Trump: "If we have Nuclear Weapons why can't we use them?"

>During a foreign policy briefing, Donald Trump asked 3 times "if we have nuclear weapons why can't we use them?"
>snappytv.com/tc/2505781/1297868 (starts around 0:50)

This man is no longer a meme candidate, he is literally a threat to the entire world.

Other urls found in this thread:

washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/29/clinton-and-trump-will-soon-receive-classified-briefings-heres-how-that-works/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

awoo~

>sit across from a very dangerous man at a table
>2 guns on the table
>if we have guns, why dont we use them?

god damn people are stupid

>considering all availabe options is a bad thing

Ok, thank you for letting me know.

because Russians could incinerate you
but I think it's just an act, he is not a dumb man

Ill tell you what. Trump might of been a Hillary Plant. If the DNC can manipulate the DNC against Sanders. Why not the election itself. Bernie Sanders would have lost against Bernie Sanders.

Its a real question
Many countries have them noone wants to use them or can, so whats the point of owning one?
Its like having a big dick and never goin out to get laid

Reading about how he wanted to sit at the negotiating table in the 80s to work out a better nuclear arms reduction treaty with the Soviets was top kek.

He's ignorant, whatever, most people are ignorant until they bone up on a subject - he doesn't exhibit the habit of preparation needed to offset that ignorance. Just go with your gut, don't spend a few weeks getting good on a subject before spouting off about it. Sell the big lie.

Truth coming from Mount Negro

It's funny...

I've always wondered the same thing.

>Unnamed "international level expert"
My good friend father is a UN bureaucrat and he told me Clinton asked how many people she could kill before being charged for crime against humanity.

Cuz they don't exist

nuclear weapons are a deterrent
they are a strategic weapon

He asked three times famalam

The only way to win is not to play the game.

>a threat to the entire world

I'm ok with this

That was a good question. The fact that they couldn't answer it and he had to ask two more times is telling. The general should answer wtf do they plan to do with nukes. Apparently there was no satisfactory answer. He is the first person asking them what are they planning to do with them.

Previous thread:

What's the point of having a concealed carry if you never have to blow a nigger's brains out because he threatened your life?

Could it be to reduce the odds of a nigger threatening your life?

>in b4 yes I just want an excuse to shoot a nigger
>followed by I can't believe the libs are taking our guns

>Sitting across from a very dangerous man
>Gun is within arms reach
>Let dangerous man leave
>More victims from dangerous man over the years
>You could have stopped this

Literally a coward.

>Have nuclear deterrent
>Tell enemies you won't use it even if they invade you
>get invaded

I hope you aren't in the military.

Check the responses

yeah but if you never use them then its an empty threat

It's a good question. We need to use them once in awhile to prove we still can. We should nuke ISIS

>unnamed source
And it's bullshit. Trump isn't president yet, why would they already be briefing him on foreign policy? Surely CTR can do better than this.

FOUR times at that.

Maybe he asked three times, because nobody gave him a satisfying answer the first two times that he asked.

T: So if we know where ISIS is, why can't we just drop a nuke on them?

C: Erm, well...I guess the world wouldn't take too kindly to that, especially the Russians.

T: Ok, so they're going to be a bit sore after it, we can get the Russians on our side on this one. Why can't we nuke ISIS again?

C: Well...If you nuke your enemies they win.

T: That doesn't sound very convincing. Can anybody else remind me why we don't nuke ISIS?

Are you suggesting we just nuke all potentially dangerous countries just in case?
Did I read that right?

no, it's not a good question
this mindfuck where every dumb thing Trump says is defended and stretched to the limits of logic by his fans is becoming boring
yeah we all hate Hillary and want Trump to win but fuck off, this is an anonymous board where people discuss freely, not a shilling board for shills

...

>If we have Nuclear Weapons why can't we use them?

And the answer is?
No bodies at the table told him why hence he has keep asking?
What kind of expert is that that they refuse to answer a question?

>Let him kill you first

stay cucked

>trying to go Minority Report on the planet
Toplel.

Deter this mountain nigger.

>A foreign policy advisor said Trump asked 3 times in an hour
>foreign policy advisor said
>said

A MSNBC Money Analyst Specialist said Trump will give all Trump supporters a Million dollars if we have this foreign policy advisor and Trump on tape/

no on answered

The world will be half black by then end of the century,
WW3 could be more than welcome.
The things is, Trump ask this for ISIS while Clinton would use it against Russia.
She's far more dangerous for the world than he is.

That hypothetical exchange still makes him sound like a lone child eating dinner at a table with adults.

TFW you'll see Sweden, Germany and France nuked in your lifetime when they become caliphates.
KEK BLESS

Thank you, brown awoo!

>what are intimidation tactics

We aren't the only ones listening.

nuclear strategy is a complex thing but one thing is a basic fact: nukes are not some bigger more destructive bombs you use to nuke random people

>trumplets rushing to defend the use of nukes

>literally
Exposed yourself, CTR.

He is trying to lose.

FSBS

based Australia

You have a 4th grader's understanding of the world.

can't hear you with that muslim dick in your mouth.

come back when you're not a cuck.

Better reason to vote for him. I look forward to the final happening and Humanity's near extinction. Maybe we'll finally wise up. Probably not though.

>inb4 edge

>Sit in a room full of gasoline
>Matches are on the table
>If we have matches, why don't we use them?

This is a more appropriate analogy

What makes you think Trump would nuke random people?

1. nukes produce fallout, which can fuck up other countries
2. not all civilians in ISIS controlled territory are ISIS supporters, and nukes kill indiscriminately
3. using nukes in a localized conflict like that is an overkill
4. even though it's an overkill in political and strategic sense, nukes themselves aren't as destructive as you think they are, so one nuke wouldn't do shit to defeat a doomsday cult that is ISIS, in fact political fallout from that action would strengthen them

You're right. That dialogue I came up with clearly shows how Trump is unfit to be POTUS.

wtf...i love Hillary now.

washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/29/clinton-and-trump-will-soon-receive-classified-briefings-heres-how-that-works/

You deserve it.

>no military background
>no inside knowledge of our or the enemies defense capabilities
>asks simple question to gain understanding on other country's deterrents

i'll grant the question may have been poorly worded, but why can't we is not the same as why don't we.

Let me guess, behind the proxy you're from some shit hole that doesn't have a single nuke.

The world operates at an elementary level.

> tfw I thought I was gonna be VP
> tfw Trump is just crashing this party with no survivors

Muslim detected

Confirmed doomsayer NEET candidate. Trump is the official choice of losers who have failed or given up life and instead of working towards their future want to see everyone else burn with them.

>mecca will be nuked in my lifetime

Maybe if you have down syndrome? Sorry buddy I guess we all can't understand common sense y'know?

I bet you understand being a cuck shill bitch right?

>Nuke ISIS and Saudi Arabia

I'm not saying it's a good idea to do in this case.

All I'm saying is, if this exchange even happened in the first place, that there's nothing wrong with him asking if this is an option at all.

They'll defend anything

>predicting the posts if Trump were discovered to be a pedophile

>"Still better than Hillary tho."
>"I don't care as long as he removes kebab and deports illegals."
>"Didn't Hillary defend a child rapist?"
>"What about Bill? He's a rapist too."
>"Thanks for correcting the record."
>"Wow really engaged cognitive activity in my brain."
>"What will the media come up with next?"
>"Is pedophilia really all that bad?"

>someone said
>must be true
ok

>people not aware that we have developed nuclear bullets and just assume he means bombs

Here you go. You know there are no stupid questions, there are stupid answers. You are explaining to me there are stupid questions. It probably means you are stupid and can't answer this. And it also means the general who couldn't answer it is stupid and should not be in charge on the nukes. They should answer candidate's questions. Their inability to do so reflects badly on them, not on the candidate. Laughing off a question they can't answer is bad for the person who can't answer the question, not for the person who asked it. I actually am concerned that the top military personnel can't answer basic questions. They are probably unqualified to be in charge of nukes.

im ready to kick back and welcome the end of existence.

How about you guys?

>i love Hillary now.
Lame. Why?

by ''random people'' I meant some insurgents in Middle East
you can't nuke non-state actors
and even though ISIS pretends to be a state, they're just an elaborate Jihadist band, nothing else
not an argument, and no, I'm Christian

Seriously though this guy is a certified anti-intellectual dunce and an Israel shill too. I can't tell if he's stumping himself intentionally, but you'd have to be a goddamn retard to agree with what he's saying. Now Hillary memes are one thing, but you really will go to war with Iran when you elect this guy.

Wow /pol you're missing a great chance to attract pacifists.
This could easily be told as "Trump opposes nukes" or "Trump supports nuclear disarmament"

Which anonymous source was it this time?

>ISIS mostly kills other sand niggers and a few Frenches
>ISIS has never directly attacked the USA
>Lets kill millions and pollute the region with nuclear fall out anyway. Pissing off even more people than before

Man some of you trumptards are grand.

Estonia can't even 12d chess

>nuclear bullets
Can still be inactivated from a satellite my dude.

Fucking this.

The world's going to lean to fear the U.S. again.

of course it's an option, and it was option since 1947 I believe
it's a dumb question
someone running for president, and moreover a 70 year old man running for president, MUST posses some basic knowledge

...

What the fuck man do you realize it would be the end of life as you and I know it if a super power launched a nuke fucking game over man

t. non country

kek

Remove the comments from context, make it exceedingly vague as you barely stutter the sentence out

Yes, I believe everything they say

If Trump said
>I do not believe that ISIS should be coddled

They would report that
>unnamed source tells us that Trump said ISIS should be coddled

welp thats that, he just fucking blew it.

Well there is literally no reason not to use them on non-nuclear states.

Obviously firing nukes at another country that has nukes is not a good idea.

...

Are you mentally cunted m8?

>2 posts by this ID

/thread

You say this but 99 percent of libshits can't grasp the concept of MAD. They were probably just shit at explaining it.

"if we have them, why cant we use them" and "if we dont use them, why do we even have them" are not the same question

I'm now #mentallyhill

So how long do you guys think the Trump meme is going to last before even the seething masses of Sup Forums's alt-right userbase admit he'd make an awful President?

If the entire world knows you'll never use your nukes, how the fuck are they a deterrent? What are they stopping? All those other people who also will never use their nukes? Are they stopping all the wars and terrorist attacks that are happening in the world right now?

A weapon you absolutely will never use is not a deterrent. It's a fucking trophy you show off to people.

>Sup Forums is fine with everything being glassed because mah Trump

Yup pretty much this.. They will defend anything.

It's a bluff. To show China we are electing a president that isn't a pussy.

I smell bullshit tbhonest.

North Korea nukes South Korea, can we nuke North Korea or will we let it nuke South Korea unless the jets and ground troops take over?

If we have nuclear weapons, why can't we nuke North Korea?

well, if they claim to be a state, just give them the recognition they deserve. then nuke them