What does Sup Forums think of this guy?

What does Sup Forums think of this guy?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Rjy61LlcHdc
twitter.com/AnonBabble

He had some jaw-dropping opinions

I don't hate him, but I never understood people's worship of the guy.

One of the greats, bridged popular culture/sensibility with actual cinema knowledge.

I really liked his earlier work but by the end it was almost as if he couldn't say anything about the movies he reviewed.

He's a fucking idiot. He thought The Golden Compass was a deeper fantasy epic than the Lord of the Rings...

But it was.

race traitor

Great critic, I often read his reviews having just watched a film, when I am processing and digesting it.

he completely btfo Sup Forumsedditors and just for that he has my respect

He gave Full Metal Jacket a bad review but praised Platoon
What a fucking pleb

Roger didn't even agree on that himself.

*blocks your art*

I like that he triggered video game people by saying games aren't art.

In his 40 plus years theres some reviews i disagree with so i hate him

>disagreeing with professional critics

Who are you again?

middlebrow

>videogames can't be art

Uh....

He's based and still triggers Lotrfags to this day

Ebert rated
Fellowship of the Ring
3/4 Stars
The Two Towers
3/4 Stars
Return of the King
3.5/4 Stars

Philosopher's Stone
4/4 Stars
Chamber of Secrets
4/4 Stars
Prisoner of Azkaban
3.5/4 Stars

And he was right HP is better than Lotr

wtf i hate roger now

Wow he has better taste than reddi/tv
Sup Forums utterly BTFO lotrfags on suicide watch all they have is memes

THIS TRIGGERS THE EBERT

how would he review this /kinography/ : youtube.com/watch?v=Rjy61LlcHdc ?

Kek

That was a two hour walking simulator.

>basing opinions off of anyone other than yourself
>critic
>lowest form expression

Glad he's dead tbqh
Now the people running his garbage site still pretending he's alive need to die and it'll be like he never existed. :>}

film criticism god

>Azkaban lower than the first two
this doesn't even come down to opinion, thats just wrong

They are all technically 4/4

>liking two of the dullest franchises in the history of movies franchises
he was a real pleb

(You)

He gave Flight Plan (2006) with Jodie Foster 3.5/4 and called it "a frightening thriller with an airtight plot"
Absolute moron desu

I didn't always agree with him but at least he clearly explained why he had the opinion he did on a film, which is better than most critics.

And Armond /our shit tasting nigger faggot/ White liked

Baby Driver
Gi Joe
Gi Joe 2
Transformers 2
Jack and Jill
Grown ups
Bvs
Indiana Jones 4

>Bvs

basèd

Baby Driver was good though.

Yeah but Armond is just a master trole/contrarian

Why even bother commenting if you are gonna emulate www.reddit.com/r/movies?

>YOU'RE REDDIT IF YOU LIKE WHAT I DON'T LIKE!

His reviews are shit. He thinks it's justified to put spoilers in them just because he's more important than you.

Sup Forums is reddit. Bvs is right here. And baby driver would be too but it just came out. And Logan and Get Out those are reddi/tvs choice too

the normiest of normie results, as expected from those plebs