Why are television and film so liberal nowadays?

Why are television and film so liberal nowadays?

Other urls found in this thread:

news24.com/xArchive/Archive/Porn-the-new-weapon-of-choice-20020330
cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/event.php?eid=3562
google.co.uk/amp/reason.com/archives/2002/04/03/porn-and-politics-in-palestine/amp
baka.com.au/articles/2002/04/01/1017206174636.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

name 5 movies where this happens

Any movie with a "message" is always liberal, like "WAR IS BAD," "GUNS ARE BAD," "POVERTY IS BAD," etc.

If you can't see the liberal bias in hollywood, you're blind

>nowadays

Chaplin was a cuck, but it wasn't that bad back then. Today, it's sickening

>War and Poverty is good

wtf

Only antiwar cucks think war is inherently bad. Of course there's bad parts, but true warriors love war. Poverty is not good but the ways liberals want to solve the problem is downright wrong

Because society is liberal.

In the 1950s it was heavily conservative.

99% of society is just monkey see monkey do. They don't know or care what any of it means or why it's a good idea, they just do it because everyone else does.

It'll probably always be that way so get used to it

Good bait

because hollywood is controlled by the gay mafia with an iron fist

>saying poverty and war are bad
>is a liberal message
How did we get so fucked in the head?

if society was liberal we wouldn't have elected Trump
I should report you for this Sup Forums tier "trolling"
Democrat detected
read :

>Chaplin was a cuck
Literally kill yourself, he was based as shit.
>stand up to two different countries giving him shit
>give a big "fuck you" to Hitler for stealing your mustache
>have the balls to go full anti-Nazi while America pussyfooted around until they got so triggered that they needed to kick him out
>write, direct, act and produce all your films yourself

@84013101
>being this desperate for (you)s

>dur read my way of the warrior post
Yeah, the whole post was autistic, pal.

>If society was liberal we wouldn't have elected Trump
I have confidence that you have no clue what that word means at all.

>Only antiwar cucks think war is inherently bad
Most everyone who isn't a nut, thinks (correctly) that war is inherently bad.

cry some more, alt right pussy

>"nowadays"

Television and film has always been liberal in the vast majority. As a matter of fact every artform ever was always predominantly liberal.

>Thinks "War is bad" and "Poverty is bad" are liberal messages
Well that answers your question of why TV and film are so liberal now

>nowadays
you must be 18 to post here

So to you war is good? Seriously? Poverty is good? So live in poverty and send your ass to war you fucking hypocrite. You won't because you're a mental midget who doesn't understand in any way how the world works.

Because you're a counter culture contrarian akin to the hippies rebelling against "family values" in the 60's except this time you're social pariah because culture isn't """evolving""" with you.

BAIT BAIT BAIT BAIT BAIT BAIT BAIT BAIT BAIT BAIT BAIT BAIT BAIT BAIT BAIT BAIT

There is literally nothing wrong with what hippies stood for and I can't figure out why they still get shit on decades later now that we have historical perspective with how shit the government was in the 60s.

Because if you're right-wing you're either a richfag, have suffered severe brain damage or mentally retarded from birth. Studios would lose money if they pandered to these people because there are not a lot of rich fags in the world and the brain damaged and retarded are just fags no one likes

Some people (read: many) deserve to be poor because they're useless genetic trash cruelly allowed to continue their existence by a welfare society that's finally become sophisticated enough to pacify and control the populace

But Liberals love war

Mom get off my Sup Forums reeee

they didn't really stand for anything unique. sure they were anti war but so are most normal decent people but they weren't obnoxious about it. being a hippy was hedonism first, politics second, that's why they affected culture much more than politics.

If you were genetically superior you would never hang around this place. So send your ass to war and live in poverty. You won't because you're a hypocrite and mental midget who doesn't understand how the world works.

>people deserve to be poor
Ah yes, this decades old, conservative lie they brainwash kids with in order to have you fighting in class warfare until you die.

Trump won because the alternative caused spontaneous vomiting all over the entire political map

What child wrote this? Christ you people are embarrassing.

Who said I was genetically superior? I mean, it's objectively true in many ways and I come from an attractive, successful, wealthy white family. But I'm fucked up enough (riveting deduction on your part) to not have been likely to survive even 300 years ago. Mental midgets argue from ad hominem and pathos, check urself my man.

>praising a liberal cuck
>being this autistic
Not an argument
Not an argument
so mostly everybody are cucks. Makes sense
To quote Trump, "WRONG."
Reread the thread and then think about what you just said.
I'm 19
Read -> >being a LITERAL HIPPIE
AHAHAHHAHAHAHAH
>unironically being liberal
BEST POST ITT RN
Not SJWs
LIBTARD ALERT LIBTARD ALERT

>they didn't really stand for anything unique
What does that even mean? Do they have to? They can't just have a cause that resonates and is similar? I think all of you who criticize hippies just do so out of memes since their message is not a bad one.
>it was hedonism first
How is free love and free expression explicitly hedonistic?
>they are bad because they were obnoxious
So what if they were loud?

Nobody ever gives me a real argument to disagree with hippies.

You were speaking about genetically inferior people who deserve to be poor. And you said they deserved to be poor. You are genetically inferior browsing a place like this. So send your ass to war and then live in poverty. You won't. Because you're a hypocrite and a mental midget who doesn't understand how the world works.

Everything he said was right, the GOP benefits the rich and upperclass exclusively, while it dupes the middle class in pretending that they are "temporarily embarrassed millionaires". As long as they scapegoat the poor of course. The GOP is a con-job and conservatism is a dead meme.

>conservatives want class warfare

Ah yes, reminds me of the grass roots, conservative movement called Occupy Wallstreet and the traditionalist messiah Bernie "gimme your shit" Sanders. Class warfare is perpetuated by the left and their Robin Hood carrot (sticks hurt too many feelings).

Your posts are full of ad hominems. Do you even understand what an ad hominem is? Telling someone to check myself is not a positive reinforcement.

Think before you speak. You're a clear mental midget.

Poe's Law makes it hard for me to take any of this autism seriously anymore. I refuse to believe you are this bent out of shape.

go discuss your surface-level degenerate politics on a board made specifically for that

it's literally because they're ugly and they smell bad. it may seem shallow but that's why a lot of people don't want to accociate with certain groups. it explains everything from racism to why nobody talked to you at school.

>class warfare is perpetuated by the left
>because they want class warfare to end
What did he mean by this?

>they smell bad and are ugly
Okay, kiddo.
>you are too! Teehee!
Uh, thanks?

I'll attempt to clarify at a high school level for you: The only reason I'm not poor is because my rich, successful, genetically fit parents are dumb enough to throw money in the dumpster fire that is my life (kind of like the welfare state!). I'm agreeing with you, but I'm the exception not the rule. My individual circumstances don't change the logic of my assertion

...

>they literally blame the poor for all their woes
>they don't want class warfare
>yet continue to vote in a way that fucks up the poor
Really gets the neurons bouncing. I guess it really does help the poor to knock them off insurance.

>lets sleep around and do drugs
yeah real good influence right there for everybody.

>imply you don't judge people purely because of their looks.
unless you're literally Jesus you're lying.

I don't do that every moment of my life, no. Since I'm not a literal child.

i don't think you know what class warfare is kid

>free society
>bad to have sex and do drugs
This isn't North Korea, fag.

>Conservatives perpetuate class warfare!
>Class warfare, as implicitly define by my counter argument, is intended to end class warfare
>Conservatives obviously want to end class warfa- wait that's not what I meant

What he said

Please tell me why I don't.

may not consciencly no but you definitely do. clearly you're too personally offended to realise the objective fact that people prefer attractive leaders.

and that's why conservatives who prefer family values find you disguting.

>wanting to end class warfare by holding the rich accountable for avoiding taxes through loopholes and doing explicit damage to the middle class, damage you can fucking calculate
>is somehow (in this dumb user's head)
>promoting class warfare
>it's class warfare when the poor and middle classes fight for a fair shake
Brainwashed.

Hitler never finished the job, blacks never got deported back and they invented medicine that was too effective against AIDS.

>family values only adhere to conservatives
>conversatives believe they somehow get to write the book on family values
Keep crying you little bitch. You live in a society with other people.

>conservatives have a monopoly on family values

class warfare is pretty obviously conflict between the classes (the clue in the name :^) ) and is one of the core tenants of a communist revolution, what you're describing is a caricature of poor class relations.

I feel like you really want everyone to be as shallow and as shitty of a person as you.

Are...are you calling Trump attractive?

What happens to the rich when their "fair share" is taken from them. They sit down and take it right? It's not likely they're part of vast networks of influence or anything. No more class warfare after that right?

come on now

"Class warfare" is not owned by one group or event, you can have them in any society. We have them here in America.

No, we have had legitamate economic war on the poor, done by conservatives. We have class warfare in this country, look at how you talked about the poor earlier, you were brainwashed to literally think the poor deserve it.

Why is fair share in quotations? Do you not want them to pay fair taxes? Are you one of those gullible retards that thinks they do? There was a literal committee held to figure out why the top 1 percent wasn't paying even half of their taxes...this was less than 6 months ago.
>they are powerful, so don't bother
Wew, what a gutless faggot.

I want crony capitalism to die.

Here's your fallacy: free society, while a just ideal, does not mean that actions arising from said freedom (premsicuous, vacuous sex and short-term gratification edified by drug use) are inherently good as well. They may be (I would disagree, but that disagreement would live in a more sophisticated dialectic), but they aren't neccisarily.

i feel like you're giving the subconscious of people who you've never met too much credit.
>Are...are you calling Trump attractive?
god no, but he's definitely charismatic... and compared to Hilary and Bernie...?
it's not just conservatives who do this too, just look at trudeau

ah yes let's promote behavior which weakens family units and slowly also weakens our nation. what could go wrong?? things are still very comfy free society free love :^)

Nobody says they are "necessary" /lit/, but people can make their own choices when it comes to contextual sex. Unless you are advocating for moral tests and sex laws on "promiscuity" like some tyrant, just live and let live.
>inb4 muh degeneracy meme

i didn't say anything about the poor deserving anything so...?
also if by economic war you mean rich people moving factories away from america leaving millions unemployed isn't that something liberals support?

Ah yes, the meme argument of "sex is going to destroy the country abloo abloo!"

Hey, olive branch man, I agree with you that crony capitalism is bad and I'm well aware that most extremely wealthy corporations pay zero taxes by hiring a legion of tax accountants. My disagreement lies in the fact that the Bernie ilk think Mr. Small Business who works 14 hours a day to pull 300k a year owes you a god damned thing. With all attempt to avoid strawmanning, that is what many of that type believe. They hate wealth because of the cognitive dissonance that it takes effort and discomfort to acquire.

*consensual

yes the radical argument that our actions have consequences.

nice strawman. it's not like porn is literally used as a weapon by the Israeli army.

>My disagreement lies in the fact that the Bernie ilk think Mr. Small Business who works 14 hours a day to pull 300k a year owes you a god damned thing.
You know nothing of what they stood for, they never said that at all.
>wealth takes effort to acquire
I wish this was even remotely true in most cases. But it isn't.

>a consequence of sex is the literal destruction of your nation
Just fuck off already.

I'm not arguing for any tests or laws (which should be obvious since I support freedom as a just ideal). I'm simply saying that these "degeneracies" (your word not mine) seem to be net negatives in terms of quality of life and societal cohesion. Can I prove that conclusively? Hell no, although I think I could make a compelling argument. Just an opinion bro, I'm no alt-right boogyman.

Kek, where did you even get that from? How does that even work? Who is threatened by porn?

>sex is the only thing that motivates him
>doesn't understand why this is a bad thing

How does wealth not take effort to aquire in your mind? Do you think the vast majority of the 1% are trust fund kids and corporate aristocracy? If you have compelling evidence, I'm more than happy to hear you out.

>I'm simply saying that these "degeneracies" (your word not mine) seem to be net negatives in terms of quality of life and societal cohesion
That's mostly a meme, worrying that sex ruins some "societal cohesion". Moralfags literally say this every decade, remember when rock and roll was going to destroy America? Society adapts and changes values over time, that's why the entire premise is autistic to me.

Most of the richest people now and of the last few decades, have been members of rich families and old money inheritance. Even the President himself is a product of wealth distribution through blood. This bullshit of "everything works for you if you try hard" is a fucking pie in the sky meme to tell poor people.

>Do you think the vast majority of the 1% are trust fund kids and corporate aristocracy?
Yes! How are you just figuring this out now?

never said that, just that it weakens the nation. weak family unit also leads to increased immigration which is much bigger problem considering that literal trash usually find their opportunistic hands on our soil. of course things kicked off much before hippies and it's very unrealistic to go back unless literal hitler would arise to power.

>sex is the only thing that motivates him
Literally nobody said that.
>that's a bad thing
That is literally why you exist, dummy. To fuck.

>Who is threatened by porn?
fucking psyops kid. why fight when you can stay at home and jerk off all day?

news24.com/xArchive/Archive/Porn-the-new-weapon-of-choice-20020330
cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/event.php?eid=3562
google.co.uk/amp/reason.com/archives/2002/04/03/porn-and-politics-in-palestine/amp
baka.com.au/articles/2002/04/01/1017206174636.html

Why this thread is still up is beyond me.

why are you posting here and not shagging someone if it's the reason for your existence?

I never said I personally was a hedonist.

>Moralfags literally say this every decade, remember when rock and roll was going to destroy America

This seems like some kind of odd slippery slope fallacy. I think it would be fairly easy to argue that rock n' roll stuff, which is contemporarily regarded as benign (n.b. in contemporary context), was a stepping stone in the path towards an unsubstainable societal paradigm. This idea that "progress" is always a good because it is progress (which is basically a tautology) is a particularly weak idea the left seems to structure their ideology around.

this is why you don't jump into arguments halfway through

>does a slippery slop fallacy himself
>progress is bad though
You can move in with the Amish whenever you want.

>progress is bad because my argument hinges on it being bad

stop doing the fallacy fallacy you fags do it all the time

>putting porn on some television channels once, which even looks like a prank
>is a covert psyops mission to do....something with open
>a broken link, a few nutty opinion pieces and one where it looks like a prank
>???
Porn as a weapon makes no fucking sense.