That's not how scar should look like after 15 years. And don't tell me it's magic scar

That's not how scar should look like after 15 years. And don't tell me it's magic scar.

It's a magic scar, user.

It quite literally IS a magic scar though.

I said don't tell me that!

It might be difficult to accept it, but it really is a magic scar.

why did he have a cool looking scar, he should have had his face destroyed

Why are you fags always fucking posting about nothing. Plotbabbys

Waiting for the Pasta

it's a magic scar

No, fuck you! SCARS DONT WORK LIKE THAT!

it's a magic scar

Maybe thats not how a scar should look, but after 15 years, Harry Potter is still one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"brrrrrrRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

"No!"

magic scars do

i have a facial scar I got when I was a toddler that is still very visible. what about it is unbelievable?

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!

idk maybe it's a fake scar makeup

But it is a magic scar.

How can scars be real if mars isn't real?

The scar is where part of Voldemort's soul entered his body. The scar stung any time voldemort was near. It was a magic scar, bro. Deal with it.

Little bitch complaining about something literally nobody has ever complained about or given a shit about. It's a magic scar, get over it. Kys.

That tiny scratch wouldn't have even left a scar

Is this Lee Goldson's Harry Potter hating brother?

Dude stop acting like a faggot

*tips edgedora*

...

It's an arcane scar

It was a magic scar.
That's why he lost it after his own piece of Voldemort's soul was destroyed.

Makes a spell to protect your son from all harm.
It doesn't stop a piece of wizard Hitler's soul from burrowing itself into your son's forehead.

>>a-at least the books were good though
>"brrrrrrRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP"

I mean he did still sorta have it.

What a weird response. Are people like just inserting maymays into random shit without thought at all? Probably meta posting or something.

>LOTR in shit

Been a /lit/ faggot forever, seen it a million times, but it still gets me. Worst is most brainlets believe it.

Post-modernists need to be gassed.

Ok