Well here's the economic effects of Trump's, Hillary's and Bernie's tax plan

Well here's the economic effects of Trump's, Hillary's and Bernie's tax plan.

Other urls found in this thread:

cnbc.com/2016/08/08/donald-trump-just-made-a-major-change-to-his-tax-plan.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_for_Tax_Justice
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Judging by the inclusion of Sanders, this is probably obsolete.

cnbc.com/2016/08/08/donald-trump-just-made-a-major-change-to-his-tax-plan.html

So the top tax bracket will be paying 33% in tax instead of 25% So this is a good thing?

>a billionaire who has run an international business for 40 years knows how to deal with money better than a psychotic woman and a senile communist

Who would have guessed it?

It only works if he figures out it's not a brilliant idea to renegotiate the debt, and makes the spending cuts to match it.

for those who don't know about economics, basically, trump is the only one who wants everyone to work more and earn less.

or is it everyone? will he be working more and making less?

food for thought

According to this graph, wages go up by 6.5 percent.

only for the top 1%

Does the graph say that?

this one does

Is that up to date?

yes. less money to create bubbles. trickle down is bs

The graph shows that everyone gets a cut. What are you talking about?

>Trickle down meme

the top will paying 35 instead of 39.6, so no

>trickle down is bs
>Aussie shitposting
pick two

Again literally everyone gets a cut.

>more money for the people
>less money for the government that needed its credit card cut a long time ago

sounds good to me

fucking fight me cunt

>Hillary
>raising middle class taxes to give to lower end niggers
I hope she gets 2nd amended.

How do you expect to fight a person when you fought a bunch of emus and lost

>the wealth will trickle down

are you dumb or contrarian?

I think he was implying that "trickle down" economics never even existed.

The 'roo is right. Trickle Down is a bad meme. Wealth only accumulates if there is steady job growth.

Well considering that the richest income brackets pay more taxes than anybody else why shouldn't they get more of a break? Do you want to be behind the Iron Curtain again?

and how do you get steady job growth? from businesses and the wealthy. this is economics 101

Why exactly does it matter if something that doesn't hurt the poor(and arguably helps them) helps the rich?
Literally bigotry.

give the rich more money what are they going to do? inflate prices of assets

The fact that anyone would even consider this racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic bigot is beyond me. As far as I see it we only have one choice. We have to vote for Democratic Party Presidential Nominee Hillary Clinton...

Yes that's good you idiot.

Low tax rates for super-high incomes is fucking retarded.

>Economics 101.

Kill yourself. Maybe try and go past entry level le supply and demand economics before saying dumb shit like this.

oh wow really makes one think
#I'mWithHer

Motherfucker there is literally no such thing as trickle down economics. It doesn't exist. The term comes from a satirical article making fun supply-side economics by using that grotesque simplification, and it stuck. If you actually took a single economics class past middle school you would know this.

Wealth for everyone matched productivity until the Reagan and Thatcher trickle down meme began. Since then the top have gained loads, everyone else is down or level and yet productivity has skyrocketed.

if we don't give the Job Providers massive tax breaks, they wont make jobs for people

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_for_Tax_Justice
nice source faggot.

...

And I suppose Reagan's illegal immigrant amnesty is just a ((())). Face it, importing socialist foreigners is always a terrible idea.

this desu
if you could go back in time and strangle
a- babby hitler
b- babby Reagan
c- george lucas present day
?

Immigration as been used by the wealthy for 40 years to drive down average wages. It's y part of the problem. The race war is rooted in a need to lynch the hyper rich.

Jobs were created before the rich got massive tax breaks.

Also

The top bracket pays 50% right now.

How do you think the wealthy start businesses without money exactly?

sarcasm buddy
I thought the capital J and P in Job Providers, also the word "job providers" would make that obvious

their dads?
I'm pretty sure it's accepted that the most of the top 1% inherited their wealth

Whether or not trickle down works, you can't deny that taking money from people who earned it is morally wrong.

You think the wealth trickles down how exactly?

You're making the big claim, back it up.

They managed it in the 1950s and 1960s before they began sucking up all productivity gains and pushed for immigration so they could make even more money. Profile:, they do not give a flying fuck about anyone but themselves and their wallets. That's why the hyper rich are all open borders globalists who use SJW shit to distract from their leeching the middle class and working class like a parasite for 40 years.

Why?

>muh tax is theft!

lmao

And what do their dads use to start the business. It's ok, this is a tricky one bud.

american cuckservatives are brainwashed and have double digit IQs. don't waste your time.

Said the faggot with $30 in checking. $0 in savings

So when a thief steals your money that's theft. But when the government takes your money that's cool?

We already knew that on August of 2015, get back to reddddit faggot nigger.

39%

Wow, why does Trump's lose so much money?

>Earned
kek, they've rigged government to work for them over everyone else. Education too, that's why you get so many yanks espousing muh trickle down and if I pull myself up by my footsteps I'll be a billionaire shit. They are shaping g society to make themselves more money and making people see them absorbing all wage growth as normal. They are importing a slave underclass of foreigners and undermining the sovereignty of nations all in pursuit of their own profits.

They don't leech off of anyone. Wealth is created not distributed you fucking moron. It's not leeching from someone to make more money than they do

Muh temporarily embarrassed millionaire.
Yanks are fucking brainwashed into obedience to their overlords

I don't know about that
In it's purest sense, sure- but the economy isn't like that
The people who've acquired the most wealth by- I don't want to get too Marxist here, but- by exploiting the working class. Owe some extra money back- they're paying it to a government to maintain order for them. I'd be just as happy raiding their houses, but they can pick

I'm sorry but I just don't see how making money from a business = stealing

exploited labor? if you go back far enough- nigger slaves- ie exploited labor?

See They are leeching when they've rigged society in such a way that most productivity growth for 40 years has gone straight into the hands of the hyper rich. They're also the cause of mass immigration, since it helps them and they don't give a flying fuck if the working class white population doesn't want it. You are literally shilling for the very people ruining our societies.

the rich agree to pay taxes (for which they receive services) by living in this country

they are free to move to somalia and pay no taxes whenever they please

Because the globalisthyperrich use their wealth to bend society in ways they helps them and blocks anyone challenging their dominance. You are clear evidence of this, you can't see why flat lining middle class and working class wages whilst the richest have rapidly growing incomes is bad? Their warping of society has worked on you.
You probably buy the we need immigrants for the economy meme too. What that really means is we need immigrants so the mega rich can get richer by paying the rest of us less.
They use government to make it hard to start new business, buy off legislators to cut their own taxes. They are corrupt to the core.

I have a feeling you've never actually taken an economics course

>Wealth for everyone
gee, what does that sound like?
also, what are computers?

I'm a conservative who supports free market economics. Just not this corporatist hell we're currently in.
Everyone should be benefitting from economic growth, not just a cartel of rulers who don't care about the nation.

>they've rigged government to work for them over everyone else

But we shouldn't cut taxes and shrink the government right?

Shrink the government means letting them have more power. There should be a nationalist state there to manage the worst failures of the free market and to stop monopolies as well as to work for all working people of the country. You might call it Nationalist-Social Democracy.

Why are the numbers at the bottomm "estimated" while those at the top aren't. Also, weird that they happen to be colored differently. Is that how you indicate an "estimated" number or something?