>Spider Man Homecoming RT : 96

>Guardians Of Galaxy 2 : 95
>Logan : 95


is Marvel literally killed DC universe this year?

is there even coming back with JUSTice league

Other urls found in this thread:

boxofficemojo.com/showdowns/chart/?view=weekend&id=dcuni.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

...

fucking capeshitters

>killing something that was never alive in the first place

>still posting this cuck
sage

>click Sup Forums
>first think i see image of Marvel again


Truly Mickey bought entire Sup Forums

>Fox and Sony have finally surpassed Marvel and DC
About time

>Spider Man Homecoming RT : 96
it's already 94, and top critics is even worse 89
Compared to Wonder Woman which held 100% at first couple days
Mcucks literally on Suicide Watch, when last thing they had is taken by DChads.
It's 2016 elections happening again.

imagine sitting around circlejerking for a capeshit company for years

imagine sitting around circlejerking for fucking DISNEY

all while refugees/nigs rape your country

I think that's less sad than circlejerking for Batman v. Superman because at least marvelshit is competently made

what a pathetic defense, kill yourself you embarrassing child.

Logan wasn't made by Marvel Studios.

It's at 89% right now though.

>all while refugees/nigs rape your country
haha it's funny because the main capeshit spammer falls under this

>Logan and WW are gonna stay as the highest rated capeshit movies of the year
damn, Disney needs to step up it's game.
they're barely winning box office despite higher budgets and competition being a woman's movie and a r-rated movie

>at least marvelshit is competently made
that's why in needs shilling to be considered successful?

As a Marvel fanatic i'm happy, but this dc vs. marvel shit is getting annoying. I don't even know why i'm bothering, you guys are all just going to ignore this. This is the last time i'm coming into one of these threads to post.

who cares

How will they ever recover?

...

it dropped to 90.

This
Average rating is 7.6 vs 7.5 from WW though

Dude, it's at 90%. Dropping steadily.

I don't believe this shit, people should be tired of Spiderman, 6 movies, 3 reboots in less than 15 years

>MCU
>Spider-man
>RDJ
>diverse cast
C'mon user, we all knew it.

I see 90% and 7.4/10. RT must be tripping balls from all the reviews coming out at the same time, it's not even updating the rottens at the front page.

>they only have current marvel film characters in the game
>because current marvel fans wont know who x-men are etc

fucking pathetic

Holland is a good Spiderman. He rejuvenated the character.

don't worry it will flop and they'll have to reboot it again

They target a children audience so the moment the actor looks over 21 they will drop him

Not really. Spidey has been an adult since forever too.

>Logan

Are you retarded? That's Fox.

>DCucks have been making fun of Marvel comics for years calling them SJWs
>they now have to praise their one (1) movie that got good reviews and only from SJWs who think its a feminist movie

>2025
>new Spider-man reboot
>Peter is in kindergarten
>his mentor is Iron Man, not Tony but Riri

They were talking about the DC fighting game when it came out.

He said Marvel, not Disney.
Reading comprehension, retard.

Marvel Studios has the greatest combination of critical and financial success of any movie studio relative to the number of movies produced of any movie studio created after the 1930s. Better than Pixar and Lucas Studios before the prequels and more efficient at making movies as well.

Do not compare pre-Disney Marvel to the MCU. The mouse shat all over the franchise, it might make more money but the quality declined sharply.

No need to keep beating the dead corpse that is the DCEU
>DCucks have been on suicide watch, since Suicide Squad no pun intended

... and everyone in it is black. Elvis, President Trump, George Washington, the Beatles, all black

Quality is subjective, money is not.

And Spider-Man still has a better avarage rating than WW
DCucks BTFO

>Spider-Man: Homecoming opens eight years prior to the events of Captain America: Civil War. We are introduced to Adrian Toomes (Michael Keaton), a blue collar electronics engineer, whose job is unexpectedly terminated leaving him no choice but to turn to a life of crime. Now, eight years later, Adrian runs a successful underground alien weapon business and has created a suit that turns him into a metal bird-like creature known as Vulture. Meanwhile, Peter Parker (Tom Holland) has been recruited by Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) and is struggling to find a balance between his complicated teenage life and being Spider-Man.

>For the majority of the film, Peter is trying to impress Tony Stark with the hopes that one day he will become a member of the Avengers. Peter feels that the only way he can prove his worth to Tony is to stop crime from happening all across the city. While trying to be the best neighborhood Spider-Man that he can be, Spider-Man stumbles upon Toomes’ men selling illegal alien firearms. Feeling determined that he can take down Toomes/ Vulture and his operation, Peter recruits his best friend Ned (Jacob Batalon) to deactivate the GPS tracker from his Spider-Man suit which unlocks all of the suit’s advanced features.

...

>One of the big things about this film is how diverse the cast is. A typical high school in New York City looks exactly like the young cast in the film. While I am glad that almost every nationality that comes to mind appeared in the film, it doesn’t dismiss the fact that their characters all lacked development. To be honest, all the high school characters are either one-dimensional or a stereotype. Tony Revolori’s Flash is just a bully for the sake of being a bully. He constantly mocks Peter and called him Penis Parker (how clever *sigh*). Liz played by Laura Harrier has zero chemistry with Holland despite being his love interest. Harrier as a character is nothing more than the pretty girl in high school and is never developed any further than that.

>Ned is the annoying fat friend who just so happens to be a genius. Ned hacks Tony Stark’s computer system which just felt incredibly formulaic and unbelievable. In fact, I found Ned as a character to be super annoying and irritating to watch and listen to. I pretty much hated every moment he was on screen which unfortunately was quite often. There is a scene where Ned is hacking into Peter’s phone and a teacher walks in and asks what he is doing. Ned responds with “looking at porn.” I seriously cringed and looked at my wife rolling my eyes immediately afterward.

>There are a lot of other students in the film but again nothing about them stand out so it would be a waste of time to mention all of them specifically. The only student that I enjoyed besides Peter was Zendaya as Michelle. She was spunky and entertaining. I loved her sarcastic tone and felt as a character she deserved more screentime. There is something that happens with Michelle towards the end of the film which hints at her being a bigger part of the sequel. If Zendaya keeps playing Michelle, the way she played her in Homecoming, I am sure she will quickly become one of my favorite characters in the sequels.

>in the time it took this shill to make this pic it dropped to 90%
JUST

Are you still butthurt BvS was a terrible slog of a movie?

>The film attempts to be funny but rarely did I find myself laughing. The writers attempt to make a joke and instead of doing it just once, they proceed to do it over and over again. There are multiple PSA videos that feature Captain America. I get that the writers thought they were being clever by incorporating Captain America into the story but honestly, these PSA videos were lame and just a lazy way that the writers could remind audiences that they were watching a film that is part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU).

>Very early on in the film, Tony Stark assigns Happy Hogan to look over Peter because he obviously doesn’t have the time or patience to babysit a 15-year-old. Peter calls and texts Happy quite often and every single time Happy is shown, he is annoyed with Peter. This happens easily five times throughout the film. It wasn’t funny the first time and it certainly wasn’t funny the fifth time. Another example of this is Peter’s best friend Ned who keeps trying to get Peter to tell him things about Spider-Man even though Peter repeatedly requests that he is not allowed to answer any questions.

>The story and characters lack logic and common sense. Peter is a sophomore in high school but randomly disappears periodically throughout the day. Where are the teachers? Why does no one seem to notice that Peter randomly disappears beside Liz? Let me not forget to mention that people like Tony Stark and Happy Hogan just randomly show up and talk to Peter in public areas. Like no one is wondering why these people are on school property or why Tony Stark is talking to a 15-year-old boy? I understand that I am not supposed to over analyze these types of films but the way that the writers tell this story makes it seem as though everyone around Peter is either blind or stupid. There is even a scene where Peter walks into an alleyway and changes into his Spider-Man costume in the middle of the day in New York City.

>Spider-Man’s costume looks old school and I liked the look of the suit. This version of the Spider-Man suit looked like the first of many more advanced suits to come. What I didn’t like about the suit was the voice operator that Peter names Caren. Why is it that every film nowadays has to have some sort of computer system that reminds the audience of Siri or Alexa? I thought the whole general idea behind Spider-Man was him learning how to use the suit and discover the powers. Now, the writers cheapen it by giving Spider-Man a guiding voice that can help him learn his suit and provide him information. This sucked a lot of the fun out of Peter trying to use the unlocked features in his suit. There is never any real sense of danger in this film because someone is always there watching over Peter.

>The visuals effects in Spider-Man: Homecoming aren’t up to Marvel movie standards. If you look at all my previous Marvel reviews, I always praise the visuals and say that Marvel and Disney continue to up the ante in the visual department. The effects in Spider-Man: Homecoming are ok but lack the gusto of the previous films. The non-action sequences are well shot but the action scenes felt more like watching a video game than an actual movie. The scene where this sticks out the most is the face-off between Spider-Man and Vulture at the end. In a lot of ways, the effects feel dated.

>Tom Holland is a good casting choice. My issue isn’t with Holland but how poorly written the character is. It is like Holland was trying to deliver a well-rounded performance but the writers didn’t give him much to work with. I feel bad bashing this film because Holland does seem like a talented young actor who brought a sort of childlike sense of wonder to the web slinger that we have never seen before. I just can’t ignore that the fact that the material he was given wasn’t good. Holland does have some moments where he shines above the script but sadly these moments are few and far between.

Damn...

Zack Snyder is our Lord and Saviour

>My favorite thing about Spider-Man: Homecoming without question is Michael Keaton as Adrian Toomes. Keaton is just a skilled actor that stood out every time he was on-screen. He somehow managed to stand out even with the little character development he was given. Keaton’s performance is great and deserved a much better film. He is one of the better Marvel villains and stood out among the rest of the film. It almost felt at times like Keaton was in a completely different movie. I guess it shows that a great veteran actor can outshine even the weakest of scripts as long as he is passionate about the project.
BASED KEATON SHINING IN A MEDIOCRE MOVIE

>Spider-Man: Homecoming is better than Spider-Man 3 but not by much. Holland and Keaton try their best but the film’s script is the biggest issue. The six writers try so hard to make Spider-Man: Homecoming into a John Hughes film but they don’t seem to understand why his films are so timeless in the first place. Hughes created likable and relatable characters that stood the test of time. Besides Peter, the high school characters aren’t anything more than one-sided caricatures of what the writers believe high schoolers are like today. They lack character development and aren’t amusing to watch. Spider-Man: Homecoming proves why Disney needs to be involved with Marvel projects. They might follow a formula but at least the formula works. Spider-Man: Homecoming is one of the biggest disappointments of the summer as well as the year.

>Are you still butthurt BvS was a terrible slog of a movie?
what did he mean by this

Feminism is dangerous.

That's outdated, WW passed $330M domestic today and BvS's US total gross.

...

I-is she going to pass $400M isn't she?

CHECKED

Based Lord & Saviour poster.

Likely.
Even if it slows down, it has a shot for $400+M dom, mathematically speaking.

Wonder Woman needs slightly lesser than Suicide Squad legs to hit $400M (domestic): boxofficemojo.com/showdowns/chart/?view=weekend&id=dcuni.htm (BOM not updated, WW is ahead of BvS right now)
SS had a 12.25 4th weekend and added 42 more (3.42x) to its cume. WW has had a 25.1 4th weekend and needs 81.6 (3.25x) for 400. SS legs (3.42x) will take Wonder Woman to about $404M domestic.

Add to that that the 4th weekend isn't over yet and it's got 10 weeks to go in the US.

BEE is the biggest zero talent AIDS infected homo on Earth, he's literally a fucking retarded faggot. If anything him enjoying BVS is an indictment, not a positive you fucking idiot.

It's a bad movie.

I'll be called a DC fan but guys...

RT score means nothing. It's just some critics rating the movie. It's not the last instance of movie being good / bad.

Chill the fuck out with the RT.

Literally >that doesn't count

$400M domestic with a $150M budget, absolutely impressive. All this "DCEU is a failed franchise" is getting more absurd with every movie they make

What are you on about? It's been proven to be a terrible movie, from script to casting and on.

I assume everyone is shitting on it and saying the new DBZ figiting plays more like MvC2 than MvCI

It's really unfortunate they're going to keep going and run it right back into the ground, too.

Anyone saying anything else has to be a shill so let's hope so

proven by who?

I'll be called a reddit fag but guys...

What Sup Forums calls kino means nothing. It's just some nerds on the internet circlejerking. It's not any indicator of a movie being good/bad.

Chill the fuck out with the kino.

Who's the tank on the left?

by whom

The entire world. People who actually know what a good movie is. And it's not Batman vs Superman.

>Logan

Logan is not made by Marvel Studios.

In fact, Logan is the most anti-marvel comic book movie (yes, even more so than Nolan´s Batman)

>Lego batman : 98%
>Wonder Woman : 93%
>Spider-man homecoming: 90%
>Memes vol 2 : 81 %
>iron JUST : 10%
>Floptastic : 9%


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHJANA

This fucking came true. Amy Pascal should be gassed.

Nobody wanted black johnny storm. Nobody. So shove a fork in your ass.

>sony and disney partnering up
Birds of a feather flock together

And in what way is that? Please, try to explain your stupidity.

>DCucks are now resorting to comparing Lego batman and Wonder Woman to Fantastic 4 and Iron Fist as reasons why DC is better than Marvel

This shit is hilarious. Keep going please.

You are not entire world, sweetie, nor are marvelbots.

Stuckmann gave it an A-.

Both are meme studios that can't make good movies for the life of them. What was the last artistically relevant movie those guys made? Disney is just good at making shit movies or at least better at selling them to the plebs, but other than that they are the same shit

Pure shit then.

I see you don't know what a good movie is.

Answer the question shill
>What was the last artistically relevant movie those guys made?

You probably didn't read the part where Sup Forums complains this shit has only 24 characters (The previous one had 36 plus DLCs), they scrapped all X-Men/FF characters/villains and every Marvel character comes from a MCU movie (Except Nova)

>4 rotten reviews

Time to review the reviewers!

>By far the most lightweight and thematically inconsequential of any and all past "Spider-Man" features.‐ TheFilmFile.com
>2/4 stars
This Dustin Putman of "thefilmfile.com" gave The Amazing Spider-Man 2 3/4 stars.

>Spider-Man: Homecoming is better than Spider-Man 3 but not by a whole lot. - Scott Menzel
>4/10
His Amazing Spider-Man 2 score? A perfect 10/10.

>This is a de-facto origin story, one that makes us wait for the sequel for a Spider-Man who isn't a menace to society. - Scott Mendelson
>5/10
His ASM2 score? 6/10.

>Hang in there, True Believers: Maybe it'll get better the second time around. - John DeFore of Hollywood Reporter
Well he didn't review ASM2 but someone else at THR did.

These people are basically baffled that a second reboot could exist. As if it offends their very soul to the point where being objective isn't something they can do.

>>Spider-Man: Homecoming is better than Spider-Man 3 but not by a whole lot. - Scott Menzel
Fucking dropped, thanks user you saved me 15 bucks

You're welcome.

If you make it down here to this last line, I commend you for your selective nature.