>atheists
>Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, so I can't believe that any extraordinary claim in the Bible is true
>However, an atheist society, with atheist morals can total exist without genocide, even though atheism predates Christ, the reason a successful atheist society or empire has never thrived is because people didn't live in great conditions relative to how they do now, so they needed the comfort religion. Also, religion is an evolutionary trait that helped humans survive, but it's irrelevant now, because technology and comfort.
>Why, no, none of these unfalsifiable assertions require evidence, because they are self-evidentially true and not extraordinary claims at all.
Why do they pick on micro issues(Canon law, scripture) and never focus on the macro issues(religion was causal in formation and care of society), and breaking Chesterton's fence might have repercussions they aren't aware of?