So is this feminazi crap or actually good?
The preview looked sort of neat, but I don't want to have to check my privilege every 15 minutes.
So is this feminazi crap or actually good?
The preview looked sort of neat, but I don't want to have to check my privilege every 15 minutes.
Seems like it's Misery but with an agenda
I just saw it, I liked it. Slow burn thriller. Elle fanning and Nicole Kidman were sexy. Idk if there was really an agenda, it showed all of the character's motivations really well.
I'll stick with the original
one of my favorite movies
have no burning desire to see the new one
it is exactly that, it's for women to shout WOO HOO everytime they cick the guy in the nuts
Sofia Coppola is a fucking hack, if you like Lost in Translation you are literally retarded and a pleb
why would feminists support Southern racist slave owners?
It's shit OP.
Even Jew Brody didn't like it.
newyorker.com
where can i watch i want the lewd
is this lewd enough for you?
is kristen dunst tits back on the sauce?
so why did critics hate the Eastwood one again?
I don't think they do.
The original one has 92% memetomatos.
I've decided to boycott women writers and directors for a year over those women only screenings of Wonder Woman.
It's cool because they've decided boycott you for your entire life for being ugly af.
wait am i confused with another of Eastwood's films or is that one that people are mixed on?
>Elle fanning and Nicole Kidman were sexy.
>Elle Fanning
>Sexy
Kek if you're gonna shill at least ale it somewhat feasible. Nobody finds that pig-nosed, 10 year old-bodied, box office drag attractive.
Movies don't care about your political agenda, and not every single piece of media will cater to your sensitivity, Drumpfkin.
I think your confusing it with another film. It seems the original film did well critic-wise but was forgotten until this remake.
HOLY SHIT NIGGER, THIS IS A BLUE BOARD, DELETE THIS NOW
Shekels go to Asian massage parlor whores, not to women writers and directors
Looks like fapkino to me