Why are libertarians so autistic?

Also why are most libertarians the same kind of people who would fail horribly in an actual libertarian society.

Other urls found in this thread:

us.mensa.org/connect/sigs/sig-crossreference/?xref=POLITICS
sodahead.com/united-states/libertarian-atheists-have-highest-iq/question-2841491/?link=ibaf&q=&esrc=s
youtu.be/2d_dtTZQyUM
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Don't me a dick, we only want weed and guns.

You don't have to cuck to corporations to get those things.

Don't what you a dick?

Most of them are just ancaps wherher they realize it or not.

Not even a libertarian but this is an incredibly weak false dichotomy.
It's in there self interest to work for the boss, that simple. Also it's obvious who ever made this image was immensely butthurt so they added in the "arbitrary private property rights" when anyone with higher than a double digit IQ can see their purpose.

Property rights are arbitrary. They only exist because they are enforced by the leviathan.

Do you even know what arbitrary means?

Since it's obvious you dont I'll bring up the definition
>based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system.

Property rights arent arbitrary because they serve a practical purpose and they wouldnt be arbitrary even if they were enforced by a strong figure like a leviathan but in libertarianism the individual enforces this right to private property anyway.

Also what kind of Stirner anarchist uses Hobbes as a political lens for dismissing libertarianism? It's incredibly contradictory.

Yes. That means if you find a job that better serves you, you do it instead.

Dipshit ass image.

the only reason this meme was ever funny is because of how fucking hilariously bad that clip-art smiley face is

Private property isn't arbitrary. Private property rights are arbitrary.

I'm not an anarchist. Anarchists are the only group dumber than libertarions

I'm socially libertarian, economically socialist. Am i a terrible person?

INDIVIDUALS IN HIGHEST IQ BRACKET ARE MOST LIBERTARIAN

>Mensans tend to be a refreshingly and disproportionately independent, free-thinking, (lower-case) libertarian-leaning bunch. This group is intended as a relatively nonpartisan forum for the intelligent, reasoned discussion of liberty-related issues, and how to pursue an environment of philosophically honest and consistent, practical limited government (or better!), individual liberty and personal responsibility.

us.mensa.org/connect/sigs/sig-crossreference/?xref=POLITICS

>The Triple Nine Society, which only allows members who have an IQ higher than 99.9% of the general public, released results of a survey answered by their members. The results? Ultra free market libertarian. They were against Government healthcare or business interference in the same way they were against drug war, gun control, and the War in Iraq. They advocated legalizing gay marriage, ALL drugs, an opt-out for Social Security, and to make Affirmative Action illegal. Although still the minority, a much larger than the general public support limiting the Federal Reserve or abolishing it. They also supported using the death penalty more often.

sodahead.com/united-states/libertarian-atheists-have-highest-iq/question-2841491/?link=ibaf&q=&esrc=s

>using the death penalty more often
>libertarian
>giving the government the ability to execute people

lmao what? Everything else made sense until that.

High IQ doesn't mean rational. High IQ people tend to live in cutoff gates communities where they forget that there's actual shit out their. They are also ridiculously autistic and have a shit understanding of human nature.

When why are successful people nearly universally very smart?

fuck off.

How much of a moron do you need to be to post a meme like this.
1: You work for you boss because it is in your best interest to make money.
2: You get arrested for not respecting private property rights which is against your best interest.

Go back to /leftypol/

that isn't a real dichotomy; "respecting private property" _is_ rational self-interest. work is fantastic, you get paid more than your time is worth to do something that results in more earnings than you have to be paid to do it, and all of this can be established with just a verbal agreement, which can then be honored for decades -- all because the money-good isn't tampered with.

communists ban money and capitalists substitute it with a worthless piece of paper so they can practice (((usury)))

you pretending you have to pick one of those two is the definition of the blue pill

Successful people usually aren't hyper-iq. The most succesful people tend to be between 115-130. Above that and success starts decreasing again.

When you're a Sup Forums Stirnerite rules don't mean anything, consequences don't mean anything. If you can you do.

A balance of different intelligence's = success.

You can be a mathematical and scientific freak of nature but if you lack emotional intelligence and you're autistic as fuck, all you're going to do is stay inside, build muh super computers and play games.

fresh out of hecks senpai

MUH FREE MARKET IS THE SOLUTION TO EVERYTHING

respecting national sovereignty and the family unit is also rational self interest

The bit about property rights being arbitrary is a Stirner quote, user.

He uses it in the sense that, by and large, property is primarily in the hands of its 'owners' due to a history of coercion and violence, whether that's church property, state property, or, heaven forbid, corporate property.

For Stirner, the egoist has no reason to accept contemporary property relations, or any such relations under capitalism, because they will always be arbitrary. The notion of ownership is alien to his philosophy, making it much more amenable to anarchism than libertarianism.

>respecting the props of bourgeois domination is in my self interest
>said the wage-slave

Top kek. Sup Forums is the most blue-pilled board on Sup Forums.

That's the thing though. Hyper-iq are almost uniquely autistic. The 99.9% society mentioned above is going to be self-selecting for autistic individuals.

He is right though?

>You don't have to cuck to corporations to get those things.
that's why I don't want the governments to enforce them

Corporations would enforce themselves much better in an An-cap libertarian society.

He's right that propery relations are arbitrary and that private property is mostly a ruling class tool of subjugation. I don't agree with his romantic view of the individual and I'm not an anarchist.

It's something you should decide for yourself. Probably after you actually read Stirner.

What's important to note, though, is that recruiting Stirner to back up one's politics, whether they're capitalist, liberal, socialist, whatever, is almost always doomed to failure. The point OP is making is that while libertarianism likes to think of itself as an individualist ideology, it's really just a drag disguise for ruling class domination, something that Stirner demonstrates convincingly in the Ego and Its Own and throughout his work.

>props of bourgeois domination
>not the government

Stop

No, just a lazy pothead who makes his family roll their eyes when his name is mentioned.

> Above that and success starts decreasing again.
Gonna need source for that. Remember there are about 10% of all people in 115-130 range and only ~0.1% > 145, so scale effect takes place.
I'm not saying it's wrong, but the only reason i can think of is lack of interest in things that most people consider success.

> You can be a mathematical and scientific freak of nature
You can, of course, but the same way you can be general freak having lower IQ. IQ is a common factor of all of your mental skills, actually including verbal and social. People excelling at one field tend to be great at every else.

Until we are talking about 'muh street smarts'.

>national sovereignty
>no relation to the government

The family unit has also been carefully maintained by bourgeois governments for centuries - through marriage licenses, tax write-offs, the inclusion of as many citizens as possible (think homosexuals). It's the most successful way to inculcate subjects in bourgeois ideology because it can start in the cradle, something you demonstrate unwittingly.

Patriotism, racial pride, religiosity, all of these things are ruses developed over several centuries by the bourgeois class because it serves the interests of capital.

Again, you've swallowed the blue pill: hook, line, and sinker.

...

>libertarianism is an-cap
>get provided with police force by the state (which is forcibly funded with over half of the income of every citizen) to protect them from competition and """lost profits""" by arbitrary regulations, taxes and """intellectual property""" laws
>somehow allowing anyone to enter the market without any barriers and making their profit dependent only on customer satisfaction helps them enforce themselves much better

go away commie, why would you try to tear down the structures that enabled you live such an easy life that you can shitpost propaganda from last centuries failed world domination scheme

Ever heard of Nash's Equilibrium. Hear is a brief clip from the movie A Beautiful Mind that can explain how if everyone works towards their best interests it can also benefit the group.

youtu.be/2d_dtTZQyUM