So, Blade 2 is on Netflix and so far it's pretty fucking awesome. I love it

So, Blade 2 is on Netflix and so far it's pretty fucking awesome. I love it.

My question is about Nomak? Is he really a bad guy? He seems to just kill the bad vampires and leaving humans alone? Why is he the "bad guy".

cus he's a goofy lookin motherfucker

just watch it man.

>Why is he the "bad guy".

thats literally the plot of the film?

He's pretty much the exact same character as the villain in Hellboy 2.

Blade villains peaked at Deacon Frost.

Same actor actually. Nomak and the prince dude that is.

>the villain in Hellboy 2.
Luke Goss
I used to think the prince was Tom Cruise

Would Nomak work if they had ever decided to intergrate him in 616?

Extremely similar story lines in regards to both characters fathers too.

They'd have to integrate Blade first. He hasn't been in anything in years.

Blade 2 fucking rules

He was turning Reavers so they'd make trouble for Vampires.
The Vampires enlisted Blade because obviously they'd eventually become a problem for humans once Vampires were in too low supply and they lacked the restraint of Vampires. so Basically leaving them alone would result in the Bad End from the Strain.
However the true Villain was his dad.
Nomak just suffered from Samurai Showdown Syndrome. There was no reason for him and Blade to fight at the end other than him and Blade decided they were fated to do so.
I don't see how.
Nuada was a hypocrite who was bitter that Humanity totally dicked his people over and wanted to genocide them.
Nomak just wanted to get revenge on his dad for making him a freak. He didn't seem to care about humanity or vampires even.
He was in the Black Avengers as Ronin also a few flashback stories to the 70s. I didn't actually read the arc, Greg Land was too much.
He was offhandedly mentioned at the Black Illuminati meeting before War Machine's funeral.
He'd basically be Morbius or the tons of other psuedovampires wouldn't he?

He was a villain in the sense that he was short sighted. He was really doing his shit to fuck over his Dad (and Sister) but his plan of creating a ton of nigh-invincible regenerating vampires that were evolved to be harder to kill was going to end up fucking over humanity in the long run.

It was one of those "Villain by situation not by choice" things that Del Toro loves to fucking do.

I don't think you could say it was "not by choice" because that implies having foresight would change his decision.

If that's the case though once he succeeded in his goal he made it a point to fight Blade knowing he was going to eat it instead of running away like he had been doing the entire film.

>Samurai Showdown Syndrome

What.

We both have swords
We are both strong and considered the best
Let's fight too the death

nigger, this is more a Sup Forums question than a Sup Forums one, given that he's movie-only

>There was no reason for him and Blade to fight at the end other than him and Blade decided they were fated to do so.

He killed Blade's waifu, that seems like a good enough reason.

And Blade could never let a Reaper live, they're far too powerful. Even a single Reaper could cause another epidemic.

...

>implying Frank going supernatural wouldn't trigger all the Ennis tacticool realism fanboys

It doesn't imply anything.

>Ennis
>tacticool
Kek, he wasn't the one who came up with "the Punisher composed by Hans Zimmer..."

>"It's strange...it hurts no more"

Nomak probably didn't want to live or life was pain for him considering the above

If he fights Blade, he dies which is fine by him, if he wins he got to kill his father, sister AND the Daywalker.

Blade 2 is by far the best of the trilogy. And yes Nomak is indeed a tragic character.