King.Arthur.Legend.of.the.Sword.2017.1080p.KORSUB.HDRip.x264.AAC2.0-STUTTERSHIT

>King.Arthur.Legend.of.the.Sword.2017.1080p.KORSUB.HDRip.x264.AAC2.0-STUTTERSHIT

So what's the general consensus on this?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=yGnfFW-vyzU
youtube.com/watch?v=e2LLS33eQvk
youtube.com/watch?v=Uu8VpSqDJtc
youtu.be/olqPODTcRHI
youtube.com/watch?v=jJewbFZHI34
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Only a dog eating retard would watch KORSUBshit

>KORSUB

'no'

kino or game cannot decide
though I liked this medieval shit in snatch format

Ok, the guy ritchie style did not fit tbqh

It's pretty fucking enjoyable, especially if you like Ritchie and aren't hung up on Arthurian accuracy.

JESUS CHRIST

I was pleasantly surprised. It started out poorly, but then we hit the first montage and from there onwards it was great until the final fight which was shit

0/10 they never discussed King Arthur's tax policy.

KINO soundtrack
youtube.com/watch?v=yGnfFW-vyzU
youtube.com/watch?v=e2LLS33eQvk

People had to high of expectations for this. Once I saw Ritchie's name attached, I knew I was in for a treat. I think some thought it was going to "rival" Excalibur.

Any yify links out yet?

It's almost enjoyable but with an enormous flaw, it's severely disjointed

Guy Ritchie has been shite for years

youtube.com/watch?v=Uu8VpSqDJtc
Anyone who didn't love this scene needs to fuck off Sup Forums immediately

>It was supposed to be one of the summer’s biggest blockbusters – a gritty reimagining of the Arthurian legend, boasting big-budget special effects, a rising Hollywood star in British actor Charlie Hunnam and a big-name director in Guy Ritchie. But King Arthur: Legend of the Sword has instead become one of the year’s biggest flops after a disastrous opening weekend at the global box office.

B-but the diversity....

>1080p.KORSUB.HDRip
Why is this allowed?

Why this movei flopped? It's because of the white protag? No stronk female leads?

marketing was atrocious
it wasn't clear who it was aimed at

they should have halved the budget (at minimum, if not reduce it further) and gone for a 15/r rating
alas

King Arthur, I'm Round Table.

>mfw his name was actually Goosefat Bill
Ritchie knows

Underrated

>Charlie Hunnam was emaciated and had lost twenty pounds for the last season of Sons of Anarchy (2008). During auditions, director Guy Ritchie was very bothered by his look, though he liked his performance, and asked him four times during the process about his poor physique and what was the heaviest he had been. Hunnam said that when Ritchie brought up the fourth time, he knew that the physicality of Arthur was very important to Ritchie. He promised him that he would get into incredible shape for Arthur and to prove his fitness for the part and even offered to physically fight the other two finalists, Henry Cavill and Jai Courtney.
>Hunnam told Ritchie, "Look, dude, you keep bringing this up, the physicality. It's obviously your primary concern. So if you want to do away with all this auditioning bollocks, I'll f***ing fight those other two dudes. I know who they are. You can bring them both in here. I'll fight them both. The one who walks out the door gets the job." Hunnam won the role after this.

budget: +175M
marketing: +100M
income: -138M

it should've been Henry

I agree Hunnam should be restricted to TV only and even then he still is subpar

If you like Guy Ritchie movies, you'll love this. If not, then you won't.

i dont need to watch it to know it's 100% absolute total shit

Why do they think putting niggers in medieval movies is a good idea? It will only drive people away from the movie.

The movie did not fail because black people were in it so stop whining about it. It failed because it fucking sucked and people just aren't interested in historical movies, fantasy or otherwise, if it doesn't have internal combustion engines or smartphones forget it

Except he was great in this. The only film where I liked him as the lead.

I hate when they do that

Sycophantic bootlicker

> Man from U.N.C.L.E: ~50 million loss
> King Arthur: ~150 million loss

Is Guy Ritchie finished after this?

Personally, I wanted to go see the movie because I always liked history movies, plus, it was a movie about king Arthur, but I dropped it when I saw a black knight in the trailer.

Did you somehow miss the part where it was directed by Guy Ritchie?

Considering the shit that is the movie, I don`t see why not.

>marketing was atrocious

>Not butchering King Arthur`s story with political correctness.

Righta

We Wuz

youtu.be/olqPODTcRHI

youtube.com/watch?v=jJewbFZHI34

Guy Ritchie is always fun and this was no exception. Fuck knows what his Aladdin will be like.

this flick is trash and edited by a an autismo

>i wanna be black
always gets me

WE WUZ KNIGHTS N ISREALITES

I hope not. I enjoyed both those films.

UTTER shit. Doesn't work as an action flick, doesn't work as a fantasy flick, certainly doesn't work as an historical flick. No-one wanted this shit, I hope everyone involved dies of aids within the week.

Wtf was that darkland sequence

>implying modern audiences recognize a director

Spielberg could release an action-adventure movie tomorrow and it would flop unless it was a known franchise.

Fuck off. Here is a list of niggers i dont care about.
>space niggers
>deep space niggers
>Medieval niggers
>Subterranean niggers
>niggers from another dimension
>tv niggers
>movie niggers
>cosplay niggers
>porn niggers
>jesus niggers
>egyptian pharaoh niggers
>underwater mermaid niggers
>nigger God
>nigger Jesus

The only niggers that concern me are my next door neighbour niggers. So shut the fuck up with this racist bs.

Indeed, not only the korean subs are annoying but there's worse, it's always very badly encoded. Even if it's 1080p, it's actually crap that has some offset parasite and looks upscaled

It was perfect, the only downside to this movie is the generic story and the plot holes

nigger God was funny desu