Now I'm pretty fucking red pilled on most topics

Now I'm pretty fucking red pilled on most topics.
>feminism
>blm
>us politics
>eu politics
>so on

But I never understood holocaust denials. I have always hated that term, seeing as skepticism shouldn't be demonized and other genocides are allowed to be ignored or questioned and other more evil world leaders are allowed to be forgiven and idolized, but I never understood why people said it was fake

Then I saw this image

And then I looked up zikon b and how it was used for delousing

And how 1 million jews move to america and 5 million to isreal

And then I read a Jewish guy demanding that people stop perpetuating the myth.

So is it real? Its obviously hard to find relevant debunking websites and shit because it get hidden. And it seems like a dead horse that people have no more reason to beat. I mean it has 0 relevance other than calling people you don't like nazis

Other urls found in this thread:

rodoh.info/forum/
holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/
holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=28
youtube.com/watch?v=VUjRIcgtz2Y
youtube.com/watch?v=B17KKZsJHpI
youtube.com/watch?v=7dxsVSzL4HE
youtube.com/watch?v=Apvg99bVCro
holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.co.at/2006/04/quick-links.html
thefreethoughtproject.com/director-cia-stratospheric-aerosol-injection/
youtube.com/watch?v=QlBA2zp992c
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nazi_concentration_camps
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warsaw_concentration_camp#Death_in_KL_Warschau
youtube.com/watch?v=47rbRNSGQUs
virginiacremate.com/frequently-asked-cremation-questions
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

If Sup Forums has taught me anything. the holocaust is the best thing that never happened.

I love those debunking images
no sources, just random ms paint edits, and yet autists will read it and say "at last I truly see" and save it despite its obvious illegitimacy

Really sad

I'll get some staged propaganda pics from a group notorious for lying to its populace and use that as my evidence that a death camp was happy fun times. It fucking hurts my head that stormfags can be this fucking dump, Im all for criticizing history but you delegitimize the cause so much by falling for such shit as this

I spent about 2 hours yesterday reading some holocaust debate forums and holocaust related websites.

It's a complete rabbit hole and you could spend your entire life researching this shit and it would still look vague and unclear.

rodoh.info/forum/
This is the premier holocaust debate forum I guess.

holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/
This is a blog by some of the most prominent holocaust believers that supposedly debunk holocaust denier shit

BUT THERE ARE ALSO HOLOCAUST REVISIONIST BOOKS THAT ATTEMPT TO DEBUNK THEIR FUCKING BLOGS
holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=28
>Carlo Mattogno, Jürgen Graf, Thomas Kues: The “Extermination Camps” of “Aktion Reinhardt”—An Analysis and Refutation of Factitious “Evidence,” Deceptions and Flawed Argumentation of the “Holocaust Controversies” Bloggers
A literal book debunking holocaust believer arguments... and its 1396 pages long.

Don't bother with this shit OP. Its a rabbit hole that you will never get out of.

These are published works, taken as factual recollections of Nazi death camps.

If you question the legitimacy of the sources, then you can check yourself using google book preview.

"ooh look the fucking NAZIS called it a working camp not an extermination camp on their offical documents haha see that shows it was actually just like a normal prison haha the nazis totally wouldn't try to obscure the truth, its not like they didn't even tell their own people what was even going on haha dont be crazy this is proof I made it in MS paint"

a few sketchy stories written by old farts totally bears the same weight as a far greater number of accounts that coincide with countless supporting accounts and other evidence.

Fucking take your confirmation bias off

>confirmation bias off

"Confirmation bias, also called confirmatory bias or myside bias, is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses, while giving disproportionately less consideration to alternative possibilities"

The more I hear about "The holocaust" the less believable it sounds. Notice that holocaust believers can never hold a debate without calling the Holocaust denier names. 100%

This is the other thing I don't understand... there's this huge taboo against questions about the event. People like you will scream "how stupid could you be? Any proof to the contrary is false!!"

I mean those chambers are actually delousing chambers undeniably. Zykon b was invented as a pesticide. Even eli wisel never mentioned gas chambers.

Now I'm not saying I don't think anything happened, but I'm curious to what really happened.

>Don't bother with this shit OP. Its a rabbit hole that you will never get out of.
This is the true redpill. It doesn't really matter at this point, just make sure to exterminate (((them))) for real next time, just to be sure. And inb4 there will not be a next time, they have made enemies of everyone everywhere since forever. It's only a matter of time.

...

If a fucking old japanese soldier came out as saying "the hiroshima nuke was acutally 20 nukes at they all made us explode" then that doesn't somehow mean it can't have happened at all due to his crazy version of the story.

Poor recounts from a small outlier exaggerating the truth because they crave pitty/attention =/= evidence against the event

You have been convinced by a few shitty infographics of dubious origin and now you see the entire event as being bogus

i'm not saying we shouldnt question the event, but all the """"evidence""""" i've seen is about as legitimate looking as chemtrails

>I love debunking those images
>Proceeds to not debunk the images
I guess you don't love it that much.

Because literary holocaust believers only argument is "are you crazy" over and over again

youtube.com/watch?v=VUjRIcgtz2Y

>PUTTING EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS FIRST BEFORE ACTUAL EVIDENCE

WHY ARE PEOPLE SO FUCKING STUPID?

did you even read my word order moron
>I love those debunking images
'those debunking images' =/= 'debunking those images'

10/10 strawman

I'm redpilled
>feminism
>blm
>us
>eu

Buddy you are a regulation gogogadget investigator
congratulations

what about the far far far greater number of accounts being for the hollocaust and its scale?

youtube.com/watch?v=B17KKZsJHpI

please for the love of god dedicate 1 hour out of your life to david irving.

>You have been convinced by a few shitty infographics of dubious origin and now you see the entire event as being bogus
Sorry nigga but there is more to holocaust denial than shitty ms paint pics. I learned this shit the hard way yesterday.

>And then I looked up zikon b and how it was used for delousing

...and?

>And how 1 million jews move to america and 5 million to isreal

[citation needed]

Britain told jews to REEEEE fuck off dont enter muh British Mandate of Palestine

>And then I read a Jewish guy demanding that people stop perpetuating the myth.

ooh, that settles it then. If a Jew says the holocaust didnt happen, whelp, who are we goyim to say otherwise, right?

But there would be a difference if america droped 2 bombs to end a war, or 20 nukes to destroy an entire country

If these deaths were caused by typhoid or starvation due to ally cuts of supply lines instead of torture and a dream of eradication it should be talked about.

People in europe treat the word "right wing" like it's a disease all because a left leaning war monger was accused of trying to remove a religious group fron the world.

the combined content against the holocaust I have seen in my 4 years here + all I have ever read does not even compare to the accounts and evidence for it.
Its like a judge in court only listening to the prosecutions shitty case and being convinced

That wasn't the point I was making, I was saying that because a couple of jews falsify the normal narrative and make it sound more dramatic, it does not act as evidence to disprove the event as a whole

david irving?

who is that guy?

a historian?

ok.

please show me the university where he got his history degree.

what's that? he doesn't even hold a degree in anything? so why should I waste my time listening to the ramblings of a non-scholar? a literal dudebro next door?

...

Did actual historians bothered with holocaust deniers yet, or is it still just Nizkor that does the fact-checking?

They did clash with them during the Zundel trial in the 80s and the Irving-Lipstadt trial in the 90s.

Michael Shermer for example is a historian who debated them many times.

That's how all Jewish lies work man. They take truth "Jews died in ww2 in large numbers because Hitler hated them". And then stretch the truth "6 shillion died and were turned into soap and lampshades".

If you accuse them of lieing they just repeat things over and over until it's "true". Look at anything the media sensationalizes for a reference.

Holy fuck German-bro, your so cucked. You live in a country where if you go outside and speak the truth about what happened during WW2, you'll be thrown in jail. In other countries your life will be ruined by being fired and publicly shamed. Not a single Jew was gassed during WW2.

youtube.com/watch?v=7dxsVSzL4HE

There are people that have devoted their entire lives to researching this shit and debunking other debunkings and reading books and books debunking other books and some of those people still come out as revisionists in the end.

In my "research" yesterday I found this guy
youtube.com/watch?v=Apvg99bVCro

This stuff is at the point where people on the same side of the argument have to argue even against each other because of minute details that make a big difference in the end. The guy in the video has a post where he argues against some other revisionist or some shit and it gets kind of nasty.

And I saw another video where Germar Rudof says that the French guy Jean-Claude Pressac only faked switching to the believer side so he could be a mole for the revisionists. He even says that once Pressac made his death numbers lower and lower the believers had to stop associating with him because it was getting to the point where his research was proving the revisionists right.

This is all way too complicated.

This. The holocaust is something that should have been done but unfortunately wasn't done.

This picture is funny because it actually doesn't show some of the most major extermination camps. (Like Warsaw etc.)

Holocaust denial has it's roots in the fact that many depections of what actually happened in the camps were fabricated. They killed millions upon millions in various ways, but the fact that some jews who survived just flat out made shit up in books/interviews triggered the conspiracy theorists, and now we will never fucking hear the end of it from conspiracy theorists and Stormfront types.

Another key component in holocaust denial is plain antisemitism - people who hate jews will jump on any bandwagon they can to discredit or undermine their narrative. The holocaust was used as a reason for a lot of the western powers to support Israel post ww2 - "these people need their own nation so they don't get genocided" is a pretty common belief.

tl;dr it's mostly stormfront autism

fun fact: if I go outside and raise my right hand in a 45° angle or say heil hitler or display a swastiks or the SS runes, I will be arrested as well. So maybe, just maybe, it isnt just about the holocaust.

Funny you brought up "Dean Irebodd" or Denierbud's One third of the holocaust video. The whole thing is like... hours, right? Well each part is refuted by historians in this blog:

holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.co.at/2006/04/quick-links.html

(scroll down to Rebuttals of specific "One Third of the Holocaust" clips)

have fun. might take a couple days worth of reading. but you truth seekers are determined, right to get to the bottom of the barrel, right?

Like I said, its vital to question the event and find out its actual extent. Most shits here look at some crappy thrown together dribble with as much legitimacy as a tumblr post and use that to debunk the event as a whole.

That acts against deniers interests because it makes them seem like dumb tinfoil hats as opposed to people in a meaningful discussion

case and point, who made this image? where is the fact checking, who has gone to "www.historyplace.com" some guy could have photoshopped that in his free time "inspeced by us"? who? when?

please stop trolling.

>> but the fact that some jews who survived just flat out made shit up in books/interviews triggered the conspiracy theorists, and now we will never fucking hear the end of it from conspiracy theorists and Stormfront types.
exactly

>there are actually people who think 660+ people were killed and cremated in Auschwitz every single day for 54 months

I found out the holocaust did not happen before I hated the Jews.

>1997.
The source is already dead. However you can fact check concentration camp locations and whether the West or the Soviets inspected each camp easily through a google search. The information isn't hidden.

?

Why import Jews instead of killing them locally? Why waste those resources?
Where do you get the energy to burn 6+ million people and fight a large war?

Well aren't you the village idiot, since chemtrails are real
thefreethoughtproject.com/director-cia-stratospheric-aerosol-injection/

Shame... Shermer is a specialist on people believing weird shit, not on WW2 history.

and that doesnt make sense because...?

>>West or the Soviets inspected each camp easily through a google search
sooo? what does that prove? even if they were all claimed to be death camps, when was that? it can merely be misinformation and speculation early on when there was little information

No matter how brainwashed a population, knowing your neighbors are getting massacred down the road doesn't sit right with most people. It was beneficial to keep it out of the way of the population. being told they were being 'relocated' was an easy pill to swallow

oh boy

youtube.com/watch?v=QlBA2zp992c

Because I actually know how crematoriums work.

- Mauthausen is a "western camp"
- Mauthausen has a gas chamber
- Several thousand jews were killed in Mauthausen's gas chamber, though the camp's total toll is about 100,000

there goes your theory that nobody was gassed in the western camps

The Soviets spread a lot of propaganda about the Nazis after the war. Jew skin lampshades and Jew fat soap were both Soviet lies.

the Warsaw ghetto was not an extermination camp. The ghetto was liquidated and its jews were shipped per train into Auschwitz and the Aktion Reinhardt camps, and thats where they were killed en masse. The warsaw ghetto uprising claimed I think only some 10,000 lives

Unless rich and powerful people magicly don't breath air, then chemtrails would affect them too.

Shermer is a specialist on people believing weird shit. Holocaust deniers are people believing weird shit. Ergo he studies them as head of skeptic society.

Jewish kiwi please leave this thread all you do is defend them and shitpost without actually answering anything

ok? so thet may be? People made up stories in a massive 6 year war, big fucking surprise
Now what? it makes sense to anyone the death camps would be in the east away from the German populous. I am not seeing a connection between that image and no death camps

>by checking how long modern civilian crematories cremation 1 person at a time inside a wooden coffin and observing all safety protocols take to cremate 1 body.

...

you'd like that wouldn't you
Opposing viewpoints don't fit the blinder-on circlejerk that is Sup Forums

They made up stories and the Jewish population barely budged after half their population was supposedly killed. It's almost like they fought and died like everyone else.

[citation needed]

my god this is fascinating to watch
How can you honestly jump between these conclusions
what do you mean barely budged? Where is the evidence of what you are saying?

Yeah okay chief, you keep believing that hundreds of corpses could be burned to ash so fine it was dispersed to an unidentifiable state every single day for almost five years with no mistakes without changing the soil composition of the surrounding countryside in any significant manner.

Show me evidence that the Jewish population dropped by even a million post WW2 instead of playing devil's advocate.

please show proof where it says the nazis dispersed ash in the surrounding countryside and that all possible dumping grounds had their soil independently tested

Im not letting you people just make claims and get away with it

Auschwitz's ashes were dumped into the Vistula. Coincidentally, there is a river near Treblinka too.

And just for the record, Auschwitz had 15 ovens (3 in Krema I, 5 in Krema II, 5 in Krema II, 1 in Krema IV and 1 in Krema 5). The total amount of muffles were 52. 2 bodies can easily fit in 1 muffle, and you can squeeze that of a child's or 2 babies in as well.

>please show proof where it says the nazis dispersed ash in the surrounding countryside

Do you even fucking understand what a chimney is? Do you have some kind of learning disability? I guess you just think the ashes stayed in the fucking crematorium oven right?

>australia

Yeah and I'm sure you think they were trucked in, gassed, and cremated in less than 12 hours too.

are you fucking for real? when you burn a corpse, do you honestly think it all evaporates away? what we call ash is what is left behind numb-nut

>australia
try new zealand idiot, but education is not the USAs strong point so i'll let it slide

HURRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

Given that over a thousand people fit in Krematorium II's gas chamber (Krema III had identical layout), I would say if all corpses of the chamber were cremated in Krema II's ovens only, then 5 ovens with 3 muffles each = 15 muffles. Stuff 2 adult + 2 infant corpses in = 60 corpses in all muffles at a time. Fire em up, lets say it takes 1 hour for the content of the muffle to be cremated = 1440 corpses a day.

oh look. I even have it on paper.

> and you can squeeze that of a child's or 2 babies in as well
Dunno why but I find this statement somehow funny.

>(((Wikipedia)))

Oh sorry I can't tell the different between your shitposter flags. Congratulations you figured out my point in the first place. There's no proof of soil composition differences. No soil samples, no proof that this shit ever happened other than the coerced testimony of some guards.

So if they were all being murdered and burned without a day of arriving how exactly do you account for these mysterious Auschwitz survivors?

you should look for people with no degree, the smartest ones are those who dropped out of high school and study for themselves. if you're really from austria, please kill yourself. you are a pity of the true existence of an austrian. fucking kike lover.

gassings had largely stopped by fall 1944. Krematorium IV was destroyed in the Sonderkommando uprising on October 7th (theres a nice film about it too, called The Grey Zone, watch it). Auschwitz was liberated by the russians on January 27th, 1945. Do the math, smart guy. The Auschwitz survivors are mostly the last batch that arrived. A camp that could house over 100,000 people at a time, you have a couple thousand survivors? Thats a 90% kill rate

you ///actually/// though ash was what left the chimneys ahahah give me a fucking break. i'll remember that one next time my friends are talking about dumb Americans

>There's no proof of soil composition differences. No soil samples,
you just ignored my point, the ash WAS left behind, the nazis could put that where ever they wanted, who said they put it in the soil? What leaves in a chimney is by nature at least as dense as air so it just mixes with the atmosphere like any smoke you thick fuck

beause you are a ebil nazi

full link please. Or did you crop it that way on purpose?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nazi_concentration_camps

It's a bit more complicated:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warsaw_concentration_camp#Death_in_KL_Warschau

Not that guy, but what do you consider "evidence"? Census data?

census data itself is unreliable as by the time Europe had done censuses post war, there would have been people movements to such a degree that it wouldn't be representative, eg jews leaving for Israel that was founded 1948, just 3 years after the wars end

>Show me evidence that the Jewish population dropped by even a million post WW2

funny you ask, because the dumb denier who made pic related was stupid enough to include the plummet of world jewish polulation in his graph. he really was so stupid that he probably left it there on purpose because it happened after ww2, which to him, is absurd.

the graph is taken from almanac data

also not everyone measured jew the same in different places and times

The first Jewish census data is from 45-46. Also. Israel isn't a black hole, they had censuses as well.

israel had their first census in 1948 and the next one was 15 years or so later, and the census was in the middle of a war. Like I said, census data in europe just post war was unreliable but thats not to say you can't cobble together an OK estimate - which pretty much everyone agrees shows a huge drop around 46-48 when data was becoming available

State of the art crematoria with the most efficient ovens in the world today need 4 hours to turn 1 body into ashes.
Math is reality, it would take too long to burn 6 million Jewish corpses in the 5 years of concentration camping. This doesn't even take the other 4-6 million civilians who weren't Jewish into account. Never hear about those eh...

The counterargument is that the dead Jews are buried at the camps, so let's dig them up.
>not allowed
Okay, let's use ground-penetrating radar.
>find untouched soil
Fine then, what is it based on.
>stories from survivors (insufficient as evidence in most criminal investigations because it's not empirical data)
>visits to all Allied-liberated camps show lack of ovens
>camps behind the iron curtain were never investigated by the West
>they relied on Soviet propaganda meant for the Soviet people for their conclusions
>Soviet trustworthiness demolished in recent years by dna sampling of Hitler's skull showing it to be a woman's skull

Oy fucking vey.

I had time one summer and did a lot of research, ordered some books.

I was not entirely convinced but holocaust "deniers' weren't neonazis they presented some well thought out scientific arguments in well written books.

I was still not convinced until I was presented with some sort of infograph that "proved the holocaust" I did a little research and saw this
archelogical dig
youtube.com/watch?v=47rbRNSGQUs

Now I know the holocaust didn't happen

"In a civilian crematorium, based on laws and out of respect for the dead and their families, each body must be cremated individually so the ashes can be collected and returned to the family.
The civilian crematorium oven is heated up and cooled down for each cremation and is cleaned out after each use. The body is usually burned together with a coffin or some kind of container, which lengthens the time required to complete the process. On the average it takes between one and two hours for each cremation depending on the oven and the remains being cremated'

"The men who worked in the Sonderkommandos quickly learned how to combine the bodies of fat people, skeletal 'Muselmänner' and children to achieve maximum results (that is, more bodies could be burned in less time).
Once the first bodies started to burn they just kept putting more bodies in to keep the fires hot. The result was continuous operation at very high efficiency in which very little fuel was needed to keep the process going for hours or days."


see

>State of the art crematoria with the most efficient ovens in the world today need 4 hours to turn 1 body into ashes.

This is why nobody takes you people seriously. You can't even get your strawman right. A modern crematorium, which works nothing like the crematoria in the camps, does NOT take 4 hours to cremate the body. You'd know this if you even did the tiniest amount of research (e.g. reading a website of a crematory)

virginiacremate.com/frequently-asked-cremation-questions

kek, nz literally ignoring all teh burger points and continues to be a brown ignorant shitposter
nice job

>not available in my country

what points? the fact that the "ash" all magically floats into the air and then is deposited over the ground? to which I said literally defies science and there is no evidence that says they spread it manually either

then explain me the 80-90s decline? 2nd holocaust confirmed?
0.01 (((eur))) added to your bank account

this one's pretty simple and impossible to deny.

>read up on the topic of historiography: the study of how history is written and shaped according to literature (usually with an emphasis on academia).

>Check then double-check that there are writers of history, examiners of said history, re-examiners multiplied by x, and see that there is always a new interpretation or focus every decade or two in scholarship. almost every major subject.

>now go and see if there has been any historical re-examination or revisionism of the holocaust.

>Then question why LITERALLY every other subject can be questioned except for one.

>Then ask yourself why won't the authorities that be let alone corroborate their sources? Or be able to access the "smoking gun" evidence from nuremberg.

>Then ask yourself "why is it illegal to question this one facet of history?"

That is suspicious, IMO.

I don't deny it happened, I do however doubt the intentionality and the (((official))) numbers.

Can't seem to find The Jager Report on your site.
You should add it.

welp.

I just want the math. How big the ovens and chambers were.

Bodies burned and gassed per day etc.. and then that mathematically adding up to the 10 million mark?

With of course all the other camps that didn't have gas chambers added on.

I don't care either way but nobody has shown me the math.

When jews say "oy vey your antisemitism is like anotha shoah!" They are actually speaking literally.