>Step 1: Find a task Simple tasks include making memes, phonebanking, joining the social botnet, and digging for OC dirt on the CF. Spread the word however you possibly can, nobody here is picky.
>Step 2: Do a thing Steal a meme from Occupy Democrats or elsewhere and replace the text. Memes should roughly follow this format: >X: Money donated to the CF >Y: What did the donor get in return? >Z: Source.
Join the botnet by making a throwaway twitter, connecting the account with ifttt.com, and using twittermoneybot.com/ to autofollow followers of major figures like Trump. Don't use your home computer for this.
Digging for info is trickier, but there's a shitton to get you started in the archive. Read all of the most important discoveries and follow the trail.
>Step 3: Post results >Self explanatory. Just remember to try and get real hard evidence that we can spread and repackage for normalfag consumption.
Julian Powell
FOR EVERY THREAD: THE BONNER GROUP
"The Bonner Group, warm or cold?" Hot.
Reposting my reports so far on The Bonner Group. I'm busy writing up the 4th report, hopefully will be ready tomorrow or Tuesday. There's a lot of work to be done here.
>About the Third Report This is more of a guide than a report. There are a SIGNIFICANT amount of leads presented in this report. I haven’t had the time yet to dig into any lead, as most of my work has been analyzing IRS 990’s (I haven't even begun to discuss that yet). What I’m providing here is the guidance to enable others to investigate these leads further. Please take the time to understand what’s being said in this report. This will enable you to become an actual researcher and discover new information, rather than depending on reports from the news media.
UPDATE: MORE TASKS FOR /CFG/ ORDERED MOST TO LEAST IMPORTANT
I’m confident that this will be the straw that breaks the camel’s back. The Bonner Group got sloppy and left a trail in the public record. If you want to be a part of history, please help with one of the tasks below.
1. We need to build Bonner Mindmaps for the past 3 years using data from IRS Form 990’s a. Follow my lead from this report, start with one organization and then follow the money b. 2012, 2013, and 2014 IRS 990s are available to the public for free. Let’s build a Mind Map for each of those years c. Any organization that paid The Bonner Group is suspect d. Any organization that receive a Grant from an organization that paid The Bonner Group is suspect e. To help get you started, this is a short list of organizations I’ve found that have worked with The Bonner Group. (there are many more, these are just the ones written on my whiteboard at the moment) i. Center for American Progress ii. Center for American Progress Action Fund iii. Leadership Conference for Human and Civil Rights iv. People for the American Way Foundation v. People for the American Way vi. America Votes vii. American Foundation for Equal Rights viii. American Bridge ix. Media Matters x. Media Matters Action Network xi. Ready for Hillary xii. Priorities USA xiii. Correct the Record xiv. American Democracy Legal Fund xv. American Independent xvi. Colorado Independent xvii. Franklin Education Forum f. As you may have noticed, I’m not very good with visuals. Someone should take ownership and format this piece similar to the Clinton Map created a couple weeks back.
It looks like from 2010 to 2013 the highest paid people were involved in filming and producing some sort of live event and doing something with the recordings:
Updates can continue since I'm not sure when we're getting any more leaks.
SHORT TO-DO LIST:
Investigate: India specifically, the ties to central banking between them and the Clintons Sant Chatwell relates to human trafficking But they us a a larger component in the people recently leaving the Indian central bank Sudan should be examined closely Cheryl Mills is an important person of interest The families you must look at are Royal Gates Buffet Underpinned by Soros Names: Are Helg Traasdahl's Muhmud Tapad (not human) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_Yunus#Criticism_of_Ideas Elisa Lam
Justin Gray
...
Kayden Clark
Investigate these organizations. Look for their donor list and shared personell.
Joseph Reed
Example of what to look for.
Landon Wright
And now I will post my findings. I will make the second half more condensed tomorrow - I am tired and will go to bed after I am done here.
>Don't let them slide this goddammit. Hillary may want to correct the record, but how about we set it straight for once and for all. >washingtonexaminer.com/article/2599032
Reposting this.
Someone meme it. Did it have anything to do with the head of these two organizations meeting on a plane?
Landon Lee
4
Mason Turner
This is not meme thread. Delete this now or get labeled a shill for messing up this thread.
Luis Lee
we are memeing her out of existence
Juan Lewis
5
Angel Wright
6
Colton Rodriguez
7
Ayden Lopez
8
Henry Foster
9
Dylan Morris
Whoops wrong general, leaving it anyway nerd I didn't ruin anything besides your chain of posts and it has to do with CFG so idgaf
Josiah Walker
10
Notice the text at the bottom. We should get in contact with her.
Let me break it down how we know that Cheryl Mills contacted Hillary Clinton about an opening for Rajiv K. Fernando. Pay-to-play for donors getting Government positions.
The uploaded image proves Cheryl Mills contacted Hillary about Rajiv K. Fernando.
Here is the link that has the e-mail discussions about Rajiv K. Fernando when ABC was investigating why Rajiv K. Fernando was appointed to ISAB (International Security Advisory Board) - abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/PDF_abc_emails_160810.pdf
Here is my original analysis (4archive.org/board/pol/thread/80669456) of what the ABC News PDF says: "-ABC asked the ISAB about Raj, and how Raj got on the board. -ISAB sends e-mails out seeing if anyone has any information on Raj's background. -No one has a fuckin' clue about this guy, and his expertise (lack thereof) -ABC pressures ISAB for a bio, ISAB is scrambling and delaying. -ISAB finds out that Raj was appointed to the board by Hillary Clinton because Mills added him to the list of people consider for a spot on the team -ISAB can't give ABC a reasonable answer, so Raj quits. He fuckin' quits because he's been made public! -ISAB tells ABC that Raj quit, and ISAB basically gives ABC a bulshit/shortcut answer out of the dilemma -Funniest thing is that ABC asked about another member (Rep. Naughton) of ISAB, and ISAB was quick to have a full biography on the guy. ISAB couldn't even find enough info to bullshit their way as to why Raj was on the team! Raj is completely unqualified, and should have never been on there and was only on there because he donated money!"
An user said this as well about the PDF - "This implicates Cheryl Mills was the main reason he was able to get the position. Also, seems like media suspicion was talked about in some of these emails."
I got to go. I'll be back tomorrow. Keep up the great work!
#NeverHillary
Brody Butler
bump for justice
Eli Evans
...
Luis Wilson
thanks for info friend, capped for reference #NeverHillary
Alexander Gomez
Ok, I'm trying to get a list of people and organizations we still need to investigate so that anyone can jump in and follow up on their own initiative.
How in-depth do we want to go on information for each person and organization?
I was thinking that Huma Abdein's sections in the Google doc would be of a sufficient length, including a mind-map.
Also, I was thinking about having docanon resorting everything into various regions for easier indexing after the DNC email section but before a section of things that need to be done/researched.
Something like: Key people in Clinton Foundation and Camp, US, Central America, South America, China, India, Central & South Africa, Middle East, EU, and Norway.
Then have each sub-section consist of four parts, which is human trafficking, weapons deals, natural resource deals, and money laundering with the actual information in each part.
The current google doc is a clusterfuck and needs to be better organized. It would also help to go over it once again since I noticed some information is listed twice in the google doc and could use consolidation.
Alexander Morgan
The Clinton Foundation 2015 anual dinner list would be another to possibly look into, or their anual summit meething
Chase Parker
bump
Cameron Ortiz
...
Brandon Collins
...
Liam Campbell
...
Carson Martin
...
Logan Johnson
...
Jordan Lopez
...
Mason Nguyen
I would love to help out more, but I'm just unsure of what is already being worked on and don't want to waste time. Better organization of the google doc will help a lot.
Luke Ortiz
Did you read the OP? More likely than not you could pick something at random and odds are it hasn't been delved into fully
I would recommend selecting the box on Wikileaks that searches 3rd party sites (Cryptome.org, etc.).
2. If you find an e-mail that has a donor's name and favors being asked, supply a screenshot of the e-mail and reference the website where the screenshot came from.
A simple analysis of what you found is very helpful.
3. It is important to reference source material, like e-mail leaks or cable leaks. Try to stay away from conspiracy stuff. You want to be able to legitimately prove laws were broken.
4. Focus on the Clinton Foundation and laws that were broken by this organization. It is important to focus on technicalities (e.g. finance laws, government treaties, etc.)
5. Read books by authors that were writing about Hillary and the Clinton Foundation, especially authors that have died recently or died under mysterious circumstances (e.g. Victor Thorn).
These books provide research that has already been done that you can expand upon. We always need more readers to help us dissect the wealth of information that is out there on the Clinton Foundation.
Here’s a book to start with: Jerome Corsi – ‘Partners in Crime: The Clintons' Scheme to Monetize the White House for Personal Profit’
#NeverHillary
Nathan Hernandez
Tell me what's listed twice and what to fix. Some of it's intentional.
I've been thinking of resorting it just to make it more organized, since some of it makes sense but some of it's placed after/before whatever's most relevant to what was found.
Only thing is is that it'll take a while.
If you have an index in mind that will be the most organized, that will be the fastest in terms of helping me fix it.
Mason Lopez
(Part 2/Last Part)
6. Look through the list of people of Bill Clinton pardoned at the end of his presidency, and look for those names in Wikileaks. See if you find anything. A person of interest is Marc Rich.
7. Read old news articles that might have been forgotten. Look for articles that detail alleged corruption by the Clinton Foundation. These allegations might be able to be proven true with the current leaks and news stories.
8. Just talking to people about what you've been reading on CFG is important. The more people realize how corrupt the Clinton Foundation is, the more willing the public will accept the facts when they come to light.
9. Always remember to not get distracted by sensationalized bullshit. It always helps me to go back and read what got all of this started - FBI_user's first round of Questions and Answers (i.sli.mg/WuG4nP.png).
10. Lastly, please focus on quality and not quantity. It is okay to spend hours searching and not find anything; don’t let it distract you. You will learn to search for quality material by spending time on this project; practice makes perfect.
You will eventually find a lead that will help out a lot. I know it. It happened to me, and haven't looked back.
Stay focused. It is easy to get distracted. Focus on the Clinton Foundation, its donors, and Hillary's role at the State Department.
A thing to keep in mind is donors that contribute to the Clinton Foundation and those donors getting favors through Hillary while she is Secretary of State. Donors paying for favors which proves that the Clinton Foundation is a money laundering operation, and Hillary was taking-in private money in exchange for government favors that she sanctioned.
#NeverHillary
Hudson Edwards
not a /cfg/ thread without email guy.
Did we ever find out what was up with email guy?
Ethan Gray
The problem I've been running into is that there are some sections that I never really knew where to place, but nobody seemed to mind as long as they knew what they were looking for.
For example, say we found something on New Person A. They're from Country A, but also have stronger ties to Company A. I wasn't sure if there should be subsections under the Country, added info to the Company, or a standalone section under a list of People.
But if anybody has index suggestions that would be very useful. I felt it would be hypocritical for me to fully organize it myself because in my opinion, how I process information is not the best or most common way. I'd rather have other sets of eyes willing to read the whole thing give me realistic suggestions.
So, if there's a good index in mind using what we have, post it, and I'll get to moving stuff/rewording anything.
Logan Torres
I think you guys are doing a great job with the Google Docs file. I also like the ClintonFoundationInvestigation website (clintonfoundationinvestigation.com/).
I think what would help out the most is designing a website wiki for The Clinton Foundation Investigation.
Most of us are very familiar with Wikipedia, and how articles link and how statements are referenced on pages.
If we build a wiki for the Clinton Foundation Investigation, people could contribute to a website that aesthetically and functionally feels familiar.
I think it would encourage more people to participate, and it would be easier to navigate for most people given their familiarity with Wikipedia.
Just a thought.
I'm proud of all the work that is being done, and that we are still staying strong.
I'm going to sleep. Got to get up early for work. Take care CFG.
#NeverHillary
Isaac Gomez
...
Easton Cooper
Assange happening
Blake Mitchell
Thanks mane, we've been doing what we can. I think a wiki could be good. We have a website, but the user working on it seems to be gone or busy as fuck.
