>Trump starts doing better in polls
>lays out strong economic policy that no educated person can refute
>Shills give up their game
Daily reminder that shills only attack when moral is lower.
Don't listen to them, they're scum who only prey when we're seen as weak.
Other urls found in this thread:
usatoday.com
cnbc.com
npr.org
motherjones.com
cnn.com
wmur.com
longroom.com
web.archive.org
fivethirtyeight.com
twitter.com
What's going on with this picture?
Tits.
I think its a before/after of a boob job. Too big of a change to just be lighting
Boobjob, duh.
Bad lighting on left hiding nasty.
Same girl, same camera, same room. Obviously several years later after she grew into herself
She ate her way to stretched thighs then too.
It looked like it could be before and after weight loss/gain.
so much better on left, smaller frame and natural tittays
Herpes on her upper thigh
> Trump doing better in the polls
> strong economic plan
Top kek
>Muh Moral
Which economic policy? Is it the one he had before, where he's going to give across the board tax cuts with minimal (if any) spending cuts, yet somehow eliminate our entire debt in 8 years?
Because that was simply brilliant.
Not an argument.
No you are scum. You are scum for promoting whores. You are scum for enabling them.
Her left tit on the after pic looks disproportionately larger than the one of the right, which would / uncommon for a boob-job (however, I do know that a lot of the more expensive titjob plans have it where they slowly implement bigger fake tits after periods of months / a year so that the skin will grow more naturally to it; maybe that's the case here, but I doubt it).
Plus with the slightly more fat on her lower-torso, hips, thighs, and shoulders make it seems like she gained more weight. My guess, gentlemen, is that we have a MILF on our hands in this pic, and right is her body getting enhanced by the hormones with pregnancy. She probably gained a bunch of weight from it, and the pic on the right is her after a long time losing most of the bad excess of it.
If by cutting our humanitarian assistance budgets then yeah
>lays out strong economic policy that no educated person can refute
usatoday.com
cnbc.com
npr.org
motherjones.com
cnn.com
>we give $5,500,000,000,000 of humanitarian assistance every year
No.
Her hips look fake, when ever they are a perfect arc they are fake. Real muscles and fat pinch around the bones.
I love the fact that you faggots consider anyone who isn't a trumpcuck a shill.
Protip: if it seems like the shills are only around on the weekends, it may be because they actually have jobs and aren't sequestered in their parents' basement furiously praying to kek for their faggy little white messiah to give them a vicarious sense of power and status.
>Starts doing better in the polls
>lays out strong policy
>NPR
>CNN
>CNBC
Nice unbiased Op-ed sources Ya' got there.
>Shills give up their game
Not unless they stop getting paid.
Even then, the most committed/desperate will cling to hope and console themselves by shitposting.
Second poll from New Hampshire showing Clinton with a double digit lead:
wmur.com
With Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Virginia, and Colorado all in Clinton's column, she already has 270 electoral votes. She doesn't need Ohio, Florida, Iowa, or Nevada. The election is over.
>no dates on polls
Sad.
Yo OP, can you tell me what Trump's economic policy is?
>not knowing how RCP works
How new are you?
Sorry, I tried to get something from Breitbart but they were too busy looking using Facebook likes for proof Trump will win in a landslide.
why don't you go to RCP and check for yourself?
Shills never quit. They simply move on to greener pastures. AKA facejew.
Lel
get rid of the bias pls before you start ''''''''correcting the record''''''
>poll date before his speech
Nice intellectual dishonesty, pal
Huh... It's almost like you don't have an argument so you resort to ad hominems.
>bias %
how do they calculate this
What if... those polls were biased???????
>tattoo
What is it with vapid whores and tats?
Why does every single young woman in the west today have a fucking tattoo?
Its so ugly and degenerate
Who wants to argue? I just want to laugh at your shitty, pathetic candidate.
Please explain for us if you're truly interested in sharing truth.
They call the bias percentage whatever it needs to be for trump to look good.
>noname site with little credibility
Get real, sophist.
>no argument
>just insults
The enlightened left, everyone.
Wow, wtf did she do?
My fucking dick!
this
and covered in piercings too
You shills are getting tired and it shows
The sad thing is this post isn't bait
THICC
except those tats kill my boner
not really but I hate them
Not an argument.
WWHWHWHWHWHWHWWHOOOOOAAAAAA
HEEEEY BAAAAABBY
AWOOOOOOOOOOOGA
>posts the dipshit linking to nate silver's site
no way you get paid with that level of competency
Aw, I'm sorry I triggered you.
Really, I didn't mean anything by it. Can we start over, please?
Let's just be friends, like in [pic related.]
Why should I argue with someone whose obvious is only matched by his obvious bias?
Like "debating" evolution with a creationist. Literally no point.
You have a problem with Nate Silver? Other than the fact that he's a homosexual jew?
You are beginning to slow and tire libcuck
>>Trump starts doing better in polls
He's currently in free fall, and now he's losing the south. kek.
Keep telling yourself those polls mean something, just like brexit.
>You have a problem with Nate Silver? Other than the fact that he's a homosexual jew?
Barring that stellar endorsement he's consistently wrong.
So is daddy.
>Trump starts doing better in polls
hahahahaha
t. younger than 20
>someone whose obvious is only matched by his obvious bias?
*Someone whose obvious IGNORANCE is only matched by his obvious bias
lol everyone wanted to escape the planet after we saw what W did to it
You must have one banged-out, raw asshole to be able to pull that much bullshit from it on cue...
Is that why you had to post a shop and all we do is post actual ill hill?
There was also that absolute madman who tried climbing Trump Tower and took all the flak from yesterday off of Trump.
Also link to his economic policy?
Not an arguement
Gained weight, duh. Lucky girl to gain weight in such a pleasant way
Nor was his comment. Your point?
Keep telling yourself those polls don't mean anything like 2012
Too fat.
Damn she on that super female vitality
Jesus Christ, this man is suitable for the role of President. He is fantastic and his plans are big, and he belongs in the Whitehouse.
Bro, you don't have an argument and no amount of unjustified personal attacks on me will change that
Keep telling yourself that what you do here is worthwhile and that death isn't coming to embrace you and everyone you love at some point in the future, instead you spend your time here, with us.
those are stretchmarks m8
Unlike Brexit, polling for the US presidential election isn't even close. November 8th is going to be a slaughter.
You're triggered
Calm down, friend.
He's looking to get a rise out of you.
What's your argument again?
>hurrr sauce me no like
Was that it?
Nope i post here everyday
I can tell, you got upset pretty quickly
The fact that you don't know who Nate Silver is is clear evidence that you're ignorant. The fact that you're shilling for Trump on Sup Forums is clear evidence that you're biased.
Is that enough argument to penetrate the cuckshed you call your skull?
You can't tell shit friendo, imagine what i said prior
I've been here long enough to know when I trigger a shill
Nope, because you are the shill, welcome to hell
...
Your memes are weak shill, prepare
You didn't post educated people.
You mean the man who has been completely wrong about this entire election?
>>lays out strong economic policy
I'd marry either side.
Sry m8. Here's a real one.
Overall his track record is excellent. Getting things wrong once in a while is very different from this debunked "unskewed poll" nonsense
I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought of the oompa-loompa thing.
Come on leaf, you have to recognize that the very thick and juicy right side is superior. She must be so soft.
Yes, I believe that opinion articles by unqualified individuals on typically left leaning media sou faces known for poor journalistic integrity are invalid sources for empirical evidence.
So lucky
It makes me wish I doodled more when I was younger. I could be making big bucks doodling on dumb whores and riding the degenerate wave. As long as you don't have a coke habit you could probably be doing really well.
...
Show me his track record on this election.
