Why is nobody scared of China?

By 2050 their GDP will make up more than half of the world economy.

It's fucking scary.

Other urls found in this thread:

i.4cdn.org/gif/1515769607106.webm
youtube.com/watch?v=WfFSTD_al-E
newsweek.com/ex-cia-agent-arrested-stealing-top-secret-information-china-led-death-us-783361
nytimes.com/2018/01/16/us/politics/cia-china-mole-arrest-jerry-chun-shing-lee.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Yellow Peril hahaha

China won't even exist in 2050. It will collapse and balkanise.

Because unlike Russia China doesn't threat it's neighbouring countries by brute force, only by economic power. And that's good. Glory to China!

We should impove ourselves in order to oppose them.

>linear projections

Why should we be scared of China? Strong China means more business opportunities and big China investments over here. Also Pandas. P-A-N-D-A-S

Did you know that Finland has S-A-M-I-S

Chinese working population passed the peak 6 years ago.
But still their economy relies on real estate industry much.
So I think Chinese economy will have a difficult time in 2020s.
Democracy movement will come again around 2030.

Hopefully they collapse and get balkanized soon.

We should welcome Pax Sinica and say goodbye to America.

People are scared of China. That's why nobody fucks with them. As for your prediction, that's ridiculous. Ageing population, economic recessions, the rise of Africa and India as more than mudhut meme regions. These things will almost certainly happen by 2050. Not to mention any wars or political shifts that may happen in the West, which would undeniably have an effect. Future predictions always end up being retarded. 50 years ago it looked like Japan was going to be the largest economy in the world.

>balkanized

That is the problem: They don't have to fear that.

They are literally one big monolith ethnic group with the same interests and agendas.

Given how America is pretty much ruining humanity and how Xi seems pretty based, people have simply settled to hope that the world would be better under Chink rule

I don't understand, why are people scared of China? They are a peaceful race that is interested in making monies.

>They are literally one big monolith ethnic group with the same interests and agendas.
Yeah, sure
>Who are Yughurs

Keep in mind their economy is dependent on America and Europe buying their goods.

Contrary to popular belief, Uighurs do not make up the majority in Xinjiang
>46% and decreasing fast
Should make Amerimutts happier

Abkhazians didn't make the majority in Abkhazia too, yet they withdrawed thousands of Georgians during the war... So, it means nothing.
If they think this is their homeland and that Chinese are commiting genocide on them things will change.

just get a chinese gf and you will be spared by our communist overlords, white man
i.4cdn.org/gif/1515769607106.webm

Well...They aren't aggressively spreading their ideology, don't invest excessively in their military and have been known to favor general stability and economic development.

I am not scared by China. China likes France.

I, for one, welcome our new communist overlords.

I like Chinese, but I hate Chinese government.
The government should be removed.

Latin Americans prefer Chinks over the Yanks. It can't get any worse than Yankee Doodles. Mexico will probably throw a fiesta.

>By 2050 their GDP will make up more than half of the world economy.

People told the same about Japan 40 years ago.

Wtf her accent is so cute lmao

...

pls
I just had a nice fap

>Democracy movement will come again around 2030.
are you sure about that? seems like chinese love extreme authoritarianism and see no issue with it.

Not really. Like half of China is ready to break apart given the chance.

I can see it happening from so many people getting a taste of the good life there and then suddenly having economic collapse and the government cracking down like old times to keep people in order.
It's once thing dominating/seducing poor peasants who's lives are shit anyway with songs of how mother government is going to take care of them, it's another when you try it with people who've made their own successful way in life.

Lol post that to the Asian identity/masculinity subreddits.

>subreddits
go back

This

/thread

>subreddits
from what I read here it will probably drive them to either suicide or mass shooting

There are also dozen of other ethnic minorities tgere and don't forget about the north-south divide in Xinjiang as well as cities that are directly administered by paramilitary unit and formed by paramilitary organization

because the world will be a nuclear wasteland by that time

Are you going to post this there too?

How about this? Something about Mandarin spoken by a blonde white girl to her Chinese boyfriend

youtube.com/watch?v=WfFSTD_al-E

I for one welcome our Chinese overlords.
Based gommies
New Chinese Civilisation

A better pic of her

lol

White mommy holding her half Chinese baby

>White mommy holding her half Chinese baby
In case you are wondering this is the dad

>>White mommy holding her half Chinese baby

>>>White mommy holding her half Chinese baby

even if they were a majority, Xinjiang is just deadweight, China would look less imposing on a map, but their real power would be pretty much the same

Its funny that whitey is getting BTFO'd. At the same time, there's something odd about the Asian's psychosexual mind. At least when blacks taunt white men, its because of historical humiliations. Meanwhile Asians are super butthurt towards whites despite them not even crossing on the h'white man's mind. Probably from Chink women going after white men.

>Asians can't keep their women in check so they go after wh*tes
>Asians feel humiliated and envious
>Asian autists then seek to replace their shame by posting borderline bisexual, sexual competition posts on a Laotian rice farming forum.

baka

>its because of historical humiliations.
Opium Wars, colonialism, Stealing land from the Chinese, etc. I admit that pales in comparison to what Europeans did the Natives of the Americas but you are ignorant of history.

>even crossing on the h'white man's mind
In the last 100 yrs or so, Western powers have had 4 major wars against Asian powers - Japanese Russo War, WW2, Korean War, Vietnam War along with the current stealth war against China. BTW there was a great news story yesterday on how the CIA's black ops division against China was totally dismantled.
newsweek.com/ex-cia-agent-arrested-stealing-top-secret-information-china-led-death-us-783361

>Chink women going after white men
LEL that you think brown SE Asian females (who make up the overwhelmingly vast majority of "Asian" females with white men) = chinks.

Did someone say P-A-N-D-A-S!!!???

I want America to do this too.

>Asians can't keep their women in check so they go after wh*tes

Again using the word "Asian" to describe over 4 BILLION people on the planet.

Absolutely pathetic.

I do too. America is Satan's whore.

>Absolutely pathetic.
What is pathetic :

1) Your lack of knowledge of the history in Asia
2) That you think the West doesnt care about China/Asia when in reality it is the #1 security concern of the US/Europe

kek

Again, your need to pathologize. I said Asians dont cross the average white mans mind. As in INDIVIDUAL people. Not politics. In politics, everyone is trying to screw someone over. And ONE MO' 'GAIN. Your pathology envy against whites has nothing to do with the historical exploitation of Asia. Its purely psychosexual ans sexual competition.

Its like those insecure Indians (dot ont feather) flexing nuts with Europeans and desperate for a white women's overused loose pussy.

>along with the current stealth war against China.

What exactly did he mean by this?

not*

>and sexual competition.

For most of human history, the Chinese / East Asians / Northern Siberians have been using white women as sexual conquests.

Just like the Spaniards and other Europeans raped the Americas to create a mutt race like Brazilians, the Chinese / Northern Siberians / Mongols did the same in Central Asia where they turned a Caucasian / Indo-Aryan population into one that that looks like this today.

In geopolitical news, this was the top story yesterday
nytimes.com/2018/01/16/us/politics/cia-china-mole-arrest-jerry-chun-shing-lee.html

The Chinese basically destroyed the CIA network in China

>deflection

What does that have to do with you being clearly being butthurt about WMAF?

see
It is hilarious you think I care about some German guy buys some Filipino barmaid just because you think all 'Asians" are the same.

...

Interesting

If it is so bad why haven't heard of this in the mainstream media? Sounds very bad news for the west

...

>more deflection

...

very nice

Has china ever done anything bad to other countries?

...

Yeah. But can't really blame Chinese people for what their government does. Hopefully they get their freedoms soon.

...

>>more deflection
Today, there are very few East Asian females with White men. There are lots of SE Asian females with White men due to the fact they live in shithole countries with lower GDP per capita than African countries.

Historically, Chinese men > "White" men in terms of who is taking whose women.

Keep repeating "deflection" over-and-over again while not understanding the points I am making.

Vietnam is really salty about 1000+ years of chinese rule ,losing the Johnson South reef skirmish of 1988 ,the border conflicts, Pol Pot and assorted maritime border conflict like chopping exploration vessel cables but otherwise few end up being shot.
It also depends on whether you consider them buying influence as a bad thing.

...

What about the Cantonese region?

Yeah it's pretty scary since China doesn't care about other countries and will do whatever it needs short of war to secure its national interests .

I hate China.

>tfw watching through thousands of asiansexdiary vids to find source

>However, there is no record of large settlements on the islands until 1956, when Filipino adventurer Tomás Cloma, Sr., decided to "claim" a part of Spratly islands as his own, naming it the "Free Territory of Freedomland".

OOOOH SAY CAN YOU SEE

brainlet post

It's GDP per capita isn't jackshit, has a life expectancy lower than that of Mexico, poor infrastructure, and massive problem with pollution.

Spratlys is mostly just a bunch of underwater rocks. The Philippine outpost there is a literal shipwreck manned by a bunch of marines living in the rustbucket and fed by passing fishermen.

Yeah, but these shitty underwater rocks can be pretty important strategically.
Especially since China will make them bigger.

The major minority ethnic groups in China are Zhuang (16.9 million), Hui (10,5 million), Manchu (10.3 million), Uyghur (10 million), Miao (9.4 million), Yi (8.7 million), Tujia (8.3 million), Tibetan (6.2 million), Mongol (5.9 million), Dong (2.8 million), Buyei (2.8 million), Yao (2.7 million), Bai (1.9 million), Korean (1.8 million), Hani (1.6 million), Li (1.4 million), Kazakh (1.4 million), and Dai (1.2 million).

china is inevitably going to implode.
when automation becomes cheaper and cheaper, theres exact no reason for companies to produce in other cunts. therefore the growth is going down and the people will demand MOAR.
not even moar growth but things like democracy, freedomz and shit.
a lot people will die in that recession but after a few years of civil war they could come out pretty good.

We have been doing that as well since early 80's so we have no right to complain, this island used to be submerged rock and now large enough to land Flankers and C-130. The news of Johnson reef battle triggered everyone to scramble for the rocks hence this installation to serve as forward outpost.
They have been rather passive these last few years, aside from adding flak towers all over the islands type 071 landing dock and its escort fleet are no longer sighted within 70km of our shores. Probably decided its better to bribe everyone with silk road aid package than conflict.

hrm im interested to see what automation will bring. most people think that it'll cause a lot of civil unrest due to the lack of jobs but if we look at the industrial revolution, the exact opposite happened. The world got even more sophisticated as less workers were needed for menial tasks.

the job market will change, just like industrialization changed it

10 hours shifts, 6 days a week used to be the norm

at least it not the nigs and nomads

that was the benefit of the unions. but nowadays normies think unions are not needed anymore because
>muh eternal growth
>muh trickle down
>muhrican dream
pretty sure there will not be general shift towards a 20 hrs/week with full monetary compensation.
also what we see since years is a dramatic increase in jobs that could easily be automated but that would be more expensive than having humans doing it.
all statistics make perfectly clear that the middleclass is shrinking in the western cunts.

>industrial revolution
different setting and different consequences. not only manual labor will be done by machines but things like law, medicine, engineering not to speak of all the business bullshit will be done by machines/algorithms easily.
when it comes to virtualization the speed is incredible. its not a development of a century or even a few decades. computing power can be scaled easily and therefore its not time to adapt for society.
the smartest thing would be to start discussing the consequences right now and initiating the right actions.
but obviously nobody wants to spend moneyz for the future.

yeah the idea is the same, machines replacing skilled jobs at the time. computing power can't be scaled indefinitely, moore's law is dead we're hitting the limitations already.

if things in law, medicine, engineering and business are made more efficient with automation then more people will have access to those skills, improving society tremendously as those skills are needed. i don't see the doom and gloom scenario with automation. humanity adapts and if the industrial revolution is an example we're only going to get better.

>moore's law is dead we're hitting the limitations already.
thing is - software is programmed so poorly nowadays the potential is still extreme.
also quantum computing COULD become a thing in a few decades.

>if things in law, medicine, engineering and business are made more efficient with automation then more people will have access to those skills, improving society tremendously as those skills are needed. i don't see the doom and gloom scenario with automation. humanity adapts and if the industrial revolution is an example we're only going to get better.
as your canadian your much to optimistic, obviously. just take a quick look at how the modern societies are developing right now. a plus in wealth is not divided between people. the development is the exact opposite of what happened in times we call the murrican dream, wirtschaftswunder in germany and so on.
its not as this will happen again
UNTIL
the people sort their shit out and vote for people that actually could change the system. (not even shilling for communism, but we need to adapt or will be adapted by time)

France is the most based of Western countries from a Chinese perspective. Unlike the UK, France is not a "running dog" of the United States. France has their own unique foreign policy and pursue their own interests. So France won't just jump on the bandwagon when the US says China is being "uppity", AKA not doing what we awnt them to to do. France was I believe the first Western nation to establish official diplomatic relations with the People's Republic. They're willing to work with China even if it's not the typical Western thing to do. Based Gaul t-b-h.

>France has their own unique foreign policy
>unique
indeed

No one is predicting China will be 50% of the world economy. As of right now, the US is about 20% of the world's economy. China's GDP is about 2/3 the size of the US now. It will catch up with the US according to most estimates by 2030-something. So 50% is a pretty unfeasible thing to do. And that's also not taking into account possible growth from other regions which could change global ratios, like in Africa and the Middle East.
Also don't underestimate Japan, their economy superseded that of all individual European countries and has stayed that way for a couple decades now.

plus in wealth not divided among people evenly doesn't change the fact everyone's wealth is increasing. the world has gotten better, we live longer, have more access to conveniences, more educated. i think that's all thanks to industries becoming more efficient, automation will only improve on it. humans are adaptable.

>>thing is - software is programmed so poorly nowadays the potential is still extreme.
also quantum computing COULD become a thing in a few decades.

both are hypothetical while it is a fact that our current pace of development is coming to an end.

Care to elaborate or are you just gonna post memes?
France indeed does have a unique foreign policy. UK just does whatever Washington tells them to do. Meanwhile France always thinks through what is actually in their own interests and will stand up to America when they see fit, like with Iraq. Out of all the European countries, France is the most independent and ambitious, in my opinion.