What exactly is wrong with Sexual Liberation? It's just the freedom to make your own choices

What exactly is wrong with Sexual Liberation? It's just the freedom to make your own choices.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/kOMkl3ApTK0
scientificamerican.com/article/be-mine-forever-oxytocin/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>the freedom to turn society into shit so it gets over ran by foreign more traditional society's.
That's all liberalization accomplishes, ever single time This has been happening since ancient times.

...

...

>What's wrong with having no dignity or self-respect or having any respect for the family I came from?

>whats wrong with having a giant stick up my ass while I masturbate and cry myself to sleep every night?

>What's wrong with visiting a psychologist???

Allah created woman for serve the man.

>a sexless weeb on Sup Forums who hates women is trying to lecture people on self respect

Stop respondiing and bumping b8 slide threads you subhuman ameriniggers I hate you double digit IQ mongrels so fucking much

sage

You only picked this proxy because you watched the opening ceremony at the Olympics.
>You ever heard Comoros before then

P
RARE
O
X
Y

Wtf is comoros?

Nothing except when you don't also accept the responsibility for the consequences that sleeping around and being the town bicycle will lead to.

If you cannot afford to feed that kid you had at 18 with Jamal before he went to prison then both you and the child should starve to death for your bad choices.

AIDS

A perfect example of what happens when people's sexual desires go to far and fuck everyone else over

I would liberate her if you know what i mean.

Nothing wrong lol

R A R - wait not I already have you

>every girl I know has casual sex
>literally none of them have had kids by accident
>Sup Forums seems to think this is the norm

Why is that?

What is wrong with wearing a hijab? No seriously, why do women wearing a hijab deserve bullying?

Looks like your usual Greek, actually. Pay your debts, Konstantinos

Within 10 years, "liberals" will make it legal for muslims to rape 5 year olds in public, or else "racism"/islamophobia/insensitivity.
In the EU the authorities/media are loathe to prosecute immigrants for raping kids and will not prosecute unless story escapes to media.
Same in UK.
Europe is finished.

Stop respondiing and bumping b8 slide threads you subhuman greekfaggots I hate you double digit IQ mongrels so fucking much


pay debnts and sage

You mean freedom to make bad choices and not be socially shamed for them.

teenage single moms

Because every time you have sex especially a women they form a bond or soul tie that will later effect them emotionally, prove me wrong how many adutls are on some kind of anti depression pill this is all the effect of being whores or whoremongers, this is why in the old days men bought women and kept them and virginity was always encouraged they understood the shit that can come from just fucking around. This is just one main big reason but we also have diseases, faggotry, sexual perversion leading to pedo/animal fuckers, and a lack of respect or honor in women to build a family and continue a clean family tree that is successful.

youtu.be/kOMkl3ApTK0

Black pigeon talks a little bit about it in this video.

Basically the sole purpose of humans is to reproduce, so the more sexually repressed you are the more you want to contribute to society to make up for the lack of sex.

I suppose this explains why people like Tesla lived their whole lives as virgins

>falling for the "acting like a whore" is "liberating" meme

Reminder that while you're sitting in on Saturday night masturbating, shitposting on here and tabbing out to TF2 while your peers are out socialising, even skinny Chinamen are getting laid.

Kill yourself, you fat virginal faggot.

It's more about not being ashamed of having sex. I've talked to many women about this and they all tell me the same thing.

They want to have sex a lot more, but they don't want to be called whores.

>It's just the freedom to make your own choices.
Sure, the issue here is that we live in a culture where anyone that makes bad choices can blame them on the nearest fucking white male etc and have their failures subsidized by the state.

If these people were held responsible for bad decisions, then i would champion their right to make them.

>so the more sexually repressed you are the more you want to contribute to society to make up for the lack of sex.

This is a negative way of looking at it. I'd say that excessive sex leads to a redirection of your energy into physical pleasure, which compromises your ability to improve society however semi-frequent but satisfying sex is important in maintaining a bond in a relationship and a healthy bond in a relationship is beneficial to an individuals ability to be of benefit to society.

Funny how all this sexual freedom has resulted in lots of people feeling pressured into sex from all around them.

Freedom is one thing, but what we have is just a change in society to a different form of pressure and expectation. Young people feeling pressured into having sex, that's no more 'freedom' than those pressured into abstinence years ago, judgemental attitudes are still there, just in a different way.

Then there's the issue that those pushing sexual liberation don't believe anyone has a right to a different opinion. People should be allowed as much casual sex as they like and if you reject them for that, you're some sort of prejudiced bigot. Apparently people should sleep around all they like and then expect that to count for nothing when looking for a serious relationship. Those pushing this sort of sexual liberation don't respect the opinions of others, they want to act as they please and everyone to accept it. Whereas true freedom allows you to make choices unrestricted, and people to respond freely. In other words, you're free to whore around all you like, but you can't seriously expect everyone to accept that when entering a relationship with you.

I'd like to eat a lot of hamburgers and not get fat, but unfortunately one eventually leads to the other.

>It's just the freedom to make your own choices.

Freedom to get a free pass on slutting around while it's acceptable in society. The damage is already taking place (divorces, troubled relationships, badly raised kids etc.).

post moar redheads

What negative consequence of casual sex is equivalent to obesity? If you take common sense measures, you are not getting pregnant or STDs. It's that simple.

>What negative consequence of casual sex is equivalent to obesity?

None equivalent. The negative consequences are far more damaging than obesity.

What are they?

Jesus fuck thats cute

You mean u would rape her like
in Turkish tradition.

whats wrong with jew wearing swastika

I would take being of poor health over being morally destitute anytime desu.

Every time a woman has sex her brain is flooded with chemicals that are meant to nurture bonding with their sexual partner. Like all chemical rushes you get from any activity, these have diminishing returns. When a woman sleeps with one man, 100% of her bonding chemicals go towards building a connection with that man. When a woman sleeps with two men, that number is now split between them. When she sleeps with three men, it's now split into three, and so on and so forth while the brain asks, "Uh what's going on we've been bonding a lot but we don't seem to be even pregnant yet? Do we have a partner or not?"

Over time this results in females who are unable to have a connection with a man on the level they would have if they'd been selective and made commitment with their sex lives. This is why divorce rates (and other negative results) increase as number of sexual partners increase. As we've come to treat human sexuality more as a play thing than the method of propagating our species since the sexual revolution, we've seen its effects.

Casual sex is not seen as immoral outside of strict christians and fringe Sup Forums weirdos.

Sexual Liberation is just another word for slavery. :^)

Because of modern medicine obesity is far worse. Without it casual sex would be far worse than obesity. HIV isn't even a big deal anymore

>he thinks oxytocin isn't one of our most common hormones
>he thinks it can just be used up until it doesn't work anymore

You're an anti-intellectual embarrassment.

its degenerate and destroys the nuclear family

>he thinks it can just be used up until it doesn't work anymore

Glad to see you're conceding the original point.

To this new point though, I never said that, so your memetext is irrelevant.

It's wrong when it doesn't allow men to peg me

Oxytocin is the bonding hormone. If your pseduo-psychology rant was accurate, that would be the hormone in question.

It's not accurate, because that's not how oxytocin works. You use oxytocin all day whenever you talk to or look at another person that you get along with.

>It's not accurate, because that's not how oxytocin works.

I didn't say that's how it works.

Are you going to address my argument or continue to construct and attack your straw man in order to try to distract from the fact you've already lost your first position and must now try to argue this one you're making up?

Dissolution of the family unit

Young men and women are being told its cool and empowering to fuck strangers, god forbid two young people settle down early, work hard , make a down payment on a house, and have 3+ children

He probably treats her real nice, unlike if a nigger would date her.

Promiscuity has very negative psychological impacts.

Sex is the most intimate act you can perform with another person, so by using it as a means of basic pleasure, you lose much of the ability to bond with a special individual.

You have lost, you made a pseudo-psychology assertion backed by literally nothing.

The bonding hormone is not just used up when you have sex. Congratulations, you bought into Sup Forums memes over actual information and medical knowledge.

A weeb is still 100 times better than a woman who has had an abortion.

Why would we need families? It's the government's job to provide for the young.

awk thats nice :3

>The bonding hormone is not just used up when you have sex.

That's not what I said.

So basically you're not going to even try to address this new point after conceding the last and instead want to try to save face by making up something to argue against that I'm not even saying. I'm not sure what you feel this is doing since I feel no need to defend a statement I didn't make, so you're literally not even arguing with me anymore.

>What exactly is wrong with Sexual Liberation?
Lust isn't a deadly sin for nothing mate. The more we preoccupy ourselves with our dicks and pussies, the less time we think about actual problems.

The idea itself is fine. I'm all for live and let live so if some chick wants to fuck an entire frat that's okay by my.
BUT
Don't expect me to pick up the mess of your life afterwards. Promiscuous women make much worse partners and I want nothing to do with them.

I like the idea of having the freedom to make bad decisions but the common sense not to.

Lowers the quality of sex by increasing the quantity.

>Basically the sole purpose of humans is to reproduce, so the more sexually repressed you are the more you want to contribute to society to make up for the lack of sex.

idk m8, I'm a virgin and I have no motivation for anything

DIS.

>Every time a woman has sex her brain is flooded with chemicals that are meant to nurture bonding with their sexual partner. Like all chemical rushes you get from any activity, these have diminishing returns. When a woman sleeps with one man, 100% of her bonding chemicals go towards building a connection with that man. When a woman sleeps with two men, that number is now split between them. When she sleeps with three men, it's now split into three, and so on and so forth while the brain asks, "Uh what's going on we've been bonding a lot but we don't seem to be even pregnant yet? Do we have a partner or not?"
>Over time this results in females who are unable to have a connection with a man on the level they would have if they'd been selective and made commitment with their sex lives. This is why divorce rates (and other negative results) increase as number of sexual partners increase.

None of this is supported by anything except Sup Forums memes.

The chemicals you are talking about would be oxytocin, the bonding hormone. You are incorrect about how it functions.

You have nothing, you are wrong and you got brainwashed by a Sup Forums board.

Congrats, you're a fucking idiot.

Choices are degenerate

It becomes harems and the disaffected males will revolt.

/thread

...

Are you me?

Only losers with no game or megacucks who want to waste time and money on a family are upset about this. Just let them rant.

Does no one remember how the Romans did this then were too distracted by orgies and sex books to do anything then the barbarians fucked them up?
We based our country off the Romans and we're going to die off like them too.

I have no problem getting cucked by a cute Asian boy.
>tfw no Asian bf

>You are incorrect about how it functions.

You're simply fabricating something about it functions that I didn't say, and thus I have no need to address anything you say on the subject until you choose to actually speak to my words, rather than words you've put into my mouth from yours. You can continue having a pretend argument with yourself if you'd like but to everyone else ITT you must realize that you just look like someone yelling at his hand talking back to him.

The problem is that with the welfare state you, and everyone else, are often forced to pay for the bad decisions others are free to make.

why is the american flag my flag i'm not in the US

These words of a genius and an insider will really make you think...

>As political and economic freedom diminishes, sexual freedom tends correspondingly to increase. And the dictator will do well to encourage that freedom...it will help to reconcile his subjects to the servitude which is their fate.

>I had motives for not wanting the world to have a meaning; consequently I assumed that it had none, and was able without any difficulty to find satisfying reasons for this assumption. Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don’t know because we don’t want to know . . Those who detect no meaning in the world generally do so because, for one reason or another, it suits their books that the world should be meaningless . ..For myself, as no doubt for most of my contemporaries, the philosophy of meaningless was essentially an instrument of liberation, sexual and political.

>An intellectual is a person who has discovered something more interesting than sex.

I don't think we have to wait 10 years for that, or even a day, been going on for quite a while.

>goes on a bullshit rant about bonding hormones
>I explain to him that he's misrepresenting how those hormones actually work
>he scurries away from his own words like the little rat pussy that he is

Nice to know I'm not alone bros.

RICED

Not quite legal yet, but the "sexual emergencies" of the Muslim men will just be passed off in law as cultural like many other Muslim practices. The sex trade rings as in the UK will just become more prevalent.

Without people who want families, there will be no Future for your ivory-tower luxury social freedom, spoilt brat

TRAIN WITH ME BOSS

>It's just the freedom to make your own choices.

You also have the choice to do drugs your entire life. That doesn't mean you should.

You can have your own choice without sexual liberalism but i'd rather to be responsible with my girlfriend and have sex after get a house and anything which help to make our future children a good person in the world.

> she will never love you and she'll find your political beliefs repugnant.....you will never find a women like that. The best you can expect is some broken down, obese sow with low self-esteem after getting abused by her uncle when she was a child. She drinks and comfort eats to tolerate your racist outbursts at perceived "cultural Marxists" on the television. Her vagina will taste/smell like sour milk. You will develop erectile dysfunction

"Nuh-uh" is not an argument, genius.
Read some fucking science
scientificamerican.com/article/be-mine-forever-oxytocin/

Well, what do you mean by 'sexual liberation'?
If you mean 'people are free to marry whomever they wish', sure.
If you mean 'promiscuity MUST be accepted' then fuck off.
Promiscuity increases the odds of
-STDs
-Oral, colon, and prostate cancer
-Infertility
-Divorce
-Domestic violence
-Single motherhood
-abortion
These things are objectively bad, meaning promiscuity is foolish. Promiscuous people are objectively bad at risk assesment.
And a lot of these results are bad for society in general; single mothers = poor, neglected kids = a burden on society, for example.
Since promiscuity is bad, it should be avoided and the promiscuous should be shamed.

that's Seychelles m8

STANDING

Nothing wrong with it on an individual level. On a societal level, causes lots of issues with social dynamics, undoing all the work of evolution in a relative heartbeat. Biggest problem is sexual liberation, more notably birth control, allows women to evade the consequences of sexual acts which are supposed to have consequences. For a single woman, no problem. For all women, a big issue. Sex will continue to carry a relative premium which men will have to work to earn, yet women won't actually have to bear any consequences so long as they have the net of birth control, welfare, and sexist child support/custody practices. Women essentially set the price of sex, and it behooved them to set it high because of the consequences of child-bearing. Now, they have retained the high price of sex, because straight men have no real recourse and by artifically maintaining a high price, they subvert the market dynamic around sex. Men still pay high prices for pussy, yet women no longer have to put up any risk themselves.

On the other hand, you have women who choose to whore around and fuck freely, and exercise their liberation. These women do little to resolve the artificial inflation of pussy, because pussy will always have absurdly high demand that outstrips what is possible, but they do shrink the pool of females fit to raise children by a significant number, despite being the women who are most likely to have children whom they do not take responsibility over.

He's just buttmad that he lost the actual argument so he had to go on a tangent attacking a made up point, he's not actually interested in ideas m8.

Checked. Missourian?

Lmao copy and paste the part of that article that supports the idea that oxytocin just gets used up from sex with multiple partners. Nothing there refutes anything I said.

it led to the end of traditional western values

Lol typical bitch, not enough balls to be anything but passive aggressive and shifty on an anonymous imageboard

You have no idea how the chemicals in question work, you bought into Sup Forums memes assuming they were medically accurate.

Why don't you go back to your home

>women won't actually have to bear any consequences so long as they have the net of birth control, welfare, and sexist child support/custody practices

That's pretty much the most important part. Slut behavior is being subsidized by others at this point. If this safety net were removed all of a sudden this "sexual revolution" would collapse because it's no longer being forcibly funded by society. It's hilarious that women scream "my body my choice" when other people's money is now being invested into their body, which ordinarily would mean their choice as well.

fkcing hate asian masculinity posters jesus just kys. asians are subhumans. i mean when someone posts about white women liking a black dicks its not that bad because its actualy based on reality of black having huge penises compared to us whties and being able to pleasure women like we cant, but asians? subhumans, undesireble etc. just kys.

she's got nice titties

bag over head, would definitely bend over

take that shizz for a ride, dawg

...