W-was capitalism a mistake?

W-was capitalism a mistake?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=NuAUUF-Ejys
globalresearch.ca/winning-the-war-of-the-world/5375649
blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/01/what-oxfam-wont-tell-you-about-capitalism-and-poverty/
forbes.com/sites/objectivist/2011/06/14/when-it-comes-to-wealth-creation-there-is-no-pie/
libertyzone.com/Communist-Manifesto-Planks.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Yes. Revolt now!

Irresponsible and underregulated capitalism was the mistake.

yes, turn in your smart phone and pc now comrade

I deserve free money!

their wealth is only on paper.

Because if the rich didn't get richer, the poor would somehow magically get that money?

Stop taking drugs son.

No, globalism was.

How long can the media keep complaining about the disparity of wealth while conveniently ignoring the fact that they're all Jews?

No it isnt.
Lets be honest most of us world rather be deas than red

>Forgetting that half of the world population is niggers, Poo in Loos, South East Asians and other poor and lazy bastards

half the world is the equivalent of a chinese rice farmer or an african aids patient

No. Corpratism was.

>can I be payed $15 an hour?
>oy vey why do you want to be payed $12.5 an hour
>oh Yahweh, I couldn't possibly pay $10 an hour
>OFFICER HELP ME IT'S ANOTHER SHOAH, EMPLOYEE IS TRYING TO ROB ME OF $8 AN HOUR

It's more like if the rich weren't so obsessed with squeezing as much labor for the least amount of money possible instead of treating workers like human beings, wealth inequality wouldn't be so bad and our economy would be a shit ton better.

Cuck.

it's not capitalism. it's called free trade and it has been the way of the world for over 4000 years, and the natural choice of any community from japan to spain.

anything other than it is an experiment and it can only be achieved through propaganda, brainwashing and/or foreign support.

>thinks this is capitalism
Kek.

this

>Greece speaking the truth in modern times
Is this end of the world ?

Until the conditioning is broken for the general populace, and we stop fighting among ourselves and unite against the ones exploiting us.

ironically half the worlds population are dirt poor chink farmers, pakis, or african dindus who own little more than a tooth brush

add that up to around 3 billion ppl x 3$, and you'll get around 10 billion $ value

nah going off the gold exchange
and what the kiwi said

No, the mistake was and is Free Trade which allows the abuse of globalism.

"Freedom means no accountability to human and world life, while competition means competing to externalize all costs onto the lives of citizens and environments."

"The nations of the world are all ‘restructured’ to be subordinate functions to the supreme moral goal of transforming humanity and the world into ever more private commodities and profits. Society itself s does not exist to this ruling value mechanism. Its logic of growth is totalitarian and malignant to the marrow. More precisely, deregulated global corporate money sequences abolish by treaties and wars all barriers whatever to their free multiplying growth through all that exists whatever the destruction of natural and social life support systems."

youtube.com/watch?v=NuAUUF-Ejys
globalresearch.ca/winning-the-war-of-the-world/5375649

letting the bank merchants on the loose was a mistake

>(((capitalism)))
>(((communism)))
>false dychotomy
private property and free enterprise is what drives prosperity
which is why national interests and central banking must be directly controlled under the threat of violence by an army, commanded by a loyal nationalist

YOU DIDN'T LISTEN

I WHAREND YOO

The wealth of the poorest is being spread more thinly? Bullshit. Also
>implying there's a limited amount of wealth in the world
Also again
>world's poorest
Way to count two billion dirt farmers in Afrcia and Asia in the same category as middle class Americans

Cool source OP. Oh wait there isn't one.

Oy vey goyim how dare you press the job creators! How are they gonna buy a seventh yacht for their son Hershel? It's anudda shoah. Don't you know the goyim benefit when the job creators earn another billion by paying 50 cents an hour? The wealth will trickle down goy vote republican

>Africans, Asians and South Americans breed like rabbits
>Skew the statistics to make the rich look even richer
>Globalism allowed companies and rich people opportunities to make profit on an even bigger scale as tariffs went down and trade barriers fell
>Surprised when they get filthy rich

The biggest problem isn't "income inequality" its in purchasing power. House prices have rose and rose and rose starting in the 50s, but the quality of life rose along with it until the early 90s. After that the price of housing and other big purchases has continued to rise relative to the median wage at bigger and bigger rates.

The largest problem facing people today is that while the cost of living itself: Food, Utilities, Clothing etc. hasn't really changed that much, the cost of rent and purchasing of housing has gotten ridiculously high. Socialists see rich people as some kind of demon and get super angry that the government aren't stepping in and taking all the rich folk's money to pay for their homes and cars, whereas they should be attacking the system itself for causing the continued rise in property, land and car costs which put them at such as disadvantage compared to their parents.

This is another reason why people hate boomers so much but for the wrong reasons, you shouldn't hate your fore-bearers because they got houses and jobs on the cheap, you should be hating globalism for the fact you can't.

tl;dr

Globalism is the problem, richer and richer "1%" is a symptom. If you advocate the redistribution of wealth you are a pinko and deserve to get thrown out of a chopper

>No. Corpratism was.

Free market and "corporatocracy" are capitalism.
Freedom to compete means freedom to limit the freedom of others via competition.

We need states, governments and unions to regulate the market to make sure that competition stays fair. The lack of regulation and transparency is what has caused the so called "corporatocracy" where Mega corporations can manipulate the politicians in number of ways.

NO YOU COMMUNIST PIGS!

>buy low, sell high
There's no way this system can fail.

Also don't forget it's not true capitalism, true capitalism has never been tried

>these articles always forget to mention those 62 people are all kikes

:(

Democracy is a mob-rule scam anyway. These fuckers should just declare themselves as monarchs and get it over with already.

>Wahhh some people make more money than me wahhh

Grow up.

>Own the same wealth as 4 billion shitskins
>Somehow impressive

>oy vey i deserve free stuff for breathing!
get a load of this goy.

>hurr durr let's give everything to the jews
Gold standard is pants on head retarded

>Oxfam is once again misleading everyone with its punchy wealth inequality stats By Oxfam’s measures, the poorest people in the world are recent Harvard graduates with student debt piles. The bottom 2bn don’t have zero wealth, but rather about $500bn of negative wealth. The poorest person in the world is richer than the next 30pc put together. Having negative wealth may actually be a sign of prosperity, since only people with prospects can secure loans. But there is a bigger issue with the narrative: more meaningful measures show greater equality. Those in the middle and bottom of the world income distribution have all got pay rises of around 40% between 1988-2008. Global inequality of life expectancy and height are narrowing too – showing better nutrition and better healthcare where it matters most. What we should care about is the welfare of the poor, not the wealth of the rich.

blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/01/what-oxfam-wont-tell-you-about-capitalism-and-poverty/

Now fuck off

>In other news, scientists are still trying to figure out why 3 billion mudhuts are worth less than a single iphone.

Its jude.

JUDE
U
D
E

The medieval mind at work

Wealth isn't a limited resource. The rich being richer doesn't automatically make the poor poorer

>Yes goyim being indebted to me for a million dollars is a sign of prosperity!
kys shlomo

Who are those people? If Jesus was the richest man on the planet and used his fortune to help the lower classes, people would still complain that he owns a disproportionate amount of wealth compared to everyone else.

>wealth isn't a limited resource
>not understanding basic economics

forbes.com/sites/objectivist/2011/06/14/when-it-comes-to-wealth-creation-there-is-no-pie/

>highest edumucation: hs diploma

Do people really not understand how wealth creation works in a capitalist system?

Bail outs isn't capitalism.

Why would you ask me that question rather than explaining it as a rebuttal? Is it because you don't know so you deflect?

Sorry m8, I'm not here to educate you on rudimentary shit that you should've learned in your first econ class.

I do
>Create money out of nothing
>lend it out to goys
>Increase interest
>take their shit
>force them to pay back on loan they created out of nothing
>get to keep goy house
>give the bill to the tax payer
This is how it works, at least if you are the 1%

Being over concerned with shit like the GINI index is based off the faulty assumption that wealth is static. THAT is econ 101

What's the alternative? A perverse form of capitalism that pretends it's not?

You are using GINI index completely out of context, how in any way does it imply that wealth is static? Holy fuck..

I didn't say that the measure itself is based off that assumption, I said that people treating wealth dispersion like it's the number one criterion we should judge a society by is nonsense.

I don't see how that backs up making the statement that wealth isn't a limited resource. Valuable resources are limited on this Earth, you may be able to print more money but you can't print more gold to put it in reductionist terms.

There are other things then gold. You can build or make something from scratch that is worth a lot more then then the crap you built it from. Then you are creating wealth.

I don't know where you've been these past few years, but we have a company called Space-X that plans on using rocket ships to mine resources from nearby astroids. By the time we exhaust this planet's natural wealth we'll be deep in space mining rocks orbiting our planet. We're likely to die off as a species before we get to the point where we've completely depleted all options.

Also, theoretical wealth's tie to actual material goods is somewhat tenuous.

There is literally nothing wrong with wealth inequality whatsoever.

The Gini coefficient is a propaganda technique.

The Independent is edited by a street shitter and all its journalists are aggressive marxist millennial leftists.

Honestly I think they should settle this presidency with trial by combat. No weapons, just fists etc.

No, globalism is a mistake.

Never allow foreigners to own anything in your country, problem solved.

Is this a real quote? God help us.

Do you know how many goods are created by using resources from all around the globe? No globalism = no computers. Or at the very least much more expensive computers.

Half of the world's population lives in the slums of China, India and Africa. I probably have more personal wealth than a hundred villages combined.

Stop posting this shit every day.

Sage

Because all these people live in capitalist countries I hear.

>(((62)))
No but I know the real problem.

Until you run out of the raw materials needed to craft whatever it is your building, then what? Wealth is limited.

Really grabbing for straws now, aren't we?

Implying you can't build shit from renewable resources.

Free markets were a mistake

Those statistics are kind of crap. The former richest man in Brazil would probably be considered the poorest man in the world, since his wealth is minus a few bilion dollars.

And he is a guy that flies on private jets, eats in the best restaurants and so on.

Wealth is 'things' in the beginning there was no things, just random resources which were later turned into things thus wealth was created as it will continue to be.

>wealth is finite
Idiot.

capitalism is the dictatorship of the coin, the god of the eternal anglo

No, obviously those 62 people work just as hard as 3.5 billion people, ya pinko commie faggot!

How so?
What would a sensible regulation of the market be?

I wouldn't mind a huge wage and savings gap if this was the case. If you employ someone full time, and don't allow them to work elsewhere, you are entering a social contract with the individual to provide services for their labour.

If a worker is on benefits etc or cannot afford to live on your wages alone (by live I mean feed himself, pay for shelter, and have a little extra to do the same quantity (re not quality) of recreation as you) your social contract with them is void and they are well within natural law to take it from you.

>(((anglo)))

Yes

>USA and europe meet every plank of the communist manifesto
>IT'S DA FREE MARKET I SWEAR
Subversive/10

libertyzone.com/Communist-Manifesto-Planks.html

>the 1%

Define the 1%.. Is the current 1% the same as last year?

its far more important what they do with they money, not how much they got of it

>If someone doesn't habe shit hes entitled to your shit

That's not what America was built on, user.. Or any free society for that matter.

if you have a mortgage or went to college you are in the bottom 30% bellow all the niggers of Africa. It's just clickbait

Its not really the 1% its owns more then half of the world combined, its like

It's wealth, not income. It doesn't mean shit, the people with the least wealth on earth are making hundreds of millions a year.

>Some people hold an unnecessary amount of an artificial representation of wealth and I dont wahhh

>I got a $3 per hour raise
>someone else got a $5 per hour raise
>leftists will claim I got poorer