Someone explain this to me: how exactly is the aryan race superior when they got their asses kicked by a bunch of slavs?

Someone explain this to me: how exactly is the aryan race superior when they got their asses kicked by a bunch of slavs?

Pic related.

they tried, they failed, they commited sudoku out of shamefur dispray

because they arent superior bunch of franks mixed with slavs and added shit northern genes and you get germans

Hitler had autism

Why do they worship Hitler then?

autists

Autism brings people together

Gee i dont know, how do rat plagues kill many people when humans are supposed to be the strongest species?

That actually makes sense. A bunch of people with mental illnesses.

If they got destroyed by an inferior race then they aren't a superior race.

>german autists literally elected someone with "we will fight everyone and win" mentality
There is no other option, germany is autistic = truth

Someone explain to me where the "Russians aren't white" meme started in the first place

While you're at it explain why Hitler despised eastern Europeans so much but embraced swarthy Italians and Spaniards

only people with German blood seriously push the master aryan race meme

Anglophones have 80%+ same genetics as the ancient western Euros who built Stonehenge, and they conquered half the damn planet and all of the oceans + today we're ruled over by one of their colonies... yet we don't run around shouting "British Islander Atlandid master race" because there's no need to brag

AUA MEN AR RANIN FROM ZE BATURFIRD!

SOVIETS had almost unlimited men to throw at the germany army , that was also busy holding the west side . A 1v1 only germany Vs soviet union , would have resulted in clear victory for the germans

The strongest man can be taken down by enough ants.

You dont get it do you, how was an army of 3Million, most of them dead in Russia supposed to fight back 11 Million savages?

it makes even more sense if you think everyone in politics has a mental illness just like their followers, everyone is thinking they're fighting for a good cause, they take positions and fight with other mentally ill individuals which formed other groups and everyone is fighting for good, it starts slowly with debates and such and it gets to a point where massive wars are fought because they're all trying to save the world

This they thought they could take on the whole world and win they where retarded. Had they dealt with Russia first then France and other then maybe

pretty much this, from a purely evolutionary point, dead people are inferior

Can a wolf defend himself from 1000 rats?

That's literally what the Nazis were, dude. The Third Reich was run by the people who spent their formative years being bullied, trivialised, and bellitled. They were the weakest and least powerful of the German men, but they were still hated throughout the Weimar Republic because they were German men and therefore always had to be privileged. A straight, white, German male in 1925 who earned 3000 marks a year was considered more privileged than a Jewish lesbian earning 300000/year

Because russians are mongols in denial, thats also why he hated them

>scratch a russian and you'll wound a tatar

This logic is not reassuring in this context

It used to be that the further East you went in Europe the shittier it got. It's still like that to a degree, but not like what is was 100 years ago.

I do that

Then why go to war with them? I don't walk up to 30 abos by myself and pick a fight

Because ants survive if they work together.

Ever seen an ant colony survive if they all fend for themselves and not kill prey together?

>the further east you go the shittier it gets
>the further east you go the more russians you encounter

Hmmm... it really made me think

Don't worry, they've been predicting that since Thomas Malthus. Africa always finds a way to fuck up eventually and kill millions upon millions of their people. It's history's one great constant. That, and Russians doing the same thing.

America betrayed them. now they stuck with the rats infestation.

Well Jan, Poles apparently weren't considered white either. In fact, more of you guys probably got holocausted than Jews.

>Then why go to war with them?
They were planning an invasion anyway, and being extremely obvious about it.

Africa equaled Europe in population in 1995, the distant, hazy past of 1995, and they exceed it by 400 million right now

aye brother we will pay tribute to the moon and the sun at the henge

good point if you gave the white colonists of America the entire African continent in 1700s, by now there would be 1 billion whites in that place

its not that slavs that pushed the aryans shit in, its the anglos

Then let them be the bad guys and attack first. It was obvious Hitler had plans beyond rearming the Rhineland and seizing Sudetenland, but the West wanted him to be the baddie before they would do something.

Because Sup Forums is a satire.

Fun fact: Hitler had very good relations with Poland until Piłsudski died and was replaced with Beck

If it wasnt for that faggot we would be on Hitlers side.

German factories and even population centers being constantly bombed by the US and Brits, day and night.

Russians having abnormally cold winter to slow down Operation Barbarossa.

Russians spamming meatshields.

Despite that, the kill/death ratio was still 20-1 in the Germans' favor versus the Soviets.

yeah, to be fair tho sausage your the first of the shit tier races, sure your the best of them, but, who really wants to be the best fucking turd??

>Russians aren't white
The butthurt belt is to blame for that meme
>despised eastern Europeans so much
He didn't, he hated ruskies for embracing the jewish communism, if he had despised eastern europeans, he wouldn't have had so many satellite states.

Kek

But it's still Africa. It's what they do. Judging Africa's population today is like declaring in a middle of an economic boom that there will never be a recession. Sooner or later they'll half a war that leads to a famine, throw in some Ebolaids epidemics, and bam, Africa once again is no threat to anyone who doesn't go there.

If you're worried about population, it's yellow people who actually have a chance to take down whites, not black

Because the "aryans" in central Europe with around 0.6% of the landmass on the planet, fought against other "Aryans" on an Island who also had control of like 1/4th or the planet, fought also other "Aryans" on an Island further to the west, fought also other "Aryans" right next to them for the west and fought slavs/mongols to the east. Those combined occupied nearly half the planet and were like 80% of the industrial power of the planet.

And only by working together, i.e. first US material support to britain, then US and UK material support to the soviets + extreme use of soviet lifes is what gave them the win in the end.

UK and France completely alone wouldn´t have won, USSR alone wouldn´t have won and US vs Nazis would depend on who can land on the other clay successfully.

If the US wouldn´t have given the clean slate to britain in 37 or 38, the west wouldn´t have dared to start shit with the "Aryans" in central europe.

Slavs are simply superior

Listen to him guys, peipk knows whats up

but what about that audio of Hitler's comments to that Finnish leader about how USSR had been enjoying a free decade to arm themselves with huge numbers of tanks and oil supply?

he seemed to recognise how much greater Soviet mobilisation capacity was than Germany, hence his strategy of being like a pitbull going straight for the throat as soon as possible

In 1941, when the germans attacked the USSR, the soviets already had massive armaments. For comparisson, germany had like 7k tanks, the USSR already 22k tanks and while the german attack was on its way, everybody kept producing.

Thanks to the soviets having no experience and were completely retarted until 1944 or so, they lost nearly everything in the first few month of barbarossa. The germans even destroyed a relevant part of their military in the first 2 weeks actually. And additionally and very important for the vast land mass of the USSR: over 80% of the soviet support vehicles got destroyed, i.e. trains, trucks and planes used to send troops, ammo, food etc to the frontlines.

This fucked them over heavily.

Hindsight is 20/20. But you're right, that way he could have convinced the Japs to join against Russia instead of drawing the US in. Then all the factories built with Lend-Lease would have been BTFO and Russia would fold like a cheap card table.

They were barely beaten, at great length, by an alliance of nearly the entire world

Russia alone would wipe the floor with germany, western allies just came in to stop russia from installing communism everywhere

but germans knew this

are they suprior yet retarded

Topkek. Without allied support Russia wouldn´t have won, maybe stalemate. But I won´t bother going into the details, has been done over and over on here.

Tldr: What USSR lacked most where Food, Raw Material and Support vehicles for delivering stuff. This they got via lend lease, otherwise support to the frontlines reduced by 60% and many more starving back home.

I think the argument being made is that UK/US supply aid to Soviets is what allowed them to survive all the early defeats described here ergo a pure 1v1 (no foreign aid from Anglos) would result in German victory

Germany was fighting a war against time. Waiting further just increases the enemies strength. They had the USSR and the USA against them as the economic power houses. The war had to be ended rather quick. OP barbarossa got the soviets by surprise. Otherwise all of europe would have become communist. And that the USSR even got half of it in the end is thanks to UK and US supporting the USSR. Even after the war, they could have pushed the USSR back to moscow (even without nukes). They just had to stop lend lease, use this stuff for their own troops and the soviets would have been fucked.

They're not. Slavic people are the most superior of them all. We eagerly wait for Western civilization to crumble so that we may become the rightful rulers of tomorrow.

>Even after the war, they could have pushed the USSR back to moscow (even without nukes). They just had to stop lend lease, use this stuff for their own troops and the soviets would have been fucked.
RIP based Patton. he wanted to do exactly that, so the proto-CIA killed him straight away

for whatever Jewish banker globalist reasons, the plan from the start was always to have a Soviet power-bloc emerge after WW2. They shot the man who tried to stop it

CHECKED

Not just patton. The USSR knew they have basically lost. To sustain themselfs against the anglo forces in the long run (i.e. winning the cold war), they had to take all of Europe, gaining the manpower, resources, academic innovation capabilities and securing the beaches to the west. That didn´t happen. Hence, the soviets had a huge military parade after WW2 celebrating the victory but Stalin didn´t attend. He knew they were fucked in the long run so he didn´t even bother.

I can't recall the exact figures, but the allied forces were significantly outnumbered to Soviet forces immediately after the war. Russia has just defeated German forces and had well attuned military production to support the war at this point.

I genuinely believe in 1945 without nuclear weapons the Soviet Union would have likely succeeded pushing allied forces off the continent. But the USA commited to Britain would mean allied airforce and navy would prevent the soviets from entering ocean territory, and a barbaric bombing session probably would have came about. It would have been a pointless and disastrous war, hence operation unthinkable.

We are talking about aryanz not germans

Lol you are mentally ill

You are mentally ill

Suuure

If they were destroyed by a inferior people that makes them more superior

>and a barbaric bombing session probably would have came about. It would have been a pointless and disastrous war, hence operation unthinkable.
so what you're saying is... Allies would have won against USSR because of Anglo freedom-bombing

the soviets won because Stalin was absolutely bonkers

>premier Stalin, we have this quarter's casualty report. we suffered 1,000,000 casualties and the enemy suffered 300,000
>excellent comrade, carry on