Prove why Capitalism is bad

>protip, you can't

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chinese_Famine
reason.com/blog/2013/03/13/communism-killed-94m-in-20th-century
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

There are no homeless in socialist countries. Everyone is well fed too

if i have a dollar, I am more important. How is that even possible? Daily Reminder that the government isn't real.

(you)

Commie china or best korea say hi.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chinese_Famine

Tesla is proof my iPhone would have been invented no matter what

#ResistCapitalism

>people have died under capitalism
>94 million killed by communism in 20th century is irrelevant

reason.com/blog/2013/03/13/communism-killed-94m-in-20th-century

Unregulated capitalism is bad.

There are no poor, because everyone is.

#ResistReddit

These are the fuckers in charge of shit

>ironically uses a hashtag
>3edgy5me

Go to the worst part of town and look at the biggest, meanest, dumbest fuckers there. Without government and religion, those people would rule everything and skullfuck anyone they want.

Can't be homeless when the state doesn't believe in homes

capitalism means that the common man loses power to the capitalist.

This is a cheap bait...

In capitalism, the profits are privatized, but expenses are socialised.
Expenses include - population education, health care, retirement. Environment previous milenia cultivation, environment cleaning. Milenia of scientific development of civilisation.

All these "expenses" are not paid by the profitor of bussiness, they were, are and will be paid by society.

Then the one, who exploits profit from the common built and maintained state, is a thief.

Who the fuck keeps making these shitty "capitalism is bad" threads?

I swear I've been seeing them consistently for the past 2 weeks. Fucking kill yourself.

I'm gonna guess.... East German?

get, check 'em
Meme Majic

But it needs to be as free as possible.

it isn't

The effect of corporate media on elections. I really want to be 100% pro-capitalist, I really do, but then you see what effect it has on how the news is reported and it just seems so downright suicidal. How in the hell is giving control over how people get their information to a tiny minority of obscenely rich people a good idea? There needs to be strict limits on media ownership otherwise you're just a de facto plutocracy.

About healthcare:

In socialistic countries, the healthcare was free. Completelly and from constitution.

In post-socialistic country, the basic healthcare is still free, because it is paid by health insurance.

The above-standard healthcare can be paid for though. (For example - amalgam black teeth filling in case of teeth pain is free. New ceramic white teeth can be paid for and they are not cheap at all.)

If you break the leg or have any illness, with which you must be hospitalised, insurance pays it regardless of price.

There is an obligatory health tax (insurance payment). Compared to any real healthcare spending in case you will sometimes become ill, it is affordable.

And it is normal, that those, who least can afford health care, usually need it most (retired elders, disabled cripples etc...). It is fair to not let them suffer just because they cannot be earning money for healthcare.

And everyone needs, that all others get some healthcare prevention of wide-spreading diseases, such as vaccination, such as fever treatment etc.

In order to do what exactly? Create profit?

...

GDR was better than the FRG

yes and no. The tradition they had to keep was a good thing, the forced socialism was cancerous

there are no homeless because everyone is homeless
>well fed
maybe if you're a cannibal