Does Sup Forums support gay marriage?

Does Sup Forums support gay marriage?

Other urls found in this thread:

lifesitenews.com/news/cdc-94-to-95-percent-of-hiv-cases-among-boys-and-young-men-linked-to-gay-se
lifesitenews.com/news/epidemic-1-2-of-gay-men-will-have-hiv-by-age-50-if-current-rates-continue-w
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11501300
independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/drug-use-seven-times-higher-among-gays-8165971.html
cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/2012/HIVIncidenceGraphics.html
join.skype.com/y1lAU4WmWGwj
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Yes, /thread.

To that, sure.
To the other 99.5% of homos, no.

Be happy, life is really short.

I don't support //any// marriage.

t. closet homo

no, not when you post a pic in your underwear.
no, not when faggots keep pestering me for a date.
no, not when co-workers come and introduce themselves as homosexual of the opposite sex of me.
i consider all those to be emo faggots trying to spread their agenda & disease.

used to be even POTUS could cheat on his wife and no one cared, because sex used to remain in the bedroom. keep it like it used to be and i don't care if you marry a horse.

t. my grandpa once said.

So only if you are guaranteed a twink?

NO, Sup Forums IS A STRICTLY CHRISTIAN BOARD

Yes.

Although I don't condone these "pride parades" where guys walk about shaking their dick about in a latex suit with a ball-gag in their mouth. Fuck that.

It's called freedom of assembly, George.

yes, but only because I want them to be miserable

yes because I don't give a fuck about what you do with your ass

You little Minutemanlet. :^)

Gay "marriage" is an oxymoron

Not Gay marriage per se, but I'm indifferent towards the LGBT.

i like how you gentrify neighborhoods though.

Pic related.

Gay emancipation was an issue invented by stupid evangelical neo-cons to disagree with so that there would be no discussion about the demographic genocide of the white race, the rampant spread of cultural marxism, and the onslaught of leftists on our education system. It literally makes no difference whether or not Liberaces get married.

>nobody is allowed to have stupid, camp fun. Everybody must be serious and pure forever without ever indulging in frivolity for enjoyment

this is whats wrong with the world today a bunch of soft ass fags KILL YOURSELF FUCKING QUEERS

U mad?

Pretty bad gif choice, degenerate.

I do, let them marry, no problem.
It's going to be a paper marriage, but I don't want our government to act like a passive aggressive preacher bitch and call it a civil union or whatever.

>Sup Forums is one person

gay marriage doesn't exist
marriage is between a man and a woman
Therefore gay marriage doesn't exist

Nope
CDC: 94 to 95 Percent of HIV Cases Among Young Men Linked to Gay Sex
lifesitenews.com/news/cdc-94-to-95-percent-of-hiv-cases-among-boys-and-young-men-linked-to-gay-se

CDC Warns Gay Men of 'Epidemic' HIV Rates
lifesitenews.com/news/epidemic-1-2-of-gay-men-will-have-hiv-by-age-50-if-current-rates-continue-w

Comparative Data of Childhood and Adolescence Molestation in Heterosexual and Homosexual Persons
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11501300

Drug Use "Seven Times Higher" Among Gays
independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/drug-use-seven-times-higher-among-gays-8165971.html

Estimates of New HIV Infections in the United States, 2007-2010
cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/2012/HIVIncidenceGraphics.html

I'm gay and I actually want to marry and have kids. I think some, not all the problems we face have come from us being second class citizens. If I have been with a man for ten years, up until recently in most places I couldn't just say "yeah that's my husband" and STILL saying that could get me fired in many states. I think marriage could help us take care of less wanted kids through adoption and surrogacy is not an inherent evil. Amazing what right statists will claim though as if the law should just be whatever the New Testament says but Sharia is the bogeyman.

milo is a degenerate faggot jew and a subversive element

No.

No.

I'm saving this one.

I think his support of black dick is absolutely subversive and his statement that gays were better off in the closet is illogical. He's not in the closet and he benefits from not having to be there.

I don't because the point of marriage is to start a family. There's no point in gays getting married other than to emulate the behavior of the majority.

Gay people can have their own thing: civil union, etc. whatever the hell they want to call it. But marriage has a purpose and straight people don't appreciate gays appropriating straight culture.

What about adoption or surrogacy? Do you think gays should be allowed to be fired just for being gay? If we are not second class citizen why do words matter?

yes, because I want gays to get brutally raped in divorce court,. that will teach them.
Didn't ellen degenerate get divorce and her woman left her for a man and took off with a huge chunk of her cash.

Government shouldn't be in the marriage business. That is just religious/traditional garbage. Domestic partnerships via legal contracts should only be allowed.

>What about adoption or surrogacy?
Gays should not be allowed around kids to begin with.

>Do you think gays should be allowed to be fired just for being gay?
Yes.

>If we are not second class citizen why do words matter?
Ideally you would be stripped of citizenship so that rights no longer applied to you.

This is an evasive tactic. Marriage will continue to exist whether you like it or not so whether gays get to call it marriage or are forced not to matters.
Also, I think at bigger issue is that gays are not a protected class for civil rights and can be denied jobs and housing just if people find out they are gay in many states. I think the Trans issue has created a wedge (no I don't think Trans should receive special protections beyond what gays do) by making a class even more needy of social support than gays. Gays are no dumber, contribute no less (Alan Turing) to civilization than straights and should be afforded all the rights and privileges of man and civilization.

Do you have any evidence to support your assertions?

I made no assertions. I made statements of opinion.

This guy smacks your butt and asks you out on a date. What do you do?

Call the police and have him arrested for sexual harassment.

t, statist shill

Literally nothing wrong with a bit of statism.

I don't think contravening US law (that gays can adopt and marry) is a BIT of statism. Its a lot. Its not logically based and you are right, its just an opinion but even opinions to become force of law need to have evidence.

Why would I give a shit about US law? In the UK you can change law by just passing a law in parliament with a simple majority. Really it would not be hard to change this at all.

>Its not logically based
Sure it is. Gays are not normal and they should fuck off.

If I recall correctly gays can marry in UK too. And why should it change? Social issues are a meme. Why not offer equal protections to equal people? Onus is on you to prove that offering marriage and adoption to gays significantly burdens society.

I'd go, I'd be amazed a dude like that would be interested in me.

>If I recall correctly gays can marry in UK too
Only in a bit of it not in all of the UK, but again, we could just change it overnight with a simple act of parliament. The US has a lot more complications in its system.

>Why not offer equal protections to equal people?
Gays are not equal. They are inferior by definition.

>Social issues are a meme.
Only to lolbertarian idiots.

>Onus is on you to prove that offering marriage and adoption to gays significantly burdens society.
Yeah, it results in brainwashing of kids by faggots. Not what is needed at all.

Right but what would be the rationale? What benefit is there to banning gays from marrying or adopting?

>What benefit is there to banning gays from marrying or adopting?
Gays can't actually have a marriage for one, all it does is destroy actual marriage by devaluing it even further. It is just two idiots fucking each other. Secondly kids should never be around gays, it messes them up. It is like showing children porn or animal abuse videos. It will give them a bad psychology.

Ok so how does it destroy marriage? Do you have any hard evidence of this?

Makes a sham out of it. If two faggots can marry anyone can marry.

Again, evidence. We don't just make laws because some nutter reactionary on the internet is scared. You have nothing.

Evidence is all over society. You would notice it if you were not mentally ill.

Gee what a great response!

t another butthurt amerifag

I'm gay and I don't support marriage.
Primarily because we've already got civil unions, and I don't need the state to tell me who I love.

On the other hand, I don't value shitting on christians either, between islam and social progressives, they really don't deserve any of the bullshit going towards them. Especially when half of homosexuality's acceptance came from the church turning the other cheek.

I'll rightfully say fuck you to LGBT, bunch of denigerating cunts.

No. Its pointless. Marriage is meant to start a family. Last I checked gays can't reproduce with each other

It should have been a states rights issue just like cousin marriage

Quick, ban the elderly, infertile and career-oriented from marriage! Glory to the fascista

But we should be able to say "that's my husband" without having to make up words for why we aren't allowed to do shit. Plenty of gays adopt or have surrogate kids, let alone lets say your sister has kids and is mental or a druggy and you take care of hers. Gays are natural caretakers.

Yes, legally at least.

You should not be allowed to adopt. Surrogacy is fine because that's you having a child with a woman, that's the whole point and the way it works. If you want to raise that child with another man instead of the woman who conceived it then that's on you, but I can't stop you from having a child with a woman of your choice, that's everyone's right.

You should not be fired for being gay. You should be treated just like straight people, but that doesn't mean you're entitled to marriage. Marriage isn't a right, it's both a religious institution and a function of the state to promote procreation and formation of families through tax incentives.

Gays have literally no reason to marry. You can live with your partner and your surrogate child but why do you need to be married? Only straight people can get married. There are plenty of things that are exclusive to certain groups of people: kids only/senior citizen only prices, certain drug use is allowed for certain Indian religions, voting if you haven't committed a felony.... not everyone is allowed to do everything. Only straights can marry. good day.

No I don't. Marriage is a contract on how to raise your own kids it has nothing to do with love though ideally love would exist in a marriage. A homosexual marriage has no meaning.

Honestly, sure, whatever. I know they're statistically shittier parents than heteros, but as far gone as the divorce rate is at this point, two devoted homo parents are better for raising children than a single mom.

>T-that's my husband!
>I need emotional justifications and stupid fucking pointless carry-ons which make literally no effect on my individual liberties what so ever beyond wanting to say some pointless bullshit

>How do I validate gays having children?
>I know, let's compare them to the worst straights!
>That's right everyone, gays are the fall guys!

I legitimately hate people like you. You are practically the reason why homosexuals stay as freaks and the un-normal, because instead of normalizing you need all your little fucking fickle bullshit and can't stop say that's it. You'll just keep on pushing untill you fully change society towards your needs.

Why should we not be allowed to adopt? Would you rather kids languish in foster care?

Adoption is for stable households. A gay household is not stable, sorry. Ironically precisely because they are not married. Marriage is a contractual agreement and is very serious when it comes to property rights and income rights of each party.

Gays can't just stroll in and adopt a child into a marriageless environment where the "family" can just fall apart.

You can't adopt because you aren't stable (married), and you can't get married because you're gay and aren't allowed to by definition of marriage being straight.

So by definition only straight people can adopt.

Gays should not be allowed to marry.
Gays can adopt, but lesbians (kek) cannot receive sperm donations. Two mothers can only lead to even more degeneracy.

They can be allowed to do whatever else in private.

They can be married in the US and often have higher income than str8s.

Yea gays are allowed to get married nowadays but that doesn't make it right.

Now that they're allowed to get married I guess they can adopt if they're married. But I'm agains them being allowed to marry, and consequently adopt children.

>What are single mothers and divorce rates
As much as I think your opponent is an idiot, I think you're on an equal level. That is a poor argument. if you'd really want to talk about homosexuals and adoption it might be better to address molestion rates in comparison to straights or some shit.

The OFFICIAL /polgb/ Skype group:
join.skype.com/y1lAU4WmWGwj

Wtf I'm straight now

Divorce is a very serious serious process, regarding property rights, income rights, of each party.

A married couple will have a higher likelihood of staying together than just a gay couple that have nothing tying them to each other. So only married couples should be allowed to adopt. That makes perfect sense I don't care about divorce rates or anything like that because the point is to provide the adopted child the most stable household possible. And that would be a household with a married couple.

>/polgbt/
>Wanting to be in a group of attention seekers, social liberals and probably tons of bisexuals and transsexuals

That is utter bullshit mate, I live in a single mother a household, straights don't have this immunity to divorce and I can bet you a hundred that straight divorce rates are high as fuck.

I don't think married couples should adopt, I think wealthy and stable families should adopt with the intention of actually caring for the child.

first post worst post

Keyword caring, and not subjecting the child to legitimate propaganda which has happened a few times as a result of lesbian couples.

Nobody said T

So only rich people should be allowed to adopt? Are you absolutely retarded do you know how few "rich" families there are and how many poor children want to be adopted?

We are talking about maximizing the number of children that are adopted while at the same time minimizing the chances that everything will fall apart in the family that adopts them. So if you want to get as many kids adopted and you want the highest rate of success, what kind of people would you prefer to adopt?

The answer, the only answer is married couples. Use your brain loser!

>he fell for the homos are couples just like us meme

It's irrelevant because it's already been ruled upon.

I personally don't give a fuck.

But there is still attention seekers, bisexuals and social liberals. Cancerous enough for me to avoid.

>Adopting children in medium/low income families
>Subjecting children to limited lives

I'll stick with wealthy couples.

Holy shit the first 15 posts were all "yes" is this what Sup Forums has become? SJWs who just happen to not like immigration as much?

go fuck of to r/thedonald so you can virtue signal how "tolerant" you are. You are a disgrace to your forefathers.

I literally just ban trannies "bisexuals" and liberals. Join. We don't have many active people but THINK OF WHAT IT COULD BE.

It's either a married lower/middle class couple or staying in the boarding home and never getting adopted. Having a wealthy couple come by to adopt is winning the lottery.

What benefits would it boast? You guys play games or do you sit around complaining? I don't sexuality orientated communities, as long as you aren't a bunch of obnoxious cunts.

They're honestly better off not being adopted, or rarely being adopted by the rich. Honestly.

Marriage is not a function of government but a function of religion. Religion can choose who they marry together.

Just to have politically conservative minded gays to talk to would be the goal. And people steeped in Sup Forums culture without the obnoxiousness of animeposters.

>ban the career-oriented from marriage
good

Fair enough, you guys voice or shit?

If we had enough people. I'm bored enough if u just want to 1 on 1 chat that's chill. I haven't been maintaining it a lot because not a TON of gay threads on pol, r9k are too shy to chat outside of animeposting/text, and soc are genuinely normies.

Absolutely not!

How much people do you have? Could easily be a honey-pot.

Why not im not deficicient and lacking

The only thing I support is the right to bear arms.

Everything else is kinda whatever, do what you want.

>inb4 EVERYTHING??? LOL

No. Everything else being normal/semi normie shit.

19 but not a lot of them talk. Hard to find "alpha" personalities" on here I guess.

19 is good and i think at least i'd prefer just a place to see user righty hwite benis not really just chat anyways aha

Well can you guys at least join and we can talk from there? You can always leave if you hate it.