We all know that women who loose their hymen before marriage are worthless degenerate fucks that are only a piece off...

We all know that women who loose their hymen before marriage are worthless degenerate fucks that are only a piece off meat.

But what about men that loose their Virginity before marriage? Is it degenerate or redpilled and manly?

not politics.

>Is X degeneracy?

Any and all pre-marital sex is degenerate.

...

Fuck off with this shit. But both are equally degenerate. Fags who say otherwise are retards with double standards. They say stuff like, "men do all the work so we deserve Virgins even if we aren't virgins." Yet over half the people who say that are spergs who can't even change a fucking tire. If you're a worthless male you deserved a worthless female.

No, because men are expected to provide and be successful in life. Only women need to be virgin because she need to put something on the table as well. It's more equal that way.

Beside, it's much easier for a women to be a virgin than for a man to be successful.

The problem with sluts is that they expect every perk of a traditional relationship while offering nothing in return.

A man never need to be virgin to marry a virgin.

Off-topic and Sup Forums-tier threads will be deleted (and possibly earn you a ban, if you persist). Unless they are quality, well thought out, well written posts, the following are examples of off-topic and/or Sup Forums-tier threads:

>Red pill me on X. (with no extra content or input of your own)
>Are X white?
>Is X degeneracy?
>How come X girls love Y guys so much?
>If X is true, then how come Y? Checkmate Z.
Enjoy your ban virgin

Where do you think sluts come from, user?

Men without virtue lead to women without virtue.

See:

A women who is a non-virgin when marrying is potentially already pregnant by another man. Thus completely fucking over the groom by placing a cuckoo in his nest and ending his bloodline if no more kids are to come.

A guy who fucks around before marriage, that doesn't affect the bride in the slightest. She has no downside to that even if he fathered some bastards (given that the whole idea comes from a time where a guy could not be held responsible for his bastards). So male virginity is pointless.

A guy who fucks around is contributing to the culture of degeneracy, which causes more women to act like sluts. It also shows a lack of character.

It's okay for a girl to not be a virgin at marriage as long as she's still a pure maiden.

Blaming men is not gonna solve anything. You are falling right into feminist trap.

Why are moralfag all such beta cuck

Who said I don't blame women? You're just falling for the trap the feminists created by offering free sex and contributing to the cycle. You're the fucking cuck.

This. Sorry to break it to you Sup Forums but the world isn't black and white like that. But sure, go ahead and reject her despite she loves you and wants no other man, I'm sure There's doesn't care whether she's a virgin or not anyway.

The guy who has a bastard is cucking someone else by your own logic.

How the fuck would you know?

Meh meant to reply to Fucking clover sometimes.

Why do you care? You aren't getting any kraut pussy.

Sage

>But what about men that loose their Virginity before marriage? Is it degenerate or redpilled and manly?

If you aren't a dad who has a home and his shit in line you aren't redpilled or manly.

>moralfags
He's literally admitting that females are incapable of thinking for themselves and are basically no better than dogs or childs.

this
We banished GG fags, now it's time for you to go too.

Mods only ban for straight porn, and dub get images that are used to derail a bait thread

Sure shows you what way they're leaning