Cartels: redpilled or bluepilled?

Are some cartels based or redpilled?
Is it true that they are what happens in a libertarian society?

Discuss

Cool helmet

No, cartels are what happens in an anarchocapitalist society

>It's a mexican thinks mexican cartels are the Big Guys(TM) episode

Juan, I'm CIA.

>Mexican
>justifying cartels
Jesus, Pedro, I hope you're memeing

That pic is a law enforcement agent.

I must admit the comments section of borderland beats is full of bantz and cartel fanboys and crazy theories. It's like drama soap opera shit. More you read, more addicted you get.

MUH DICK

sauce me!

What would happen if drugs were legalized, you made a monopoly, and united all the cartels, and allowed them to run the Harmacies(tm); well if you made drugs legal, then it would likely be more than the cartels interested in competing for that legal market. The two concepts of regulation that come to mind, are making sure the product is not posioned... which would seem antithetical to business, killing your customer. And also making sure the price is fair market value; which would be difficult, considering addicted individuals may give an arm and a leg if need be. Of course ideally individuals would not need or desire hard drugs. To try to make a society in which individuals do not need or desire them, could be a partial goal. If that goal fails, the above suggestion could be another possible attempt.

Isn't there a cartel called the Knight's Templar?

Low IQ dumbasses. Think about it, they've made and continuing to make a bunch of money being drug dealers, what do they do? They continue being drug dealers, they haven't changed in decades, haven't transitioned to buying up/into/creating above board businesses with the huge startup cash they have from drug dealing. So instead of being able to be freely out in the open with their wealth, they're forever back alley, any moment everything crashing down on them. Their cognitive level is no different than the lowest nigger thief who can't do the cost benefit analysis that shows it's not worth robbing someone for $20 when you could get the same money even at minimum wage in about three hours without the huge risk of dying or going to jail.

One does not simply get out of these cartels.

You have no idea just how brutal these people have adapted to be in order to compete.

There is no simply "leaving".

>Keeps population low
>Brings money into Mexico

Whats not to like about them

Elizabeth Ann Velásquez

bluepill. Anti-state, anti-law, anti-border. Faggot bluepill meztizo shit. You even get the sense of this if you've ever known someone involved in the 'trade' or if you even remember like Al Capone movies--they're always portrayed as these socialistic strongmen who want to help their familia, muh communitah etc.

Can confirm.

The Italians did it better, they didn't have to kill innocents as much to keep their traps shut. That was culturally motivated by Omerta, the Central American Cartels have no such loyalties.

Cartel = mafia, wants to sell drugs for charity
Los Zetas = terrorist organization backed by Hezbollah, kills for thrill and makes money off drugs

They go to war

I side with the cartels

There are ways out for various people involved, not all of them low level do or die beaner mules, and especially no excuse for them being whole family & generational involvement, if one of them were of the you're kill if you leave situation, could still setup above board for kids & family. The "if you leave you die" routine itself is an example of the low IQ retardation, who haven't thought two steps ahead, they've ensured they will forever be cockroaches. dumbasses.

Evil evil man.

Faggot

>Italians did it better

If Italians did it better they'd still be top dogs today. You don't get to the top by being a softserved pussy and Omerta is a naive, romantic concept that never held up. All criminals are entirely self-serving. Don't be upset that the Mexicanos realized this and enforce their own brand of loyalty through a system of reward or brutalization. You call them animals, I just call them realists.

In reality the Mexican cartels are the most sophisticated, the largest, most influential and most wealthy criminal groups to have ever existed.

cartels dont bother with street-level sales

your gangs do that

cartels basically operate with billions in profits on an unregulated, untaxed shadow econ

they make more money than they can launder. there are hundreds of houses in mexico that are basically used as currency storages; 2-3 million usd $ in small bills (thats they shit they don't launder). no legit business can net them that kind of profit in the short term

18 million at 7% long term capital gains after ~20% averaged long term capital gains tax nets a million a year, but say a million/year isn't enough for you, OK, 180 million. What's better, 10 million a year free and clear or a billion in small denominations stacked in a bunch of houses in messihole that you can't do anything with? I know what I'd choose.