Why didn't they just shoot Voldemort?

...

He would have deflected it with magic

why didn't they just let him have Harry

Why couldn't you write the series for children based in a country where you have to have ID proving you're 18+ just to buy cutlery??

Why didn't lord moldybutt just avada kedavra harry potter at the started of the of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
a-at least the books were good though
"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>god tier is filled with soap opera level stories

Voldemort death eater touched down on the east coast of the United States and were promptly shot at with AR15's and had to evacuate.

if they killed him, he would win

guns are banned in England. How fucking stupid are you OP?

1. Firearms are difficult to obtain in the United Kingdom, doubly so for Wizards, who likely have no real legal documents backing up their existence in the first place. On top of this, underage Wizards can't do magic without getting in trouble, so they couldn't use magic to obtain said firearm
2. Voldemort is never out in the open. He generally keeps his location a guarded secret unless he is at full power, and sends the Deatheaters and other minions to do things for him so as not to risk exposure when he can't properly defend himself
3. Any situation in which the Characters find themselves facing the Dark Lord, he know they are there, and can easily prepare defenses for any attack.
4. Possibly the most important, Voldemort's soul has been divided and placed into a number of horocrux items that must be destroyed (via magic), before he can be killed. Each of these items must be located, often in an extremely dangerous and hidden location, and destroyed at great cost. Shooting Voldemort before destroying the horocrux's would merely weaken him.

Kek

HP is british self deprecation and parallels the shitty dystopian no gun society of the brits.
Also its a wizard fantasy in a castle nobody wants guns.

>Hi, Mr. Arms Specialist, I want to shoot a scene where our young protagonists, one girl and two boys, shoot and kill a powerful and magical arch villain and his gang of death eaters-
>say no more

I don't know what guns I just feel saying say no more is cool

IT WAS ALL A MEME
I used to read quibbler magazine
Voldemort and Dumbledore up in the pensieve
Hanging portraits on my wall, every saturday, Quidditch, seeking girls, let me work my magic on em all
I let my wand rock til my wand popped
Smoking tentacular leaves and mandrake, sipping on slughorns private stock.

>"No!"

Every time.

Why don't wizards make their own gun industry

It's a good line

...

...

...

...

>Why didn't lord moldybutt just avada kedavra harry potter at the started of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises?

He did though. That's literally the catalyst for the entire series you illiterate mongrel.

Harry Potter autism thread?

you're really bad at making these

Wizards are confused by any muggle technology past the 1600's, which largely has to do with the International Statute of Secrecy, in which the Wizarding world voluntarily decided to completely remove itself from muggle society. Wizards have their own towns, their own schools, their own government, everything. It would literally never occur to a Wizard to make a firearm because he can theoretically just zap shit dead or incapacitated with his wand in a nanosecond, assuming the other party didn't have a chance to block. Now, a wizards raised in muggle society would still probably understand to some degree how a firearm works, and might even see the purpose in using one, but no Wizard is going to have the machining skills, the metallurgical skills, or the chemical know-how, to just go out in their shed in and make a firearm; in the same vein that some African bush-man isn't going to just go build an AK out of the blue with no training. He may know what a firearm is, and how it works, but the bush-man lacks the pre-exsisting industry and tradition to produce such a technologically complex piece of machinery.

Why didn't they side with Voldemort and kill Harry and all the non-magic shitstains? Voldemort did nothing wrong, magic must be preserved.

I don't see you making any better and you quoted the alternate ones I made.

then how come hogwarts has in-door plumbing? did merlin build the toilets twothousand years ago?

Its a huge castle that's over a thousand years old yes

Because its a children's series you piece of shit

>Why didn't lord moldybutt just avada kedavra harry potter at the started
>*goes on to criticise the books despite obviously not read them*

dude instragram filters lmao

you can't have guns or anything more deadly than a plastic spoon in bongland

These are supposed to have the "a-at least the books" line in greentext, fucking amateurs trying to use this pasta.

>hating Delbonnel
>shitposting in every HP thread
Lmao wow no argument from the armchair critic

why didn't voldemort just kill baby harry with an axe or knife or something?

it's not like a stab can be repelled by a love charm or whatever harry's mom did

Why would you recommend Ayn Rand to anyone?
Are you american?

they could snipe him. he doesnt have inhuman super reflexes

They should redo this series on HBO (as it's owned by WB).

Could fix some mistakes from the books, not have the same visual continuity problems that the movies had, and you'd be able to fully adapt the books and even add some background shit.

Was Voldy an international criminal?

Because that would make them as bad as him.

Rowling doesnt believe in funz

>HBO
>good writing directing or casting
>tv shows good
>the visual tones of the films is bad because they are different wah
>wants the books filmed verbatim
Stick to jewflix user

He posted the wrong one.

You can just tell it's GoT season

The books would do better as a TV show.

Most books do better as TV shows vs Movies.

Because the best it could do is destroy his body, as long as he has his horcruxes he could recover from it.

Also, chances are powerful wizards have some permanent protection spells in power for that sort of thing.

Yeah, they can make Hermione black like Rowling originally intended

Anything that has Atlas Shrugged as "god tier" cannot be taken seriously.

Imagine the recoil on that gun destroying her face

No they wouldn't because tv shows are all shit. HBO can't even do got. Wow you don't even get the purpose of filmmaking. If you film something verbatim it is nothing. Go read the book if you want the book reddit

Worst form of this pasta I've seen, poor effort.

Apply yourself.

Reminder more half of them are pure kino.

>chances are powerful wizards have some permanent protection spells in power for that sort of thing.
So, why didn't they use it on Harry?

Fuck off with your film blullshit you pretentious faggot.

TV shows based on books are better than the movies. Because movies are limited severly by their length.

HBO only within the last two years have been fucking up GOT, the years where they no longer have a book to adapt from.

I prefer the game myself.

Pride.
Voldemort is not gonna use cheap tactics. Remember when in the graveyard he simply could have Avadakedavra'd Harry but he instead wanted them to have an old fashioned duel with bowing etc.
He surely when Harry was an infant simply could have used KNIFIO STABBIO but that is a plot hole that is always introduced when magic and stuf is involved

Was Harry ever in any particular danger of being shot?

the true love charm was basically a spell deflect and he avada kedavra'd the baby so it hit him and destroyed that piece of his soul

>HBO only been fucking up got for two years
Holy shit you are cancer like id expect a plotfag to be. Gots direction is shit and its shit visually as well.

>and its shit visually as well.

Oh. OK so you're obviously trolling. Sometimes hard to tell.

>game of thrones is good visually
>but directed badly
Not to smart are you Lmao

I never said it was directed badly. It's got decent direction. But it's visuals are great. Which is why you're obviously trolling.

how the fuck is notes from underground low tier when karamazov is god tier. you are a fucking retard.

No the visuals are dull because the direction is almost nonexistant past S1 or S2.
Everything in that post is wrong. Its the dullest meme. Brave new world in low tier?

>No the visuals are dull

Like I said, obvious troll is obvious.

>what is bait

o fug

Guns are muggle technology

>"No!"

Every time indeed

As opposed to a country where they would have been arrested in the second book for drinking butterbeer before turning 21 (twenty one years old)?

Or how about a place where Harry gets the death penalty for kissing a chink under 18 years of age?

Why didnt voldermorty just conquer the human plane of existence? Then the wizards wouldnt give a fuck

Isn't Voldemort immortal? And he probably has a magical shield barrier on him at all times.

Probably has some sort of magical barrier desu

Except for The Shining and maybe IT

>the game of thrones tv series is shot well
>reddit spacing
The absolute state of Sup Forums during got season.

and harry potter you dont get a film like the shining or azkaban without raping the book with love.

No. It's called putting a space between your quote and my comment you fucktard. The state of Sup Forums is ruined by you pretentious cunts, who hate everything popular or even remotely mainstream. If it's not some unheard of french cinema then it's shit. Do the world of favor and neck yourself.

King's TV shows have almost always been shit since he's a horror writer, but his shit ends up airing on family TV, so all the horror shit is removed.

That's a lot of assuming. No I just hate plebs like you that actually talk about tv shows fuck off back to www.reddit.com

>plebs like you that actually talk about tv shows

On a TV and Film board... yeah, so pleb. Jesus dude you're either a terrible troll or retarded.

What game is that?

They tried that, he ended dying by snake bite.

>he still doesn't understand
All television is shit user.