Congratulations on supporting a candidate who fundamentally misunderstands the Constitution

Congratulations on supporting a candidate who fundamentally misunderstands the Constitution.

Other urls found in this thread:

c-span.org/video/?328774-1/hillary-clinton-town-hall-meeting-keene-new-hampshire&start=2824)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_Switzerland
twitter.com/hillaryclinton/status/651070235349487620
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Thank god there's a second amendment to fix such tyrannical behaviour

>How to lose the election in one tweet

RIP Hildawg

i hope those 2nd amendment people do something about it, i don't know

>someone actually belives this

I'm glad she's resolute to do something, as it's becoming clear that something needs to be done.

I'm looking forward to see what her plan for the issue is.

you guys know once she stacks the supreme court there will be nothing to stop her

checks and balances doesn't work if two of the branches of government are completely corrupted

Better get in here Sup Forums

It looks like the Sup Forums tards have hatched an evil plan....

Better get in here Sup Forums

It looks like the Sup Forums tards have hatched an evil plan...

overturning D.C. vs. Heller so that states and cities can craft "common-sense" laws, including requiring trigger locks when your gun is in your home, making it impossible to defend yourself with it

also considering a national gun buyback program (c-span.org/video/?328774-1/hillary-clinton-town-hall-meeting-keene-new-hampshire&start=2824)

>(2) Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56.


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller

Link it, cunt, or its fake

>clearly states it "shall not be infringed"
>infringes anyways

I wouldn't mind the gun buyback program.

If she really considering overturning D.C. vs Heller? That might be a good option.

This. I want to share it.

m8

How far Sup Forums has fallen. Truly now reduced to facebook with porn.

...

I doubt this bitch has ever even READ the constitution.

she
>believes "Heller was wrongly decided in that cities and states should have the power to craft common sense laws to keep their residents safe"
>said "The Supreme Court is wrong on the Second Amendment"
>will be "relying on the executive power of the presidency to further gun restrictions that would have little chance of becoming law"
and she gets 4(?) supreme court nominations so I can only assume she's doing all in her power to overturn it

this is applauded by the media, whereas trump's correct commetary is triggering

It's all the press Sup Forums has gotten over the past few years, the normies and newfags come, land on Sup Forums and never leave.

>you guys know once she stacks the supreme court there will be nothing to stop her
>checks and balances doesn't work if two of the branches of government are completely corrupted

obama was ready to put a 4th marxist jew on the supreme court

the jews will commit another russian revolution but the US

>epidemic

>(((the media)))
oh nooooo

We will putsch back.

>I wouldn't mind the gun buyback program.

Australia had a gun buyback program.

They also made it so it was illegal not to sell your guns in the gun buyback program.

Gun buyback programs are gun confiscation programs.

Obama and Hillary Clinton have praised Australia's gun confiscation and said the USA needs to follow their example.

She's not entirely wrong.

>5 Oct 2015
Meh

She is 120% wrong

>They also made it so it was illegal not to sell your guns in the gun buyback program

Are you guys inexplicably terrified of suburbs like the Yuropoors are? Because with some oil, a few rags, and a shovel, you can make that unenforceable, assuming you have a yard.

There's so many guns in America that the government would be in crippling debt if they did that, unless they literally gave out pennies per gun.

What she means is:

>If checks and balances prevent me from doing what I want legally, I'll just do it anyway.

>Hillary will be democratically elected
>B-but why is she doing her job as president??? Fucking liberals!!111

Please, just commit suicide you ignorant drumpfshit.

>unless they literally gave out pennies per gun.

Which is why Hillary's "gun buyback program" will turn into a "gun rescue program" where cops kick down your doors and take your violent murder tools away from you.

All gun grabbers want to grab guns. Hillary Clinton wants you to turn in your guns or die protecting them.

How is she going to do that without a clear majority in congress?

Has crippling debt stymied the efforts of any nonsensical wasteful policy lately?

Sounds like a strong leader to me.

Hillary Clinton understands the 2nd amendment about as well as Donald Trump understands the 1st.

You have one candidate trying to take our constitutional right to bear arms and you have another who wants to rewrite libel laws because the media are a bunch of meanies..

This whole election has flown right on past clusterfuck-retard level.

I might just have to plan a boating trip for sometime in November and bring my entire collection of firearms with me.

Based Hillary stopping trumptards from killing themselves after a historic landslide. What a gal!

This.

I own a karr handgun. It's US manufactured ccw. It cost more than my first car. I'm not selling it back for pennies.

Get airtight burial vaults and bury 'em deep, lads.

>A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

2nd amendments doesn't protect guns as much as it protects militias. It's a real shame that people do not understand this.

The whole reason for the 2nd amendment is so that the people can overthrown the government if the government becomes tyrannical. Now, if the government becomes tyrannical lets say. It would mean the modern american military vs a handful of idiots with no combat experience and a bunch of shotguns. Who would win?

It's extremely outdated.

If you truly believe in the 2nd amendments and what it means I suggest copying what Switzerland does.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_Switzerland

They also have mandatory conscription. Meaning that if the government does become tyrannical you have a population of military trained people with guns there to take their country back.

The current 2nd amendment is awfully outdated and we either remove it or we copy a similar style that Switzerland does.

>How is she going to do that without a clear majority in congress?
And being in prison will definitely get in the way of her plans

>uses th media for corruption
Gets mad when called out

Thanks for corrupting the record
Won't change my vote EVER

> shes not entirely wrong
Only in that Scalia had to unclude the stupid "right unlimited" clause to make it palateable to the left. That part was wrong.

nd amendments doesn't protect guns as much as it protects militias.

How do you expect militias to arm themselves?

>They also have mandatory conscription.

Mandatory slavery for the government

Fuck off, shill.

The only way for a militia to be armed is for its individual members to arm themselves.

Except the SCOTUS and every contemporary document from the time says you are a giant fucking retard and that the second amendment guarantees individual gun ownership irrespective of militia service

>american military vs a handful of idiots
You're overlooking the painful fact that most of the military will not fight against its citizens

Remember a large majority of the military and law enforcement are right wing and highly patriotic

...

...

...

A militia, defined in the same document, is described as any able bodied man between the ages of 16 and 45. The 14th amendment extends this to cover all US citizens.

Deal with it.

That could be the case.

However, a good chunk of the military would still fight. And that is the problem.

There are regulations against anti-tank and anti-plane weapons. So a militia couldn't actually acquire those weapons unless we lift those restrictions. Or again, copy what switzerland does with their armed caches.

> Not quoting the superior preceding right in the Pennsylvania 1776 constitution (and adopted by many states)

"For the defence of themselves and the state, the people shall have the right to keep and bear arms"

>TEH CONSTITOOSHUN IS THERE TO ENSURE GUN VIOLENCE HAPPENS!!!
yes, it's *other* people who dont get it

Hasn't Obama tried that several times?

I didn't believe you initially. I knew this was fake.

>mfw it's real

twitter.com/hillaryclinton/status/651070235349487620

Gun grabbers make me paranoid.

I may or may not buy a bunch of cheap-ass handguns, rifles, and shotguns that are all common ammo, along with 1k(+) rounds of each type.

Put them in a seal-able crate and dump a 5 gallon bucket of cosmoline over them. Close it up and bury them innawoods somewhere.

We don't need to do shit save resist. Once Americans are resisting their government, foreign countried will get involved and the whole situation becomes a clusterfuck

Executive orders are Constitutional retard. Bush is the reigning king of executive orders.

Ban niggers and bam problem solved

>anti-tank and anti-plane weapons

What, you mean explosives?

Can you explain what the fuck an anti-tank or an anti-plane weapon is?

RPGs are completely legal in the USA as long as you transfer them according to the NFA.

Improvised explosives make good work out of tanks, and there aren't enough tanks or gas to fuel tanks for armed patrols of the USA.

USA civil war patrols would be done via lightly armored vehicles which are extremely susceptible to improvised explosive devices that goat-fuckers in mud huds can put together with $10 walmart watches.

>leftists
>giving a fuck about the Constitution

pick one

>good chunk of the military would still fight
75% desertion rate is not a good chunk and this number in real life would be much higher

>There are regulations against anti-tank and anti-plane weapons.
How many military bases do you think will turn during a civil war?

Here's the problem.

We currently regulate many weapons. Weapons that could be valuable to the public. So either we update our amendments to make sure that we have access to those weapons or we remove the fucking amendment.

The 2nd amendment makes absolutely no fucking sense in todays age. How the fuck am I supposed to fight against a F-16 with a fucking shotgun and a AR-15? I can't buy a anti-plane gun because the government doesn't allow it. So why don't we update it to make it more like Switzerland's laws where there are weapons caches and trained personnel?

>write an executive order to violate the rights explicitly protected in the bill of rights
>Constitutional

.0002 cents have been deposited into your account

Pull a 75% out of your ass.

Do we know military bases will turn against the government?

People still care about constitution?

"If you people don't do what I want, I will see to it that I break all the rules to have you do so."

>How the fuck am I supposed to fight against a F-16 with a fucking shotgun and a AR-15

What is guerrilla warfare? what is afghanistan? you have zero clue about warfare m80 please read

No. He asks permission. Hillary is saying she we enact executive order(bypass congress)

You don't realize how damaging it would be for America to attack it's own citizens. You have to imagine how this would go down for a second.

>Hillary bans guns
>gun lovers decide to get organized and say fuck the government we are going to still own guns
>they gather together and fire weapons all day and proudly show off their guns (they didn't kill anyone they just fired their weapons)
>government then has to step in and attempt to arrest them
>gun owners refuse
>government uses lethal force since the gun owners won't back down
>gun owners fight back but they all get killed
>someone inevitably was filming this whole thing
>now everyone in America has seen that the U.S. government attacked peaceful gun owners

This would cause mass histeria, people would realize the American government has gone way too far and from there an actual civil war would start.

When the military runs into town with a tank brigade what are we supposed to do as a militia?

The military would rather clearly win.

What if that militia had military training and modern weaponry that the military deploys? Like what switzerland has?

Which makes more sense?

oh hello ctr
still using shitty bait and out-dated insults i see.
you arent even worth the coffee they give you

>implying she will be democratically elected since she already rigged one election
>implying the presidents job is to strip people of their rights

>How the fuck am I supposed to fight against a F-16 with a fucking shotgun and a AR-15?
idk, but in the last decade, America showed it could not beat a bunch of inbred sandniggers.

everything will be fine. we can all get along.

Hate to break it to you, but we aren't some shit stain in the midle east country.

A guerillawar would play out much differently here then it would there.

Besides, I'm arguing for either removing all guns. Or updating it so we have updated militia with MORE guns and MORE firepower.

77777777 get said trump will win

trump will win, KEK wills it

>When the military runs into town with a tank brigade what are we supposed to do as a militia?

Look up the facebook of the retard driving the tank, find his family, kidnap them, demand he turns over his tank and surrenders or you kill his whole family

>What if that militia had military training and modern weaponry that the military deploys? Like what switzerland has?

"Military training" doesn't transform you into a licensed weapon not allowed in Great Britain anymore. It's not that great. It's the barebones required for grunts to understand how to take orders and function individually or as a small unit.

It would be great if the militia had training and was armed identical to our military, but the only way for that to happen is for them to work directly with the military, and likely be infiltrated and taken over by them.

Clinton is anti-2nd Amendment and about as understanding of it as Feinstein. In their view, peasants shouldn't have guns.

Trump's comments on the 1st Amendment are entirely correct. Freedom of the Press means you can cover any story you want without government censorship or legal consequences, however you cannot violate other people's rights with your stories or make things up to print as fact.

Bundy ranch situation?

A armed militia took over a government building and the government went in and what happened?

fake and gay. Gun confiscation will take place over the next 20 years.

There will be no, 'ok, guns are now illegal.'. First it was full automatics and ordinance. Next semi automatics. Etc..etc...

Nothing you say or do is going to change it. As you can see, the ball is already in motion.

On behalf of Norgay, sorry.

Can't tell if shill or baiting people into thinking you're a shill.

Its even worse than that. She understands it perfectly.

Really makes you think.

jesus christ you are either retarded or ctr

you dont shoot at tanks and jets
you shoot the corrupt politician when he is getting coffee

Until you read and adress this and realize that there would be no us military to fight the civil population (oversea's militaries are another story)

What if we had a system like this.

>Buy a gun
>Forced to have training with local militia leaders
>Forced to sign up with local militia
>Local militia has arms that are stashed that are not allowed to be sold to current public.

Is that more true to the original meaning of the constitution?

>the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed
I'll take the right to bear arms for 200

oh so you are ctr then...

YOU DONT SHOOT FUCKING PLANES
you use your 2nd amendment to shoot THE PEOPLE that fly them. you shoot the politician calling for airstrikes on civilians

its that simple. people have to eat. people have to sleep. people have their vices.

thats the point of the 2nd amendment. some politician decides the people dont have the right to vote anymore, and you shoot him.

>yfw that black trip fag on /k/ went to the bundy ranch

Why are you so angry? I haven't gone into any of those detail's

Her leftist globalist scotus will uphold everything she does so everything she does will become 'constitutional' that way.

>Buy a gun
>Forced to have training with local militia leaders (because you were put onto a list where everyone who buys a gun goes onto
>Forced to sign up with local militia (forced to register as a gun owner and first target of a civil war)
>Local militia has arms that are stashed that are not allowed to be sold to current public.

Fuck you, everyone should be able to buy any arms. Even nuclear.

The US constitution does not offer the Bill of Rights as a conditional only if you sign up for your government training/reeducation camp.

Repeal the National Firearms Act and the 1968 Gun Control Act.

It was a joke.

Of course you'd need more modern military equipment to take out planes and tanks. That is the entire point.

We currently do not allow the public to have access to those weapons. What I'm suggesting is that we make it accessible and have a system for it.

To prove I'm not a CTR shill I'll say fuck hilary clinton she's a corrupt bitch.

>well regulated means well trained
that technically is
>militia
nice meme, A milita being necessary for security
just says states should have a militia (which we do its called the draft)
>turn in your guns
the right to KEEP and BEAR arms

so not at all you correct the record shill

Well, there you go.

That is what it currently means under the current constitution.

can you say:
I do not work for Correct the Record
?

if im wrong then i apologize for the accusation