What went wrong?
What went wrong?
wasnt it that part 1 and part 2 were based on a book and part 3 was just fan fiction?
They didn't stop after the first one.
1 - imdb
2 - reddit
3 - Sup Forums
nepotism and assuming a woman could create art as deeply as a man.
They can't.
They lack the self-awareness.
the second one was better you retard
No Robert Duvall
Nice bait lad
No book
>more rootytootypointandshooty = better
no
John Cazale died.
/thread
Nice bait
Different poster here but I think neither is the better film, theyre just great for different reasons. Also de Niro in 2 is kino.
>wah wah im too dumb to follow nonlinear storytelling
fuck off
>no u!
I rest my case
THIS. Godfather III was the most character-driven and emotionally powerful film of the trilogy.
Pure incestkino and wopkino.
>quoting something that they didn't even say
You're fucking dumb, user.
found the incel
That just means you consider yourself clever for understand simple shit.
It's an alright flick just like the other two.
20 years too late
Convoluted plot
Irrelevant to the story
Only created to see Micheal die in Sicily
>unironic incest / epheb subplot
>Convoluted plot
Have you ever considered that you're just dumb for not understanding it?
>Convoluted plot
>Don Altobello plans coup detat because Mike wants out
>Later it shows he's in business with Luchezzi, the master mind behind the Vatican deal swindle along with smoking priest and banker man
>Mike subverts them with his own pope after the previous one dies
>Meanwhile a vague incest plot goes on
>And dumb Coppola bimbo ruins the trilogy almost singlehandedly
>Mike and his enemies fight it out in the old country
All of that shit is boring as fuck.
It's like Phantom Menace with it's senate politics about trade route taxes.
Part 1 and Part 2 had simple, yet engaging storylines compared to this clustefuck