Tony

>Tony was right in Civil War
>Tony was right in Civil War II
>Tony was right in Vietnam
>Tony was right in Secret Wars
>Tony was right in Armor Wars
>Tony was right in Age of Ultron


How can one man be so based?

>Tony was wrong in Civil War
>Tony was wrong in Civil War II
>Tony was wrong in Vietnam
>Tony was wrong in Secret Wars
>Tony was wrong in Armor Wars
>Tony was wrong in Age of Ultron
Ftfy

>Tony was right in Civil War II
No he fucking isn't. The dude refuses to use Ulysses' intel at all. If it were up to him, Thanos would have attacked Project Pegasus and done whatever the fuck he wants for the 20 minutes it would take heroes to get there.
This has nothing to do with the Minority Report situation, he doesn't want to use precognition for anything at all, for no reason other than CHANGING THE FUTURE IS BAD.

Did a little fat bald man who has a fetish over black men wrote this page?

A little fat bald man?

...

Isn't he a futurist? Isn't his whole thing change it for the better or anticipate it or some shit?

Being a member of the illuminati makes him a hypocrite

>Tony was right in Civil War

Yeah he's clearly unaccountable for that Skull Invasion or that Osborn takeover.

Of course he was right, that's why they wrote him as the villain.

How was Tony right in Vietnam? Other than the fact that Stark probably made a pretty penny

>Tony was right in Civil War II

I think the funniest part of this page is that they recycled panel that makes it looks like Strange just lost his left palm five times.

A large part of magic is sacrifice and making deals. Sometimes those deals just so happen to involve loaning the Dread Ceolun of Faranta your left hand for five minutes every other Wednesday.

I think you meant to say "biased"

>Cyclops was right
>Magneto was right
FTFY.

He cant know the actions taken by using Ulysses information won't result in a worse outcome.
Using information before it happens DOES become a slippery slope and becomes impossible to draw a line of what is acceptable and what isnt.

>He cant know the actions taken by using Ulysses information won't result in a worse outcome.
That's fucking bullshit logic. You never know if anything you do will have a bad outcome.
And is there a worse outcome than "Celestial Destroyer devestates the world" or "Thanos kills everyone in Project Pegaus and gets his hands on ISO-8"?
Just because War Machine happened to die fighting Thanos doesn't mean that stopping Thanos wasn't the right thing to do.

I think tony is worried carol will go down the same path he did in the last civil war and is trying to stop that

Idea: A Dr Strange comic where the main antagonist has sacrificed his poses in exchange for power. Every time he's on-panel he's drawn in the exact sane position, Inferno Cop-style.

So he's worried that Carol will act on threats before they happen and become a fascist, so he's acting against her before it happens.
Isn't that a tad hypocritical?

>becomes impossible to draw a line of what is acceptable and what isnt
I'm pretty sure evacuating before an earthquake or making preparations to fight a Giant Alien Robot and Thanos are acceptable.

It's not hypocritical when you're right.

Objectively, how much a person tends to be right is inversely proportional to how well he's received/seen by the public and how much forgiveness they grant him for his punctual errors.
This happens in both reality and fiction.

Oh no, it's Captain Nolegs McGiantDick!

Yes. A little bald fat man. Named Bendis.

This. It's litterally impossible to be as wrong as this guy.

Back to irrelevancy with you, Quire.