Can you explain to me, without using the word nigger...

can you explain to me, without using the word nigger, how tiny countries like iceland and netherlands are rich and brazil with loads of people and resources is a shithole?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Zsh_b70NSFQ
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

negroes.

its a lot easier to manage a small monolithic country

nazis

They bleedin' nig nogs, innit?

Non-whites.

Corruption, gangs, and israel is right

porch monkeys

>without using the word nigger

fbpb as usual Sup Forums

Piccaninnies, Moon Crickets, and Antique Farm Equipment

>firdst bost pest bost

sreggin

More people, less for everybody, if Brazil was 50 milion you all be rich.

it's called white supremacy. germs guns and steel

Resource curse

Nordic climate requires spending entire spring/summer/ fall working ass off to survive winter. Over centuries, a culture of planning ahead and working hard developed. In South, historically, food was in abundance all year around, and supply greatly exceeded demand, so people didn't need to adapt to planning ahead. Now, the population changed drastically, while the culture remained.

Because we stole a bunch of stuff few centuries ago which made us rich and then we didn't fuck everything up because we're white. Basically we got a head start when we already had a head start because we're white and not black.

Damn it sucks being stupid and not white.

But we wuz in the past

The answer is bad colonization and [spoilers]Negos[/spoiler]

Genes, guns and steel

pretty sure the point of that book is no, it has nothing to do with race

Didn't your empire fell because of a women?

According to Jared Leto, because 10.000 years ago there was horses here and lamas there.

this book isn't taken seriously by anyone. Mental gymnastics: the book


no idea who you're talking about

Your last empress

We never had an empress m8. Maybe you're confusing with the daughder of Pedro II, who ended slavery

Unless you want to consider dilma one

>ebin
Being this retarded.

>are rich
You are dumb

Low IQ population.

youtube.com/watch?v=Zsh_b70NSFQ

It's LITERALLY that simple.

This
Its because smaller countries usually divert more resources to education, all the while being financially intelligent with their money. Usually these small countries take advantage of comparative advantage specialising in a trade. And a lot of times they don't have to worry about external/internal defense.

Larger, less developed, nations such as Brazil, have problems such as corruption, intellectual/capital flight, and subpar institutions. This leads to economic traps such as the middle income trap, in which a nation struggles to achieve upper income status.

>daughder of Pedro II
Yes that's the one, I though she did and then the monarchy was abolished.

You're a fucking dumbass if you honestly believe this.
No matter what race you're from, if you grow up in poverty you are bound to be less intelligent, especially if you are raised in a regressive culture with terrible institutions. Kill yourself disgusting sand niggers. Or go fuck some goat somewhere else.

>China lacked the necessary convoluted coastline for dissidents to hide out in
I haven't read his book but surely he doesn't try to make such a ridiculous claim.

The "refutation" to the first point is just completely wrong on such an unjustifiably stupid level it's astounding, it's like this guy has never looked at a map before.
>Europe is isolated from Central Asia by the Alps, the Urals, the Caucasus, the Russian Steppes, the Taiga and the Anatolian plateau
>No significant cultural exchanges took place between these regions until the 15th century
>Sub-Saharan Africa lies as close to the Fertile Crescent as Western Europe

Like what

The rest is mostly correct and has some good arguments but that first point is sporting some serious retarded arguments.

Not really supporting the book, but I read it a few years back and whoever wrote that rebuttal is fucking retarded and probably never read the book. 2, 3, and 4 are all dead wrong.

>2
GGaS implies that the Incan civilization was flourishing, yes, and following the same patterns that European ones, but about 1000 years behind, due to lack of crops.

>3
Beans, corn and squash are not actually all indigenous to the same part of America, and the three weren't united until after the birth of Christ

>4
>200 AD
>3,000 years after sandniggers were domesticating them


The real question you should be asking is why the Middle East is a shithole if it should be so perfect, geographically. (Hint: Islam)

>>China lacked the necessary convoluted coastline for dissidents to hide out in
This has to be a fucking joke

IQ

The Middle East and North Africa are shitholes because Islam was too good of a religion, if you think about the point at which Europe began to overtake the Muslim world in terms of technology and commerce, it's about the same time as the Catholic church was being challenged, in the Western Schism, the spread of Protestantism.

Islam is so monolithic, and has such a stranglehold on society that it has yet to have a significant reform on the level Christianity has. Of course there are these different Islamic sects, but Sunni Islam refuses to change the way Catholicism did, and now it's turning out in their favour.

Using turkroaches and poles for work and having all the whites working in the tertiare sector