Trump: Obama-ISIS claim 'not that sarcastic'

>“Obviously I’m being sarcastic ... but not that sarcastic to be honest with you,” Trump said Friday.

So...he's just trying to lose on purpose now, right?

thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/291294-trump-obama-isis-claim-not-that-sarcastic

Other urls found in this thread:

foreignpolicy.com/2016/03/18/pentagon-wasted-500-million-syrian-rebels/
m.huffpost.com/us/entry/8236164
thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/291294-trump-obama-isis-claim-not-that-sarcastic
judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Pg.-291-Pgs.-287-293-JW-v-DOD-and-State-14-812-DOD-Release-2015-04-10-final-version11.pdf
judicialwatch.org/blog/tag/hillary-clinton/
globalresearch.ca/cia-ops-finally-revealed-what-the-us-ambassador-in-benghazi-was-really-doing/5483957
a.desu.sh/dtyxys.zip
wikispooks.com/wiki/File:DIA-287.pdf
pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/film/rise-of-isis/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withdrawal_of_U.S._troops_from_Iraq
syrianfreepress.wordpress.com/2015/10/11/identifying-fsa/
syrianfreepress.wordpress.com/2014/09/24/usa-backed-fsa-arabamerican-2/
huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/14/us-military-aid-to-syria-rebels_n_3444104.html
washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/obama-backs-us-military-training-for-syrian-rebels/2014/06/26/ead59104-fd62-11e3-932c-0a55b81f48ce_story.html
reddit.com/r/syriancivilwar/comments/3rsbsa/salafi_jihadism_part_one/
syrianfreepress.wordpress.com/2014/08/27/isis-mossad-aanirfanblogspot-report/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>he's just trying to lose on purpose now, right?
That was the plan all along. This is Ross Perot done bigger and better.

Obama's actions as president directly contributed to the rise of ISIS.
Trump is far from the first person to say this.

If he's using old strategies in the Internet age he's going to lose.

this...and

The media claims they can't identify sarcasm (THEY CAN)

>Trump is far from the first person to say this.

Trump didnt say that....he said Obama "founded" ISIS which is simply a bold faced lie.

The rise of ISIS had much more to do with the disenfranchisement of the Sunnis by the Shiite gov of Iraq...and the violent suppression of Sunni protests by Iraqi government then by Obama sticking to the troop withdrawal timeline negotiated by Bush.

Obama founded ISIS as much as Bush did

Such a flimsy bitch.

He could have gone full steam ahead with his comments and performed better, now he's just being a wishywashy cunt.

His definition of sarcastic isn't entirely wrong, but he should be saying it's hyperbole. He's exaggerating, but not that much.

>Trump didnt say that....he said Obama "founded" ISIS which is simply a bold faced lie.
Or, as he said, it was partially sarcasm
He sure did.
>yfw your retarded partisan politics doesn't work

Also the billion dollars in arms and training we gave ISIS, as well as destabilizing Libya, and legitimizing the rebellion maybe had something to do with ISIS?

You're a moron. We wanted ISIS to isolate Assad. We didn't give a shit how it happened. We did the same thing with Al Qaeda in the 1908s. I guess we never learn to stop using Saudi terror groups to accomplish foreign policy goals.

>Obama founded ISIS as much as Bush did

riiight...cuz going to Iraq and ripping open centuries old sectarian hate and not having a clue as to how to deal with it...is the same and Obama pulling out troops per the scheduled negotiated by Bush and calling them the "jv team"

totally the same/

oh god the ride never ends

I LOVE IT
MAGA

>the billion dollars in arms and training we gave ISIS,

ummmyea...you're gonna need to source that claim.

...and Libya had to do with ISIS. They are there now but hanging on by a thread.

>Trump: Hillary and Obama are the founders of ISIS.

>Experts: That's objectively false you fucking retard.

>Trump: I was just being sarcastic, y'know.

>Experts: So you were just pretending to be stupid?

>Trump: Well, I wasn't really that sarcastic after all...

he was being sarcastic about being sarcastic

>We wanted ISIS to isolate Assad

No. the US wanted Syrian rebels to isolate Assad. Which is why the US gave $ and training to supposedly moderate Syrian rebels

ISIS started in Iraq under Zarqawi...and was a direct response to Shiite attempts to push them into irrelevance.

...

>shills and retards are so desperate that they wanted to push the narrative that Trump meant Obama LITERALLY founded ISIS, a la Bill Gates and Microsoft, by flying to Iraq and beheading people

Libya was an ISIS stronghold for years. We are just now forcing them out.

Joke: What do you call a $500m program that trains "3 or 4" rebels?

A: A covert op to funnel weapons to "moderate rebels.

foreignpolicy.com/2016/03/18/pentagon-wasted-500-million-syrian-rebels/

This is the only publicized program, but the CIA was trafficking weapons there as early as 2011, so we can assume they've spent a considerable amount more.

Ah, yes, the mysterious "moderate rebels".

m.huffpost.com/us/entry/8236164

>ISIS was only in Iraq

No shit. That's why the DUA reports talk about supporting a Salafist state in Northern Iraq and Syria that will"isolate the Syrian regime."

The media know exactly what he meant, but by now they learned to twist his words just enough to raise a stinker. Though I think that if he said that Obama funded ISIS, it would be more accurate. Same punchline, more favorable reaction.

>blaming Bush the greatest president
Liar.

Here's another knee-slapper from the horse's mouth:

> It’s always been a fantasy, this idea that we could provide some light arms, or even more sophisticated arms, to what was essentially an opposition made up of former doctors, farmers, pharmacists, and so forth, and that that they were going to be able to battle not only a well-armed state, but also a well-armed state backed by Russia, backed by Iran, a battle-hardened Hezbollah. That was never in the cards.

>desperate

for what? Pointing out how ridiculous Trump is doesnt not make one desperate. Its not like hes going to win...so desperation is not needed.

Seriously guys, he's been down in the polls for at least TWO WEEKS! There's no way he can come back with only 11 weeks left. Nobody has every come back before!

(The above statement is sarcastic. It's meaning is exactly the opposite of its stated meaning. Hillbots haven't had a firmware update to include sarcasm or hypperbole, making this disclosure necessary.)

Trump 2016: We're Only Pretending to be Retarded

This is to kick up dust and keep the words "obama" and "isis" in the news as long as possible.

>are you fucking sure about that?

>shills and retards think Trump wasn't being sarcastic
>trying to hide the fact obama created ISIS

>thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/291294-trump-obama-isis-claim-not-that-sarcastic

The entire globalist network is working against him, 195 countries and an equal amount of nationally supported news agencies and an untold number of jew owned news companies are actively spinning stories against him.

With this opposition it's difficult to predict how anything will be used against you with success. Trump is in a bad position.

>Implying ISIS in its current form wasn't created by the Obama administration

LMAO LIBERALS ARE SO FUCKING STUPID GOD DAMN!

The media is being autistic as fuck about this

>Libya was an ISIS stronghold for years

years? They didnt declare themselves in Libya until Nov 2014- less than 2yrs ago. fail.

>What do you call a $500m program that trains "3 or 4" rebels?

They are literally dozens of syrian rebel groups fighting Assad. Please provide evidence that US funds went to "ISIS" and not any of the other groups...groups who routinely fight against ISIS as well.


>That's why the DUA reports talk about supporting a Salafist state in Norther Iraq and Syria.

all the DIA document shows was that in 2012 (before Daesh even existed) they supported the myriad Syrian opposition and thought maybe a declared "caliphate" in eastern Syria might help isolate the regime...but they were also wary of a worst case scenario which would result in "dire consequences" and a "grave danger" for Iraq....which obviously came true. The document referred only to eastern Syria and was very fearful of it spreading to Iraq.

read for comprehension:

judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Pg.-291-Pgs.-287-293-JW-v-DOD-and-State-14-812-DOD-Release-2015-04-10-final-version11.pdf

They just keep letting themselves get trolled.

Imagine if Trump knows something totally damning is coming and he is just having his fun.

is obama going to commit suicide if trump wins? you can tell the fact that trump was doing so well in polls was a yuge blow to his ego. it's like he takes it personally.

>The above statement is sarcastic. It's meaning is exactly the opposite of its stated meaning


So Trump meant that Obama didnt start ISIS and wasnt the MVP of ISIS?

Trump does bring up a valid point. It's been 8 years with Barry O in charge. He can't keep blaming GW for everything.

>So...he's just trying to lose on purpose now, right?

love this meme

ISIS was not founded by Obama that much,
because it was rather founded by HILLARY CLINTON,

with support of Chris Stevens, gangster and arms dealer hiding behind diplomatic immunity, who fully deserved executing in Benghazi on Sep11 2012 !

Getting sufficient information is just few hours googling,
and thanks to based Judicial Watch
judicialwatch.org/blog/tag/hillary-clinton/
globalresearch.ca/cia-ops-finally-revealed-what-the-us-ambassador-in-benghazi-was-really-doing/5483957

Text on attached picture (with links to sources) can be downloaded here:
a.desu.sh/dtyxys.zip

Beside sending arms from Libya to Syrian rebels, H.R.Clinton also permitted selling chemical weapons to middle east and delayed recognizing Boko Haram as terrorists, in exchange for massive Clinton Foundation bribes.

There has not been any such fraudulent gangster among presidential candidates yet...

>moderate Syrian rebels
Burgers actually believed this

He's ridiculing the media for overblowing this. They just keep reading into every tiny quip and trying to make it out to be the worst thing ever.

The actual facts behind the words don't matter, its the sentiment they're expressing that's important. Trump supporters get that, the media doesn't.

let's just say that's how the media will report his death once Hillary's men get to him

>implying this will lose him votes

kek. can't wait to witness the CTR butthurt when he wins. it's going to be fucking gold

>>moderate Syrian rebels
>Burgers actually believed this


There were some at one time...prolly all beheaded by now.

>H-he's only pretending to be retarded.. r-right g-g-guys?

>two years ago
>years

How is that a fail?

>evidence that US funds went to ISIS

It went to groups that were against Assad and wanted to establish a "Safalifist State." Only AQ and ISIS affiliated groups fit this description. Why would they waste money funding groups that were fighting other rebels when their only motive for being there was to overthrow Assad?

Your link literally destroys your position. They point out a danger to to Iraq, but fund the "opposition" anyway. An "opposition" that is "driven by AQI, Muslim Brotherhood, and ISI."

Here's the damning part of your link. Literally the first page.

Putin already explained how America's position in the middle east is responsible for ISIS. Trump is just repeating.

wikispooks.com/wiki/File:DIA-287.pdf
(This document is available from more sources now, no need to attack specially wikispooks for it...)

This document was also available to H.R.Clinton at the time, when her staff has been sending arms from Libya to Syria... (as evidenced by another released DIA document...) - for which the Benghazi arms dealers have been executed by Libyan rebels...

>>>>>>>>
The West, Gulf countries and Turkey support the opposition, while Russia, China and Iran support the regime.

AQI supported the Syrian opposition from the beginning, both ideologically and ...

...
The opposition forces will try to use the Iraqi territory as a safe heaven for its forces ..

... there is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared
> Salafist principality in Eastern Syria
> and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want
in order to isolate the Syrian regime.
>>>>>>>>

Note: Salafist principality is exactly what ISIS is. They anticipated and desired it at August 2012 already...

Note2: why is this and similar reports in all capital letters? Is it, because some army officers possibly cannot read small latin letters, to avoid confusion ?

This. It is almost pathetic at this point.

The 2nd amendment thing was such a stretch. It showed that they were really scraping the bottom for something.

The Obama founder thing was a bit more hurtful to Trump, as it is technically not correct. Though to be honest the media biting this ends up leading to the truth of Obama and Hillary's true connection to ISIS to be put on the limelight.

Why is the left and the entire media responding to this "Obama founded ISIS" thing as such a literal statement. Who could possibly think that Trump was suggesting Obama met with al Baghdadi and the boys in a secret bunker to help get ISIS started. It's like they're all being intentionally stupid here.

Obama didn't create ISIS like an evil mastermind, but he made it worse first with indecision when the opposition wasn't overrun with Jihadists (he sent nearly expired meals instead of guns), then by funding an operation that trained 5 rebel fights for 500 million.

The CIA has also been covertly funneling arms via intermediaries. They tried to get these weapons to the 'right' groups but they surely knew the risks of doing so. Whenever a group feels like it cannot win, it merges with someone else. Sure they had 'good' intentions but there was obvious cataclysmic downsides.

Do you people recall the media talking about Obama's role in the Syrian crisis to this extent before Trump made his retarded comment? There's at least value in getting even CNN to talk about it.

>They are literally dozens of syrian rebel groups fighting Assad. Please provide evidence that US funds went to "ISIS" and not any of the other groups...

Everyone sane with little orientation in Syria knew, that all so called "moderate" rebels defect to An Nusra (AQI front) and to ISIS, and that all US arms end up there...
(I'm not sure, if I'll find that evidence before the thread archives, but you may try find it yourself too...)

No evidence. Okay, thanks.

I posted it here, thanks.

I thought you had surely left the thread in disgrace.

>They are literally dozens of syrian rebel groups fighting Assad

And literally all of them have ties or are allied to ISIS, Al-Qaida and other muslim terror groups

But if Obama did create ISIS then why would Trump lose if Trump is right? Trump for Prez!

master troll.

Trump
>says something that may have been taken out of context, but could imply that Obama founded ISIS

>Media
>run a hundred stories
>TRUMP FUELS CONSPIRACY THEORIES
>BUT THAT'S FACTUALLY WRONG
>TRUMP LIES

Trump
>Geez, don't these people know sarcasm?

Media
>TRUMP SAYS HE WAS BEING SARCASTIC
>IS HE LYING
>CAMPAIGN IN MELTDOWN MODE
>TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP
>WHAT THE FUCK ARE WE EVEN SAYING ANYMORE

Trump
>well I'm not being that sarcastic

Media
>TRUMP
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE


CAPATCHA
>street "welcome to west end"
>american flag opposite
>creepy google coincidence?

should I search for link to video, mentioning this article?

pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/film/rise-of-isis/

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withdrawal_of_U.S._troops_from_Iraq

Result Withdrawal of U.S. military forces from Iraqi territory, Iraq War ended,[1][2][3][4][5][6] rise of ISIS

trump is a big believer in the saying 'there is no bad publicity '

>bold faced lie
it's bald-faced lie, shill. Don't you have an english or some equally useless literature heavy degree? More importantly, yes I believe that ISIS is a US asset, theres a lot of evidence that points to it. And because Obama is the commander-in-chief, the blame ultimately rests on his shoulders.

“No, I meant he’s the founder of ISIS. I do,” Mr. Trump said.
“He was the most valuable player. I give him the most valuable player award. I give her, too, by the way, Hillary Clinton.”

> No evidence. Okay, thanks.

Sorry, searching through thousands of saved articles and images takes some time...

syrianfreepress.wordpress.com/2015/10/11/identifying-fsa/

syrianfreepress.wordpress.com/2014/09/24/usa-backed-fsa-arabamerican-2/

... I'll try to search more...

>Obama funded the Islamic State
>Obama founded the Islamic State
certainly advocates one's thought

Fucking hell

>>two years ago
>>years

you forgot the word "less" than 2yrs....so, less than "years ago" ...math not your strong suite?


>It went to groups that were against Assad and wanted to establish a "Safalifist State

Clearly the complexities of the players involved in the Syrian conflict are a bit beyond you. The Free Syrian Army was a secular army fighting Assad. The attempts and funding and training them in no way points to funding and training ISIS. You need to pull your head out of your ass.

Clearly you cannot read for comprehensions- the document clearly states that the establishment of a caliphate by ISIS would pose "grave danger" for Iraq was it to be avoided.

Were splitting hairs a bit here but its just not factual to because the US funded some syrian rebels therefore they funded ISIS. Thats a 2nd grade analysis that does not hold up to rational scrutiny-

only problem is he's correct
you just don't bother to look at the dictionary definition of what it means to "found" something or someone

>So...he's just trying to lose on purpose now, right?

He's just trolling right now, he's staying in the media.

Trump just wants to say "see, I was right again..."

June 14, 2013
U.S. Military Aid To Rebels In Syria To Include Automatic Weapons, Mortars, And Rocket-Propelled Grenades

WASHINGTON, June 14 (2013) (Reuters) - The United States is likely to send weaponry like rocket-propelled grenades and mortars to Syria's rebels after President Barack Obama approved arming the insurgents, sources said on Friday.

huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/14/us-military-aid-to-syria-rebels_n_3444104.html


June 26, 2014
Obama asks for authorization to provide direct military training to Syrian rebels

The Obama administration asked Congress on Thursday to authorize $500 million in direct U.S. military training and equipment for Syrian opposition fighters, a move that could significantly escalate U.S. involvement in Syria’s civil war.
Money for the assistance, which would expand a CIA covert training program, is included in a $65.8billion request for the Pentagon’s Overseas Contingency Operations, or OCO.

washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/obama-backs-us-military-training-for-syrian-rebels/2014/06/26/ead59104-fd62-11e3-932c-0a55b81f48ce_story.html

>It went to groups that were against Assad and wanted to establish a "Safalifist State

Islamist = any group that wants Islamic principles to be involved in governance. This is a HUGE spectrum, the complexity of which many people fail to appreciate. Most of the rebels fall under this category even if all they want is just a democratic constitution that gives reference to Islam instead of all-out theocracy (like most countries in the Middle East). I'd say the vast majority of FSA groups straddle the line between secular and Islamist.

Salafist groups are more conservative, and adhere to the Salafi school of Sunni Islam.

Groups like Ahrar al-Sham and Jaish al-Islam are Salafist. And despite being Salafist they still have a nationalist outlook and want to establish an Islamic civil state instead of a jihadi emirate. Both have been moderating their outlook after pressure from their backers. Jaish al-Islam has now been aligning itself with the FSA moniker, and could be considered anti-ISIS, anti-AQ (there are quite a few tensions between Nusra and JaI), yet still Salafist.

Overall the rebellion can be divided into three broad groups. FSA-banner groups which seek to install a civil democratic state, many of which may be Islamists of some sort. Then come the revolutionary Islamists which have a nationalist outlook but are much more outwardly Islamist in ideology. All the groups of the former Islamic Front can fall into here, alongside groups like the Sham Legion. Third are the Salafi-Jihadists like Nusra, Jund al-Aqsa and ISIS.

But he's right

Why is Sup Forums saying he's pretending to be retarded or trying to lose?

>Note: Salafist principality is exactly what ISIS is.

nope- try again:

Islamist = any group that wants Islamic principles to be involved in governance. This is a HUGE spectrum, the complexity of which many people fail to appreciate. Most of the rebels fall under this category even if all they want is just a democratic constitution that gives reference to Islam instead of all-out theocracy (like most countries in the Middle East). I'd say the vast majority of FSA groups straddle the line between secular and Islamist.

Salafist groups are more conservative, and adhere to the Salafi school of Sunni Islam. Others here have written great write-ups on what that means, such as /u/bensaul which you can read here reddit.com/r/syriancivilwar/comments/3rsbsa/salafi_jihadism_part_one/

Groups like Ahrar al-Sham and Jaish al-Islam are Salafist. And despite being Salafist they still have a nationalist outlook and want to establish an Islamic civil state instead of a jihadi emirate. Both have been moderating their outlook after pressure from their backers. Jaish al-Islam has now been aligning itself with the FSA moniker, and could be considered anti-ISIS, anti-AQ (there are quite a few tensions between Nusra and JaI), yet still Salafist.

Overall the rebellion can be divided into three broad groups. FSA-banner groups which seek to install a civil democratic state, many of which may be Islamists of some sort. Then come the revolutionary Islamists which have a nationalist outlook but are much more outwardly Islamist in ideology. All the groups of the former Islamic Front can fall into here, alongside groups like the Sham Legion. Third are the Salafi-Jihadists like Nusra, Jund al-Aqsa and ISIS.

PRAISE KEK!

So the FSA was a single entity with a unified command structure and democratic, secular ideology?

Remember when Trump literally told all gun owners in America they should assasinate Hillary?

>I was j-j-just pretending.... NOT!!!!!

This guy is a shitposter IRL. I won't support Hillary but I sure as hell won't support this guy.

user, click this link read it
it defines the Syrian rebels as the Salafist (want an Islamic state), AQI (which splintered into Islamic State and al-Nusra, guess what they want), and the Muslim Brotherhood (guess what they want)

it then goes on to point out how they all want the same thing, in case you haven't guessed, an Islamic totalitarian state

so lets recap: before they began sending aid to the rebels, they knew they included THE SAME RAT BASTARDS WHO WERE KILLING AMERICAN SOLDIERS IN IRAQ, and two groups with the same methods and agendas, two groups that fucking everyone knows share common cause.

Of the people they trained in Jordan all but like 4-5 went to IS iirc. No surprise.

so yes, Obama literally is the founder of ISIS
so yes, Obama literally sent aid comfort AND WEAPONS to the same group that killed US soldiers and who are trying to ethnically cleanse Syria

because hes a liberal, idk why u niggas are even expecting him to be a true republican

>FSA-banner groups which seek to install a civil democratic state, many of which may be Islamists of some sort

This group is completely imaginary and only exists as a PR group for the various AQ spinoffs and hard line sunni groups.

Pretty sure he means hyperbole, but he needs to connect with low information voters who don't know what that means

>And literally all of them have ties or are allied to ISIS, Al-Qaida and other muslim terror groups

Again- the discussion is whether US funds went to ISIS. No one has provided even the slightest bit of evidence to support this.

Overall the rebellion can be divided into three broad groups. FSA-banner groups which seek to install a civil democratic state, many of which may be Islamists of some sort. Then come the revolutionary Islamists which have a nationalist outlook but are much more outwardly Islamist in ideology. All the groups of the former Islamic Front can fall into here, alongside groups like the Sham Legion. Third are the Salafi-Jihadists like Nusra, Jund al-Aqsa and ISIS.

I dont expect asshats from Sup Forums to understand the subtleties of a very complex situation...just know that you are wrong and failing in your attempts to support your narrative.

> No evidence. Okay, thanks.

syrianfreepress.wordpress.com/2014/08/27/isis-mossad-aanirfanblogspot-report/

I've got more saved analysis articles in my native language, not translated from English...

Many people knew, that FSA people usually defect to An Nusra and to ISIS. From the USA-trained rebels, none stayed in those "moderate" forces, all defected to an Nusra !


Attached picture from another video... I'm lazy now to search for it more exactly...

True Republicans are complete dogshit.

Because Correct the Record went from $6 million to $50 million in funding.

The thing that scares me the most are not the rigged polls -- Nate Silver spilled the beans that they were rigged (but that its perfectly ok to rig them), but that Michael Savage began using Sup Forums shill talking points on the SAME FUCKING DAY (that he's trying to lose, that he's fucking up, etc).

>theres a lot of evidence that points to it.

really? please share.

Just because you are an idiot doenst make me a shill.

except he didn't

Just to let people know, your average American absolutely hates ISIS and doesn't particularly like muslims. Stuff like this isn't political suicide at all. It's just saying what most people are thinking.

CTR shills are trying to gaslight you.

Ok, geez, you're totally not desperate. We got it. Nobody would protest being called desperate so much if they actually were desperate.

>liberals in charge of handling banter

Oh wow they fail at it what a surprise

>Obama asks for authorization to provide direct military training to Syrian rebels

Is every syrian rebel a beheading jihadi from ISIS?

CNN says he did.

The user here kindly provided a link demonstrating A) that we knew the rebels were AQI/ISI and that B) the non AQ derived rebels (which are few and far between and usually admit they don't mind collaborating with their IS brethren) were known to have the exact same goals, the founding of an Islamic state (lower case "s" on purpose doncha know).

always remember that whatever other crimes he has performed, Obama knowingly financed and armed the same group that butchered tens of thousands of Iraqi men women and children and killed many of his own country's soldiers.

why? so they could ethnically cleanse Syria.

>so yes, Obama literally is the founder of ISIS

with logic like that - who needs a brain?

We are le cool millennials and so much smarter with our tech-fu than Grandma Clinton voters!!1

No, but once ISIS kills them or co opts them they get our weapons just the same.

>except he didn't

He did. I remember all the edgy fags in the Trump general celebrating over how based he was for asking for someone to assainate him

then the media called him out and you have Trumpfags crying DELETE THIS HE WAS JUST KIDDING

Seems like whenever he says something fucking stupid his cult like followers cry HE WAS KIDDING

>This group is completely imaginary
>imaginary

perhaps it seems so from your mothers basement.

...

>says obama founded isis
>free media coverage
>says it was just sarcasm
>more free media coverage
>haha not really, I meant it
>even more free media coverage
66th dimension olympic hop-scotch

The document here admits that there are 3 rebel factions, all hard core Islamic theocracy types, all with an identical goal of turning the religiously diverse country of Syria into a Sunni theocracy.

just think what sort of deranged madman sets out to help Al Qaida and groups considered too radical even for Al Qaida commit genocide on Shiite and Christian Syrians. let it sink in