What if I told you women aren't what you've been raised to think they are?

What if I told you women aren't what you've been raised to think they are?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=diatVPzADnk
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24845881
sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/05/160509085748.htm
s000.tinyupload.com/index.php?file_id=49527412846044741884
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019188690400385X
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26098378
pillse.bol.ucla.edu/Publications/Pillsworth&Haselton_ARSR.pdf
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1617143/
rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/royptb/367/1589/657.full.pdf
nytimes.com/2015/06/12/health/college-rape-prevention-program-proves-a-rare-success.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=0
ibtimes.com/women-less-forgiving-toward-unattractive-men-study-1943420
theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/11/the-evolution-of-bitchiness/281657/?utm_source=SFFB
youtube.com/watch?v=YWjo41vP2yQ
psychologytoday.com/blog/living-single/200902/no-getting-married-does-not-make-you-live-longer
sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/06/150624155436.htm
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/4790313.stm
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.22797/abstract?campaign=wolearlyview
synergy-pr.com/files/JESP72009.pdf
emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/mate-choice-copying-in-humans.pdf
psy.unipd.it/~pbressan/papers/BressanStranieri2008.pdf
theguardian.com/science/2010/jun/18/love-sex-masturbation
readability.com/m?url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/4790313.stm
spring.org.uk/2015/01/men-and-women-process-emotions-in-different-ways-this-affects-what-they-remember.php
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00444.x/abstract
web.missouri.edu/~gearyd/MatechoicePDF.pdf
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26754158
people.fas.harvard.edu/~iversen/PDFfiles/LottKenny.pdf
medicaldaily.com/fat-bottomed-girls-women-wide-hips-more-sexually-active-due-confidence-bestowed-evolution-278650
gpi.sagepub.com/content/6/3/251.full.pdf
gpi.sagepub.com/content/8/2/159.full.pdf
dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3557688/Women-really-love-bad-boys-Females-likely-lust-people-criminal-records-males-study-finds.html
eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2016-05/w-wif051616.php
bloomberg.com/graphics/2016-who-marries-whom/
tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00224499.2014.996279
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19085605
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23421402
psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2015-55834-001/
pss.sagepub.com/content/20/6/661
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019188690800370X
unz.com/isteve/when-society-encourages-mean-girls-to-bully-boys/
nymag.com/scienceofus/2016/01/european-queens-waged-more-wars-than-kings.html
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22544306
news.utexas.edu/2015/08/06/genders-differ-dramatically-in-evolved-mate-preferences
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052970
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0131613
medicalnewstoday.com/articles/265855.php
sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/12/151207081824.htm
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804314000743
medicaldaily.com/brain-facts-know-and-share-men-have-lower-percentage-gray-matter-women-292530
journals.lww.com/joem/Abstract/publishahead/Chronic_Disease_Risks_From_Exposure_to_Long_Hour.98984.aspx
evp.sagepub.com/content/14/2/1474704916652144.full
faculty.washington.edu/hechter/KanazawaPaper.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Please elaborate.

Lad, do you know where you are?

They're not pseudojews who will lead to the downfall of society?

I wish someone had told me in 8th grade tbqh. It would have saved me some rough redpilling.

youtube.com/watch?v=diatVPzADnk

are they traps?

women aren't whores?

>1 post by this ID

I think anyone with any critical thinking skills and an adequate amount of discipline have taken the "redpill" you're selling sonny jim

>women

What is the female imperative? Survivall. The bluepill is a socially-generated dream world built to keep us under control in order to change a human being into this.

[cuck photo]

Basically all modern women are treacherous whores.
If you want a girlfriend then go for looks only.
That way when they backstab you or go crazy you won't be invested in them.

Nothing is the lie to children told about it even simple, pure air and water are more sinister than innocent would be led to believe.

This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill: the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill: you stay in Wonderland, and I show you just how deep the rabbit-hole goes...

>cucked leaf

manliest response possible.

The female race has 3 directives

Prime directive: Have sex with best man (men) available, get pregnant, have as many babies as possible.

Secondary directive: Secure provisioning for self and babies. Preferably with a weak, stable, needy man.

Tertiary directive: If she fails in directives 1 and 2, secure provisioning for self by any means necessary.

>female race

lel

Jokes on you fatass, I've never had a woman.

>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24845881

Following recall of a conflict involving direct aggression and role-playing a reaction to it, compared with men, women reported their anger would dissipate less quickly and they would take longer to reconcile. Women also exhibited increased heart rate, but little change in cortisol, whereas men exhibited little change in heart rate but increased cortisol production. We interpret the results as indicating that women are less prepared than men to resolve a conflict with a same-sex peer.

>sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/05/160509085748.htm

Why do we choose the partners we do, and why do we get flak about it from our parents? A professor says it comes down to simple genetics.


>s000.tinyupload.com/index.php?file_id=49527412846044741884
>sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019188690400385X

The paper cost Professor H. S. Nyborg a long legal battle with his university, which began with his suspension under trumped up charges and ended with a full acquittal on appeal, with the university forced to reinstate him (of course they never stopped going after him and he had to do the whole charade again with another paper in 2011):

The article tested four hypothesis:
Inadequate analysis explains why researchers have been having incosistent results on gender-based differences in intelligence
The adequate method proposed will identify a male lead in general intelligence
The male lead is mostly explained by larger male brain size
Because males have a higher average intelligence and a wider distribution, there are exponentially more males at the top end of the distribution; that translates into a significant numerical superiority of highly intelligent males as opposed to highly intelligent females, explaining male dominance across society

>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26098378

Study shows that women are attracted to selfish guys that are full of themselves, yet guys are not attracted to those qualities in women.

>pillse.bol.ucla.edu/Publications/Pillsworth&Haselton_ARSR.pdf

UCLA research compiles women's dualistic mating strategy across all cultures

>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1617143/

Dominance has been suggested to honestly reflect male genetic quality.
Some researchers have suggested that the high mating value of dominant men is a result of their tendency to reaching higher socio-economical status and, therefore, gaining the resources that they may invest in their mate and offspring
There is also evidence that males of high genetic quality have a tendency for lower parental investment (Waynforth 1998). In response, a mixed mating strategy may have evolved in females: they prefer genetically superior males as short-term or extra-pair sexual partners while, at the same time, they seek males who are more willing to invest in their offspring as long-term or social partners

>rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/royptb/367/1589/657.full.pdf

Here, we develop and explore the hypothesis that the norms and institutions that compose the modern package of monogamous marriage have been favoured by cultural evolution because of their group-beneficial effects—promoting success in inter-group competition. In suppressing intrasexual competition and reducing the size of the pool of unmarried men, normative monogamy reduces crime rates, including rape, murder, assault, robbery and fraud, as well as decreasing personal abuses.

By shifting male efforts from seeking wives to paternal investment, normative monogamy increases savings, child investment and economic productivity. By increasing the relatedness within households, normative monogamy reduces intra-household conflict, leading to lower rates of child neglect, abuse, accidental death and homicide. These predictions are tested using converging lines of evidence from across the human sciences.

>nytimes.com/2015/06/12/health/college-rape-prevention-program-proves-a-rare-success.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=0

A study which trained female freshman college students to avoid rape SUBSTANTIALLY lowered their odds of being sexually assaulted

>ibtimes.com/women-less-forgiving-toward-unattractive-men-study-1943420

The study of 170 college-age women revealed that unattractive men earned a “negative double bias” upon violating a social norm.

However, handsome men did not earn a negative bias if they broke a social norm or did something wrong.

>theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/11/the-evolution-of-bitchiness/281657/?utm_source=SFFB

Women engage in indirect aggression and slut-shaming, even in clinical research studies. Why?

>youtube.com/watch?v=YWjo41vP2yQ

"In a series of studies, more than 1,000 adult participants rated the sexual attractiveness of hundreds of images of the opposite sex engaged in universal displays of happiness (broad smiles), pride (raised heads, puffed-up chests) and shame (lowered heads, averted eyes).

The study found that women were least attracted to smiling, happy men, preferring those who looked proud and powerful or moody and ashamed. In contrast, male participants were most sexually attracted to women who looked happy, and least attracted to women who appeared proud and confident." by Prof. Jessica Tracy of UBC’s Dept. of Psychology

>psychologytoday.com/blog/living-single/200902/no-getting-married-does-not-make-you-live-longer

The two groups of people who live the longest are those who stay married and those who stay single.

>sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/06/150624155436.htm

A woman would rather be TERRIFIED than disgusted by a man

>news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/4790313.stm

Study shows that once a women 'bonds' or knows she has fully secured her mates commitment she will lose interest in sex.
But women, he said, have evolved to have a high sex drive when they are initially in a relationship in order to form a "pair bond" with their partner.
But, once this bond is sealed a woman's sexual appetite declines, he added.
The rational for why a woman's sex drive declines may be down to supply and demand. If something is in infinite supply, the perceived value would drop

>onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.22797/abstract?campaign=wolearlyview

A new study has shown a correlation between birth control and decreased thickness in the brain regions responsible for "responding to rewards and evaluating internal states/incoming stimuli".
Self-awareness - Evaluating internal states
Self-control - Responding to rewards
Solipsism - Inability to process incoming stimuli
Not only does the pill have an effect on the mindset of women by changing the way we reproduce (and thereby how the genders interact), but now we know it also has a physical impact on the brain.


>synergy-pr.com/files/JESP72009.pdf

>emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/mate-choice-copying-in-humans.pdf

>psy.unipd.it/~pbressan/papers/BressanStranieri2008.pdf

Women prefer taken men with attractive partners especially during the low-fertility phase of their cycle

>theguardian.com/science/2010/jun/18/love-sex-masturbation

>readability.com/m?url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/4790313.stm

...the hormone Prolactin makes people not want sex. Its essential, otherwise humans would only want sex and not even take time to eat. It spikes after sex... and it rises after relationships get older. At 1 year, then at 3 years it rises again. (Sounds like the typical stages of a relationship doesn't it?) It also rises more in women than in men, and although they cant put humans in cages, they found that monkeys they tested only had high prolactin levels after sex or... when they were brought in and put into cages, and they realized they were trapped. To me it explains why so many women have low libidos and then when getting out of a marriage, suddenly turn into fireballs of sexual desire: they aren't trapped. Prolactin is apparently what pushes us to want new partners.

>spring.org.uk/2015/01/men-and-women-process-emotions-in-different-ways-this-affects-what-they-remember.php

Study of 3,000+ finds men and women process emotions differently and this affects what they remember
Women rate emotional images as more stimulating and are more likely to remember them than men, a new study finds.
While strong emotions tend to boost memory for both men and women, this neuroimaging study may help explain why women often outperform men on memory tests.
The results come from a very large study of 3,398 people who took part in four different trials.
Both men and women were asked to look at a series of pictures, some of which were emotionally arousing and others which were neutral.
They were also tested on their memory for the pictures.
The results, published in the Journal of Neuroscience, showed that women found the emotional pictures — and especially the negative pictures — more stimulating than the men (Spalek et al., 2015).

>onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00444.x/abstract

Using nationally representative data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth, I estimate the association between intimate premarital relationships (premarital sex and premarital cohabitation) and subsequent marital dissolution. I extend previous research by considering relationship histories pertaining to both premarital sex and premarital cohabitation. I find that premarital sex or premarital cohabitation that is limited to a woman's husband is not associated with an elevated risk of marital disruption. However, women who have more than one intimate premarital relationship have an increased risk of marital dissolution. These results suggest that neither premarital sex nor premarital cohabitation by itself indicate either preexisting characteristics or subsequent relationship environments that weaken marriages. Indeed, the findings are consistent with the notion that premarital sex and cohabitation limited to one's future spouse has become part of the normal courtship process for marriage.

web.missouri.edu/~gearyd/MatechoicePDF.pdf

>Only women are picky in regards to both short & long term relationships, but men are ONLY picky in regards to long term relationships
>Women just sit back and pick
>Men have to compete
>Everything is based on reproductive potential >The individual's ability to invest in the growth, development, and later social and reproductive competencies of offspring and/or the potential genetic benefits a mate would confer on offspring
>Despite what the kike media says, women try to avoid short term relationships and casual sex unless the man is alpha
>Most westerners ignore this shit
>Women want men who are considered successful within their given culture
>Culturally successful men's children have better psychological and physical health, also a longer life.
>Women prefer husbands who are better educated and earn more money than they do.
>When women are forced to make trade-offs, a prospective marriage partner’s cultural success is rated as a necessity and other characteristics as a luxury.
>Hero in romance novels is always an older, handsome, socially dominant, and wealthy man who ultimately marries the heroine despite having his pick of dozens
>Women who marry older and better educated men have more children, are less likely to get divorced, and report higher levels of marital satisfaction than women who married younger and/or less educated men.
>Culturally successful men are often arrogant, self-serving, and better able to pursue their preferred reproductive interests than are other men. These preferences often involve pursuing multiple mating partners rather than investing in a single woman and her children.
>Women prefer men who are physically strong and make them feel physically protected.
>Intimacy and emotional satisfaction from partner is more of a luxury than a necessity for women.

Continued

>Women rate a kind, understanding and intelligent husband higher than a purely culturally successful one with none of these traits.
>Women prefer taller than average athletic symmetric men with 0,9 waist-to-hip ratio and shoulders wider than hips.
>facial features that women like: large eyes, large smile, prominent cheek bones and chin.
>Asymmetric men are less physically active, manifest more symptoms of depression and anxiety, and report more minor physical problems (e.g., colds, headaches). They also have a lower IQ, higher basal metabolic rate and fewer sex partners.
>Handsome husbands not only give beautiful, but also healthier children.
>Women's ratings of the physical attractiveness of men are moderated by the ratings of the women’s peers, especially if the peer ratings are negative.
>Women’s ratings of the physical attractiveness of men are influenced by the men’s perceived social dominance and by the age of the women’s fathers when they were children.
>Women's preference for physical attractive men rises around the time of ovulation.
>Men are deceived by their partners into raising the children of another man, that is, cuckolded, about 10% of the time.
>Nonpaternity rates are higher than 20% in low socioeconomic settings.
>Women are attracted by the smell of pheromones around the time of ovulation.
>Women prefer extra-pair partners with whom they have a level of emotional intimacy as contrasted with a stranger.
>Men like variety.
>Men benefit from sex, women pay.
>Women do STR to achiece a LTR or to cheat their husband.
>Men masturbate more often.
>Women strongly endorse the double-standard that pre-marital sex is less acceptable for women than men and feel guilt and anxiety after sex.
>Men fantasize more about sex and group sex.

Cmon dude. Literal prostitutes are not the problem.

>Women fantasize about personal and emotional characteristics of their partners.
>Men focus their fantasy on physical characteristics.
>Almost only men use prostitutes and that's why they have more sex partners than women.
>Men value the intelligence, kindness, understanding, personality, friendliness and sense of humor of their partner just as highly or even more than physical attractiveness.
>Men, especially socially dominant ones, are more jealous.
>Infidelity (or the suspection of it) and desertion are common motives for a man killing his wife, seminal study of homicides indicate.
>Men like youth, symmetry, low bmi, 0,7 waist-to-hip ratio (cues of fertility).
>Women’s fertility is low in the teen years, peaks at about age 25, and then gradually declines to near zero by age 45.
>The most attractive dating partner for teenage males is a woman about 5 years older than themselves, that is, a woman with higher fertility than females of the same age or younger than these adolescent males.
>Ovulating women smell sexier.
>Oversupply of women results in liberal sexual mores, high divorce rates, out of marriage births, single mothers, increase in women’s participation in the workforce, and lower levels of paternal investment.
>Oversupply of men results in increase in the level of commitment of men to marriage, declining divorce rates and greater levels of paternal investment.
>In societies in which polygyny is not constrained, culturally successful men (about 10-15% of men) will typically marry several women, which results in male-to-male aggression and many men with no children.
>Men, but not women who engage in serial monogamy get more children than their married peers.

>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26754158

Men are over represented in every type of fetish and perversion except masochism

>people.fas.harvard.edu/~iversen/PDFfiles/LottKenny.pdf

Allowing women to vote INHERENTLY increases the size and scope of government

>medicaldaily.com/fat-bottomed-girls-women-wide-hips-more-sexually-active-due-confidence-bestowed-evolution-278650

Wide hipped chicks are whores

>gpi.sagepub.com/content/6/3/251.full.pdf
>gpi.sagepub.com/content/8/2/159.full.pdf

Women LITERALLY hate their own nations and actively seek their destruction with immigration

dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3557688/Women-really-love-bad-boys-Females-likely-lust-people-criminal-records-males-study-finds.html

Women really DO love bad boys: Females are more likely to lust after people with criminal records than males, study finds

>eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2016-05/w-wif051616.php

Women are more likely to be sexually fluid than men because evolution historically required them to have sex with co-wives in polygynous marriages

>bloomberg.com/graphics/2016-who-marries-whom/

Shocking, look who marries whoo

...

>tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00224499.2014.996279

Basically, female rape victims often go on to enjoy sexual relationships with their rapists

>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19085605

Men dream of many things

Pounding a teenager, getting seduced by a MILF, footjobs, autistic girls, pegging, brazilian scat orgies, grannies, BBW, choking themselves while dressed as batman, etc.

What do women like?

Getting raped

>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23421402

There's a BIOLOGICAL reason cucks will defend women at all costs

>psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2015-55834-001/

Women have evolved to seek an older mate

>pss.sagepub.com/content/20/6/661

Nobody wants to fuck niggers

>sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019188690800370X

Women love facial scars when they're fertile

>unz.com/isteve/when-society-encourages-mean-girls-to-bully-boys/

Women will follow any totalitarian fanatic regime with even more savagery than men

>nymag.com/scienceofus/2016/01/european-queens-waged-more-wars-than-kings.html

European queens waged more wars than kangz

>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22544306

Women with high self esteem have the most frequent an intense rape fantasies on average

>news.utexas.edu/2015/08/06/genders-differ-dramatically-in-evolved-mate-preferences

Men’s and women’s ideas of the perfect mate differ significantly due to evolutionary pressures

>journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052970

Liberals are biologically cucked and a danger to us all

journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0131613

Sexist men are literally winners on average

Not an argument

Dads with smaller testicles are better fathers, study shows

>medicalnewstoday.com/articles/265855.php

>Previous studies have shown that lower levels of testosterone in men have been linked to increased parental involvement.

sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/12/151207081824.htm

Men have better sense of direction than women, study suggests

Do women panic more than men? An experimental study of financial decisions

>sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804314000743

Married men already know, m8.

medicaldaily.com/brain-facts-know-and-share-men-have-lower-percentage-gray-matter-women-292530

How about that?

Women have less less gray matter in their brains than men do

Guess who also tend to have less gray matter?

PATHOLOGICAL LIARS

You can't believe the change being a mother makes to a woman till you see it first hand.

I've more faith she'll have my back now that she's a mother.

Letting women work is literally killing them


>journals.lww.com/joem/Abstract/publishahead/Chronic_Disease_Risks_From_Exposure_to_Long_Hour.98984.aspx

Women like taken men

>evp.sagepub.com/content/14/2/1474704916652144.full

Women are the niggers of gender

Bump

faculty.washington.edu/hechter/KanazawaPaper.pdf

Fascinating read

For foreign conquest and alien rule, the evolutionary psychological perspective suggests that women should fear alien rule much less than men, but only so long as they are reproductive, because they then have a good chance of being spared by the conquerors and have the option of marrying into them. Accordingly, the analyses of the Eurobarometer data show that young women are much less xenophobic than young men, but the sex differences disappear around age 50. […]

Interestingly, a separate analysis (not shown) demonstrates that the interaction term between sex and age in a combined sample of all ages is not statistically significant, except for religion. It means that, at least for nationality and race, women do not gradually and linearly become more xenophobic over the life course. They suddenly become qualitatively more xenophobic sometime between the ages of 40 and 50.

Women are a biological dream come true for the jews

FUCKING DEAD

...

>when a nigger is just about to tell you the ultimate truth you realize shit is fucked up big time

hilarious as fuck and somewhat sad at same time lad

U wot m8?

Very interesting information OP.
TYVM.

Yes they are troll. 0/10 attempt.

Cuck

>What if I told you women aren't what you've been raised to think they are?
but I've been raised to think they are sluts

Tl;dr women's lib was a mistake. Thanks science for telling us what we already knew but weren't allowed to say

i can confirm this

dad was financially viable selfish asshole kind of guy who spent zero time raising me

being raised with a father who isn't interested in his own children means the mother does most of the raising which leads to a more emotionally active offspring which leads to a lower rate of assholeness and douchebagness

but also a less chance of being a huge fucking asshole to attract dumb broads

Good man

What if I told that only 99% of women are manipulative, selfish, attention whores?

Na I'm just fucking kidding man. I'm starting to think the jews are right. Single motherhood is the future. My fucking father is an asshole, every now and then i dream of killing him. And I wake up with a smile on my face after such dreams.

I'd ask you what you thought of those odds.

What if I told you only 99% of niggers were violent idiots?

id cal u a faggot lmao

>benis

Anyone with experience here know how likely that bitch was full of STDs?

Im pretty sure that now in a liberal feminised society, beta men are needed anymore.
They literally have no purpose, and they know it.

Big daddy govt

This is quite accurate.

depends what you define as beta. A man who is intelligent and has enough resources can easily convert from beta to alpha in any stage of his life.

The question is, is it worth it? Do you really want to engage in a relationship with a woman and hand over all your power to her?

The challenge is to find one of the 1%
and they were probably be very average looking...which is a good thing

I am sorry that is the case. Is he a drinker and a fiend?

>What if I told you women aren't what you've been raised to think they are?

I would tell you to shut the fuck up.

WHY SO SERIOUS

You make the mistake many cuckservatives make of believing in unicorns

As if somewhere, out there

There's a hidden valley with angelic maidens who are nothing like "other girls"

Betafags often put slavic, asian, hispanic, etc. women on a pedestal to the bafflement of foreign men who must deal with them

And average chicks are absolutely horrible when it comes to entitlement

And here comes the cuck cavalry to save the maidens

>all this misogyny

Who hurt you anons?

are you gonna tell me they are decent fair people with a conscience? cuz that's bullshit lol

your fat crushed my dicc

Women care about surviving and security. Security in the west means money. Less opportunity for men means less men are able to attract females. "Where have all the good men gone?" Replaced, by women in education and careers.

Copy and paste this when the subject comes up

but haim we need to make more white children why cant you just buy an ukrainian wifu and lock her up in your basement ?

sometimes id wish there would already be machines that would replace woman's.

na he is just a bad father who physically (beating) and mentally abuses his own children.

I could even forgive him if he was this ""tough"" when he engages other people.

But no, he is a fucking pussy when talking to others. But against his own children and family he is the tough guy.

>You make the mistake many cuckservatives make of believing in unicorns
The difference is that while unicorns do not exist, good women do. It all depends on the person as well. I would make it known to my potential GF that I plan on living a minimalist life style. So if she was a gold digger, she wouldn't be interested.
You have to reproduce somehow my friend.

I am the child of a single mother, let me tell you that your father will never raise to the level of sickness and psychopathy that single mothers get. Mine used to grab me by the roots of my hair and lift (i felt like my scalp would come off my head) and keep me in the house for months. And all of her single mothers cheered that, it's much more rare for men to do this.

>The difference is that while unicorns do not exist, good women do.

They are molded, by age, wisdom, and religion.

I am sorry that is the situation for you, but not all men are like, for I most certainly not be abusive like that. Mommy has never got a knife from kitchen to defend herself from him has she?

She prob secretly enjoys watching him get beat and controls him thru his abuse lol

>They are molded, by age, wisdom, and religion.
Yes this is true. And as I am sure you know, every family is very unique. Not all women all women come from degenerate liberal families.

today I took the red pill

All my guy friends have various common interests like sports, hunting, music, vidya, art, etc. The best conversations I've ever had with my fellow men have occurred while we engaged in such activities. Even just moving around furniture or landscaping. It's that feeling of working together towards an accomplishment and relating over that shit.

Women, make time with the express purpose of talking between friends. Over coffee perhaps, but the act of communication is more important than the event or activity. Even a ‘stitch-and-bitch’ is simply an organized excuse to get together and relate. For women, communication is about CONTEXT. They are rewarded by how that communication makes them feel. For Men communication is about content and they are rewarded by the interchange of information and ideas.

It’s likely that our hunter-gatherer tribal roles had a hand in men and women’s communication differences. Men went to hunt together and practiced the coordinated actions for a cooperative goal. Bringing down a gigantic prey animal would have been a very information-crucial effort; in fact the earliest cave paintings were essentially records of a successful hunt and instructions on how to do it. Early men’s communication would necessarily have been a CONTENT driven discourse or the tribe didn’t eat.

Similarly women’s communications would’ve been during gathering efforts and childcare. It would stand to reason that due to women’s more collectivist roles they would evolve to be more intuitive, and context oriented, rather than objective oriented.

Whereas men tend to distribute rewards and resources primarily on merit (stubborn rock you get the liver for dealing the critical hit, wolfheart you get a leg for crippling it, faggot flower you get the cock), women spread resources collectively irrespective of merit. Again this predisposition is likely due to how women’s ‘hard-wiring’ evolved as part of the circumstances of their tribal roles.

>good women do
Science says no

no, but I wanted to use the kitchen knife and stab him with it.

he doesnt abuse me anymore, because I could beat him up now and he has seen that I hate him to the point I could easily kill him without any regrets.

But the problem is, I'm really depressed now. I dont really feel like doing anything anymore except waste time.

I dont know how to overcome this and get the will to live again.

I am sure his father would not like that...not one bit.

Show me the science that says that all women are bad.

Every girl I have ever loved.

I am sorry that your father could never put a smile on your face.

he'll put a smile on my face once he dies though

He just posted a dozen links showing women are biologically awful people.

Because men have such varied interests, passions and endeavors based on them it’s easy to see how men compartmentalize themselves into various sub-tribes. Whether it’s team sports (almost always a male-oriented endeavor), cooperative enterprises, cooperative forms of art (rock bands have almost always been male space) or just hobbies men share, it is a natural progression for men to form sub-tribes within the larger whole of conventional masculinity.

Because of men’s’ outward reaching approach to interacting with the world around him, there’s really no unitary male tribe in the same fashion that the collective ‘Sisterhood’ of women represents. One of the primary strengths of the Feminine Imperative has been its unitary tribalism among women. We can see this evidenced in how saturated the Feminine Imperative has become into mainstream society and how it’s embedded itself into what would otherwise be diametrically opposed factions among women. Political, socioeconomic and religious affiliations of women (various sub-tribes) all become secondary to the interests of ‘womankind’ when embracing the collective benefits of being women and leveraging both their victim and protected statuses.

Thus, we see no cognitive dissonance when women simultaneously embrace a hostile opposition to one faction while still retaining the benefits that faction might offer to the larger whole of the Sisterhood. The Sisterhood is unitary first and then it is broken down into sub-tribes. Family, work, interests, political / religious compartmentalizations become sublimated to fostering the collective benefits of womankind.

Women are terrifying in this almost insectlike hivemind they share. The ultimate goal being to maximize hypergamy worldwide.

This is how your so called "traditional" women can claim to "hate" feminism n' shieet but still ENJOY the bennies of feminism.

You must have really hated your father

God damn beat that fucking whore