New 'Star Trek' CBS series to heavily support multiculturalism

hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/star-trek-discovery-woman-captain-916866

>The Bryan Fuller series will be led by a woman, ... with the role potentially also being diverse. The character, however, will not be a captain, ... The top-ranking member of the fleet will instead be a lieutenant commander, Fuller revealed Wednesday ... adding, "but with caveats."

Diversity above all else.

>Fuller also added that the series will feature roughly 7 lead characters. "Star Trek started with a wonderful expression of diversity in its cast: a Russian, a black woman, an Asian, a Vulcan … "We wanted to paint a picture of Star Fleet that's indicative of encountering people who are much more different than we are."

>"We're going deep into something that was for me always very tantalizing, and [we're telling] that story through a character who is on a journey that is going to teach her how to get along with others in the galaxy," he told reporters. "For her to truly understand something that is alien, she has to first understand herself."

Globalism, check.

>Fuller confirmed that his Star Trek also will feature a gay character after he received hate-mail during his time on Voyager...

Pushing a gay agenda because he was personally affected.

Are you ready to witness another celebrated franchise ruined by multiculturalism?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=_skkBMvlWBw
claremont.org/crb/article/the-politics-of-star-trek/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

well that's new.

NOT!

They're going to crash the fucking ship before it gets out of space dock.

fuck this gay earth

the thing is star trek was doing this before it was cool I fear its going to be so forced this time around like with voyager no one gave a fuck there was a female captain with Ds9n no one gave a fuck that the guy in charge was black but I can see them pointing these things out every episode like look how progressive we are to have a black half alien lesbian captain or some shit

>"Star Trek started with a wonderful expression of diversity in its cast...

wat

>no one gave a fuck

that's before they were 'redpilled' online by a bunch of psuedo-sociologists and tinfoilers.

the truth is that these series haven't changed, you have.

The leading character will be a white woman whose love insterest is the super-genius/super-human negroid, wanna bet?

Yeah you got an asain. A woman. A Vulcan. Realistic as nobody else would be able to make it on the prized ship of the fleet.

It will fail unless they target their demographic. I hate people who try and make things that go against their target area and than get pissed when it fails.

The reason star trek was so good even with a full diverse of cast was because it wasn't pandering to anyone.

cool, we get to watch them ruin star wars now too... and then throw a tantrum and call us all horrible when it flops and everyone shits on it

Remember most of the episodes will be on a subscription service, so he expects people will pay to see this.

Since TNG in the 90s Star Trek has been supporting the idea of a globalistic and multicultural society in the not so distant future.

>watching any star trek after TOS
lmao
m
a
o

also, ds9 is a bad example for you to use because it took a fairly strong stance against racism and much of the old world thinking; an episode with captain sysco back to the 1960s as a "black" writer (i think) and all of the Cardassian genocide of the Bajorans metaphors.

that show, along with voyager, is the epitame of what has come to be described as SJW material.

No way bro, since it's very inception Star Trek has always been about an inclusive socialist space utopia. Star Trek is a great series but it's socialist as fuck.

Genderless alien, who is black.

lmao I am still the same as I was when I first started watching it when I was a kid in the 90s the culture we live in is forced as fuck star trek no one made a big deal about race gender or sexuality it didn't matter who you were fucking or what was between your legs unlike our culture the only thing that mattered is what you could contribute to your civilisation something that I hope one day we can do but with people like you it is impossible

I'm currently rewatching DS9, arguably the most cucked series of them all, and it is extremely tame.

There is even an episode with a bunch of alien refugees (with violent males) who came through the wormhole and Bajor turned them away. It was great because I'm so used to modern SJW shit that I half expected to see the refugees being accepted.

The Bajorans literally gave a number of reasons similar to Trump's, for why they couldn't accept the refugees.

what is the prime directive the complete opposite of that man

It at least made a little sense for ST because they have replicators. They are literally a post-scarcity society. But yeah, "Let That Be Your Last Battlefield" in TOS for example always had them combating racism. But it was an overall combating of racism that used another species to convey that to all viewers instead of shoving racism masquerading as equality (social justice) down the throats of a specific portion of the audience.

I like the idea that maybe some day we can all stop fighting and work together and explore the stars. I don't like being told we can do that while the captain sneers over her shoulder and calls me a fucking white male oppressor or some other dumb shit in some hamfisted attempt to look intelligent to a progressive audience. Star Trek never had that kind of smug shit. Just a vision. A somewhat naive one, but not a smugly naive one.

>hating star trek

there's nothing good to say about you fucks anymore.

your petty little faggots that can't stand being excluded to the point where you don't represent a fucking super majority of a +90% white cast. not even being the fucking protagonists is good enough for you cunts anymore.

fuck this racist shit

i'm going to play some mass effect and try to enjoy aliens, D I V E R S I T Y and storytelling done decently.

>being this self-unawares
your post is literally a pile of meaningless dribble.

ds9 is probably my fav star trek. keep watching it.

also there are reasonable and unreasonable stances on accepting refugees and illegals. do you think that here, in america, that both sides aren't using the illegal immigrant problem to their political benefit? these ppl have become 15% of our population in less than 30 yrs and our congress still sits on their hands in dealing with it. the reps never seek a solution to energize their base against the illegal, brown hoards and then never do anything about the problem once they're elected.

>Star Trek does same thing it always has done

Yeah, and?

>falling for the Star Trek is a socialist utopia meme

It's not socialist or capitalist. It's a post scarcity economy.

Socialism/communism redistributes wealth and capital, that's the defining characteristic. If you have no need for capital or wealth because there is no scarcity of goods then you have no capital and it can't be capitalism or communism.

It's a utopian scenario created and imagined by a technologist. Gene Roddenberry believed technology would solve the world's problems, and I'm pretty sure he was a patriotic conservative in his personal life.

>Star Trek started with a wonderful expression of diversity in its cast: a Russian, a black woman, an Asian, a Vulcan …

>No, that's not good enough; we must make it MORE DIVERSE

I stopped giving a shit about this franchise in the ninet-

>MORE DIVERSE
>Star Trek also will feature a gay character after he received hate-mail during his time on Voyager...

wtf I hate star trek now

>that's indicative of encountering people who are much more different than we are

wait a minute, i thought we were all the same?

I've already watched all Star Trek series multiple times through and DS9 is absolutely the most cucked series out of them all.

I'm sorry you have such bad taste. Even Voyager is better than DS9 and Voyager is pretty bad.

((((((((((Lesley Goldberg))))))))))

Diversity is our strength, and we must all strive to become one.


You can try to figure it out what they meant by that, but it's best to just chalking it up to liberalism being a mental disease.

star trek has always been the most culturally diverse tv show.

moving along.

Conservative?

Gene Roddenberry was a communist bud... Not the "Omg he's a socialist so I'm going to call him a communist!" kind... The guy was an actual support of communism.

The thing that was great about the "diversity" shtick in the entire series, was the fact it wasn't in your face.
You didn't have to appreciate the nigger who must ooga booga and rape white women.

He was just another crewmember who had to also obey the starfleet command structure, Federation law, and utmostly, the Prime Directive.


Really this show is more of a Nazi propaganda, as it is promoting authoritarianism as it squashes petty squabbling and unites everyone involved to common goals very effectively. Race doesn't come into it. It's a meritocracy.


If this is SJW material, I don't know what is. On the surface I see how, but it really isn't.

these fucking cuck faggots.

they will not get a dime of my money for this garbage.

PS. JJ trek is complete ass.

>even voyager is better than ds9

besides getting the fuck out of here, try posting that shit in Sup Forums.

go ahead, i dare you

>wtf I hate Star Trek now

Lol. Here's the litmus test man:

New Star Trek, ask yourself:

does planet Vulcan exist in this star trek I'm about to watch?

Yes = you're good, it's pre-reboot cucking
No = avoid like the plague, it's modern money grab Jew Jew Abram's influenced shit.

It's that simple.

if what I just said is beyond your comprehension you are completely lost your opinion is worthless to me

man, a 2 yr old could understand your post and be equally confounded by the stupidity within it.

Yeah I absolutely have no idea why they did that other than

>this isn't your granddad's star trek anymore. Look at us be edgy and dark

Serves literally no purpose.

Well, it looks like CBS is about to go bankrupt.

I haven't watched Star Trek in 10 years and this won't make me either

Star Trek was always diverse and gay.

oh no, the pedophiles might get upset

>The Bryan Fuller series will be led by a woman
Correction: one of the leads will be a woman not sure if she will be the highest ranking officer. In Star trek this is nothing new as DS9 had a female captain who defeated the borg with a cup of coffee.

>… "We wanted to paint a picture of Star Fleet that's indicative of encountering people who are much more different than we are."
Their having more aliens which he has openly said to explore more of the universe.

>Star Trek also will feature a gay character
being that this guy loves star trek, if the focus is being gay and not scifi then this series will fail. But knowing Fuller's past work on trek series, the gay character would be part of the shows dynamic like whorf but NOT the entire show which would just be stupid.

What I find weird is there wont be a captain, so the highest ranking officer he has discussed being on the show as a character is a leut capt, might be cool though if this series focuses on the experiences solely of the crew of a space cruiser???

>confused_vulcan.jpg

So basically it'll be a star trek series.

Frankly, I don't see Sup Forumstards ever understanding star trek or its appeal, at least not until they move out of their parents' basements and get some life experience.

you're that guy that listens to rap music expecting to eventually find the soothing muse of bob crosby.

OP, if I didn't know better I would suspect that you have no idea that star trek was like that from the very beginning. But you aren't that stupid, right? I'm certain you are aware that the star trek franchise has been pushing diversity for half a fucking century and didn't come to Sup Forums to whine about it like it is something new. Nobody could be that stupid. I mean, they'd have to either be a complete moron or utterly ignorant of the history of star trek. OP definitely isn't an assblasted minority hating retard desperately searching for a reason to hate modern media and clutching that the first thing he can find, right? Right?

Protagonist is a black woman, but she is not the ships Captain. This is supposed to show what life is like for the lower ranked Starfleet personnel.

Which is a cool idea, but the forced diversity ruined it.

Sorry you enjoy the equivalent of soap opera tier writing as they try to make shit compelling via political intrigue and other nonsensical plot lines.

The cardassians are space nazis

The bajorans are space jews

The maqui are the noble savages

The federation is shown to be far more corrupt and stupid than tos and tng showed it to be.

>yawn

It's funny but the series was so fucking bad that they had to throw the ENTIRE FUCKING ALPHA QUADRANT INTO WAR just to keep the series interesting.

I mean c'mon... it's Star Trek, so I'm able to watch it, but it's easily the furthest from what made star Trek, STAR TREK, while also being the weakest writing. I think most normies liked DS9 because it's less intellectually challenging and easier to follow.

So yeah, Sup Forums would probably agree with you, same with reddit, I know my opinion is unpopular, but I don't care. DS9 is weak and it only gets accolades because it appeals to the star wars nerds who can't handle a complex plot or intellectual episode to save their life. You're in the same camp as Kevin Smith man, good job.

>Which is a cool idea, but the forced diversity ruined it.
lol what forced diversity? they didnt even announce the cast but if it looks like the multiculture club that is pretty normal for trek. If they focus on that it will fail or do the white/black cucking thing.

Star Trek has promoted cultural diversity & inclusion since its inception, but somehow I predict this will be blatant pandering. The diversity will be the main point of the show, rather than intellectual and moral quandaries involving a group of people who happen to be diverse. Also they will take shots at 'space Trump'.

It will suck.

>This is supposed to show what life is like for the lower ranked Starfleet personnel
Which is stupid. Who wants to watch the continuing stories of someone who pushes buttons all day and takes orders?

>muh contrary opinion

your whole argument is ruined once you decided on voyager being better than ds9. the writing in voyager is shit, every episode is damn near a rehash of something that happened previous one, and the characters are boring af.

i know you want to pretend that your opinion of the series represents the truest expression of intellectualism and nuance found within a show about discovering a slight variation on everything its previously trumpeted as new and exciting, but you are entirely wrong.

Source? I've heard this claim but I haven't seen any substantial proof. Communists don't tend to be optimists either, and he was an optimist about human nature being good overall, believing that technology could eventually cure us of our destructive nature once scarcity was removed.

I mean, he was an air force veteran and if you watch the original series, which he had a lot of creative control over, he shows a lot of patriotism and reverence for the USA. He seems to have been a pretty red blooded American.

Even the Klingons in TOS were the metaphorical Soviet Empire to the Federation's USA.

IDK though. Maybe your right, I just haven't seen definitive proof.

>>This is supposed to show what life is like for the lower ranked Starfleet personnel
no proof of this yet but many of us are hoping the show focuses on the everyday life of the workers on these ships such as the analysts who review data, or the fleet personnel who load the cargo at the dock and other mundane tasks which as of yet has not been explored as a series.

>nerds mad that nerds are beta faggots
wow, and I thought you guys were pretty fucking shit before

>tfw there will never be a Gunslinger captain of a Federation Dreadnaught

>OP, if I didn't know better I would suspect that you have no idea that star trek was like that from the very beginning.

Voyager is better deal with it MRA.

>your whole argument is ruined once you decided on voyager being better than ds9. the writing in voyager is shit, every episode is damn near a rehash of something that happened previous one, and the characters are boring af.
And herein lies the problem. Voyager being weak doesn't make the case of why DS9 is better.

Which sounds like it might be interesting in theory, but breaks down when you consider the need to present a variety of compelling and entertaining stories with traditional conflict. There have been a number of tries at this on the small scale in other ST series, with diminishing results. It becomes NotStarTrek.

>Star Trek started with a wonderful expression of diversity in its cast: a Russian, a black woman, an Asian, a Vulcan...
Is Vulcan code for Jew?

>Even Voyager is better than DS9

lol kill yourself

you must mean phaser slinger but damn that concept is making my dick hard

Sorry "Millenials", pretty much everything they did after TNG was woefully SJW, in every bad sense of the word

>nips

what the fuck

was Voyager SJW?

Yep Borg are space Jews. They show the evil military kill them all at the end. SJW triggered.

>Implying the space jew isn't the literal space jew

this character kills the Sup Forumsite

>parasite
>lives multiple lifetimes
>comprises all of the memories and experiences of its previous hosts
>raceless
>genderless
>a fucking worm

fucking trills are so based

>was Voyager SJW?
>female captain

gee, i wonder

meant to quote you

Forgot "she" is trans use to be a he in previous life... still would bang her though.

Data tried to murder him horribly with a banned disruptor. One of my favorite TNG moments.

You do realize Star Trek shoved all this down our throat at the beginning right?

What a humongous, ignorant faggot you are.

Voyager wasn't SJW because no one was thinking "lets make the lead female because she's female".

Star Trek has always been current year. The problem is they are making things gay or female just to be gay and female.

youtube.com/watch?v=_skkBMvlWBw

Sisko is Mr BLM always crying about the 1930s and shit. Then he himself being racist against aliens.

Obrien is Sup Forums he hates them spoonheads

So is the captain going to be a Hijab wearing muslim woman?

they will still have the token cool white guy
>Will Riker tng
>Chef O'Brien ds9
>Tom Parris v

>obrien is Sup Forums
>marries a gook

ok brah

no one in star trek on the federation side is anything like Sup Forums

>thinks all of pol is hardcore racist like him

I think the reason nobody cared about voyager or DS9 is because Janeway was a successful captain regardless of whether she was a woman and DS9 was the same. The problem with forced diversity is that they are not written well, they shove it down our throats rather than making it natural.

Stark Trek has always been about multiculturalism

What's going to kill the show is going against the tried and true approach of not having the captain as the MC. Nobody would even care if the Captain was a female and a rug muncher. Janeway got 7 seasons

>people who don't know jack shit about Star Trek shitting the bed over this.

Please stop. You're making fools of yourselves. Star Trek has always been like this. It's the entire fucking point of the show.

Trips of truth right here

>Star Trek: Discovery

The name is gay as hell

>they shove it down our throats rather than making it natural.

now i can understand this contention while disagreeing with your framing of the problem. the problem isn't that minorities are 'shoved down our throats' if writing can change our perspective on it- the problem is simply the writing regardless of the characters introduced. saying otherwise is practically asserting that you've no problems with shit writing as long as the characters are white.

Star Trek has always been lefty but it's never been millennial lefty

Only thing I can remember that comes close is when Riker fucked some androgynous woman

Star Trek was always multiculti as fuck. How could it possible get more so?

>people getting mad when the new start trek *might* have social, racial, etc messages
You know the first interracial kiss on tv was on star trek right? The show has been like this from its inception.

...

>the 1st interracial kiss on tv was on star trek

this is not entirely true, although it is ONE of the first along with a handful of others.

>Voyager wasn't SJW because no one was thinking "lets make the lead female because she's female".

You have no idea how these decisions are made, do you?

How is this news? Star Trek was ALWAYS the most progressive, multicultural show on TV. That was the point of it.

TOS:
Black woman in a senior position on the Fedaration's flagship. In the fucking SIXTIES.
Asian dude there too. Also, a Russian.

TNG:
I don't even know where to start. Did you even watch the episodes?

DS9:
Hahahaha you haven't watched any of this, have you? It has at least five episodes pointing out the struggles of blacks and one episode focussed wholly on how they were treated in the 30's.

Just STOP. You obviously don't know anything about this.

No you're an idiot. Roddenberry was an Internationalist Socialist. And Star Trek was his utopia of a world without borders, without currency, where people worked for the betterment of humanity. It's always been communist propaganda.

...

B R A V O

F
U
L
L
E
R

Sure, but something tells me this version will be a bit more overt about it.
Watching the old series you could enjoy a show about space shenanigans, now you'll be watching a guide on how to exterminate fucking white males across the known universe and beyond.
Every white male is going to be Barkeley or Wesley, except the good cuck PC bro that will jump to the defense of the downtrodden and learn a valuable lesson each episode.

DS 9 is bad ripoff of Babylon 5 with handful of good episodes. Voyager has better one off episodes.

ah there it is.
the asspained B5fag.
nigga it has been DECADES let it go.

>Star Trek has always been lefty but it's never been millennial lefty

This.

Star Trek has progressed with progressives.

60's Trek: Do the right thing, even if it's against prime directive.

TNG-era: Allow shit to happen because it's against primedirective.

JJ-Trek: 'muh feels, break rules, get rewarded for it.

claremont.org/crb/article/the-politics-of-star-trek/

>How is this news? Star Trek was ALWAYS the most progressive, multicultural show on TV. That was the point of it.

Trek has never been modern SJW show. Modern SJW's are retards that want to ban autobiography of 50's and 60's civil right activist, guy who actually suffered oppression, because it's tittle NIGGER hurts their feelings.