Kelly does it again!

Kelly does it again!

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juxtaposed_controls
clickhole.com/article/feel-free-explain-your-take-brexit-picture-david-d-4568
theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/aug/19/tax.taxandspending
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

but that is a good idea. and europe actually is dealing with that problem right now. that's why they resent the UK (who has at least a body of water to help) getting out while the getting's good.
fuck even the most liberal media right now is agreeing that europe needs to shut borders

Way ahead of you America.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juxtaposed_controls

Next wall we need to build is for Canada.

Those moose huggers are getting uppity.

Scotland will just rebuild the Hadrian wall

>build a wall
They'll just chunnel under it and smuggle more drugs across the border.

If you want to live in an isolationist country, why not just move to North Korea?

Because they love other countries, they love them so much they won't let anyone leave.

If you want to live in a Muslim country why not just move to Pakistan?

Remember that when all your goods cost 50x more because you can't get cheap chink made shit anymore. iPhones will cost over $1500

>Canada

They've created much larger problems for themselves in response to a lesser problem.

Let that sink in. You agree with fucking Kelly.

Sup Forums was a mistake

where the hell is crying liberty

>Implying cops aren't on a power tri[ when they arrest you for drunk driving
>Implying jacking off to ebony doesn't kill racism
>Implying that store on Grove St isn't out of those GOD DAMN CRACKERS WHAT THE FUCK I MEAN COME ON HOW THE FUCK AM I SUPPOSED TO EAT MY SOUP WITHOUT CRACKERS WHAT KIND OF SHOP ARE THEY RUNNING I AM A PAYING CUSTOMER AND TO BE TREATED LIKE THIS IS UNFATHOMABLE
top kek m8

Well a wall would help keep out all those illegal immigrants who go around shitting in our streets and pools. That actually happened btw

-Adolf Hitler, 2015

Wow it's almost as if the Onion is owned by a Hillary Clinton supporter and keeps injecting liberal anti-right bias even under the cover of being a "satirical" news site. Even Clickhole has fallen, too.

Last week I could have given a fuck about Brexit now that everyone is losing their minds over it I say it was the best decision the Brits ever made outside of electing Churchill

...really? clickhole does political stuff?

clickhole.com/article/feel-free-explain-your-take-brexit-picture-david-d-4568

So, what exactly are the Remainers' arguments?

lmao, the shit you get triggered by

UK charging them a wall cannot cost the EU more than what they lose by enabling Greece's leeching off them.

Please learn to communicate in English.

Because there are things other than isolationism in North Korea that would make that extremely undesirable.

UK is going to have to either hike taxes, cut spending, or both now that they don't get the economic benefits from EU membership.

>If you need a half hour to skim a few Guardian op-eds and come up with a pop culture–inspired metaphor for the whole deal, go right ahead. David will be here when you get back.

kek

That EU dosh and the Money Jews won't turn Pounds into Monopoly Money because you've messed with the Status Quo.

They're scared and they like being able to travel to all those countries without the hassle of a passport.

Racism

indeed. For some reason it holds more weight than 'troll' with some posters even though it's the same intent of expression.

People would have rightfully ignored posts crying 'troll' but 'Sup Forums' is seen as a boogeyman
A boogeyman on Sup Forums

TV license crackdown squad incoming. No one will be safe.

That everyone who disagrees with them is racist.

That takes literally no stance on the issue either way.

Well, I did it and it made me feel better so thanks

"what if the greys are behind this mulder"

Learn it hard ways UK.

There are literally zero economic benefits for being in the EU.

>but that is a good idea.

China please go

>"All left-wing parties in the highly industrialized countries are at bottom a sham, because they make it their business to fight against something which they do not really wish to destroy. They have internationalist aims, and at the same time they struggle to keep up a standard of life with which those aims are incompatible. We all live by robbing Asiatic coolies, and those of us who are 'enlightened' all maintain that those coolies ought to be set free; but our standard of living, and hence our 'enlightenment', demands that the robbery shall continue. A humanitarian is always a hypocrite[...]"

The EU expected financial responsibility from the UK and indeed all of it's member nations. The UK was asked at one point to send much of it's money elsewhere because their "economy was doing well", meaning if a member nation is doing well, it might not matter because the EU could expect the money to be redistributed elsewhere.

How does 'financial responsibility' mean 'gib monies plz'?

The english already had a wall ironically it was to keep out the english and was built by romans but still...

Why domt we mve the Mudslmes to China? that would solve two birds with one bush

That's wrong, tho.

China already has Muslims.
I doubt they like them, but I'm sure they have them.

Does the UK really receive that many economic benefits from the EU?

I understand Poland wanting to be in the EU, before the migrant crisis, but UK's money into the EU always outweighed what it got

>"Ever since the nineteenth century our national income, dependent partly on interest from foreign investments, and on assured markets and cheap raw materials in colonial countries, had been extremely precarious. It was certain that, sooner or later, something would go wrong and we should be forced to make our exports balance our imports: and when that happened the British standard of living, including the working-class standard, was bound to fall, at least temporarily. Yet the left-wing parties, even when they were vociferously anti-imperialist, never made these facts clear. On occasion they were ready to admit that the British workers had benefited, to some extent, by the looting of Asia and Africa, but they always allowed it to appear that we could give up our loot and yet in some way contrive to remain prosperous. Quite largely, indeed, the workers were won over to Socialism by being told that they were exploited, whereas the brute truth was that, in world terms, they were exploiters. Now, to all appearances, the point has been reached when the working-class living-standard CANNOT be maintained, let alone raised. Even if we squeeze the rich out of existence, the mass of the people must either consume less or produce more. Or am I exaggerating the mess we are in? I may be, and I should be glad to find myself mistaken. But the point I wish to make is that this question, among people who are faithful to the Left ideology, cannot be genuinely discussed. The lowering of wages and raising of working hours are felt to be inherently anti-Socialist measures, and must therefore be dismissed in advance, whatever the economic situation may be. To suggest that they may be unavoidable is merely to risk being plastered with those labels that we are all terrified of. It is far safer to evade the issue and pretend that we can put everything right by redistributing the existing national income."

Responsibility?

Pay back your debt.. £5 trillion

Let's ask the EU.

free trade among members

anything an industrial nation produces is guaranteed to get sold as the poorer countries that can't

The EU was started by Germany and France so they could sell their shit without foreign competition. The UK follows the same system but at a lesser degree.

China's low-ass wages negatively impact our economy overall by taking jobs overseas and driving the value of labor down.

You don't get to be part of a society that you benefit from and play the "I don't have to share my cake if I don't wanna" at the same time.

Which is why they chose to leave.

No, it's not. It's a common lie told to scare idiots. Source: NAFTA.

That doesn't mean shit to the UK, though, and it effectively outsources labor and production to cheaper alternatives since there are no longer any penalties for doing business at the expense of poor people.

Source: See above.

They don't want to be part of the society. No European state really does. They're afraid of Germany and to a lesser extent France.

This bogus brotherhood nonsense is just silly. No, the UK doesn't have to share their cake if they don't want to.

What's with thr huge hatred towards immigration?

>agreeing with Kelly

The UK was bleeding money into the EU but receiving less than it was putting into it.

What's with the love for it?

Institute for Fiscal Studies says the opposite; that the increased cost from losing free trade would more than negate the benefits not having to pay into the EU.

>The EU was started by Germany and France so they could sell their shit without foreign competition
And it became a horrible abomination that started dipping its fingers into other nation's policies.

If you were England, would you want Germany sticking its fingers in you pie?

Remember, it hasn't even been a year since Merkel called for a "European Army."


The EU really should be more like the OAS

>The EU really should be more like the OAS

The organization that lets its member states commit fucking coups d'etat against each other.
That's what the EU should be like.

What a shitty non answer.

>IFS
You mean those people who said "Fuck taxing the rich, increase the VAT and make the garbage men pay for everything"

theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/aug/19/tax.taxandspending

The IFS is a politically biased institution. The EU isn't the only trading partner on planet Earth, the UK will do just fine.

Ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer.

How about you extol the virtues of unchecked, unlicensed, passport-free immigration?

My vague understanding is that people get in to an easy country where they'd have to work for a living and then move to another EU country to leech

There's been a lot of conflict (lots of it violent) between immigrants and locals in Europe lately.

Imagine how embarrassed Trump supporters are going to be when he gets absolutely rekt by Hillary and people only remember him for being a borderline-racist loudmouth who had more flip-flops than a Californian beach party and who cheated millions of dumb Americans out of their money and their votes.

Damn, fuck me then. Pologies.

The EU should be non interventionist, yes.

England is England, France is France, and if they and the rest of Europe want to get together and help one another with trade and shit, fine.

The EU is an Empire by committee

Conflict over what?

Literally who is Hillary's demographic? I live in an extremely liberal area and everyone hates her for stealing the election from Bernie.