "SHUT UP OR I WILL KILL YOU, I WILL PUNCH THROUGH A WINDOW TO HIT YOU YOU DISGUSTING RACIAL INFERIOR, HOW DARE YOU SAY ANYTHING BUT PRAISE ABOUT YOUR BETTERS. WE WUZ KANGS. QED."
>white team: "see?"
>black team: "see what? Talk clearly you stupid retard."

10 minutes about nothing, 5 minutes about memes, 5 minutes about literal nazis

shut up you racist

>it's true

G E T
O F F
M Y
B O A R D

Those two headlines can coexist. Internet products regularly achieve great notoriety while failing to turn a recognizable or traditional profit.

>What is Sup Forums

A place of freedom where true diversity exists in the sense that no thread goes without 300 replies of conflict, trolling, and shitposting, as mindhive doesn't exist; with the exception that such faggotry is the topic of the thread that it unifies even the most hated conflicting parties together.

That's Sup Forums, and that's why i love it.

BBC and the journalism it represents, is one such faggotry.

Wow. Cogent reasoning. I'll just leave Western civilization in your hands, you sound really capable. Take good care of the fissionable material, now.

such epic much based

I love you too faggot desu.

OK racist

toasting in epic bread
sum1 archive dis shit nao

It's weird how chirpy those people at BBC are when talking about a site for nazis

Big Ben Clock

>implying Sup Forums isn't all newfags at this point

I think a good quarter are underage b& too. Thanks Hiro you filthy gook.

the bbc is unironically more biased than Sup Forums

IPT is blocked here although that's hardly "private"

t. whiteboi who has never stepped foot in the real world

Unironically correct. I've been here for over a decade now and there's no other place out there that's willing to talk to people with different opinions. Even on pol you have nazis talking to commies. That won't happen at reddit, nazis there are just downvoted and ignored.

>you have nazis talking to commies.
By talking you mean calling them cucks and shills

That doesn't mean anything. The reason it doesn't mean anything is that you reflexively, categorically and automatically throw it around. It doesn't have any meaning because if I was one of you, one day I would say one wrong thing and Jack's a donut. It has nothing to do with actually helping nonwhite people, it's clearly cult behavior.

>WAYCIST
>WAYCIST
>WAYCIST
>WAYCIST

They may call them cucks, but they will actually debate commie talking points. Won't happen anywhere else

racist?

>but they will actually debate commie talking points.
Yeah by calling them shills and kikes

>britbongs pay a licence to watch a leftwing govt propaganda network named after BBC

can't make this shit up

I have a question for some anons. Why are you racist, Sup Forums?

bbc and the rest of the media refused to show the charlie hebdo cartoon after the attacks. honestly that is the most ashamed i have been of western civilisation. how can you have the gall to talk about strength and courage after every terrorist attack when the charlie hebdo attack was THE moment that freedom of expression came under attack and nobody lifted a fucking finger for fear of reprisals?

hope the bbc reads my post

>BBC makes a video article titled "Life advice from a 117-year-old"
>they don't ask for advice relating to how she got to such a deep age
>diet
>workout
>hobbies
>habits
>none of the information that interests and is valuable to the whole world universaly

>they instead waste a precious opportunity to ask her on her opinions on polygamy

This is BBC "journalism".

bbc.com/news/av/magazine-39580173/life-advice-from-a-117-year-old

How old is this video anyway?