Is it gonna disappoint?

is it gonna disappoint?

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/Disney/status/632583376214622208
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

I don't think so, I liked the last one at least and they have a good track record going

I think it's going to go great.

you think frozone is gonna have a kid that's a lil bit younger than jackjack?

Yes. Un-warranted sequels never work

He probably would have a kid younger than Jack Jack, like around 4 or so and Jack Jack be a kid just growing into controlling his powers

No.

After the horseshit that was Tomorrowland I have no idea.

Finding Dory was surprisingly excellent, so I'm hopeful. It felt like a celebration of the original without becoming stale due to reusing too much. If Incredibles II clears the same bar, I'll be ecstatic.

I blame Lindelof for that

>Pixar sequel
>guaranteed a billion whether it's GOAT or two hours of Brad Bird taking a dump

It sure isn't NOT gonna dissapoint

>Star Trek
>Ridley Scott sci-fi
>Brad Bird's perfect track record

I wonder what Lindelof's eyeing up for the next victim.

>giving Pixar undeserved money
What are you doing? Do you WANT them to make Cars 4? Don't go to sequels we haven't asked for.

I don't think so.. it's possible, but that'd just be because people are too in love with the first one.

The great thing about these Disney/ Pixar movies is the group writing, which really seems to work well for them. It's a team effort and I'm sure they can come up with something good.

The only thing that could go wrong, is that they take the story too far away from the first one. We want new, but really, we just love the old movie and the old character dynamics, and if it's ''too'' new.. well, people will most likely bitch and moan. It's a balancing act.

Except this sequel was very much warranted

It will be a preachy elitist suck fest.

Yep

>Cars Sequel
>Monsters Inc Sequel
>Finding Nemo Sequel
>Now an Incredibles Sequel
STOP

Also The Good Dinosaur was shit. More Pixar films are bad than good now. Brave was passable but Inside Out is really the only great Pixar quaility movie they've made in about 6 years now.

Guess they've run out of ideas. Disney Animation studios are quickly surpassing them anyway.

I'm waiting for the fujoshis to latch onto a teenaged Dash

Like they did with Jack Frost and Hiccup

>Now an Incredibles Sequel
>STOP

>getting mad about the only one that actually deserved a sequel.

It really didn't. It was a movie that told its story fully and ended with things all wrapped up. This can only taint its legacy.

This sequel isn't going to suddenly not be shit after a spree of shit sequels from them.

user did you not notice the sequel setup at the end.

Although they did resolve that in videogames is this gonna be a rehash of those or is there going to be a new villan

Besides it's a superhero film the only films more sequelable then those are porn

I liked Tomorrowland managed to have the villan complain about the world being fucked without sounding whinybit about simultaneous obesity and poverty epidemics really got me
It was an all around decent film maybe a few pacing issues.

But even if you dident like it (I'm certainly not going to claim it's a masterpiece) but I can't think of anything that would make it get a rating as intense as horseshit

Of course it is. Disney has been trying to cash in and ruin the Pixar name for years now.

Finding Dory?
Toy Story VII?
CARS?!

They probably told Brad Bird that they were going to make it with or without him, because that's what studios do. That's what Disney does.

nah

>Finding Dory?
It was good though

If its a timeskip, Violet's ass is probably never going to live up to the built up expectations for it.

>Toy Story VII
When did they manage make four more sequels after 3?

I think you need to stop reading Shadbase then

It's going to be like two pies in the face, and one in a field in Pennsylvania.

I wonder how many years after the first one it will be.

>Brad Bird perfect track record
Someone didn't see Tomorrowland.

Fake.

Fuck, that meteor just missed the world trade center.

Finding Dory was amazeballs.

>amazeballs

I dont see how it can possibly be as relevant as the first. The first came out when superhero films were just blooming into real money makers and its ideal that we really coulldnt/want real superheroes is so orginal for its time, not even including then"when everyone is super,no one will be" idea. I think the only real logical step is a "civil war" situation where the goverment needs to have heroes register or where the villian in just a dude who the incredibles indirctly wronged and wants justice. I mean how the hell do you top syndrome as the villian??? Maybe even have a pervious hero mr.incredible fought besides come back and be the villian would a good twist. I just dont really know how you make s sequel to such a orginal film as this and it not be lackluster compaired to the first.

How did they wrap things up? Can you tell me how the world reacted to the heroes being okay once again? Because it was a big part of the whole movie, and they didn't have the time to show us how things changed.

Oh it's real all right.
twitter.com/Disney/status/632583376214622208

Outside of Toy Story i think this is the only Pixar movie that can realistically use a sequel that can fit with the narrative and huge world that was made for it.

I got the impression all that could be said for Cars, Finding Nemo and Monsters Inc was said already. Anything else would just be totally superfluous time wasted that never really added anything. Just another film with the same characters. Which is basically how I see those sequels.

Incredibles set up a lot of world building that left things open for lots of other tales, sometimes not even needing the Parr family and it would not be too out of place.

I feel like all that can be done with Monsters Inc and Cars are basically episodic adventures and shorts. Which they have made a bit of.

>I blame Lindelof for that

Maybe from a pure structure standpoint, but the Objectivist masturbation fantasy of a universe and thematic focus was all Bird. I was willing to let that slide or excuse it in Incredibles, but Tomorrowland was literally Galt's Gulch Is Awesome: The Movie and it made me ill.

Just once I'd love to see them fail...

But then again...i like Brad Bird's work.

>Just once I'd love to see them fail...
Cars 2 and The Good Dinosaur weren't enough?

>think the only real logical step is a "civil war" situation where the goverment needs to have heroes register or where the villian in just a dude who the incredibles indirctly wronged and wants justice.
That's dumb though as supers were just returning to the public eye at the end of the first movie.

It's not going to disappoint me because I'm not going to expect anything better than Monsters University and Finding Dory. I'm sure it will disappoint a lot of people though.

No, I mean a complete box office toilet flush, one that NO one is excited over just because it says "Pixar". That ends up costing them more than the production/advertising/merch can recoop.

Or maybe just bitter because I want a chance to have that feeling of being on top just once in my life, instead of being mechanically crowded out by inane repetitions, and "guaranteed" money makers.

I need new stories and fresh ideas.

99% of sequels are worse than the source. So probabilistically speaking, this film will disappoint, yes.