Dude Hogan deserved it, lmao

>Dude Hogan deserved it, lmao

What did Netflix mean by this?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=LEdAkWOXcVM
youtube.com/watch?v=-Pr8S44o6N4&t=405s
youtube.com/watch?v=PHow1B32WZw
youtube.com/watch?v=jdP8TiKY8dE
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>dude free speech is stealing and then publishing someone's sex tape

>court orders you to take down hulk hogan sex tape
>refuse
>get sued
>'what if we joke about child pornography during the trial?'

bravo gawker

HULKAMANIA IS RUNNIN WILD BRUTHA

>I mean, I’d rather if she was going to fuck some nigger, I’d rather have her marry an 8-foot-tall nigger worth a hundred million dollars! Like a basketball player! I guess we’re all a little racist. Fucking nigger.

What did the Hulkster mean by this?

They hurt his friends
and they hurt his pride
he had to be a man
he couldn't let it slide.

And NetFlix is promoting their shit but they forget social media's still a thing. Who is going to side with their retarded asses? You were given a court order to stop and desist and you said no, during the civil suit, you made a joke about peddling illegal contraband. The jury awarded Hogan 118 million. I understand 50 million was the max. But they went over the maximum. It's the ultimate form of "We're not having your shit."

WHATCA GONNA DO WHEN THE HULKSTER AND THE KKK RUN WILD ON YOU

HOAK KOGAN, WE'RE COMIN' FOR YOUR DAUGHTER NIGGA

I love how the documentary skips over almost the entire trial in order to paint gawker as the good guys.

>publishing Jlaws nudes are wrong and you should go to jail
>what does that have to do with us publishing hulk hogans sex tape and then refusing to take it down even after we get a court order telling up to.

He doesn't want his daughter becoming a single mother with a halfbreed child.

Does it have any connections to Gawker?

>>publishing Jlaws nudes
Who gives a shit about publishing. dude went to jail because of how he got them. Or should anyway. Hell, if you're stupid enough to give other random people your personal information and access to sensitive material, you should be the one to blame, not the guy who asked you for your password.

i'm sure hogan didn't give two fucks once he got that 140 million

>Hell, if you're stupid enough to give other random people your personal information and access to sensitive material, you should be the one to blame, not the guy who asked you for your password.

Weren't they phished, though?

They were. Well, AFAIK in JLAW's case, the hacker targeted her specifically exploiting a flaw in icloud (later fixed by Apple).

I was referring to pic related

>out peter thiel because of his political views
>he then utterly destroys your company and your life
This would be a kino movie

dude "revenge porn" is okay when we publish it lmao

I am so glad that Gawker got what they deserved.
But now it seems like that the remnants (like Gizmodo) are on a butthurt crusade.

This movie is such garbage, actually caused an argument between me and my retarded roommate because he watched it and sided with Gawker because it literally is his only info on the case
>Gawker is the victim and the first amendment is under attack
>Somehow this has to do with Trump when he literally has nothing to do with the case
>Gawker being literally retarded hypocrites looking for attention that was obviously going to be sued into oblivion is irrelevant

What's the argument for it being against the first amendment, slander and libel laws already exist

what did they say?

BOOKED

What has this done?

Some retard said they'd also host a sex tape of a 4 year old (age might be a bit off) celebrity too

youtube.com/watch?v=LEdAkWOXcVM

Have fun user. I have never seen such a severe raping in court.

youtube.com/watch?v=-Pr8S44o6N4&t=405s

>the day the hulkster ran wild on gawker

mods were so fucking salty, banning nearly every thread that popped up

it was incredible

it really was, good times

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((netflix))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

IIRC, the Gawker people were arguing celebrity sex tapes were a matter of public interest and a prosecutor asked them if that was true of all celebrities, even children, or if there was a cut off age to their stance. I think the prosecutor was fishing for holes in this stance of "it's always okay if it's a celebrity" defense, and expected an answer of like age 18 being the cut off.

Gawker's owner answered 4. 4 years old and above was acceptable for a sex tape.

Apparently he meant it sarcastically, but I cannot even imagine being so smug that you would sarcastically joke about hosting sex tapes of 4 year olds while you are being sued and under oath.

I always thought it was ironic that they did all this yet say how it was rape to even look at The Fappening. I think if you take a stand that one is bad then the other should too.

If they hadn't made a stink about the first I doubt anyone here would have care beyond taking shots at The Hulkster for being stupid enough to get his sex tape leaked, should have sold it.

this guy has more hair coming out his nose than on his head

This never happened, you don't have a roommate.

Well I guess I should go tell him that

The argument was not exactly coherent because we had both been drinking
Basically the first amendment absolutely protects all publishing of anything that is "news worthy" about a public figure

>41 minutes

Not watching that

did you count out the parentheses so there's an even amount on both sides?

It doesn't though, unless the "public figure" is the government

>Basically the first amendment absolutely protects all publishing of anything that is "news worthy" about a public figure

Except that it doesn't. Freedom of the Press simply means the freedom to use a printing press and disseminate your writings without government interference.

Releasing a private video of a man having sex to the public to humiliate them is not protected under the First Amendment.

It's a retarded argument but didn't they also have articles condemning anybody who even looked at the fappening pictures and even had a list of all porn sites who had them up

They weren't on trial for being hypocrites.

If the prosecutor tried to follow that line of reasoning, they would just simply say the anti-fappening articles were opinion pieces of the author or whatever. He needed to defeat their actual defense, which he did because they said retarded shit like porn of 4 year olds is morally okay.

Sup Forumsedditors still mad at gawker for doing their job

It's because, outside of Denton and like two others, the same staff exists in the same building. Univision just closed the main page "Gawker" due to not wanting to have it around, but the same people post the same articles under the other pages, namely Gizmodo, Jezebel, Kotaku, etc.

Reminder the judge for this case was the same one who ordered them to take down the tape in the first place.

>endless whining about movies you haven't watched
Truly you guys are the new SJW. Such delicate little flowers.

>this fucking guy again

>Truly you guys are the new SJW

huh, hadn't thought about it like that before

The more interesting story is this lawsuit, and a number of others, are all part of Peter Thiel's massive grudge against Gawker for speculating/outing that he was gay

why are rightwingers all for spying and intercepting people but then when it happens to them is "omg muh rights are being infringed!!" all the time?

Isn't outing someone as gay one of the biggest sins in the social justice circle

I guess it's okay because he's a republican

>What did Netflix mean by this?
Is that what the director said or what Netflix said? How much was Netflix involved with the making of the film?

>gay shaming
fucking shitlords deserved to be bankrupt

...

If it's any consolation, I don't think many people are falling for it

Yeah, it was okay to out him because they weren't outting a poor gay to the public, they were "exposing le hypocrisy that this RIGHT WING billionaire is actually GAY!"

>go on Netflix to see if real
>see description
>"Hulk Holgan's case against Gawker Media sheds light on wealthy, powerful figures who challenge freedom of the press to silence critics"

Are you fucking kidding me?

its true user. name one figure more powerful than hulk hogan. you can't.

Someone should make a counter documentary

>freedom of speech is a sex tape leak

How is funding someone's lawsuit against the law or unethical? Thiel did nothing wrong.

>Hogan sextape
>Wrong Hogan

Again the media misread what I wanted to fap to.

youtube.com/watch?v=PHow1B32WZw

I'm honestly starting to think this is bot-posting.

Some asshurt liberal script-kiddy made a bot that scans threads on Sup Forums for vocabulary that typically relates to political discussions and posts from a list of variations of the stupid "YOU ARE LE TWO SIDES OF LE SAME COIN" non-argument, regardless of context or relevancy.

Netflix has been a machine for churning-out Liberal propaganda for well over a year now.

How is this new to you? Did you somehow miss Dear White People, The 13th and Bill Nye Saves the World?

Welcome to the future of media.

what did he even do?

Imagine being this butthurt

>Sup Forums tards are this delusional

Nobody is botting. It's just that you people are more obnoxious than 2008 era furries.

>bullies crying that they got bullied by a bigger bully

>goes to court and sues a company for millions putting them close to bankrupt
>judge lets HH come with his black bandana
>wins
how do you want your news site senpai?

>being this retarded

Some people just don't give a shit, but the constant whining by you fucks, no to mention the dozens of daily threads about the 'evil liberal media' is obnoxious as fuck. You guys cry just as much as SJWs, that's a fact.

So butthurt that you go into threads on Sup Forums and throw out the same limp-wristed non-arguments over and over and over again because you're running damage-control when people shit-talk your progressivist delusions?

Yeah man, that IS pretty butthurt. Glad you agree.

>Some people just don't give a shit

You probably don't fall into that catagory though lol judging from you posting at all.

>Some people just don't give a shit

With the way you spam threads with the same tired and debunked hand-waving, you're not really convincing me that you "just don't give a shit", retard.

Aaaaaaaaaand like clockwork, Leftist damage-control springs into action.

Struck a fucking nerve, didn't it?

>With the way you spam threads

But I don't. I've never even made a single thread.

>"YOU MUST BE A LEFTIST IF YOU DON'T AGREE WITH ME!!!!!"

Kill yourself. All of you edgy Sup Forums faggots turned Sup Forums into a fucking shithole.

>somebody disagrees with me
>ooh le leftist fukken gommunist damage kontrol :DDDD

Meanwhile, above you there's 4 posts in a row (probably samefagging) being extremely ass mad.

>Duck Season!
>Rabbit Season!
>"UGH! Can't you see you're both two sides of the same coin? wake up, sheeple!"

Haven't they heard of Log Cabin Republicans?

Imagine being this butthurt

>"YOU MUST BE A LEFTIST IF YOU DON'T AGREE WITH ME!!!!!"

If you're triggered into sperging rage over someone informing you that your "LE TWO SIDES OF LE SAME COIN"-meme doesn't hold water, then yes, in all likelihood you are a leftist getting butthurt that your argument-obscuring tactics aren't working.

Please fuck off and go do something more productive.

>All of you edgy Sup Forums faggots
Yes, completely neutral people routinely enter threads that are obviously Sup Forums-bait and throw tism fits about Sup Forums.

>turned Sup Forums into a fucking shithole.
Sup Forums has always been a shithole, newfriendo

>If you disagree with anything/point out the flaws in logic of anything, you are exactly the same as SJW's.

Well this totally doesn't sound like some butthurt keyboard-warrior getting upset over his views being attacked.

>With the way you spam threads with the same tired and debunked hand-waving

What the fuck are you even talking about? Did you escape an insane asylum or something?

God I love this image. I hate SJW's and anti-SJW's and this pic never fails to make me laugh.

stay mad nigger

>>If you disagree with anything/point out the flaws in logic of anything, you are exactly the same as SJW's.

All this strawmanning really does make you look like an SJW

I relish the fact that this documentary attacks "Fake News" on the eve of CNN being exposed for generating fake news.

>CNN being exposed for generating fake news.

Didn't happen lol

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH HE HAS RIGHTS! HE MUST BE PROTECTED!!!
say the people that stole pictures of actress and shared it online

>people ITT unironically getting mad about people shitting on Gawker

youtube.com/watch?v=jdP8TiKY8dE

>getting mad

The only mad people in this thread are the alt-right snowflakes. Look at them. Look at the rage in their posts. You can tell they're frothing at the mouth white responding to obvious bait.

So where's the exposure? Where's the confession of fake news generation?

>anyone who doesn't eagerly lap up blatant propaganda is an edgy Sup Forums faggot

>just pretending to be retarded
wew lad

All the money in the world doesn't fix the reveal that he's a racist and a shit father.

>Did you somehow miss Dear White People
I kind of liked it desu

lol