Is there any board more uneducated about its subject matter than Sup Forums?

Is there any board more uneducated about its subject matter than Sup Forums?

/his/

Sup Forums

Sup Forums

just came here to make sure this was posted
also Sup Forums

love you all, Sup Forums bros

Sup Forums

>no argument for why, just saying that it is
Amazing. That's why this board is sooo high quality.

Are you kidding me?
Most of Sup Forums doesnt know anything about music outside of the few chosen artists they never stop talking about

Unequivocally this. The football (american) threads are unbridled shit.

Sup Forums, /k/. Sup Forums, /lgbt/, /fa/, /his/, /jp/, /lit/, Sup Forums, /news/, /soc/, Sup Forums

Your post is low grade shill material. That's all.
Step up your shitposting fellow leaf.

You gonna sit here and babysit your thread like a tripfag all day? Fuck off.

Really makes you think

[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x
Blow it out your ass leaf

>shill
>he can't come up with an argument so he uses meme buzzwords

If you don't like it, don't read.

/his/lit/v/x/
Ironically Sup Forums is the best at being Sup Forums the shittier it gets the more accurate it becomes.

Well in your original post you never asked why, so stfu this is what you get.

All of these boards are more educated about their subject matter than Sup Forums. Suck it Americuck.

Nice argument in your OP.

>leaf
really makes you sage

OPs don't need to provide one, newfriend.

>waaah i don't like the answers now i crie like a babbie

Typical SJW

Sup Forums for sure

most boards are about hobbies so they can't be all that wrong, but Sup Forums is filled with retards who just want to talk about their newest phone, or what specific browser release line they should use, what their desktop looks like, and how to best and most efficiently program fizzbuzz

it's a few capable guys stranded in the middle of a moron ocean

Only if OP is a huge faggot... in that case you are right.

Burden of proof is on you leaf

More buzzwords for a typical shitposter.

OP is a faggot

does /x/ really count? Everytime I go there its always loaded with batshit insane fuckery.

>soooo
>>>/reddit/r/CorrectTheRecordYouth

>Burden of proof is on you leaf

And burden of poof is on you, faggot.

...

/his/ knows almost nothing about history and it's filled with Stirner memes anytime someone tries to have a deep discussion.
/lit/ is infested with retards who think Sup Forumsacks are out to get them.
Sup Forums, the validity of your opinion is measured against how much it goes against be prevailing opinion. The more you disagree with the "right" opinion, the more correct your opinion is.
/x/ I shouldn't have to explain.
Goes without saying that haunted house/slenderman/wizardry threads don't qualify as an honest inquiry into the paranormal or supernatural. Sup Forums is more in tune with magic than they are, check these digits.

Sup Forums actually cares, even if we only know shit about shit, we care about shit, that's more than can be said for any of those other boards. We also don't have to force honest deep discussions, Sup Forums has easily the most heartwarming threads around. We are like a clan of territorial gorillas that become super freely every once in a while.
If everyone is nice all the time then you can't tell the genuine nice from the fake nice and it all becomes a blur.
Since everyone on Sup Forums is an ass, the nice threads that we have are always extremely genuine and yield warm fuzzy feelings.

Poor babbie here go play with a ball.

You must be new here. Place used to be amazing '09 ish when I was newfagging. Lurk moar.

>posting selfies on Sup Forums

Take that shit to /soc/, asshole.

>Sup Forums is better than every other board in doing their own job
Prove me wrong.

>Sup Forums, the validity of your opinion is measured against how much it goes against be prevailing opinion. The more you disagree with the "right" opinion, the more correct your opinion is.
So it's exactly like Sup Forums then?

I mean I guess if their profession is not making sense then they are pretty good at it.

Stop taking selfies if you hate seeing them posted.

is this supposed to be a joke, man I really don't understand German humor

>what happened 7 years ago is relevant now
Nobody cares how much of an oldfagg you are

If Sup Forums was a public place instead of an obscure image board then yes. We deal in our own underground version of politics, Sup Forums handles objectively accessible/understandable games. If Sup Forums was a national news station then you'd be correct. Otherwise we're just an enclave trading ideas. Aren't you the refutation of your own post by posting a dissenting opinion though? That or your the affirmation of it in which case you'd be hypocritical for calling it a bad thing? So what is it? Are you wrong in which case Sup Forums right, or are you right in which case Sup Forums is also right?

Did you forget rule number one?
>Sup Forums is always right

Doubtful
Sup Forums is a tinfoil feels board, is literally fueled by resentful and rage filled conspiracy enthusiasts, and there's very little reason or rational discourse as a result. While users may have been educated once, it's pretty much mandatory to deny anything taught in order to fit in.

>Sup Forums is always right
Said nobody ever.

this thread is why we need to ban leafs

he's not an oldfag

back in my day, anyone from 2007+ was a newfag and that would never change. that makes both me and him newfags

also, Sup Forums was never good. I've never actually been to the board but it's pretentious and normie as fuck
>believing you are superior based on what you consume rather than what you produce
>ever

Prove it leaf cuck. You can't. Go suck shit and die

/qa/
They think we "raid" them whenever some random faggot even makes a little quip of a political opinion on any board, tells them to go back to Sup Forums, guess we get raided by Sup Forums, Sup Forums and etc all the time too according to them.
They don't actually have constructive criticism on the site either, they just shitpost their subjective faggotry

Your vagina has no power here. Leave.

Ran out of responses?

You can't prove your argument. I can, but don't feel obligated too. That's why you're a plebeian and I'm a patrician.

I gave you a response, you uneducated idiot.

I just use the term "oldfag" in a derogatory fashion for someone who acts superior based on how long theyve been on the site, but I know what you mean

>All of these boards are more educated about their subject matter than Sup Forums
You're asking for arguments but don't even point out any. Kill yourself already.

Get hit by a truck.

lmao #rekt

literally Sup Forums tier posting. saged

This is overwhelmingly accurate. /his/ in particular is disgraceful, if I see one more thread about fucking swords written by people whose idea of reliable sources is Lindybeige I'll fucking kill myself.

Also Stimer was disqualified from reading forever around the third time I saw him posted. Decided that he couldn't possibly have anything important to say.

I really disagree with OP. Sup Forums is probably one of the most based boards on the site in the sense that if you come with an argument without backing it up, you'll be ignored completely. If you can't come with a rational argument, you're ignored completely, or if the bait is good enough, flooded with examples why the poster is wrong.

Sup Forums

>if you come with an argument without backing it up, you'll be ignored completely
And yet all these shitposters in the thread have gotten responses. Clearly you're an uneducated faggot.

Don't forge to sage, newfriends.

Counter-sage. Triggered? :^)

Krauts are always based.

probably Sup Forums

Are you actually joking? Every time -- actually almost every fucking time -- I've brought in facts and sources and taken a paragraph or two to actually explain shit, whoever I've been replying to (often several people) just ducked out of the fucking thread.

Post some retarded one-liner shit about how [x] is LITERALLY KEKS because [clearly fallacious argument] and people actually bother to reply.

This is consistently the worst board for any kind of serious discussion.

>You can't prove your argument. I can, but don't feel obligated too. That's why you're a plebeian and I'm a patrician.

You can't be arsed to argue in good faith, why should we treat you as anything other than a perennial shitposter?

It's your burden to provide evidence. Please learn how arguing works, there's a sticky on the front page you should've read.

Stirner is p good, actually. He's a very important although overlooked figure in the history of philosophy, but he's not essential reading.

This guy knows

>Sup Forums actually cares, even if we only know shit about shit, we care about shit, that's more than can be said for any of those other boards.
This isn't a positive you faggot
not only is everyone here a complete retard but because you think you're "fighting for a cause" or "doing something that matters" you become a hundred times more insufferable
Sup Forums is basically the embarassments that were project chanology and gamergate all the time, except the board hasn't been deleted yet so you haven't had the chance to step back and realize how fucking annoying and cringy you are

That's because you're doing it wrong.

If you bring a legit argument and back it up with facts then you've won that argument if the other side can't respond. Chalk one up to yourself, even gloat a little (this tends to motivate people to take you more seriously).

It may be that at a later point your argument is defeated, but untill that point it stands. This is in fact how Sup Forums works. It's basically survival of the fittest for who can argue their case best, the winner being "Sup Forums's position on the subject".

if you don't like it, then you can get out

The burden of proof is on the person making the claim. That means you.

You still don't understand how this works. You have the burden of proof, as per the sticky image.

>The burden of proof is on the person making the claim. That means you.

Can you prove that? I mean, you just made a claim after all.

this

Certainly I can:

God exists.
Prove it.
I don't have to. It's on your to prove he doesn't.
You can't? Well then I guess he must exist ;^)

Sup Forums is true kino, whereas Sup Forums is a mere flick

* Somehow believes he's asking if Sup Forums is uneducated about Facism

You did nothing to prove that the burden of proof is on the person making the claim. Very sad.

The so called burden of proof is nothing but a social construct.

Demonstrating the lack of comparative effectiveness of the alternative is an effective way to prove the comparative effectiveness, which he did.

I did, you're just either shitposting or didn't understand the example.

Here's another.

You're on trial for murder
The judge asks to you prove that you were NOT in the victim's house that day.
When you can't (because providing hard evidence for an event that didn't take place is all but impossible), you are convicted and taken to jail - despite truly never having been in the house.

Because of this, the person making the claim that you DID do something must prove it. The default position of logic is a negative until proven otherwise.

would somebody fucking nuke my country already

this board is fucking unbearable because of stupid leaf posters

>leaf

He did not deliver a proof of his claim. All he did was emphasize his wish for a proof.

Mediocre.

I demonstrated that if it is on the person challenging the claim to prove his case, while the person making it does not have to, it leads to unsupported and often wrong conclusions.

/trash/

>being a self-loathing faggot
Americaboos on this board are disgusting.

The fact that you are too retarded to get his point doesn't mean that he didn't make one.

In the case of Canada, I find it acceptable.

You demonstrated nothing. You literally put forth "MUH FEE FEES: the non-argument".

Sad.

A point is not proof. "Proof" is not a synonym for "point".

Never post again.

Please point out the specific point at which I made an emotion based argument.

>Show my opponent's proposition in action and how it reaches flawed conclusions
>This is somehow not proof

>Moooomoooom, I want this guy to have the burden of proof when he makes a statement because it makes arguing with him sooooo much easier, and the fact that he won't comply is meeeeeeaaaaan

i guess you're right, considering all those uneducated leftypol, ctr and antifa /inv/aders

Yes, arguing with someone who uses proper logic is much easier, because it's actually possible to beat them.

Why is this bad, and at which point did I cry out to anyone or imply the other people was mean?

fucking kill yourself

you're probably not even an old stock canadian

fucking chink

>I am a retard, look at me, I am a retard
great argument, kevin shantal tùrczy

Sup Forums isn't pro socialism though. Sup Forums is anti women.