>“It wasn’t intentional, but you can’t make it up. When they go in and they support the opposition in Libya and Syria, and the opposition is aligned with ISIS, and we arm the opposition and they lose those arms to ISIS, unintentionally,” Johnson said.
This is actually true, this article elaborates on how we took our eye off the ball on jihadists in order to depose seculari-ish dictators.
This is more about our relationship with al-Qaeda, but finding jihadists and giving them space to grow to fit our foreign policy goals has been a bi-partisan affair, which is why we are in need of a third party.
This, when he fucking invaded Iraq and banned all offical who are members of the Baath party he did.
Colton Allen
Johnson and Paul both don't have the halal to call out bullshit that's why they lose
They are both too ingrained in the game
Ayden Jackson
And then Obama/ Clinton policies allowed them to grow from one of many low level insurgency groups to a major force occupying Iraq, Syria, Libya and inspiring attacks and sending it's fighters throughout the West.
Connor Gonzalez
It has been bi-partisan, that is why we need a Libertarian in the White House.
Cooper Williams
>Isis was founded in 2004
Yeah know
Either way the fault of Isis is Mohammed the Koran and Islam advocates for a worldwide caliphate, otherwise how could there ever be peace
Nathan Baker
Fuck off with your Gary "Open Borders" Johnson shilling.
Noah Bennett
>hat is why we need a Libertarian in the White House.
You mean Green in the white house?
Samuel Diaz
>unintentionally Good goy
Isaac Hall
>This will be the end of Johnson's campaign
Henry Baker
If only there was a secular government in Iraq who was holding back the tides of goat fuckers.
Jason Hall
Because they're fucking crazy. Jill Stein wants to ban Wi-Fi and screens from schools.
>In a campaign event, she called the use of technology in education a “corporate ruse.” Apparently, “we should be moving away from screens at all levels of education”. Regarding wireless networks, she said, “should not be subjecting kids’ brains to that.”
>The World Health Organization has stated that radiation “exposures from base stations range from 0.002% to 2% of the levels of international exposure guidelines.” Humans, in fact, absorb “up to five times more” radiation from FM radio and television than WiFi technology.
The VP "human rights activist" Ajamu Baraka is so far left he considers Bernie Sanders an imperialist tool and a borderline racist.
Johnson is not for an open border, he wants work visas ( not citizenship) for the 10 million immigrants already here and working. This is much better than the Trump deportation plan (that would cause riots) or the Clinton plan of automatic citizenship if you can cross the border.
Michael Rivera
Why is this in the sports news section?
Joseph Jackson
>took our eye off the ball Oh Goyim I am laffin!
Kevin Hernandez
American Politics is a sport senpai.
Ian Myers
>This is much better than the Trump deportation plan (that would cause riots)
Yeah enforcing laws heh, crazy right? This is why we need Libertarian government.
Maybe you should read Trumps deportation and citizenship plan, it's pretty reasonable and not just "THROW THEM BACK TO MEXICO LOL"
Camden Green
>Johnson and Paul both don't have the halal to call out bullshit that's why they lose Rand Paul did though. Then he got a talking to and was forced to apologize.
Julian Lopez
THIS JUST IN GARY "GAY" JOHNSON SUCKS A DICK
Anthony Ward
He is the Bernie of the neocons
The single worst foreign policy decision since Korea
Bentley Baker
Found the libcucks. Isis wouldn't hsve had tgevsame power it did if Obama would've left Syria alone
Jackson Wilson
They wouldn't have any power if what was planned as a 90 day engagement didn't turn into a 10 year war.
Daniel Nguyen
This is not the same as founding. "1. a. trans. To lay the base or substructure of (a building, etc.); to set, fix, or build on a firm ground or base. (Sometimes used simply = build, erect.)
3. a. fig. To set up or establish for the first time (an institution, etc.), esp. with provision for its perpetual maintenance; to originate, create, initiate (something which continues to exist thenceforward)."
At the most, the policies of both major parties have contributed indirectly to the development of radical groups in the Middle East, but this is not a situation where the verb "found" can be used accurately. Trump and Johnson are showing again that they don't understand the basics of the English language. This will only be noticed by those who are not "poorly educated." This is why Trump and Johnson have no chance with the majority of the population (who are better educated and more careful with language).
Also, OP is a retarded faggot.
Noah Rodriguez
It's not 100% inherent to Islam, Indonesia for example does not have a durka problem despite being the biggest Muslim country in the world. Because Islam was different when it spread to southeast Asia.
While Christianity (and pretty much every religion except middle eastern Islam) became less and less extreme over the years, Islam today is more radical and theocratic than it ever was. They were more culturally advanced a thousand years ago.
Daniel Hill
>and more careful with language >I.E. Use more mental gymnastics to hide the fact that you fucked up big time
Christopher Sanders
Hmm I think I feel the Johnson now.
Grayson Clark
The context of Johnson's statement was a live interview, and yes the policies of Obama (and Bush/Clinton) in Libya/Syria/Iraq have a supported the rise of jihadists like ISIS, directly.
Nathan Foster
No, just respect the historical conventions of English semantics and don't make up meanings for commonly understood words. But really, this is just Trump playing dog-whistle politics again (except so obviously that everyone can see them). He's implying a conspiracy, though has no evidence for this. He tries to establish it just through force of repetition. Shit drives me crazy because it's so retarded. It's politics for really fucking stupid people.
Tyler Kelly
>He is the Bernie of the neocons Nah. He's just someone whose afraid of dead-lifting in his sleep.
Jordan Ortiz
The DIA knew that withdrawing from Iraq would create a "Salafist principality" and an "Islamic State" that could be used against Assad.
It was a deliberate policy, and Johnson is just there to shit-up the election for Trump because he's human dog shit, and is probably on the take from the Clintons.
Isaiah Cruz
I see CTR is out in force today.
Mason Roberts
haha i no right like who cares if bush fucked up he's a republican teehee it was obviously all obama (PBUH)
Ayden Thomas
It's the bi-partisan establishment, that's why we need a the Libertarian Party.
Jeremiah Stewart
Part of the problem is stupid party politics which you're shilling, the second part is stupid politicians, which you're also shilling.
Jason Gonzalez
>Part of the problem is stupid party politics This. Another party won't make a difference, it will just get bought off like there other two. You should care about what is best for your country, not what is best for your movement
Owen Morris
You remember the way the media started mentioning "anonymous". Always seemed so forced and ill informed to people who understood what was happening.
Logan Smith
100% honestly, and not shitposting here: Easiest way to solve the illegal immigrant problem is to have one day every month where killing illegal citizens is legal. We do that for three or four years, and they'll all either be dead or go back to Mexico themselves. Problem solved. Only cost is cleanup which provides low skill jobs and boosts the economy
Julian Hughes
Enforcing a law that would cause more trouble than good is not right, just look at prohibition.
Separating families who are contributing and have been here a decade or more is a big deal. Johnson has no problems deporting illegals, but we have to be realistic and spending billions to do something that will harm society more than help seems like a bad plan.
Owen Peterson
>harm society more than help
Harm society by removing a people that undercut American workers, driving wages down and destroying a tax base? Yeah, okay Karl
Eli Martinez
>Enforcing a law that would cause more trouble than good is not right, just look at prohibition.
What you're saying is >Enforcing borders is more trouble than it's worth
Tyler Cox
families are not going to be separated, they all have to go back.
Johnsons plan is basically a Sweden plan, does nothing in the short term, does fuck all in the long term and will ignored in the near future and business back to usual, might as well have no borders at all.
Jace Parker
>Separating families who are contributing The law won't do that. It will kick out the WHOLE family.
See? Problem solved.
>Johnson has no problems deporting illegals
Wrong. He has and continues to promote amnesty.
>but we have to be realistic and spending billions to do something that will harm society more than help seems like a bad plan.
Keeping them here will continue to cost of Billions in ANNUAL COSTS.
Which costs less? Billions in a single expenditure, or Billions in an annual expenditure?
Eli Bailey
Islam became more fundamentalist over the years and Christianity became less.
