Anarcho-capitalist thread!

Anarcho-capitalist thread!

Libertarian?

Who makes the roads?

Enjoy roman armies marching down your streets

The roads which are not necessary to market success will not exist, and don't need to exist.

Just one of those bad months for pol

private companys who want roads :)

What roman armies?

bump

>Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow? 'No!' says the man in Washington, 'It belongs to the poor.' 'No!' says the man in the Vatican, 'It belongs to God.' 'No!' says the man in Moscow, 'It belongs to everyone.' I rejected those answers; instead, I chose something different. I chose the impossible. I chose... Rapture, a city where the artist would not fear the censor, where the scientist would not be bound by petty morality, Where the great would not be constrained by the small! And with the sweat of your brow, Rapture can become your city as well.

hell yeah user! Andrew Ryan was the real good guy in that game!

fuck yeah anarchy!!! dudes its time to shoot up the entire city!! i hate school!!

For everyone in this thread, is it more important to abide by the NAP, or to use force to distribute money to the poor?

I say that the poor will extraordinarily benefit from the NAP. No regulations so they can start businesses any way they want. No corporal punishment to fuck them up as a kid. No central bank to manipulate and inflate currency (which hurts the poor the most). No wars to send the poor into fight.

NAP > Socialism

i agree user!

The only people who would disagree with you are lazy parasites user
>What is the most admirable creature on God's green Earth? Why, it's the bee! Have you ever seen a bee on vacation? Have you ever seen a bee take a sick day? Well, my friends, the answer is no! So I say, be... the bee! Be the bee!

Who pays them? And who pays for highways?

>The roads which are not necessary to market success will not exist, and don't need to exist.

So anyone who has to commute to work is shit out of luck? That doesn't sound like a good idea at all.

>Want to build roads
>Go to bank and take out loan for road project
>Build roads
>Charge tolls for road
>Pay back bank loan
>Make profit
>Continue on to bigger and better things

roads will be paid for by the private company's who desire them.

Necessity spawns creativity and enginuity.

You're used to thinking of a community where work is a 20-30 minute drive. Who knows, work could be next door. Advertisements could help pay for roads too. The point is: who knows, but the government has certainly subsidized the oil industry through cars and roads contributing to global warming.

I mean, the entire structure of society changes over the years. Housing that does not accommodate satisfying the desires of individuals would not exist, and does not need to exist.

So basically only people are already rich as fuck can afford to build roads that will make them even richer? Nobody can afford the millions of dollars it takes for a major highway construction.

And whats to stop abuse? Those private companies can charge whatever rate they want. You're going to make people poorer for just trying to get to work.

>right wing 'anarchism'

kek lad what are you doing with your life

Nothing exists that doesn't provide [wealth].

Toll roads exist.

MFW trans-continental trains were privately built and operated, but cost millions in fixed costs.

Who cares if the rich get richer, they only do it by satisfying the needs of others, such as providing roads.

Wew lad

anarchism is right wing :) so called left wind anarchism doesn't make sense because it replaces government with government :)

MFW trans-continental trains were privately built and operated, but cost millions in fixed costs.

Who cares if the rich get richer, they only do it by satisfying the needs of others, such as providing roads.

Wew lad

>And whats to stop abuse? Those private companies can charge whatever rate they want. You're going to make people poorer for just trying to get to work.
TWO FUCKING WORDS private courts

>What is the most admirable creature on God's green Earth? Why, it's the bee! Have you ever seen a bee on vacation? Have you ever seen a bee take a sick day? Well, my friends, the answer is no! So I say, be... the bee! Be the bee!

Bioshock's Andrew Ryan is what happens when you pass a poplit dissection of Ayn Rand through the lens of ((progressive intellectual game designers))

>so called left wind anarchism doesn't make sense because it replaces government with government :)

except it literally doesnt xDxdD

might as well just have lynching parties decided by popular vote, kek.

except it does left wing "anarchists" want social security,welfare and public healthcare and taxes to pay for it all.

No lynching by definition is considered wrong in the eyes of free market anarchism because it goes against the victims natural born rights.

but if a board of sweaty old jewish men hit a gavel its okay?

Centralized banks would not exist.

The revolution is coming socialfags.

how is that relevant to my statement.

bank =/= court

only within the current economic system do left anarchists believe in that. In an anarchist society there would be no be taxes because there would be no necessary government. How do you balance the idea of anarchism whilst also believing in private property babe xx

Then left anarchist philosophy falls apart because it is human nature to want private property there for there would be constant in fighting.

>it is human nature to want private property

WEW

its true that's why communism/socialism doesnt work i.e Venezuela,cuba,russia etc...

This is what happens now. The difference is that the government violently monopolizes the court system, so if you're not satisfied with the service our conditions, you can't go elsewhere.

You aren't making a very compelling case for remaining with the status quo.

>doesnt even know the difference between state capitalism and anarcho-communism

THIS KEEPS GETTING BETTER

Nice b8 m8.

anarcho- communism is a oxymoron. communism requires government.

Workers can start up co ops right now with no more barriers than any normal business structure. Why aren't they? Because your beloved proletariat are perfectly fine with the idea of private ownership of capital.

Combine that with the massive failues that were every communist state (or state that prohibited private property), and you get the impression that most people want private property.

Hey, kid. Wanna buy some heroin?

The kid doesn't have to buy the heroin nobody is forcing them to.

tribal societies are by default anarcho communist

He worded it in a kinda dumb way, but he's right.

Private property is the basis for conflict-solving, because the world we live in is finite and we have to figure out who has exclusive use over which scarce resources.

Well, first of all, your body is a scarce resource. Who owns your body? The religious say it's the soul, the non-religious say it's the mind.

Your soul/mind owns your body, which means it has exclusive use over it. This is why murder is wrong, because under property rights, you are attacking someone else's property (in this case, their body).

The non-aggression principle comes from this. When you initiate force, you are attacking/violating someone's private property.

He said "human nature" because it's the most basic and simple form of solving conflicts, by observing the private property rights of each party.

>communism requires government.

You should finish High school before you start trying to grasp politics sweetheart. Maybe read Marx and get an entry level understanding of what anarchism is

So what your saying is you want a uncivilized society? where people are constantly fighting over resources and even in tribes there are small governments

>goy wants a loan for roads
>charge 230% interest
>write in clause for royalties on any income incurred from toll roads built under this loan agreement
>never get repaid for my loan and only option is to murder the loan recipient and take over the toll booth
>cars not stopping at toll booth. just give me the finger

Actually i used to be a Marxist.

The "goy" can find a better place to get a loan i.e free market.

He doesn't have to. But believe me. When he sees this new Pokemon labeled heroin which I didn't even have to respect the trademark to use, he's going to want it.

think of the business opportunities in child heroin rehab clinics. The free market knows best.

Its not the job of the seller to be concerned with what the kid puts into his body.

Pretty sure the loan cartel doesn't allow competitors.

Which is why you get these kids hooked at a young age.

You were probably one of those state-capitalist, Snow hat-wearing, DPRK-loving autists. Weren't you?

monopoly's cant form in a free market.

what streets?

Checkmate.

Voluntarism is better - nobody will bitch at you for their false presuppositions about how markets (which are literally just voluntary association in action) function.

nope i was a ancom.

>sweetheart

back to tumblr

fuck off
NS immediately takes control from your disorganized asses
88

socialism in general loses while capitalism forms to the needs of each individual.

Even when heroin was legal, kids weren't commonly using it.
Opioids don't jive well with kids, because kids like to be active and excited.
Stims OTOH...

Lil Timmy would love some free market coke.

If an anarcho-capitalist region had some time to cohere and form stable institutions, it would field a superior military to a national socialist state.

New Thread:

Why do protesters always fly black and red?

nope mines better :)

As an industry man I look for profits where others miss it. To my surprise, "who maintains the roads" wasn't the right question to ask once mass privatization hit. The answer was obvious - the owners do. Collecting a small fee per use of the road was also fairly simple.

What nobody realized was that the land under roads were property. I began a corporation to own roads around my friendly city and invested heavily in other companies that did the same. It was a few years before acquisitions forced consolidation of my business with others, thereby combining our properties. More and more roads were owned by my business.

Owning all of the roads was not my goal. I simply waited until I had a connecting loop surrounding the city. A loop of private property, owned by me, surrounding the city. You're smart. You can see what my next step was. Cost of living went up, given the taxes I levied on imports to the city. Exports also went up but I never starved anybody, that would be bad for business. A slice off the top of economic activity of an entire city was more than enough to make shareholders happy.

At leas the ones that didn't live in my city.

Wanna be anarchist edge lords.

...

So basically,
NO ROADS

Oh honey you have a lot to learn

nope there would be roads because the businesses who would need them would pay to have them built.

>neighbor's son wanders into my yard
>shoot him for violating my property rights
>neighbor punches me
>sue him for violating the NAP in Coca-Cola(tm) private court presided over by a judge who got his degree from wal-mart
Can't wait for the capitalist utopia 2bh

That violates the child's rights.

Let me put your argument in a better way.

So basically, if I want to start up a small business in a new sector of town, I'm going to have to build my own roads, because there's no expectation that buisnesses will actually want to support my venture..

That's the problem with your utopia, it makes businesses harder to start up and stunts the development of the rural areas which consist only of farmers.

that's not how that would work.
anyone with common sense wouldn't shoot a kid for wandering into your yard.

If only it were possible to traverse unpaved ground, and if only we had some sort of vehicles capable of such a feat, anclapism would work.

Alas, there is nothing of the sort. Anarchists BTFO.

>telling me how to defend my own property as is my natural right
How about you fuck off back to the USSR you fucking statist bootlicker

you could build your business next to a already existing road.

learn more pls.

suuuuure

kek

Having a child is an implicit contract to help the child

>medieval Iceland and Republic of Cospaia survived like 3 centuries under anarchy, one always under the threat of being invaded by Norway or Denmark, and the other surrounded by several Italian warlords
>Nazis couldn't last 30 years
the candle that burns twice as hot lasts half as long :^)

Antifa.

Babies using dead babies as foundation.
>hurr human rights durr
grow up.

>implicit contracts

Starting to sound a bit statist there faggot.

But you've just said that roads will be no where the market doesn't want them.

I'm building my business specifically in an area of town where there's no competition. Why would the road construction businesses build a road in an area of no economic importance.

>recreational nukes
I like this!

Not ancap, but you guys suck even more. (somehow)
Hitler sold his nation into debt slavery and payed for it with the blood of young german soldiers. He had no fucking clue about economics either- and he admitted it. His millitary strategy was bullshit and he was a retarded pervert.
Your fuhrer: a shit

Hardly. Contracts cannot be formed without the mutual agreement of at least two parties. In the case of children, the second party doesn't even exist at the time that any such contract would be made.

Also, implicit contracts are a really shaky area, especially when you consider the issue I mentioned.

please grow up