Are you satisfied with your country's leader in Civ 6? You DID get into the game, right?

Are you satisfied with your country's leader in Civ 6? You DID get into the game, right?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johan_de_Witt
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_Oranje
youtube.com/watch?v=dtcXttNnG_w
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

...

No. We have many very popular figures, many other less know kings worth mentioning and they choose a no name simply to have more women on the list.

its strange that they portray harald as a pagan when he actually was an orthodox christian. they should have just went with harald fairhair if they wanted that pagan stuff

No, not in the least.

Teddy should get a bonus to Calvary instead of combat on home continent

>everything is about PC
You're an absolute retard if you think she is a nobody.

yeah, his proportions aren't fucked up enough though. He was a weird-ass giant.

There are 2 Polish civs in Civ 6, Poland and Scythia, so yes.

stop shilling your shit game dickhead

Your civ leader looks Anglo af

Holy shit, what was wrong with him?

no

i prefer civ v

Gigantism, the genetic disease. He was a very lively man despite the condition.

Pinhead?!?!

>11 Females
>24 Males
>still complains about there being more Females

Jadwiga a cute!

Hitler when? I'm sick of having to use a mod every game

they don't want to use bad guys
Why do you think Russia doesn't get Stalin? China Mao? Japan Hirohito?

>Jayavarman's face

stalin and mao were in civ4

Winners can't be bad guys.

That's because history is written by the victors

>Lautaro
Nice

It seems weird to have Victoria representing England now that Scotland's in.

Yeah? well you're a fucking faggot brit

you know it would also be an insult to Germans as well
nobody would gain from adding Hitler

Ok tier. Would like to see Lenin, though. Or Ivan the Great.

But think of the mutt alt-righters!

No, Moctezuma was a bad leader, that's why he was killed by his own people.

>tfw no Churchill leader to slap Germany's shit

Yeah, Lenin as an alternative leader would be great.

I know a lot of Germans hate Hitler for how many Germans died because of his autism, and how it led to the division of Germany, but is it really a majority of them?

No, each and every felipe in spain was a fucking dumbass.

>simply to have more women on the list
Why they can't do a men and a woman for each civ? It would be only natural.

what about current?

Eleanor Roosevelt would be interesting as an American leader

>Khmer isn't even noted but non-countries like Korea and fucking Georgia are
WEW

even if we all would love Hitler, just the fact that out of all the guys it's Hitler that gets picked could be seen as an insult because some of us would think that they just see us as Nazis or that that was the only history we have

Ivanka Trump. Not elected, but surely leader. Like Theodora of Bysantium, for example.

Next game should have Boris Yeltsin.

Not compared to Eleanor.
She was de facto president in the last months of FDR's life.

>Zelda fanboy

Fuck no. Even Khrushev would be better, at least he make it into the space.

When will they add us.....they have fucking Nubia ffs

Oh fug they are, this is what I get for not buying civ 6 I guess.

Peter is okay, I guess, but Ivan the Terrible, Lenin or Nicolas II would be more fun.

>gorgo
>gain culture by murdering
w-wut

after important grönland and sealand leaders get added. 2 each

Gypsies have no great leader, so I guess that it's impossible.

>tfw you have two nationalities and none of them is in the game

Flemmish and Wallonian aren't nationalities.

lmao

>Nicolas II
Special trait: get shot.

Imagine introducing extreme capitalism into your nation as lenin

...

No.

If they wanted to take a "i like spy network" leader, they should have taken Louis XI

Vlad the impaler, Stephan the Great, Michael the Brave
all 3 would easly do

why is Gandhi skin nigger tier? the georgian girl is also too brown

>Why they can't do a men and a woman for each civ? It would be only natural.
Was done in Civ2. And it's even more shitty since they completely made them up on some occasions like with the Zulus or Japanese.

>Americas
>El Ogro de las Americas

Stalin and Mao are present since Civ1.

Lenin was actually a Russian leader in Civ2.

>Nicolas II
I thought Russians hated him for forcing entry into WWI?
Every unit you kill gives you culture bonuses.

>I thought Russians hated him for forcing entry into WWI?
Don't listen to him, he's retarded. Peter the Great is actually the greatest leader.

>Every unit you kill gives you culture bonuses.
In Civ3 Conquests there was a Mesoamerican scenario where you had to capture and sacrifice enemy units for culture points. It's much better suited for the Maya than the Greeks.

Even """civilizations""" like Georgia and Australia get into the game but my country never will.

You're a honorary Swedish bitch.

*an honorary

>Australia
Could you please call it by its proper name of England 2?

They're not even including Sweden anymore

Seriously fuck this game. It was made for retards who don't have the mental capacity to even play civ 5. You know that this was their intent with the addition of all this leftist bullshit

I would have preferred Johan de Witt instead.
He would have had a neat caricature.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johan_de_Witt

>who don't have the mental capacity to even play civ 5
Whoa, and I thought that Civ 5 was a crapfest for the mentally challenged.
Well, even he would be better than a female figurehead who surrendered the country to the Mofs.

>Whoa, and I thought that Civ 5 was a crapfest for the mentally challenged.
You are correct, Civ 6 is the same but even dumber

who would lead finland? hard-mode: no mannerheim

The choice of Wilhelmina can be justified through their implementation of their loyality system. Their execution on her design is just weird. Like they stopped researching what she was supposedly like at her gender and first paragraph of the wiki entry.

> Their execution on her design is just weird. Like they stopped researching what she was supposedly like at her gender and first paragraph of the wiki entry.
You hit the nail right on the head.

One-tile system is probably the most retarded "innovation" (I'll leave the whole wargame nonsense for now). AI is pretty dumb when it comes to warfare (especially naval operations) but at least it could effectively convert its production and research to plentiful and contemporary armed forces (yep, the much derided stacks of doom). In Civ4 AI at least learnt to use artillery to decreased casualties. A pretty big progress if you ask me.

And then they completely rehauled the system and did fuck all to teach AI what to do with it.

...

need David Lange for new zealand
bonus power: diplomacy works much better than it should
weakness: completely incapable of using uranium resources.

Kekkonen

Exactly, they made all these changes to make it easier for retards to grasp. Watch Angry Joe's review of civ 5 if you want to hear an actual retard talking about how great it is because it is so dumbed down.

>Stalin transformed Russia from backwater shithole to super power
>Mao forced the Japanese and Republicans out of the mainland, unified China and ended the century of humiliation
>Hitler destroyed Germany, gave half of it away to Communists and strengthened his enemies

Killing yourself after you managed to ruin everything in 6 years isn't exactly good leadership.

I am not satisfied at all
It's a literal loli and she didn't achieve shit aside from getting married

desu i like the move away from stacks of doom
though i'd have preferred something like a cap of 2-3 units per tile to a single unit cap. getting bogged down behind tens of units made late games tedious without adding any additional difficulty.

What do you mean about loyalty? I know almost nothing about Holland in WWII. Was she a big figure to rally behind?

>no Iain Smith
>no Cecil Rhodes
>no Mussolini
>no Franco
>no Furher

I'd be more concerned about Barbarossa than Frederick if I was her.

I want to ____ Cleopatra.

At the time of the german occupation she spoke to dutch resistance via a radio broadcast, Radio Oranje, 32 times.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_Oranje

>mfw white liberal canucks thought it was offensive that civ 6 included poundmaker, day of the rake when?

>Barbarossa than Frederick

>Mao forced the Japanese and Republicans out of the mainland
Second part: Correct
First part: No
Holy shit, somebody needs to get on that and make a Rhodesia mod

youtube.com/watch?v=dtcXttNnG_w
>7:10
>he literally says how older Civs were booooring 'cause dem stacks and no combat animation
Howling.
In Civ1-2 all units on a square were destroyed if the top defender lost the fight (except when they are stationed in cities or forts).
Reimagining the idea of the collateral damage would be a so much better and more elegant solution. It's just retarded to make simple moving of workers and armies throughout the game so excruciatingly painful for almost zero gain.
>At the time of the german occupation she spoke to dutch resistance via a radio broadcast, Radio Oranje, 32 times.
Joan d'Arc is a much better leader even though she was no ruler.

No, I don't why an Indian woman is our leader

Derp

Guess I'm an idiot

gp (good post)
Praise fire brother

yes

t. Nazi

POLISH DEATH CAMPS