Is allowing children to dress and act this way child abuse?

Is allowing children to dress and act this way child abuse?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/RcKEej9N8xw
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Of course it is and parents should be prosecuted for corrupting a minor

/thread

Nothing wrong with allowing damaged goods to be damaged goods.

This one wasn't. Bleh

No no, the child abuse is what happens to that boy at the late night pride parties after

Yes

yes.

It'll get its comeuppance.

And by that I mean it'll get cumupitsass.

allowing, no

forcing, yes

Wat a qt

Are drawings child abuse?

I'd imagine some form of abuse probably led to him being that way in the first place.

Maybe, but goddamn I wish my parents dressed me up like that

Allowing them to be transfreaks is child mental abuse.

>thinly veiled pedo thread

MODS

If that child is now to be considered a 'woman' than photographing it without a shirt on would be considered the production of child pornography for showing the bare, undeveloped breasts of a minor woman.

tl;dr - That is literally child porn if that thing or its parents identify it as a woman.

Can you at least dance like him?

youtu.be/RcKEej9N8xw

Nice

Gay parents should be allowed to raise their adopted kids anyway they like, as long as it's legal.

Pic related.

Who is this semen demon?

>no crazy hot milf living near you
Where do you even find this sex addicts?

>Brazil

Should have known

I guess this is child porn too

wtf are you allowed to kiss someone else's kid on the lips?

The real abuse is knowing he'll never drain my balls daily while I finger his little boi pussy

its not suggestive at all, horrific picture of agent orange

>Is allowing children to dress and act this way child abuse?

No, its pedophilia. On basis that any picture like this is soft core child porn.

Same. I'll never get to enjoy having my underage asshole being ravaged by monster pedo cocks. I have to live my life angry and frustrated.

No.. :(

See The dancing is more soft core than the pic

>Kek at the fat fuck pedo getting a raging hard on

I literally think in despair that I was never taken advantage of as a cute kid, I was abused but not in a fun way - god I'm a degenerate

They are gay and he is adopted. Unfortunately, they probably do more than just kiss him on the lips. Perfectly accepted by society.

How many cocks do you reckon that "boy" has sucked?

...

Lmao somewhere in Europe, right?

I prefer the Agent Jeb one.

REMINDER: This takes place in Brazil and people in North America would be outraged if this ever happened.

The main problem is that Brazil is the most morally corrupt place on the planet and not even your Olympians are safe from the drug gangs.

everyone here is a degenerate

this is a degenerate site

picture it's a napalm strike and the kids got really burned but survived.

I think sexualisation of children is child abuse. They're naive and inquisitive and teaching them that sexualising yourself is more import than play or learning more productive social interaction is destructive. It's also inviting other kinds of abuse.

That's purely disgusting. A faggot kissing a child on the lips. Does it get worse? Why do lgbt fags have to present themselves in such a way?

Every guy I know who was molested or raped as a kid ended up really kinky and horny, bottoms not tops, and they tend to enjoy rough sex

They're often carrying some emotional baggage but it's nowhere near as bad as most normal, non-raped girls, so you can totally deal with it

I want to fuck that boy into oblivion

Maybe it's a good thing then. The world needs slutty bottoms to milk semen from men.

Wish I had an emotionally damaged or shy slutty guy right now to fuck and break in

Traps are always emotionally damaged and willing to do anything to win the affection of men. I know this from experience.

So intolerant.

OK you guys --

isn't that the kid who won that makeover.

it's enabling

That's not a napalm strike you fucking retard.

If you find lesbians hot, you should kys

The look on her face tells me that she's realizing what a mistake this was.

Oh shit that's the kid that the Eternal Anglo shitposter used to post in here.

I would say likely no....
The image could in no way be considered sexually suggestive by any reasonable person. It is an account of the 'horrors of war' and its historical value and thought provoking nature likely outweigh its nudity. Think of it like the national geographic articles about the african tribes where women didnt have tops. None of that was considered pornography.