Should atheism be state-banned?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3036133/Brits-religious-world-UK-comes-59th-poll-65-countries-30-population-say-faith.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Do you not realize that the UK is one of the most irreligious countries in the world, especially when it comes to the white population, with over 13-15 percent of people being "convinced atheist"?

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3036133/Brits-religious-world-UK-comes-59th-poll-65-countries-30-population-say-faith.html

Our Queen bears the title Defender of the Faith. And our State Church is Christian :P

Yes, apostasy should be punishable by death.

No, the state should not make laws with respect to religion, to the extent such religions are compatible with the constitution

A religion like Islam is incompatible with a liberal democracy as it considers itself superior to the law. It can therefore justifiably be banned

That's the spirit

Fuck off with your stupid thread.

Sage

Yet only less than 30 percent of the population say they still have faith.

To be fair we can in2 science and have been in2 science for decades.

Science/religion, what has contributed more in your opinion?

We had this thread yesterday, frogposter

Fuck off, Ahmed.

Hence why I'm asking the OP question

Off you fuck then

No. Atheism should be encouraged, religions hold us back and divided humanity. If we want to unite all humans we need to all be atheists. No borders, no church, no God. It is the future!

This is our country now. Convert or die. I hope you resist.

Yes. Let's be like the SJW's and make everything we dislike illegal.

>It is the future!

As if it's too late to change it

Let's not dislike anything

>Bad stealing?
>lol m8 that's just your subjective valuation

>Ban*

It is inevitable though.

You can ban actions but you cannot ban a way of thought.

That is a basic human right you fucking mongoloid.

So why don't lefties just let it happen instead of pushing for it?

No, but the state should have a religion of state.

Dont need to repress religious minorities(if they're not dangerous), but a state religion gives legitimacy to the ruler, like in the Achaemenid Empire with zoroastrism

Absolute human rights can only come from God my m8

Atheists are a threat to everyone's soul by spreading their degenerate propaganda

So why exactly should atheism be banned in the UK, when 53 percent of the population saying that they weren't religious, 13-15 of the population saying that they were "convinced atheists" and less than 30 percent of the population saying that they still have faith in a god and they rest saying that they didn't know/care? So please tell me why atheism should be banned.

There's no such thing as "human right", only privileges.

I don't think the state has a position interfering these matters.

What I believe in has nothing to do with Cameron, corbyn, sturgeon, the lib dem leader (can't renege his name) faragio etc etc unless I am causing harm to others

>People who think different things then me should be banned
You're as bad as the liberals you hate.

Atheists are the same as kiddy rapists to be honest with you, so yes, all atheists should be drawn and quartered

Because the UK for the last millennia and the principles it was founded on are Christian

Because Atheism infringes on his fee fees.

I mean, where do you draw the line? I'm not religious at all, but I'm not an Atheist. More of a Deist really.

Not all belief-systems should be legal

Islam for example..

At anything anti-Christian. So militant Atheism and Islam

Degenerate propaganda is not necessarily a condition of Atheism. You can be an Atheist or just generally irreligious and still maintain a sense of morality and duty to the greater good. A lot of quiet Atheists draw influence from what religion teaches.

I'd allow attack Atheists who publicly spread their atheism and anti-Christian rhetoric

>I'd attack Atheists*

Through the State and the law of course

It's millennium, not millennia. Millennia is the plural of millennium, you fucking retard.
Also I don't really see why the majority of Brits should be banned from having an opinion that you don't agree with.

Because it goes against the traditional foundation of the country

ID change bump

Should be determined by their propensity to cause harm.....
Militant Islam - causes actual harm
Atheism - offends some people

And? The UK is was founded in 1707, which means it's over 300 years old. Who cares if goes against the the traditional foundations of the country? All the people who founded the country are now dead. Also you sound like a sad Christian who's just now realizing that Atheism is the way of the future and is salty about it.

Atheism is only the future if we want it to be our future :P

You don't believe in my god? You must die!
You believe in a god? You must die!
This is why the first amendment exists

Maybe in yankland

And that's what the British people want since religiousness has been on the rise for the last couple of decades.

should atheists and their families be publicly crucified?

That's another question I need to start a thread on

No, 1st Amendment.

First islam, then atheism, then restore Christianity as the state religion and spread it by the rifle.

There is no consensus

As long as that holds, there is a chance for change

Ban the fastest growing denomination?

With the spread of information these days people are taking the red pill much quicker and easier before

Tldr atheism is growing faster then ever before and there's nothing that will stop it

See We still have the ability to do it if we hurry up

I think our energy would be better spent encouraging secular morality that mostly aligns with us and is agreeable to atheists.

>secular morality

But that doesn't mean anything

I know, but it seems to mean something to atheists.

Change for what? Also do you not realize that the majority of the 30% percent of people who have faith are either Muslim sandniggers or old people that are going to be dead in the next few decades?

You should actually search up on the percentages of irreligiousness among the young adults/teenagers in the UK.

I don't think it can mean anything to anyone

Just leave it to me :)

god gives head in heaven

first you fuck your god

he wants it up his ass

heaven is for faggots

christian paradise

As a Christfag I'd prefer Islam.
I can coexist with atheists and Jews.

>in the mind of an atheist

As an atheist I'd prefer Islam.
I can coexist with Christians and Jews.

You can talk shit all you want about the irreligious, but at the end of the day, they still outnumber you in your own country.

>majorities never change

What I'm saying is repackage Christian morality as secular morality and have atheists promote 'their,' trendy new morality.

Most Atheists don't want to listen to anything Christian

I don't know if you can be that cheeky

There hasn't been a single year in the UK where more people would join Christianity than leave it, I don't really see a possibility of Christians becoming a majority ever again.

Just have faith

If they are atheists out of spite, then wouldn't they just "convert" to Islam out of spite after your ban?

Because atheists are pussies and are afraid of Islam

lefties push for freedom of religion. which is exactly letting it happen, whatever it is.

AIU, Sam Harris...

>lefties push for freedom of religion

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

So, Atheists are actively afraid of and against Islam. Meanwhile, the turn-the-other-cheek unconditionally-loving Christians are letting in the poor unfortunate downtrodden Muslim refugees by the tens of thousands with open arms.

This might make me seem against more Christianity, but that's not quite right: we need a new (old?) Christianity to become popular in the West again, something Deus Vult style. So, in effect, I would support banning both pussy Atheists and pussy Christians to make way for Deus Vult Christians.

>Sam Harris

That jew would be shitscared of walking into a mosque

>So, in effect, I would support banning both pussy Atheists and pussy Christians to make way for Deus Vult Christians.

Agreed. It's probably never gonna happen in your country unless you reinterpret your 1st Amendment though

not sure how this is relevant

>britfaggot
>statist nigger
>idiot

checks out

>ff
>paedophile

Checks out

Think about it

Bella is over 18 in that pic

somebody settles in a retarded lawsuit about some stupid shit that nobody cares about?

yeah that's deep man

Kek

You're right, Sharia Law for all!

I guess we all know why you're a libertarian

That is deep. Go use the state to fuck over Christianity why don't you, you hypocrite

Because I believe in Liberty and the principles that this country was founded on.

that's funny, my state is keeping christianity on life support

Your country may have been founded on slavery, but it was not founded on child porn

Did those principles include limiting the vote to educated adult white males?

Genuinely curious

>defender of the faith

are you implying that such a title has any meaning? and that the rest of the world wouldn't shit on britain for outlawing atheism?

It's not exempt from rights and Liberty just because you don't like it.

I bet your state-enforced Christianity is secularism 2.0

And you're retarded. If she looks like that, her age doesn't matter. She'd be hot if she were 3 and if she were 300.

You're welcome to try

I guess that's a debatable topic. Not one that's strictly defined as much as something like the first amendment or second amendment in the constitution.

you a libertarian as well?

i wish

>you're welcome to try

we wouldn't need to try, britbong.