Ancaps will defend this

>Ancaps will defend this

Meme ideology

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Ms1MrY8kTFs
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

You had me at "child mail-order bride".

>street
>bride
>house
>private
>property

>Ancaps

Can you point to me where the problem is? The warlord across the street clearly violated the NAP and thus the neighbor responded in kind.

Put your trip back on so I can filter you Nationalist View

...

>shooting a TOW missile
>not deploying your recreational nuke
Plebeians

This. WTF I love libertarianism now

Jesus that pic

...

>defenses so weak that a starving child can make it all the way to your lawn

You can do all those things in a non Ancap society..

...

who are you quoting?

Holy fuck I need more of these. Fucking hilarious.

I don't have that many ancap memes sadly

That's not how this works newddit

...

Why is it the governments fucking problem if I sell heroin to a 5 year old?

Fucking nazis.

Damn. I was in pain from the fucking first one. Maybe I'll just go find some ancaps to piss off with them.

You're the newfriend family

you don't need to reply with your reddit boogeyman whenever you don't understand a meme that would require you to browse other boards and since longer than this summer, Ahmet. If you're not sure how to fit in just lurk moar.

I'll contribute.
Quality is shit though.

>tfw will never seriously discuss ancap or libertarianism on Sup Forums again because every thread is filled with strawmen and strawmemes

>People ITT are admitting that the only reason they don't have child sex slaves, sell heroin to babies and kill their neighbor, is because government tells them not to.

Wew.

It's just so idealistic though. Libertarianism is more realistic, but anarcho-capitalism banks way too much on people being perfect hippies who will bring no harm to anyone.

Kek

>implying there is any serious discussion to be had with ancraps or lolbertardians

Have you always been to able to reach that far or is it something that come and goes?

...

Ugh I know right. Fucking CIS scum mysoginists

Yeah because ancaps and libertarians are fucking memes.

If you were capable of serious discussion you wouldn't still be spalshing around in the lolbertarian kiddie pool and would have graduated to the grown up version: liberalism.

>says the "national socialist"

?

>tfw this applies to ameriburgers dying from treatable diseases because their insurance doesn't cover treatment, but muh nothing is free someone paid for it right xdxdxd

This is great.

is there any limit on how powerful one can become in a libertarian society? no government, no human rights, no law enforcement...

sounds amazing. throw me in a libertarian society and i promise to make slavery and genocide look like a joke

Because it's a fucking meme ideology

stop being such a cuck portugal
socialism has only brought you to be the poorest country in western europe

>I shot the mailbox again, on purpose

holy fuck, I dont think anything online has ever made me laugh that hard

thank you burgerbro

Explain to me why fairly bought child sex slaves are wrong without retorting to "muh feels"

>liberalism

Nazism is there biggest meme that even fewer people take seriously.

you dont deserve to be taken seriously, your beliefs are a joke and people shouldnt have to put any more effort into humoring you and making you feel like an equal contender than you put into your ideology

My fucking sides

are libertarians worse than soviet-jewish communists?

I think it's close at least

>people being perfect hippies who will bring no harm to anyone.

Not really.
There is a way ancap can work fine and that way is called private cities.

A bunch of private start up cities could be created in international waters or off the coast of nations that would allow them. Or existing cities could secede and become privately owned city states.

These free cities could set up their own system of taxation or fees or funding, their own services, their own laws and rules and ultimately their own form of governance.

But where is the anarcho in this capitalism? Because it would be entirely voluntary to live in these cities. People could apply or sign up, depending on the cities rules, and sign an actual contract, instead of that bogus 'social contract' that 'legitimises' the use of force by the government.

Basically you could pick your city or state like picking your Internet provider, and cities would have to compete to offer the best service to keep and gain new customers/citizens.
This would ultimately end endless political bickering, because leftists could go to leftist cities, right wingers to right wing cities etc.
And in the long run we would find out which system is best.

That's how ancap would work.

I think this is one instance were we have a legitimate reason to resort to our "Feels"

You could create a socialist city in ancap world. Idiot.

>Street

Fucking this. No idea why Sup Forums doesn't get this. The city state model formed the greatest civilisations in history, it's a good model.

What if I feel like having a sex slave?

>tfw you "requisition" a stealth bomber and use it to drop mustard gas on the city centre just because.

See
It's just people attacking with insults but never with any arguments.
And with a lot of anger too, like the ideologies of liberty are a huge threat to their way of life or something.

I don't get it.
You are attacking people whose sole mission is to leave you alone.

>This would ultimately end endless political bickering, because leftists could go to leftist cities, right wingers to right wing cities etc.
this seems up the naivety of you and everyone who thinks like you perfectly

people already have the option of emigrating to places with law and system that fits their ideology and lifestyle and they still prefer to just go to nicer places and try to force them to change, you retard

this wouldnt be any different

once again you're just taking some pretty little meme system that looks sweet on paper and expecting it to work out perfectly, look where that got the commies

this is why no one takes you seriously, you're a daydreaming child without any grounding to reality

It causes long term psychological damage to the child and they are not old enough to consent. Enough damaged people are going to cause serious problems, the escalation of crime etc.

You would need to engage in a contract with her giving her entire consent
taking slaves is a violation of other people's freedom and therefore an agression

>Successful cities get flooded by 3rd worlders and become the 3rd world.

>they still prefer to just go to nicer places and try to force them to change, you retard
Democracy is the problem. People need to be able to freely exit but not influence the laws.

>slaves
>consent

>slaves
>going out to commit crime

What if I buy her from her dad?

How do Ancaps rationalise the fact that a sufficiently powerful private organisation could pay for a security force and compel people to pay ransom, thereby ostensibly become a dictatorship?

Why are ancaps and ancoms autists who don't realize that pure anarchism isn't capitalist or communist? There are no rules of economics in a society with no rules.

>no government, no human rights, no law enforcement

All of that is wrong

I think they think inside the box too much and are not willing to actually explore our arguments

...

My god.

I will admit that's actually plausible. The only problem I see is city states starting to screw with each other and crap like that. Who is there to enforce property rights or say where the property lines end? Shit like that would get out of hand.

Her dad is not her owner, he can't trade her body, he merely has the natural responsability of her safety and well-being

this is pretty basic stuff krautbro

The city states have an alliance which prevents that from happening.

Simple.
They are the same as their oh-so-hated "statists"
Only difference is that ancraps are in denial

because it is overpowered by people paying a security force that DOESNT do those things

And how would that work?

What exactly is wrong with this picture, Abdul?

You'd need some sort of mercenary-military force that enforces anarcho-capatalism. Anything deemed "too socialist" gets bombed.

And what if i would take you as a slave and make you shovel shit and pick cotton.?
And please stop posting images of children you are attracted to.

in denial about what?

he described the initiation of coercive force

>Successful cities get flooded by 3rd worlders and become the 3rd world.
>implying 3rd worlders would be able to leech of a libertarian city that gives no sort of welfare or advantages to them

they'll adapt, becoming productive members, or they'll fucking starve

id is an anagram for fuckb0yz

>people already have the option of emigrating to places with law and system that fits their ideology and lifestyle

No they don't. Legally immigrating somewhere is very hard and tedious.
Also This
A private city has no obligation to change unless they have a democratic system.
Did you not get the part where cities could set up their own immigration rules?

So the best system is to pay for protection from differing private security forces?

So you're saying the best system is that we pay for one dictator to protect us from another?

What a fucking joke.

Sup Forums is mostly Nazi, but the anarchocapitalism allows Nazis to exist - the Nazism doesn't allow any other system to exist in the same time.

Ancap > anything

And by that logic you would your dads property, and he could sell you off as a sex slave.

That's why the city states have state-run militias (sometimes called "armies") who will protect their territories silly.

who pays for the army?

Yes.
And that makes that corporation a de-facto state.

Ancraps say "no state", then they say that a all-powerful corporation "forcing" them to do stuff (effectively a state) is ok.

Ancraps are in denial.

Which you would be free to do in an anarcho-capitalist society (or in a muslim one.)

Rules of economics are natural rules.
People have engaged in economics before government existed.

This kid is more learned than I was at his age.

Somehow this worked already in the 6th Century B.C. in Greece.

Read Rothbard's works.

Everybody in this thread should watch this

youtube.com/watch?v=Ms1MrY8kTFs

yeah, mcdonalds are such burger dictators

...

The people in the city.

This may seem like a tax, but the differentiation here is that for one, it was probably made known beforehand that access to the city required paying the army fee. The other is that if you still don't pay the fee, the army no longer has any obligation to protect you specifically if somebody attacks you, since you didn't contribute.

>corporations
>in an ancap society

good one bro, all corporations thrive on state sponsorship

>then they say that a all-powerful corporation "forcing" them to do stuff (effectively a state) is ok.

no they don't. you cannot describe a single hypothetical that satisfies that accusation without introducing the initiation of coercive force, which ancaps do not support

> Read Rothbard's works.

(((Rothbard)))? You're using the guy who said that selling your children as a commodity is ok as an example for your cause?

All of these meme examples imply that we only have morals because of government, which is of course not true.

>anarchism
>ancap
Pick one.

Ideally a city state screwing around would lose customers and eventually go bankrupt. If the citizens somehow endorsed the aggressive actions of their state, other city states will need to defend themselves.
War can still happen, but it's not as likely as with our current governments who are not accountable for their actions.

...