Israel has carried out one of its most substantial attacks on Syria in weeks, with a pre-dawn flurry of airstrikes against an army base and weapons depot outside of the capital city of Damascus.
The airstrikes began at 2:40 am local time, with planes striking from Lebanese airspace. Syria claimed to have hit one of the Israeli planes in retaliation, though Israel has yet to confirm this.
This wasn’t the end, either. After the airstrikes, Israel fired a flurry of surface-to-surface missiles against the same Syrian base from Israeli territory. Syria reported their air defenses managed to intercept at least some of these.
As is so often the case, Israel did not comment on their attack. Despite having attacked Syria almost constantly throughout the past several years, Israel maintains that they are “neutral” on the war.
Based. Expect Sup Forumstards screeching about their favorite dictatorship for this whole thread.
Isaiah Morgan
Bombing someone doesn't necessarily mean you're not neutral in a conflict.
The only true indicator of non-neutrality is a government recognizing the fact that they are in a conflict, or at war.
Take this example. In WW2 there were multiple skirmishes between Portugal and the Nazis, and Switzerland an the Nazis. Yet both Portugal and Switzerland were always neutral.
Gabriel Jenkins
Switzerland and Portugal didn't fucking bomb Germany. Israel has taken sides in the Syrian war from the beginning.
> you don't support the Zionist oppressors, do you user?
>have the USA threaten Syria with invasion because of their substantial stockpile of modern chemical weapons >Syria agrees to destroy its weapons to avoid liberation >Israel can now bomb Syria without fear of retaliation
They are smart.
Matthew Sanchez
If Syria had attacked Israel with chemical weapons the entire world would've come down on them. Even Russia would've stopped supporting them over such a blatant violation of international law.
Jeremiah King
>This is your brain on jewish propaganda
Juan Campbell
>Bombing someone doesn't necessarily mean you're not neutral in a conflict.
Benjamin Carter
Obviously, but Israel would probably not risk bombing them in the first place if they were still sitting on heaps of VX and other highly lethal nerve agents. The risk of chemical retaliation would be simply not worth it. Weapons of mass destruction are usually just a deterrent.
Ethan Perez
The way I see it they're trying to either provoke Syria into attacking them or just slowly whittle down their military, economy, morale and faith in Assad's leadership if they never retaliate. It's unjust but on the other hand Syria and Iran would go full Hezbollah if they could.
They would never actually be used. They were a deterrent like Israel's nukes.
Elijah White
Doesn't matter. Israel knows they're fucked. That's why they're lashing out at the last minute. It's basically a tantrum because they couldn't get their way of having another caliphate next door.
Josiah Clark
why can israel never allow any of its neighbours to achieve relative political stability?
they always talk about how they want to peacefully coexist with everyone.
Thomas Jackson
The Swiss shot down planes of the axis AND the allies which entered their airspace. It's called armed neutrality. Look it up.
Nicholas Richardson
>Bombing someone doesn't necessarily mean you're not neutral in a conflict. Spoken like a true burger
Adrian Torres
>Bombing someone doesn't necessarily mean you're not neutral in a conflict.
Jackson Gomez
Which has literally nothing to do with GPS guided bombs being thrown at an airbase.
Nolan Moore
Attacking army bases and weapons only delays Assad's capture of the rest of the rebel controlled areas which at this point is just cruel, Assad has won the war dragging this conflict any longer than it has to be increases civilian suffering.
Zachary Morris
Unbelieveable. I never tought that mutt brain could shit out something so idiotic and nonsensical. wow, just WOW.
Charles Miller
...
Cameron Torres
...
Jordan Butler
dude, stop.
Asher Roberts
Include me in the cap pls
Isaiah Gutierrez
is this satire
Austin Campbell
I didn't know that Syria was part of Israeli airspace. Go suck your master's dick somewhere else
Robert Hill
...
Jose Perez
For any brainlets here:
Most targets are weapon stockpiles intended for Hezbollah. After the 2nd Lebanon war part of the UN resolution that included withdrawal of IDF forces, was disarmament of the Hezbollah - which never happened because neither UN or Lebanese army are willing or capable to enforce it. That why since forever Israel been saying that it will intercept any attempts to arm Hezbollah, and we've been destroying Syrian weapon convoys heading to Lebanon even before the civil war. If you look up the most causualities during the last raid are Hezbollah fighers.
I bet it drives our enemies mad that we don't let them to quietly rearm. Good, get fucked terrorists - we're not cucks like euros and even if everyone turn against us we will still get you no matter what. Stay mad.
Gavin Carter
kek
Noah Ortiz
how's that f35 flying high bibi
Luis Flores
It was revealed that Obama allowed Hezbollah to continue its massive drug smuggling operations into the US for the Iran deal You think Hezbollah hasn't learned how to smuggle weapons into Lebanon by now? They can just fly anything they need from Iran straight to any airport in Lebanon.
Jaxson Perez
Pretty fucked up when the Jews join sides with the murdering horde of Muslim extremists.
Jayden Price
JUDEN!
Landon Rogers
saved
Isaac Howard
They smuggled fuckload of weapons already, that's no fucking secret. But we catch them - we destroy it. This is honestly more of a symbolic act to remind them as long as they maintain anti-Israeli possition they're not off the hook, and that Israel won't hesitate for a second to cut them down if they make any move against us.
James Stewart
And Syria is obviously in Israel's airspace just as every other place is. right to exist =/= right to preventive retaliation
fucking israelis need to stop voting right wing
Jackson Adams
They usually attack when Hezbollah gets weapons. I'm assuming this is the same shit.
Nicholas Martinez
You just read the thread and then responded. Nice try to look like a smart person, mutt.
Nathaniel Campbell
Why is Hezbollah bad again despite all they do currently is killing ISIS in ME?
Easton Howard
>why can israel never allow any of its neighbours to achieve relative political stability? The only time their neighbors are capable of stability is when it's a hard handed dictatorship.
You could also ask why their neighbors attacked them so much early on? They basically set the tone of interaction.
Hudson White
Hezbollah is bad by definition, according to Israel. Therefore Hezbollah is bad by definition, according to the USA.
John Gutierrez
>Bombing someone doesn't necessarily mean you're not neutral in a conflict.
Xavier Scott
>If Syria had attacked Israel with chemical weapons the entire world would've come down on them. Yet the world hardly blinked an eye when Israel used chemical weapons to bomb a hospital in Palestine. Fuck everything, to be honest.
Hudson Gutierrez
>You just read the thread and then responded. Nice try to look like a smart person, mutt. Implying I read the whole thread. It's common knowledge anyways. I don't know why Sup Forums and Sup Forums keep acting like Israel is doing anything new.
Dominic Cook
>TNT is a chemical weapon! It's got chemicals in it!
Michael Collins
White phosphorus, you fucking piece of shit.
Liam Brown
>Good, get fucked terrorists Your country is a terrorist state.
Daniel Lopez
>Why is Hezbollah bad again despite all they do currently is killing ISIS in ME?
This is why Israel hates them.
Hezbollah was founded in the early 1980s as part of an Iranian effort to aggregate a variety of militant Lebanese Shi'a groups under one roof. Hezbollah acts as a proxy for Iran in the ongoing Iran–Israel proxy conflict.[29]
Hezbollah was conceived by Muslim clerics and funded by Iran primarily to harass the Israeli occupation.[5] Its leaders were followers of Ayatollah Khomeini, and its forces were trained and organized by a contingent of 1,500 Revolutionary Guards that arrived from Iran with permission from the Syrian government,[30] which was in occupation of Lebanon at the time.
Serbs should hate them because
Backed by Iran, Hezbollah fighters fought against Serbian forces during the Bosnian War.[32]
It's also believed to be involved in some synagogue bombing in Argentina and occasionally praises non Sunni suicide bombers.
Nothing to make them evil like ISIS but enough to understand why other countries don't like them.
Nolan Walker
USA uses White phosphorus as well
Zachary Sanchez
>White phosphorus, you fucking piece of shit
>It's a chemical so it must be a chemical weapons
It's an incendiary weapon not a chemical weapon you stupid fucking leb.
Jackson Allen
A stable Arab world is Israel's biggest nightmare. If all Arab countries were to be stabilized they would instantly join forces against Israel.
Jaxson Nguyen
>Bombing someone doesn't necessarily mean you're not neutral in a conflict. Peak jewish mental gymnastics.
Brayden Jackson
-> Sup Forums
Caleb Stewart
>Bombing someone doesn't necessarily mean you're not neutral in a conflict.
Charles Campbell
We're not all as stupid as that guy, you gotta believe me
