You picked the wrong candidate, Sup Forums...

You picked the wrong candidate, Sup Forums. Instead of choosing a stable candidate like Rand Paul who has proven himself by fighting for your constitutional liberties and would be far ahead of Clinton in the polls, you were willing to pick someone like Donald Trump who's supports the Patriot Act, supports illegal NSA domestic spying programs and has openly said he wants to invade Syria for the oil industry, concepts you were once opposed to, but now support JUST because he wanted to build a wall. Now Hillary is taking this guy to town and she doesn't even have to work hard; forget making his wall 10 feet higher, every time this guy goes on the air he says something that buries him 10 feet lower.

That's right, you're willing to pick an anti-constitutionalist candidate because it appears that you don't care about the constitution anymore, you're willing to sacrifice as much liberty as possible because you're more afraid of America becoming a plurality than you are of government tyranny. What happened to you, Sup Forums? You've turned from libertarian-leaning individuals into full socially far-right wing national socialist sympathizers who increasingly believe that individual liberty is a road to "degeneracy."

During the primaries, the main argument I've heard here against Paul was that he was "too short" and Donald Trump was taller. What a ridiculous rationale.

I hope you're happy. Enjoy your 4-8 years of the Clintons again.

I'm a lefty, but I agree. what the fuck were you people thinking. I mean DONALD TRUMP? Really? The biggest clown on the planet, is the fucking republican nominee. I mean WHAT THE FUCK people. I would have even prefered rubio, or like op said, rand paul.

I supported Rand. At least I live in Kentucky and get to vote for him here.

Why is this thread posted every day?

because Sup Forums, and by extension Sup Forums, are nothing but bored nhilists who just want the world to entertain them.

I prefer Rand Paul to Donald Trump, but Trump is still waaaaaaay better than Shrillary or any neocon.

a lot of Sup Forums still likes Paul but he doesn't have what it takes to win.

$.02 has been deposited in your account

Sup Forums refused to support Rand because once upon a time he took a picture in a Yamika.

Nevermind that fucking Trump is a retard that wholly supports Israel.

Fuck me man, that shit hurt, pic not related.

Plus he will never even get the republican nomination in 10,000 years

Ron is weak.

Trump just needs support. From people who can put some experience into his campaign.

rand paul was my first choice shame he dropped out. but better trump that that witch hillary

Shukran jazilan ya akhi.

I'm still backing Trump, but I voted for Rand in the primaries and I think not only would he have wiped the floor with Hillary in the election, he also would have been a phenomenal president. Maybe in 4-8 years.

>Instead of choosing a stable candidate like Rand Paul who has proven himself by fighting for your constitutional liberties


dont you mean fighting for israel? fuck off shill.

#MAGA

I'm still writing him in

>Wants to audit the federal reserve
>winning the election

pick one

you're a fucking idiot

He's a manlet

I completely agree. I wish rand would have stayed in the race longer. He didn't even wait for Iowa before dropping out.

im just voting for trump because he has the better memes and i know with him as president i would laugh until Putin or china decides to have a nuclear war. You're right, Trump is not president material but he sure as hell is entertaining.

>I voted for rand in the primaries
No you didn't, unless you're in iowa you didn't.

Rand is crazier version than Ron. Who would have been his running mate? The woman he supported that didn't want to let gays get married lol

They couldn't help it.

Stupid people are media driven and picked the guy they saw on tv the most. They have no idea what his policies are and if they did they wouldn't be able to understand them.

Are you new?

If Rand had been selected then mainstream media would simply have ignored him, like they did his father.

The goyim are fucking wise now, and we selected someone who cannot be ignored in that way.

Piss off shill.

wtf I hate you picked the wrong candidate, Sup Forums now

this but ironically

Live in Texas, and he was on the ballot even though he had already suspended his campaign.

Yeah but he didn't win tho

I forgot he was even running. He forgot he was running too if I recall. Didn't he drop out very early?

>Now Hillary is taking this guy to town and she doesn't even have to work hard
when you figure out why that is you'll figure out why rand wouldn't be anywhere close to her.

>>That's right, you're willing to pick an anti-constitutionalist candidate because it appears that you don't care about the constitution anymore,
nah you're a dumbass. constitutionalists are a minority stuck with the "republican" $$$ based uni-party so long as people like rand stick with them and frauds like cruz get to shephard


>I would have even prefered rubio, or like op said, rand paul.
that's why you got trump because you wouldn't have voted for either. leftys don't give two shits about the constitution until it's time to point at some evil christians over abortion or muh weeeeeeeeeeed, then promptly back to trying to control everything through taxes because a government by the people should be amoral and all about self sustaining income right? rand would have been a waste of time.

Haha, let's vote for a man who wants to keep the constitution intact that has amendments that an elite few lobbied for and not vote for the man that will abolish birth right citizenship in order to curb illegal immigration!

He doesn't have the spine necessary to do what he says, regardless of what a good person he is and how nice his policies are. Same with Bernie on the other side.

Trump is a fighter. Face it. Any other candidate would wither under such pressure, which is exactly what Rand would get if he acted on his ideas.