Harvard study on media bias confirms the media has an anti-Clinton bas

mediaite.com/online/harvard-study-says-media-coverage-built-up-trump-tore-down-hillary/

Other urls found in this thread:

nytimes.com/2015/04/25/us/politics/bill-clinton-ends-role-with-laureate-chain-of-for-profit-colleges.html?_r=0
news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2016/04/nicco-mele-named-new-director-of-the-shorenstein-center/
twitter.com/nicco?lang=en
youtube.com/watch?v=mCMyHJJrdDw
youtube.com/watch?v=dAu44wVgb58
youtube.com/watch?v=5my7EJv42PU
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Pretty nice they're giving Trump so much free promotion.

Since when is Harvard a joke?
I remember 20 years ago it being some sort of prestige university that everyone looked up to.

Now whenever I hear of it it's just stupid shit.

>negative in tone
So essentially anything the person conducting the test disagrees with.

>Media
>anti Clinton bias
Can't make this shit up

>muh Hillary is a victim
Harvard is the Harvard of shills.

Just due to the fact that there's overwhelming negativity for all of them just shows that this election is fucking horrific.

Reality does

You will not find much negativity targeted at Hillary in the media.
You will however see nothing but negative shit about Trump 24/7

The only thing this shows is that the media is corrupt. There's nothing ''horrific'' about this election. Trump is going to win, Hillary is going to jail once Trump gets in the office.

Harvard probably considered talking about Hillary's scandals as negative press. KEK

>Trump in the negatives
>Anti-Clinton Bias
Trump hasn't gotten 90+ people killed for profits

Technically speaking Harvard is the Harvard of whatever it chooses to do.

Most of the media is conservative you subhuman slavnigger piece of human garbage. FOX News has the majority of the audience and literally 100% of talk radio is right wing.

CNN is totally pro-Clinton. Their bias during RNC was SO obvious. (it is the only station on wire in europe)

FOX is mostly pro-Clinton. (can judge just from short shots)

It then depends, what all you call "Media" ...

Reminder that the Clinton Foundation uses universities to launder money. So of course they're defending her

nytimes.com/2015/04/25/us/politics/bill-clinton-ends-role-with-laureate-chain-of-for-profit-colleges.html?_r=0

>A
>FUCKING
>LEAF

huh... when you put it that way.. it really makes you check my digits

>harvard intellectuals

A FUCKING LEAFNIGGER

and all the shills are going to be indicted for being party to murderers.

>media
>conservative
A FUCKING LEAF

almost

I fucking hate Harvard.

Jewish infested piece of shit

...

kek does not bless the wicked

>Corruption
>Deaths
>Leaked national security

>Why is everyone so negative towards Hillary?
Fuck leftists.

That's because people in the media are educated. If you take a sample of high school janitors I guarantee they'll be pro-trump

Because shes a criminal whos commited crimes including treason. She only just dodged the charges because shes so well connected and already the establishment front runner

>Shorenstein center for media

more money to be biased towards the candidate that will win breh

A FUCKING LEAF

Majority of people who are drawn to the arts lean left politically. The majority of people who seek media jobs lean left politically. The vast majority of and ALL of the big "new media" companies are ran from San Fransisco.

Yes somehow media is conservative?

True. So fucking true that NOBODY ever mentioned how the "moderate freedom fighters" supported by Obama and Shillary are jihadi savage beasts not different than ISIS. How comes, if the MSM is so against, Shillary, they don't use what would be one of the most negative things you can find on her?

Fucking LEAF how about you kys and make the world a better place instead?

Fox news is literally the Republican shill channel. Ailes worked for the Republican party and he literally created Fox news to shill for Republicans and lie about Democrats.
Shows how much you know.

CNN is kind of fake neutral . They literally hired Lewandowski to shill for Trump

Oh Clinton says we should reduce pollution and Trump says Climate change is a hoax made up by the Chinese . Let's be neutral. They've gone out of their way not challenge Trump .

This is fucking rich. It must be opposites day at Harvard.

OR she is a shitty person and the media is only reporting THE FUCKING TRUTH. If the truth happens to paint her in a negative light.....that's on her isn't it?

>leaf prime minister wants this to happen to every children in his country

I'M FUCKING PISSED

Breaking news: Nobody can be trusted except for yourself. More at 11.

>The Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy was interested in determining how “good” and “bad” press reflected the rise of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton to their respective nominations. Though Trump has criticized the media on a more frequent basis than Clinton due to his penchant for controversy, the study concluded that his media coverage has had much more of a positive impact for him than for the former Secretary of State.

news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2016/04/nicco-mele-named-new-director-of-the-shorenstein-center/

The director of the "Shorenstein Center" previously worked on Howard Dean's 2004 campaign and his twitter feed indicates he's clearly in the bag for Hillary.

twitter.com/nicco?lang=en

>WAR IS PEACE
>FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
>NIGGERS ARE PEOPLE
>ETC ETC ETC

What was considered "media"? I remember seeing another article about this a while ago, and it was looking at all the small media sites which were going for Bernie. If you look at only the big mainstream ones, like Fox CNN WashPo etc., I can't imagine that Clinton is getting more negative coverage than Trump.

Ten years ago, the PResident of Harvard (Lawrence Summers) was forced to step down because he pissed off some feminists. In a meeting to discuss why there were more male STEM professors than female STEM professors, Lawrence Summers pointed out that men have a wider IQ distribution (like pic-related), meaning there are more male retards and more male geniuses. Since Harvard STEM professors are geniuses, we should expect there to be more men.
Somebody ran to the media and it became a big national story and he was forced to resign because feminists can't handle facts. Harvard agreed to put more effort into helping women succeed at STEM or some bullshit like that.

Fox is typically a republican shilling network, this is correct. However for the vast majority of time; Fox and the republicans were doing everything they could to stop Trump.

CNN claims neutrality, yet repeatedly gets exposed for shilling for the left.
Two recent examples being:
youtube.com/watch?v=mCMyHJJrdDw
youtube.com/watch?v=dAu44wVgb58

Yesterday every single article on the front page of CNN was Trump bashing. What the fuck is an ocean nigger even doing talking about American politics? Your opinion means nothing.

(((harvard)))

>CNN
>neutral

liberals think having harvard students/graduates doing something gives it academic leverage

fun fact : harvard gives people good grades and passes people just because they pay for the class. a professor started getting suspicious of another professor and enrolled a nonexistent student in his class. the fake student not only passed but did well on his final exams

harvard is a joke. hoohle it. CNN ran a article on higher education in which harvard and yale got called out on different things.

the writer didn't read the article
>hillary got less attention early on because the election in 2015 was in the bag
>only picked up when bernie "had a chance"
>about 50% of the "bad press" was fox news alone
this is literally nothing

>CNN is kind of fake neutral . They literally hired Lewandowski to shill for Trump

They also "literally hired" Van Jones to shill for Obama

They also "literally hired" James Carville to shill for Clinton.

>(((Shorenstein))) Center

Better luck next time my dude.

Used to be blue pilled and thought Republicans who complained about the liberal media were tin foil wearing crack pots.

Now I'm on the other side and I see what they mean. And it is depressing as shit.

>when you find out you can take the redpill any time but the bluepill comes along only once

>and just like Bernie's campaign
>there's no refunds.

A FUCKING LEAF

Whether that study is accurate or not its only talking about the results.

The media was Played by trump, they did not support trump.

They were goaded into tearing him down left front and center 24/7.

The effect this had, rather than making clinton look like a better choice... was more like a Celebrity Roast.

And it is destroying the faith the public has in the Media too.

So they're still getting ratings, but now the public is turning on cnn/fox/msnbc to grab some popcorn and LAUGH (not at trump, but at the BS the news keeps spinning).

Who's acting like a child now... the man, or the people throwing tomatoes at him.

...

Lewandowski is still receiving severance pay from Trump and is contractually obligated to not criticise Trump. Van Jones is liberal , but he criticises Obama sometimes.


CNN has 2 guys present their viewpoints and pretend to be neutral (even when one is lying or very incorrrect).

>(((harvard)))
>(((mediaite)))

ftfy

obviously neither of these organizations understand anything remotely close to "truth"

FOX is pro republican, which isn't the same as pro Trump. Trump hijacked the party with the aid of the voters.

CNN and MSNBC are practically part of the Clinton campaign. I wouldn't even consider them as news source but propaganda outlets.

NYT has fabricated a story to try to hurt Trump
WaPo have hired a team of a 100 reporters to dig into Trump's past, yet found nothing. Meanwhile they couldn't have been bothered to put one person to go through DNC mails.

All of the MSM collaborated in their tin foil conspiracy theory mongering that Trump is bought by Putin, while providing zero evidence to support this.

oy, veh! it's like anudda fire

Maybe Hillary had behavior that more people view negatively and she engages in such behaviors often enough to be notable.

>CNN is kind of fake neutral

CNN literally takes you off the air if you dare cite facts that don't shine Hillary in a positive light.

youtube.com/watch?v=5my7EJv42PU

And what would you know about how the media works, kike?

...

>Trump hijacked the party with the aid of the voters

This is called democracy.

> Trump is bought by Putin.

Just because Putin isnt paying him doesnt mean they cant be Friends.

Sheesh as if this is a bad thing. We need to be friends with russia.

Also much less likely to be discovered because no paper trail.

>Just because Putin isnt paying him doesnt mean they cant be Friends.

Lets have a fact based discussion here. Have Putin and Trump ever met?

>Sheesh as if this is a bad thing. We need to be friends with russia.
>need

When one breed of retards is replaced by another. You *need* to take care of your own interests. being on good terms with Russia benefits you, but it's nothing you can choose and it's has to be bilateral.

I doubt Russia and Russians see you as a friend.

I'm not believing that crock of shit for a second.

She's fucking TERRIFIED of an open press conference. Why would that be?

Not so much a shill as a rent boy.

they're arguing that because all the negative media on trump had a positive impact on his poll numbers it wasn't actually negative media

>My face when Hill shills are bombing the fuck out of Sup Forums
>My face when whenever they come to Sup Forums and start to get shut down, THAT is when one of the janitors on their payroll closes the thread.
You can't escape these fucking shills anywhere.

Well according to your own chart there the media positively covers clinton 2 to 1 over Trump.

Commies and libcuck jews took over our prestigious universities. Not kidding they are 50% jews now

ARE YOU FUGGING GIDDING ME >:DDDD

...

kek, I just turned on my CNN app on my phone and quite literally every headline is a negative slander article about Trump.

This couldn't be anymore untrue.

...

>Majority of people who are drawn to the arts lean left politically.
This saddens me deeply as an artist. Art is very closely linked to the foundations of western thought and is, in my opinion, a distant cousin of geometry and thereby mathematics. Watching it be co-opted by leftists and perverted as it has been is tragic.

(((Harvard))) study.

(((Social science)))

rare?

Fox was really warming up to Trump until Ailes stepped down, it's not so much pro Clinton but rather they just concern troll about Trump.

qualitative analysis slips pretty quickly into subjective judgment, not to mention the "negative coverage" probably just means certain keywords deemed "negative" were used. Like that meme comparing the Bible and Koran's use of certain words without considering the context.

HAHAHAHAHA YEAH OK. Go on google news, go on yahoo, go on WaPo, or the NYT, or the LATimes, or ABC, CBS, NBC, CNBC, MSNBC, MSN, AOL and tell me there's no bias against Trump. Most local stations are owned by ABC too.

But that's wrong, male iq curve is like the female curve shifted to the right

It's because starving artists want welfare so they can keep making shitty non-art and "messaging" the world. There are more of those than there are real artists making money from good art/porn.

>they're STILL trying to convince everyone they're rebels against the system

>percentage of coverage devoted to issues
>percentage of issue coverage negative in tone
So basically when the media does talk about Clinton's policies, they disagree with her? What about the other 72% of attention?

Not necessarily. Male IQ has more variation which means there's more male idiots but also more male geniuses compared to women.

This is it. Trump is finished. The full force of the honest, respectable press is coming out against this filthy barbarian.

Just look at the poll numbers. Trump is done. I'm not worried at all.

This is why social """"""sciences"""""" is nothing but politics disguised as objective truth.

Issues
Negative
Personal Life
Purely positive

are the major categories

most people who call themselves artists aren't anything remotely close to artists. so no worries. i believe amongst those who would legitimately be considered artists by, say the great master painters of the past, a majority would have conservative political views.

>tadema so you know i'm not a complete retard but sort of know what i'm talking about

isn't this cunt just as dangerous as one of those "the end is near!" idiots on the streats? I can't really take her seriously

Well, yeah

The media constantly talk about Trump and his latest antics, in a negative light mind you

...

>FOX is mostly pro-Clinton

There may never be a comment more disassociated with reality than this.

Schornstein means Chimney in german... coincidence?

>unironically believing this

hahah holy shit. Thanks for that. I haven't had a good laugh all day.

>28% positive for Clinton
>84% negative for Clinton

So I am to understand Clinton mysteriously gets 112% media coverage while Trump gets 55%?

This is a joke, right? It must be a joke. They are literally constantly bringing up Hitler all the time with Trump. That's probably equal to "Hillary Clinton lied before the FBI".
When they compare Shillary to Elizabeth Bathory (with explanations for the American audience) and attack her 24/7 like pic related (already posted, here: )
, yeah, then I will agree that they have an EQUAL bias.
But Hillary worse off in terms of bias? Pfff.

Anybody go to Caltech?

Whats it like?